Background. An increasing number of hip prostheses are inserted without bone cement. Experimental research has shown that hydroxyapatite (HA) coated implants are strongly fixated in the bone, which is believed to reduce the likelihood of prosthetic loosening. However, in recent years, there has been much debate about the role of HA particles in third-body polyethylene (PE) wear and formerly we have shown the revision rate to be high among older-design HA coated cups. Purpose. We hypothesized increased PE wear-rate using HA coated acetabular components in comparison with non-HA coated components (control group). Materials and Methods. We performed a retrospective comparative clinical study based on two patient populations identified in the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry (October 2006). All patients had primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) between 1997 and 2001 with cementless Mallory-Head acetabular components. One group received HA coated acetabular components (75 patients, 77 hips). The other group received identical components without HA (70 patients, 73 hips). In all cases the liner was similar and 28 mm metal femoral heads were used. All patients were invited for a radiographic follow-up in 2007. The AP radiographs were analysed for two-dimensional (2D) polyethylene wear using the semi-automated PolyWare software. All cases of non-responders, stem revisions, hip dislocations and patients with less than 5 years of follow-up were excluded from the analysis. Findings/Results. The 2D linear PE wear-rate of 0.18 mm/year (SD 0.09) was higher (P<0.001) in the group with HA coated cups (n = 54) compared with 0.12 mm/year (SD 0.07) in the group of non-HA coated cups (n = 35). The Effect size of the difference in linear PE wear-rate, established as Cohen's d, was large (0.9). The time of follow-up was similar (p = 0.11) in the HA group (7.2 years) versus the non-HA group (7.6 years). There was no case-mix concerning distribution of gender and operated side in the groups; however, the mean age was lower (P = 0.001) in the HA group (57 years) compared with the non-HA group (63 years). Conclusions. We found a significantly increased PE wear rate in HA coated acetabular components at midterm follow-up. The patients with HA coated cups were younger on average, and this might partly explain the findings because the activity level expectedly is higher in younger patients. Still an effect size of 0.9 is large and should raise concern and supplement considerations in future clinical decisions on component selection. A randomized (RSA) study on newer type crosslinked polyethylene liners is recommended to bring about more information on the clinical performance and longevity of HA coated acetabular components

INTRODUCTION. Cementless Total Hip Replacement surgery is a well established procedure for relative young patients with severe hip disease. Excellent long term clinical results have been published on the performance of the femoral component. With growing clinical experience, our concern focused on excessive wear of the Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) ringloc liner of the Mallory Head cementless Total Hip Prosthesis. After its introduction in our clinic in 1997, this implant is still in use without any modification. We were concerned that due to premature liner wear, the performance of this implant would not be compliant with the international guideline on implant survival (NICE guidelines: at 10 year follow up, 90% of all implants should still be in situ). Our objective was to establish the amount of liner wear in our first 200 MH implants. METHODS. Our first 200 patients consecutively treated with Mallory Head prostheses were followed up to obtain a recent digital image. Follow up was complete for 181 (90.5%) of our 200 patients. Ten had died and nine were not able or willing to come for follow up. The mean duration of follow up was 8.3 years (range: 8–13). The 181 recent digital images were classified as either excessive wear or no excessive wear by two independent orthopedic surgeons. Next, liner wear was measured in the 2D frontal plane using PolyWare Pro/3D Digital Version Rev 5.1 software (Draftware Developers, Conway, USA). A threshold for excessive liner wear was set at 0.2mm/year, according to literature. RESULTS. Using software for measuring PE wear, 46.7% of all patients had excessive UHMWPE wear (> 0.2mm/yr). There was no relation between the amount of wear and BMI, gender, component size or the acetabular inclination angle. Thirteen patients (6.5%) were revised. Nine of these revisions were for excessive liner wear or aseptic loosening (4.5%). For now, our series of cementless Mallory Head prostheses is compliant with the NICE guideline on implant survival. However, with the measured amount of wear we expect to see a significant increase in the number of revisions for liner wear in the near future. DISCUSSION. Our clinical observation of premature UHMWPE wear proved correct. The measured amount of UHMWPE wear is consistent with the few other studies published on this subject. Although we present a retrospective study, limiting the strength of our results, we have included a large group of patients with acceptable loss to follow up. It is unclear if the observed wear will lead to a sharp increase in the number of revisions within the next few years. Possibly, future revisions will be complicated by loss of acetabular bone stock following the pathofysiological reaction to wear particles. Our results can probably be generalised for any district hospital