Objectives. Porous metal surfaces have been a popular option for acetabular component fixation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). New THA component designs are introduced periodically with the expectation of better wear properties and survivorship. Since its approval for use in 2002 there have been few clinical outcome studies published on the Pinnacle acetabular cup system. We hypothesised that the hemispherical porous coated Pinnacle acetabular cup system with a range of cup options and bearing surfaces would give us predictably good fixation and survivorship at five years post implantation. Materials and Methods. A total of 1391 Pinnacle acetabular cups (De Puy, a Johnson & Johnson company, Warsaw IN) were implanted between the period March 2003 to August 2011 by four senior surgeons. There were a total of 29 patients requiring revision surgery. Of these revisions, 23 were excluded from the final analysis. Sixteen were for early infection requiring debridement of the hip joint and exchange of the modular liner and femoral head. Five patients sustained femoral peri-prosthetic fractures requiring further surgery with retention of the acetabular component in all cases. Of the remaining 8 revision cases, only 6 had more than two years follow-up. All patients had pre and post-operative Harris hip scores, WOMAC and SF-12 scores. All patients were assessed with serial radiographs immediately post-operatively, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, every 2 years thereafter. Component migration and revisions (excluding infection and peri-prosthetic fractures) are reported as failures. Post-operative radiographs were evaluated for component migration. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves were drawn to show survivorship for cup type and bearing type. Results. A total of 894 Pinnacle acetabular components implanted into 796 patients were available for inclusion in the final analysis. There were 358 males with an average age of 63.70 years and 438 females with an average age of 64.55 years. The average period for follow-up was 44.95 months with 133 patients having more than five years of follow-up. Only one cup showed signs of aseptic loosening and component migration on plain radiographs, this patient had previously sustained an acetabular fracture requiring open reduction and internal fixation ans subsequently developed osteoarthritis. The cup failed to adequately in-grow and migrated medially to an intra-pelvic position, this was revised to a Trabelcular Metal cup with bone grafting to the acetabulum. There were two cases revised for instability. Three revisions were performed for aseptic loosening of the femoral components which were revised with retention of the acetabular cups. Conclusion. Published data on the performance of various porous coated cups have demonstrated varying degrees of osteolysis, however the Pinnacle cup has shown excellent midterm results postulated to be associated with the taper lock liner mechanism of the Pinnacle cups resulting in less micromotion and, therefore, reduced hydraulic pressure pumping polyethylene wear debris behind the cup. Our study confirms excellent overall survivorship of the Pinnacle acetabular porous coated cup system at a minimum of two years followup in over 790 patients

Background. Large head metal on metal total hip arthroplasty MOM THA have been consistently shown substantial improvement in wear performance compared with metal on polyethylene articulations. Large diameter femoral heads theoretically can reduce dislocation risk by increasing range of motion before impingement, increasing prosthetic jump distance. However, early failure associated with adverse local tissue reactions (ALTRs) to metal debris is an emerging problem after MOM THA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate mid-term results of MOM THA. Materials and Methods. Twenty-five patients, 28 hips were included in this study. The average age of the patients at the time of surgery was 66.9 years. Three patients were men and 22 were women. MOM THAs were performed using 28 PINNACLE Cup system (DepPuy) (C-STEM: 23, S-ROM: 5) with posterior approach and head size of 36mm. Twenty-five primary THAs due to osteoarthritis in 22 cases and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in one, and two revisions due to recurrent dislocation THA patients, were performed. The average follow up was 56.7 months. Evaluation items are JOA score, cup anteversion /lateral opening angle, and complications. Indication of the system were applied for patients with high risk of dislocation such as recurrent dislocation in primary and/or THAs, posterior pelvic tilt, elderly, RA and mental disorders. Results. The average JOA score improved from 48.3 (range: 26–77) preoperatively to 88.3 (range: 55–100) postoperatively. The average cup anteversion was 21.7 degrees (range: 2–38) and average lateral opening was 45.5 degrees (range: 37–60). Three patients (12%) developed dislocation. Two patients (8%) required reoperations from the deep infection. One female patient (4%) remained hip pain and was suspected pseudotumor / ALTR, which was confirmed by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Conclusion. Large femoral head MOM THA was useful for patients with recurrent dislocation in revision THA. However, three patients developed dislocation in primary THAs (12% of primary cases), which suggested that the more accurate placement of the acetabular cup is important even in the large diameter cup. Although only one case (4%) revealed ALTR, however, continuous careful follow-up would be necessary in the MOM system

In a cross sectional cohort study three different metal on metal total hip systems were assessed. Two monoblock acetabular designs; the Durom socket (Zimmer, Warsaw, In) and the Birmingham socket (Smith and Nephew, Memphis, TN), and one modular metal on metal total hip system (Pinnacle, Depuy Orthopaedics, Warsaw, In) in patients who have received these implants in the our region. 56 patients were recruited in total. All patients were assessed clinically, radiologically and biochemically. Whole blood Cobalt, Chromium and titanium levels were tested. The median head size used in the Birmingham group was 52mm (Range 44mm to 56mm), and in the Durom group, 48mm (Range 42 to 54mm). The median head size used in the modular Pinnacle group was 40mm (Range 36–44mm). The blood metal ions levels in the larger non modular acetabular sockets were significantly raised compared to the Pinnacle group. For Co 1.95 µg/l and 2.70 µg/l in the Durom and Birmingham groups respectively compared to only 0.52 µg/l in the Pinnacle group (P< 0.001). Mean Cr levels were the same for the two monoblock systems, 1.9 µg/l compared to the Pinnacle sockets 1.2 µg/l (P< 0.001). Our study clearly demonstrates that there is a significant difference in metal ion levels in patients following a monobloc large head arthroplasty system compared to a smaller modular metal on metal hip arthroplasty. The smaller head size appears to produce less metal ions whilst at the same time a 36mm–44mm head size is large enough to increase hip stability and range of movement as well as decreasing the risk of impingement. In our practice we are no longer using this design and the safest strategy, when considering metal on metal bearings, is to use a modular, smaller head system such as the Pinnacle

This study used model-based radiostereometric analysis (MBRSA) to compare migration of a recently introduced cementless hip stem to an established hip stem of similar design. Novel design features of the newer hip stem included a greater thickness of hydroxyapatite coating and a blended compaction extraction femoral broach. Fifty-seven patients requiring primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) were enrolled at a single centre. Patients were randomized to receive either an Avenir collarless stem and Trilogy IT cup (ZimmerBiomet) or a Corail collarless stem and Pinnacle cup (DePuy Synthes) via a posterior or lateral approach. Both stems are broach-only femoral bone preparation. RSA beads (Halifax Biomedical) were inserted into the proximal femur during surgery. Patients underwent supine RSA imaging a 6 weeks (baseline), 6, 12, and 24 months following surgery. The primary study outcome was total subsidence of the hip stem from baseline to 24 months as well as progression of subsidence between 12 and 24 months. These values were compared against published migration thresholds for well-performing hip stems (0.5mm). The detection limit, or precision, of MBRSA was calculated based on duplicate examinations taken at baseline. Patient reported outcome measures were collected throughout the study and included the Oxford-12 Hip Score (OHS), EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L, Hip Osteoarthritis Score (HOOS) as well as visual analogue scales (VAS) for thigh pain and satisfaction. Analysis comprised of paired and unpaired t-tests with significance set at p≤0.05. Forty-eight patients (30 males) were included for analysis; 7 patients received a non-study hip stem intra-operatively, 1 patient suffered a traumatic dislocation within three weeks of surgery, and 1 patient died within 12 months post-surgery. RSA data was obtained for 45 patients as three patients did not receive RSA beads intra-operatively. Our patient cohort had a mean age of 65.9 years (±;7.2) at the time of surgery and body mass index of 30.5 kg/m2 (±;5.2). No statistical difference in total stem migration was found between the Avenir and Corail stems at 12 months (p=0.045, 95%CI: −0.046 to 0.088) and 24 months (p=0.936, 95% CI: −0.098 to 0.090). Progression of subsidence from 12-24 months was 0.011mm and 0.034mm for the Avenir and Corail groups which were not statistically different (p=0.163, 95%CI: −0.100 to 0.008) between groups and significantly less than the 0.5mm threshold (pNo statistically significant differences existed between study groups for any pre-operative function scores (p>0.05). All patients showed significant functional improvement from pre- to post-surgery and no outcome measures were different between study groups with exception of EQ-5D-5L health visual analogue scale at 12 months which showed marginally superior (p=0.036) scores in the Avenir group. This study was not powered to detect differences in clinical outcomes. This study has demonstrated no statistical difference in subsidence or patient-reported outcomes between the Corail hip stem and the more recently introduced Avenir hip stem. This result is predictable as both stems are of a triple-tapered design, are coated with hydroxyapatite, and utilize a broach-only bone preparation technique. Both stem designs demonstrate migration below 0.5mm suggesting both are low-risk for aseptic loosening in the long-term

Purpose. To determine whether there is a difference in the metal ion levels among three different metal-on-metal total hip systems: two monoblock large heads and one modular metal-on-metal total hip replacement system in patients who received these implants in our region. Method. A group of 56 patients were recruited that had either undergone total hip replacement (THR) with a Birmingham resurfacing socket, the Durom resurfacing socket, or a Pinnacle metal-on-metal bearing surface. All patients recruited were at least one year following their surgery in order that their ion levels had reached a steady state. We reviewed every patient clinically, radiographically as well as biochemically. Blood was obtained for cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) levels. Current radiographs were arranged to assess the stability and mechanics of the total hip systems. All patients signed an informed consent and completed three questionnaires, The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) index, the Short Form 36 (SF36) and UCLA activity score. A Harris Hip score was completed in order to assess individual hip function. Statistical analysis was performed on the collected data to assess whether there were any other potential influence on the mean levels of Co and Cr. Results. The blood metal ion levels in the larger non modular acetabular sockets were significantly raised compared to the Pinnacle group. For Co, 1.95 parts per billion (ppb) and 2.70 ppb in the Durom and Birmingham groups respectively compared to only 0.52 ppb in the Pinnacle group (P< 0.001). Cr levels were the same in the two monoblock systems, 1.9 ppb compared to the Pinnacle sockets 1.2 ppb (P<0.001). In all groups however these levels were within an acceptable safe range. The mean head size used in the Birmingham group was 53.2mm (Range 44mm to 56mm), and in the Durom group, 47.1 (Range 42 to 54mm). The mean head size used in the modular group was 37.3mm (Range 36–44mm). There was no difference between the three groups in terms of functional outcome and patient demographics were similar in all three groups. There was no statistical difference between the groups in terms of anteversion and abduction angles. There was also a smaller spread in this group in terms of range of angles. There was also no relationship between these values and the metal ion levels. Conclusion. All three total hip systems demonstrated average metal ion whole blood levels in a safe range. Larger diameter metal on metal bearings had higher ion levels

Introduction and Aims. There are many surgical, implant design and patient factors that should be considered in preclinical testing of hip replacement which are not being considered in current standards. The aim of this study was to develop a preclinical testing method that consider surgical positioning, implant design and patient factors and predict the occurrence and severity of edge loading under the combination of such conditions. Then, assess the safety and reliability of the implant by predicting the wear, deformation and damage of the implant bearings under worst case conditions. Methods. Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC, 36mm, BIOLOX. ®. delta, Pinnacle. ®. , DePuy Synthes, UK) and metal-on polyethylene (MoP, 36mm, Marathon®, Pinnacle. ®. , DePuy Synthes, UK) bearings were used for this study on multi-station multi-axis hip joint simulators. Two factors were varied, cup inclination angles (45° and 65°) and translational mismatch between the femoral head and acetabular cup (0, 2, 3 and 4 (mm)). Under each condition for both CoC and MoP bearings, three million cycles of gait cycle testing were completed with wear, deformation and/or damage measurements completed at one million cycle intervals. Other outputs of the study were the level of dynamic separation between the femoral head and acetabular cup during gait, the maximum force at the rim during edge loading when the head was sliding back to the cup confinement. Means and 95% confidence limits were determined and statistical analysis were done using one way ANOVA with significance taken at p<0.05. Results. As the level of mismatch and the cup inclination angle increased, the magnitude of dynamic separation and the force at the rim increased. The level of dynamic separation and the force on the rim correlated with the wear of CoC bearings (R= 0.96). For polyethylene, steeper inclination angle did not significantly increase the wear (p>0.05) however, edge loading under 4mm translational mismatch and steep cup inclination angle did (p<0.01). The combined wear and deformation of the polyethylene liners at the rim increased under larger levels of dynamic separation. Conclusions. The magnitude of dynamic separation and force at the rim were predictive of the severity of edge loading. These parameters can be measured using short term testing (500 cycles). This will determine the effect of variations in surgical positioning, implant design and patient factors on the occurrence and severity of edge loading. Then, the wear, deformation and/or damage on hip replacement bearings can be determined using longer term simulator testing under selected conditions. The short term tests do not only help identify worst case scenarios but may identify the boundary of surgical position under which the implants performance may be considered acceptable. A new approach for preclinical testing of hip replacement was developed:. Stage 1: Short biomechanical tests. : assess the occurrence and severity of edge loading conditions where the outputs are:. Magnitude of medial-lateral dynamic separation. Maximum force under edge loading. Stage 2: Wear assessment. : assess the tribological performance of hip replacement under selected conditions where the outputs are:. Wear rates. Deformation and/or damage on the bearing surface

Introduction. In recent years, an increasing number of reports related to adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) following metal-on-metal (MOM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been published. Some patients who experience ARMD require revision surgery. Objectives. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the mid-term results of MOM THA. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent THA at JCHO Saitama medical center from January 2007 to December 2010. A metal liner and metal femoral head were used in 37 of 214 cases (17%). This sub-group comprised 2 men and 35 women (mean age at surgery, 63.5 years; range, 39–79 years). The original disease is 28 osteoarthritis, 5 osteonecrosis, 3 rheumatoid arthritis and 1 rapidly destructive hip coxarthropathy. We investigated the system type, size (cup, femoral head, and stem), and cup position (anteversion and inclination). Moreover, we used imaging (radiography and computed tomography [CT] or magnetic resonance imaging [MR]) to assess for aseptic loosening, metal hypersensitivity reactions, and pseudotumor formation. Results. Six women with osteoarthritis experienced significant localized soft tissue reactions, and underwent revision. The average duration to revision was 41months(range, 28–63). Of these, 4 patients had received the PINNACLE cup system (Depuy; 4/14, 28.6%) and 2 had received the M2a-Taper cup system (BIOMET; 2/23, 8.7%). The femoral head sizes of the PINNACLE system used was 36 mm, and the femoral head sizes of the M2q-Taper systems used were 28mm and 32mm. Four patients had no signs or symptoms, 1 patient complained of anterior thigh dullness and 1 patient had a dislocation. The average cup anteversion was 15.7 degrees (range, 10–19 degrees) and the average inclination was 49.2 degrees (range, 43–57 degrees). Conclusions. MOM THA was associated with a higher incidence of revision. The majority of cases that required revision had no severe signs or symptoms. Therefore, all cases of MOM THA should be assessed periodically using CT or MRI

Purpose of the study. We reviewed one hundred and twenty patients who had primary total hip replacement using Corail/Pinnacle Metal on metal bearing surfaces between 2006 and 2009. We were interested in the metal ion levels of the whole cohort, the incidence of unexplained pain, pseudo tumour lesions (ALVAL) and early loosening and failure. We were particularly interested in the relationship of the acetabular cup position in relation to the pelvis and lumbar spine. Material and methods. We reviewed 120 charts and 104 patients in total. All patients had metal ion assays (cobalt and chromium). All patients had standardised radiographic evaluation using a special technique to assess acetabular cup position and the relationship to the pelvis and lumbar spine. Results. Ten patients had mild hip pain. This was not considered to be pathological pain related to the MOM articulation. None of the patients had any generalised symptoms of metal allergy as reported in the literature. We detected one patient with soft tissue fluid collections suggestive of an ALVAL lesion on ultrasound. The average cup inclination was 48 degrees with a range from 34 to 53 degrees. Conclusion. Our experience at 5 years with the Corail/Pinnacle Metal on Metal articulation has been acceptable. NO DISCLOSURES

Introduction. Achieving primary and long-term stability of femoral implant is critical for THA. This can be influenced by the shape and location of surface preparation as well as geometry. The Corail® stem has developed in 1986 in France, which is a straight quadrangular, and full HA coated standard titanium alloy stem featuring a metaphyseal tulip flare in combination with horizontal and vertical grooves. We have performed 75 THAs using it since May 2013. The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiographic changes of femur over time in Japanese patients after THA using this HA coated stem. Materials and Methods. Between May 2013 and September 2015, we implanted 75 THAs using a Corail® stem (DePuy-Synthes) in 66 patients. Their ages at operation were 47 to 93 years (avg. 66.5 years). Durations of follow up were 6 to 34 months after implantation (avg. 13.7 months). Acetabular components were standard titanium alloy, either 37 Pinnacle Porocoat®, 19 Pinnacle Gription® (DePuy-Synthes), 8 Ranawat®, 5 Regenerex®, or 6 G7® (Zimmer-Biomet) uncemented cups. Heads were either 73 BIOLOX delta® ceramic (CeramTec) or 2 CoCr. Liners were either 56 Marathon® (DePuy-Synthes) or 19 E1® HXLPE (Zimmer-Biomet). We studied 74 hips except one hip which was revised due to infection at the time of 3 weeks after surgery. Postoperative radiographic evaluations were done at the time of 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 months and then every 6 months thereafter. We examined cancellous condensation, radiolucent line, osteolysis, cortical hypertrophy and stress shielding using both of plain X-ray and Tomosynthesis (Shimadzu, Japan). Results. The stem size included #8 in two hips, #9 in seven hips, #10 in eleven hips, #11 in twenty three hips, #12 in thirteen hips, #13 in ten hips, #14 in seven hips and #15 in one hip. Four periprosthetic fractures occurred during surgery. There were three subsidences in combination with radiolucent line at Gruen Zone 1 (Fig. 1, 2 and 3). The cancellous condensation was observed in 25% of all at the time of 2 months, 63% at 4 months, 87% at 6 months and 100% at 9 months after surgery at Gruen Zone 2, 3, 5 and 6 (Fig. 4, 5 and 6). At the latest follow-up, osteolysis, cortical hypertrophy and stress shielding were no evident in each hip. Discussion. Primary stability of the Corail® stem must be achieved in a bed of cancellous bone. ARTRO group recommends that the correct size is the size that fills the femoral cavity to within 1 to 2mm distance from the cortices in templating process. We followed this indication intraoperatively in early days, but we experienced three subsided cases that might be caused by this indication. In present, we emphasize to gain the surgical tip to feel both axial and rotational stability by the final broach rather than the indication in templating process. Radiological appearance of the remaining cancellous bed shows 0.5 to 1mm distance from the cortices and we don't have any stem subsidence after we changed out previous surgical technique

INTRODUCTION. Component positioning of an artificial hip joint plays a key role in durability of implant. Despite the fact that a number of numerical, experimental and clinical studies have been carried out to investigate the effects of cup inclination on polyethylene wear, steep inclination has been reported to be associated with both high and low volumetric wear. Moreover, how cup anteversion affects wear and its interaction with inclination are still unclear. To address these knowledge gaps, in this study wear and contact mechanics of a hip joint under various cup positioning has been investigated by using FEA (Finite Element Analysis). METHOD. A Pinnacle. ®. Marathon neutral liner 36×56mm was chosen to model the wear and creep over 3 million cycles (mc) based on the Archard's law and modified time hardening model in ANSYS, respectively. Central composite design of response surface method was used to generate 9 FEA runs, where the operative inclination angles varied from 35º, 45º to 55º and operative anteversion angles differed amongst 0º, 15º and 30º. The range of cup angles were chosen to be similar to the Lewinnek “golden” safe zone for dislocation. The gait cycle as specified in ISO 14242-1 was applied to the femoral head. RESULT. Edge contact takes place with steep inclination and anteversion, resulting in a decreased contact area (wear contour) which intersects with cup rim, consequently increasing the contact pressure and wear penetration depth. According to the FEA result, maximum wear rate, contact pressure, wear depth and Mises stress were found in the model with highest inclination and anteversion angles. However, within the range of positioning angles studied, the predicted volumetric wear rates only vary from 13.68 mm. 3. /mc to 13.92 mm. 3. /mc, which are comparable to the corresponding wear rates measured in vitro, i.e. 12.9±3.8 mm. 3. /mc (inclination = 35º, anteversion = 0°) and 15.4±5.0 mm. 3. /mc (inclination = 55º, anteversion = 0°). DISCUSSION. Increased wear rate, contact pressure, wear depth and stress were predicted with a combination of steep cup inclination and anteversion, resulting from the edge contact condition. While the increase in stress and wear was modest within the range of positions tested, combinations of higher inclination and version are not uncommon and would be expected to result in more significant increases. Hence in a total hip replacement surgery it is desirable to ensure that the contact area lies well within the bearing area by avoiding excessive inclination and anteversion angles

Aim of the study was to analyse the modifications of the pre-op and post-op femoral off-set after cementless total hip replacement. During an 18-month period, from January 2015 to June 2016, we retrospectively analysed data of 79 (n = 81 hips) patients (M:F = 31:48), with an average age of 70.38 yrs ± 10.05, who consecutively affered to our Department and underwent cementless total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis with Pinnacle Gription. TM. cup and Corail. TM. stem (Depuy). All cases of infections and revision surgery were excluded. Inclusion criteria: postero-lateral approach, 2 dedicated surgeons. All patients were clinically and radiographically evaluated at 4-months and 1-year postop. Preop and postop femoral off-set were calculated using Impax Agfa software. Average preop HHS was 46.7 ± 7.7; at 4-months post-op 86.4 ± 5.7; at 1-year post-op 90.0 ± 5 (the improvement had a statistically significant p-value). There was no statistical significant difference between the preop and postop off-set values obtained (t-student test). In 38 (46.9%) hips we increased the femoral off-set and we analysed using χ₂-test if there was a correlation with hip pain, HHS and dislocation. There was no statistical significance. Our overall results show good and excellent clinical results at 1 year follow-up in cementless total hip replacement. We believe that our pre-op digital planning of the implant and the offset obtained is a crucial step in determining these results

Introduction. Contact between the femoral head and rim of the acetabular liner in total hip replacements has been linked to adverse tribological performance that may potentially shorten the lifespan of the prosthesis. Predicting the size and location of the contact area can be done computationally, however, experimental validation of these models is challenging due to the conforming nature of the bearing surfaces. This study aimed to develop a method of accurately determining the in-vitro contact area between the femoral head and acetabular cup in metal-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings under different component orientations. Method. Metal-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-polyethylene samples, with a nominal diameter of 36mm (DePuy Synthes, Leeds, UK), were tested with the cups orientated using a combination of inclination (equivalent to 45°, 55° and 65° in-vivo) and version (−20°, 0°, 20° and 40°) angles. The liners, which were first gold hard-coated (EMSCOPE SC 500, Quarum Technologies, UK), were inserted into a Pinnacle. ®. titanium shell, and femoral heads were mounted on a vertical spigot (Figure 1). A single-station multi-axis electromechanical hip joint simulator (Prosim, Simulator Solutions, UK) was used to position the samples with 18.7° flexion, 6.2° adduction and 8.3° external rotation, congruous with just after heel strike (ISO 14242-1), and apply a 3kN static axial load through the centre of the femoral head. The contact area was generated by manually turning the head about the vertical axis of the centre of rotation of the applied load, removing the gold hard-coating from the contacting areas. The contact area was determined from photographs of the acetabular cup using SolidWorks (Dassault Systèmes, US) and ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, US) software packages. Three repeats under each combination of cup angles were completed, and the mean contact area and 95% confidence limits were determined for each bearing under all cup angle combinations. Results. The metal-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings generated non-spherical, irregular shaped contact areas (Figure 2) ranging between 350mm. 2. and 470mm. 2. when tested under a range of conditions (Figure 3). Total mean contact area decreased significantly with ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings (t-test; p=0.001) and non-significantly in the metal-on-polyethylene bearings (t-test; p=0.68), when tested with 65° compared to 55° of inclination. Version angle had the greatest effect on contact area when combined with 65° of inclination and the least effect when combined with the 45° inclination angle. Evidence of the contact zone reaching the edge of the cup was observed on samples tested with steep inclination angles for both bearing combinations. Discussion. A well-demarcated area in the gold hard-coating was quantifiable using the methods described above, enabling the contact area in conforming hip replacement bearings, with the head and liner centres coincident, to be measured experimentally. The polyethylene liners showed a degree of deformation under load resulting in an irregular-shaped contact area, the size and position of which was affected by cup version and inclination angles. This data can be used to validate contact mechanics computational models

This study presents an unusual recurrent case of pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) around a ceramic-on-metal (COM) hip retrieved at 9-years. PVNS literature relates to metal-polyethylene and ceramic-ceramic bearings. Amstutz reported 2 cases with MOM resurfacing and Xiaomei reported PVNS recurring at 14 years with metal-on-polyethylene THA. Friedman reported on PVNS recurrence in a ceramic THA. Ours may be the first reported case of recurrent PVNS of a ceramic-on-metal articulation. This young female patient (now 38-years of age) had a total hip replacement in 2006 for PVNS in her left hip. In her initial work-up, this case was presumed to be a pseudotumor problem, typical of those related to CoCr debris with high metal-ion concentrations. She had an CoCr stem (AML), 36mm Biolox-delta head (Ceramtec), and a Pinnacle acetabular cup with CoCr liner (Ultramet, Depuy J&J). This patient had no concerns regarding subluxation, dislocation or squeaking. Three years ago she complained of mild to moderate groin and thigh pain in her left hip. This worsened in the past year. She noticed increased swelling now with an asymmetry to her right hip. She went to the emergency room in Dec-2014 and was referred to a plastic surgeon. In our consult we reviewed MARS-MRI and CT-scans that demonstrated multiple mass lesions surrounding the hip. Laboratory results presented Co=0.7, Cr=0.3 ESR=38 and Crp=0.3. At revision surgery, the joint fluid was hemorrhagic/bloody with hemosiderin staining the soft tissues. Multiple large 4–5×5cm nodules were present in anterior aspect of the hip as well as multiple nodules surrounding posterior capsule and sciatic nerve. Pathology demonstrated a very cellular matrix with hemosiderin-stained tissue and multiple giant cells, which was judged consistent with PVNS. The trunnion showed no fretting, no contamination and no discoloration. The superior neck showed impingement due to low-inclination cup. There was minimal evidence of metal-debris staining the tissues. There was a large metallic-like stripe across the ceramic head. This is a particularly interesting case and may be the first reported recurrent PVNS around a ceramic-on-metal bearing (COM). Data is scant regarding clinical results of COM bearings and here we have a nine-year result in a young and active female patient. She was believed to have a metalosis-related pseudotumor yet her metal-ion levels were not alarmingly high and there was no particular evidence of implant damage or gross wear products. In addition, the CoCr trunnion appeared pristine. Our work-up continues with analyses of wear and histopath-evidence. This case may demonstrate the need for a broadening of the differential diagnosis when dealing with hip failures

Introduction. The deltamotion bearing system provides a large bearing even with small acetabular components. With optimally placed components the risk of dislocation is extremely low. However the acetabular component is a monobloc system and has significant technical considerations. This is an early series of patients to determine whether a monobloc system can be reliable placed in an acceptable position. Method. 66 consecutive deltamotion cases were performed between 1/09/2010 and 31/12/2011. 52 cases were in primary operations and 14 were in revisions. In each case the surgical technique was modified and a trial reduction was performed using the pinnacle trial shell and liner. This enabled the surgeon to determine the optimum combined anteversion before insertion of the definitive component. In no case was a component sacrificed due to failure to achieve adequate press fit fixation. In each case the acetabular component was assessed to determine the angle of inclination and version. 32 cases had follow up of greater than 1 year and these patients were contacted telephonically and interviewed concerning adventitious noises. Results. No patients have been revised. There have been no dislocations and no sepsis. No patients report any adventitious noises at 1 year follow up. The average angle of inclination was 40° (32–55°) and the average version was 12° (0–28°). Discussion. The deltamotion system provides large ceramic bearings from a shell size of 44mm upwards. No other system can offer this advantage. With a small modification to the surgical technique the monobloc system can be reliably placed in an acceptable position. ONE DISCLOSURE

Purpose Of Study. The study was started in 2004 to determine the best bearing surface in the long term, and to measure the metal ion levels generated by each of the bearing surfaces. We present the latest updated results. Material and methods. A prospective randomised study was started in 2004 to compare the wear characteristics of Ceramic on X linked Polyethylene (C.O.P.), Ceramic on Ceramic (C.O.C), Ceramic on Metal (C.O.M.) and Metal on Metal (M.O.M) bearings. The level of Cobalt and Chrome ions in red blood cells have been documented at serial intervals, using the ICP – MS method. Aside from the bearing surfaces the rest of the implant is standard, using a Pinnacle Cup, Corail Stem and 28mm heads. 256 Cases were enrolled on the study. To date 71 cases have been lost due to death (26), revision (9) and lost to follow up (36), leaving us with 185 for follow-up. An even spread of cases in each bearing surface are still available for follow up, viz. 46 C.O.P, 48 C.O.C., 44 C.O.M. and 47 M.O.M. Average follow up is currently 4.8 years, ranging up to 9 years. Results. To date no difference could be determined on the wear properties, with all bearings being acceptable. The only wear that could be measured was with C.O.P. bearings. Metal ion levels at no stage have been raised in the C.O.P. and C.O.C. bearings. Initially C.O.M. bearings had lower levels than M.O.M. bearings, but by 36 months were virtually the same with the mean below the 2ug/L level. At 60 month follow up values on almost half of the cases show markedly lower metal ions in the C.O.M. group. Outliers in both groups were associated with poorly placed cups, with the C.O.M. bearing being more forgiving that the M.O.M. group. Conclusion. To date the C.O.P. and C.O.M. bearings are performing the best of the 4 bearing combinations. NO DISCLOSURES

INTRODUCTION. Metallic ion release may be related to bearing surface wear and thus serve as an indicator of in-vivo performance of metal on metal (MOM) articulations. OBJECTIVES. Compare large head MOM hip components with modular MOM and metal on polyethylene (MOP) to determine their relative effects on serum metal ion levels. METHODS. A prospective controlled trial to compare clinical, radiographic, and serum metal ion concentration (Co and Cr) results between the Large Head ASR XL System (MOM-1), the Ultamet Advanced Modularity System (MOM-2), and the Pinnacle Acetabular Cup System with polyethylene liner (MOP). We enrolled 151 consecutive patients (MOM-1 = 97, MOM-2 = 22, MOP = 32). Radiographs, clinical scores (Harris Hip and WOMAC), and serum ion level assessments (in Parts Per Billion - PPB) were performed pre-operatively and post-operatively (6, 12, and 24 months for all patients and 60 months for MOM-1). At 60 months, we compared WOMAC, Harris Hip scores and serum ion levels (Co and Cr) from MOM-1 (revisions excluded) to 24 month scores from MOM-2 and MOP. After revision, serum ion levels were measured at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS. In MOM-1, 11 patients had significantly elevated ion levels at all postoperative periods (Co AVG 130.35 PPB and Cr AVG 61.46 PPB) after 2 years. Excluding outliers and revised patients, average serum ion levels in the 86 remaining MOP-1 patients at 24 and 60 months were statistically higher than MOP and MOM-2 patients. However, this difference was not clinically relevant (no symptoms, no revisions, Co and Cr AVG below 5 PPB). Table 1. Nine hips (9.3%) in 8 MOM-1 patients required revision and serum ion levels decreased rapidly post-up, but have still not returned to baseline after 1 year. Serum ion levels were not significantly different between MOM-2 and MOP groups at any time. Clinical scores improved after surgery in all groups and continued to improve in MOM-2 and MOP patients after 2 years, but decreased slightly in the MOM-1 patients at 2 and 5 years. Average cup inclination angle did not differ significantly between the groups: MOM-1 50.2, MOM-2 47.8, and MOP 51.7. CONCLUSIONS. We are presenting 5 years of prospectively collected data comparing ion levels among 2 MOM and 1 MOP group, as well as post revision ion levels at 1 year. Average serum ion levels were elevated at all post-operative periods in the MOM-1 group, but this was attributable to significantly elevated levels in a subset of outliers that ultimately required revision. Excluding these outliers, there is a statistically significant but clinically irrelevant difference in post-operative ion levels between MOM-1 vs. MOM-2 and MOP. There was no radiographic evidence of component malposition or aseptic loosening in any group. MOM-2 and MOP performed comparatively across all variables. We present an algorithm to diagnose and manage patients with MOM THA (Yable 2.) and offer evidence that metal ion levels do decrease after revision. Table 3

Introduction:. Implant dislocations are often caused by implant or bone impingement, and less impingement is critical to prevent dislocations. Several reports demonstrated that greater femoral offset delayed bony impingement and led to an improved range of motion (ROM) after THA. Therefore, an increase in the femoral offset may improve ROM and decrease implant dislocation. The aim of this study was to clarify the effect of the femoral offset in avoiding component or bony impingement after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods:. Seventy-eight patients underwent THA with a Pinnacle cup and Summit stem (DePuy). Intraoperative kinematic analysis was performed with a navigation system, which was used to obtain intraoperative range of motion (ROM) measurements during trial insertion of stems of 2 different offset lengths with the same head size. Further, ROM was also measured after actual component insertion. Results:. Maximal ROM was independent of the femoral offset of the stem in each patient (Figure 1). Further, we measured the intraoperative maximal ROM corresponding to high offset stems of 2 different lengths (stem sizes 1–3; + 6 mm, stem sizes 4–9; +8 mm), and compared the maximal ROMs between the standard- and high-offset stems. There were no statistically significant differences (Figure 2). These results indicate that an excessive offset length of the stem may not affect ROM. We also analyzed the correlation between femoral offset length and ROM, and found that the range of external rotation was significantly greater in patients with greater femoral offset (RR = 0.36, P = 0.02) (Figure 3). However, we could not show any correlation for the ROM values in the other planes of motion. Discussions:. Summit stem is available in 9 different sizes with standard offset lengths ranging from 36.0 mm to 44.0 mm. The average offset of Summit stem was larger than other stems. These differences in offset length could be the reason why the high offset stem did not change maximal ROM in our study. Further, the summit stem employs 2 different types of high offset lengths (+6 mm and +8 mm). We did not find any difference in maximal ROM even after using the +8 mm high offset stem. Our results indicated that even the Summit standard offset stem might have enough femoral offset to avoid implant/bone impingement. However, several reports showed that increasing stem offset increased the bending moment on the prosthesis and increased the strain in the medial cortex, and may lead to early failure of the femoral component. Nevertheless, selection of the offset stem should be performed carefully to prevent offset complications

Total Hip Replacement (THR) accounts among the successful procedures in orthopaedic surgery. It is reported that survival rate of implants can be as high as 93% at 20 years]. Nevertheless limb length inequality may result being the cause of major discomfort and dissatisfaction for patients. Additionally limb length inequality may also be recognised as a source of an abnormal force transmission through the replaced joint, contributing to early loosening and failure of the implants. Not only limb length but also restoration of best possible femoral offset is critical to stability and long term result of the procedure. The main objective of our study was to assess the accuracy of determining limb length and offset changes intra-operatively by using a navigation-based measurement technique (Brainlab Navigaton System). Further we examined how many measurements were within a target accuracy interval of [−3mm, +3mm] when compared to values as provided by the implant manufacturer for trial neck (standard and high offset) and ball heads lengths. We have enrolled 60 consecutive patients between November 2010 and November 2011 with primary or secondary coxarthritis requiring total hip replacement. All patients received the Trilock stem and Pinnacle cup with cross linked PE Marathon and Biolox ceramic heads (36 mm). The analysis is the result of a prospective comparative study. Inclusion criteria of the study were: Patients with primary or secondary osteoarthritis, patients requiring primary arthroplasty at the time of index surgery, patients operated in the timeframe between November 2010 and November 2011. The primary objective of the study was the validation of the accuracy of intraoperative limb length and offset measurement with the aid of BrainLab navigation while changing trial components such as neck (standard and high offset) and trial heads (different lengths) as reported in their nominal values by the manufacturer. Each patient has undergone the following measurements: Intraoperative navigation measurement with BrainLab Navigation System for limb length and offset determination. Patients demographics: 60 consecutive patients, 12 males, 48 females, mean age 67.83 (37 – 84) mean BMI (26.26);Navigation measurements. Measurements obtained intraoperatively with the aid of BrainLab navigation system showed a consistent and remarkable reproducibility between the data obtained and the differences expressed in mm between the different trial components as specified by the manufacturer, i.e. it was possible to consistently reproduce the length and offset variations when changing trial component from standard to high offset for the neck and for the different ball heads lenghts. Results show a mean difference of −0,17 mm e 0,14 mm for offset and limb length measurement respectively (SD +/− 1,24 mm), among nominal values of trial components and those recorded with navigation. In this study we have approached the issue of limb lenght and offset determination as an intaroperative challenge that should be accurate, reproducible and provide vital information for leg length and offset determination at the moment of surgery. Intraoperative assessment of length and offset with the aid of BrainLab navigation system has proven to be a valid and accurate tool by matching the difference in measurements in an objective way i.e. by assessing and recording these differences when trial components such as neck and ball heads where changed intraoperatively. Data recorded have been compared with the nominal values for the different trial components provided by the manufacturer. The results show mean differences of −0.17 mm and 0.14 mm for offset and length respectively (SD ±1.24 mm) between navigation and the nominal values of the trial components as per specifications. We can therefore conclude that BrainLab navigation system is a valid, precise and reproducible tool for intraoperative limb length and offset assessment during Total Hip Arthroplasty

Introduction. Modern acetabular shells have many liner options from which the surgeon can choose to most appropriately reconstruct the arthritic hip. Lateralised liners are one option that is available to the surgeon and these liners have potential benefits over “standard” polyethylene liners. Benefits include decreased Von Mises stresses which may lead to decreased polyethylene wear, lateralisation of the femur away from the pelvis which can decrease impingement / increase ROM and having the ability to use larger femoral heads in a smaller shell improving stability of the THA. Despite these benefits, lateralised liners are not routinely used by surgeons as there is concern over lateralisation of the centre of rotation of the hip with increased joint reaction forces, unsupported polyethylene that could lead to liner failure, and a slightly increased torque moment to the shell which could lead to micromotion and failure of the shell to obtain bony ingrowth. This study reports on 5-year minimum clinical and radiographic F/U of a prospective series of lateralised, moderately crosslinked polyethylene liners. Methods. 102 consecutive patients who were to have a THA with a polyethylene liner were enrolled prospectively in an acetabular shell study. Two patients that had standard thickness liners were excluded from this analysis. The remaining 100 patients all had +4 lateralised liners of the same construct (Marathon polyethylene / Pinnacle Cup, DePuy, Warsaw, Indiana). All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon via a posterior approach. A neutral or 10 degree face changing liner was chosen based on shell position and stability of the THA construct. Patient data including the Harris Hip Score (HHS), WOMAC and ROM was collected at 3, 6 and 12 months and yearly thereafter. Radiographs were obtained at each visit. Results. 87 patients with minimum 5-year clinical and radiographic F/U were evaluated. Average age was 68.7 years with an average BMI of 27.3. Average F/U was 7.5 years (5–10.1). Sixty-one liners were neutral and 26 were 10° face changing. HHS improved from 44 pre-op (18–71) to 95 at latest F/U (68–100). Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 97% at an average of 7.5 yr. Three liners were revised – one during revision of a femoral stem, one for sepsis, and one for instability. There were no mechanical failures or liner dissociations. Radiographic F/U revealed no obvious polyethylene wear or osteolysis. All cups were radiographically ingrown. Conclusions. Lateralised liners can provide advantages with respect to wear, ROM and stability of the THA construct when compared to standard thickness liners. Concerns of increased polyethylene wear, failure of the cup to ingrow and potential liner dissociation or failure were not seen. At midterm F/U this particular lateralised liner/shell construct appears to be performing well clinically and radiographically with excellent survivorship. Although further F/U is required to evaluate long-term performance, these results should allow surgeons to use this construct on a routine basis without fear of early or mid-term complication