Triplane ankle fractures are complex injuries typically occurring in children aged between 12 and 15 years. Classic teaching that closure of the physis dictates the overall fracture pattern, based on studies in the 1960s, has not been challenged. The aim of this paper is to analyze whether these injuries correlate with the advancing closure of the physis with age. A fracture mapping study was performed in 83 paediatric patients with a triplane ankle fracture treated in three trauma centres between January 2010 and June 2020. Patients aged younger than 18 years who had CT scans available were included. An independent Paediatric Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeon assessed all CT scans and classified the injuries as n-part triplane fractures. Qualitative analysis of the fracture pattern was performed using the modified Cole fracture mapping technique. The maps were assessed for both patterns and correlation with the closing of the physis until consensus was reached by a panel of six surgeons.Aims
Methods
We share our experience in management of failed in-situ pinning in severe unstable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE) by surgical dislocation approach. A retrospective review of hip database from 2006 to 2013 showed 41 children underwent surgical dislocation for SCFE. We identified seven who had severe slip with failed in-situ pinning.Purpose
Method
To assess the radiological outcomes of medial screw epiphyseodesis of the proximal femoral physis in the management of lateral growth arrest following treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. We identified 10 patients noted to have lateral growth disturbance of the proximal femoral physis, 9 of which were managed with medial screw epiphyseodesis. Serial radiographs were reviewed. A new technique was employed to monitor progression of lateral growth arrest and also to assess the role of screw epiphyseodesis in preventing further deterioration or indeed allowing for improvement. This method involved calculating the tilt angle (angle formed between a horizontal reference line and a line joining medial and lateral points of physis) and following its progression with increasing age.Purpose of Study
Methods
Percutaneous physiodesis is an established technique for treating mild leg-length discrepancy and problems of expected extreme height. Angular deformities resulting from incomplete physeal arrest have been reported, and little is known about the time interval from percutaneous physiodesis to actual physeal arrest. This procedure was carried out in ten children, six with leg-length discrepancy and four with expected extreme height. Radiostereometric analysis was used to determine the three-dimensional dynamics of growth retardation. Errors of measurement of translation were less than 0.05 mm and of rotation less than 0.06°. Physeal arrest was obtained in all but one child within 12 weeks after physiodesis and no clinically-relevant angular deformities occurred. This is a suitable method for following up patients after percutaneous physiodesis. Incomplete physeal arrest can be detected at an early stage and the procedure repeated before corrective osteotomy is required.
We compared the accuracy of the growth remaining
method of assessing leg-length discrepancy (LLD) with the straight-line
graph method, the multiplier method and their variants. We retrospectively
reviewed the records of 44 patients treated by percutaneous epiphysiodesis
for LLD. All were followed up until maturity. We used the modified Green–Anderson
growth-remaining method (Method 1) to plan the timing of epiphysiodesis.
Then we presumed that the other four methods described below were
used pre-operatively for calculating the timing of epiphysiodesis. We
then assumed that these four methods were used pre-operatively.
Method 2 was the original Green–Anderson growth-remaining method;
Method 3, Paley’s multiplier method using bone age; Method 4, Paley’s
multiplier method using chronological age; and Method 5, Moseley’s
straight-line graph method. We compared ‘Expected LLD at maturity
with surgery’ with ‘Final LLD at maturity with surgery’ for each
method. Statistical analysis revealed that ‘Expected LLD at maturity
with surgery’ was significantly different from ‘Final LLD at maturity
with surgery’. Method 2 was the most accurate. There was a significant
correlation between ‘Expected LLD at maturity with surgery’ and
‘Final LLD at maturity with surgery’, the greatest correlation being
with Method 2. Generally all the methods generated an overcorrected
value. No method generates the precise ‘Expected LLD at maturity
with surgery’. It is essential that an analysis of the pattern of
growth is taken into account when predicting final LLD. As many
additional data as possible are required. Cite this article:
