Aims. The aim of this study was to describe services available to patients with periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPFF) in England and Wales, with focus on variation between centres and areas for care improvement. Methods. This work used data freely available from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) facilities survey in 2021, which asked 21 questions about the care of patients with PPFFs, and nine relating to clinical decision-making around a hypothetical case. Results. Of 174 centres contributing data to the NHFD, 161 provided full responses and 139 submitted data on PPFF. Lack of resources was cited as the main reason for not submitting data. Surgeon (44.6%) and theatre (29.7%) availability were reported as the primary reasons for surgical delay beyond 36 hours. Less than half had a formal process for a specialist surgeon to operate on PPFF at least every other day. The median number of specialist surgeons at each centre was four (interquartile range (IQR) 3 to 6) for PPFF around both hips and knees. Around one-third of centres reported having one dedicated theatre list per week. The routine discussion of patients with PPFF at local and regional multidisciplinary team meetings was lower than that for all-cause revision arthroplasties. Six centres reported transferring all patients with PPFF around a hip joint to another centre for surgery, and this was an occasional practice for a further 34. The management of the hypothetical clinical scenario was varied, with 75 centres proposing ORIF, 35 suggested revision surgery and 48 proposed a combination of both revision and fixation. Conclusion. There is considerable variation in both the organization of PPFF services England and Wales, and in the approach taken to an individual case. The rising incidence of PPFF and complexity of these patients highlight the need for pathway development. The adoption of networks may reduce variability and improve outcomes for patients with PPFF. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(5):378–384

Aims. Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) are devastating complications that are associated with functional limitations and increased overall mortality. Although cementless implants have been associated with an increased risk of PFF, the precise contribution of implant geometry and design on the risk of both intra-operative and post-operative PFF remains poorly investigated. A systematic review was performed to aggregate all of the PFF literature with specific attention to the femoral implant used. Patients and Methods. A systematic search strategy of several journal databases and recent proceedings from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was performed. Clinical articles were included for analysis if sufficient implant description was provided. All articles were reviewed by two reviewers. A review of fundamental investigations of implant load-to-failure was performed, with the intent of identifying similar conclusions from the clinical and fundamental literature. Results. In total 596 articles were initially identified, with 34 being eligible for analysis. Aggregate analysis of 1691 PFFs in 342 719 primary THAs revealed a significantly higher number of PFFs with cementless femoral implants (p < 0.001). Single-wedge and double-wedge (fit-and-fill) femoral implants were associated with a threefold increase in PFF rates (p < 0.001) compared with anatomical, fully coated and tapered/rounded stems. Within cemented stems, loaded-taper (Exeter) stems were associated with more PFFs than composite-beam (Charnley) stems (p = 0.004). Review of the fundamental literature revealed very few studies comparing cementless component designs. Conclusion. Very few studies within the PFF literature provide detailed implant information. Cementless implants, specifically those of single-wedge and double-wedge, have the highest PFF rates in the literature, with most investigations recommending against their use in older patients with osteoporotic bone. This review illustrates the need for registries and future PFF studies to record implant name and information for future analysis. Furthermore, future biomechanical investigations comparing modern implants are needed to clarify the precise contribution of implant design to PFF risk. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B(1 Supple A):50–9

Aims. Currently, periprosthetic fractures are excluded from the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) definition of atypical femoral fracture (AFFs). This study aims to report on a series of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) that otherwise meet the criteria for AFFs. Secondary aims were to identify predictors of periprosthetic atypical femoral fractures (PAFFs) and quantify the complications of treatment. Patients and Methods. This was a retrospective case control study of consecutive patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures between 2007 and 2017. Two observers identified 16 PAFF cases (mean age 73.9 years (44 to 88), 14 female patients) and 17 typical periprosthetic fractures in patients on bisphosphonate therapy as controls (mean age 80.7 years (60 to 86, 13 female patients). Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of PAFF. Management and complications were recorded. Results. Interobserver agreement for the PAFF classification was excellent (kappa = 0.944; p < 0.001). On univariate analysis compared with controls, patients with PAFFs had higher mean body mass indices (28.6 kg/m. 2. (. sd. 8.9) vs 21.5 kg/m. 2. (. sd. 3.3); p = 0.009), longer durations of bisphosphonate therapy (median 5.5 years (IQR 3.2 to 10.6) vs 2.4 years (IQR 1.0 to 6.4); p = 0.04), and were less likely to be on alendronate (50% vs 94%; p = 0.02) with an indication of secondary osteoporosis (19% vs 0%; p = 0.049). Duration of bisphosphonate therapy was an independent predictor of PAFF on multivariate analysis (R. 2. = 0.733; p = 0.05). Following primary fracture management, complication rates were higher in PAFFs (9/16, 56%) than controls (5/17, 29%; p = 0.178) with a relative risk of any complication following PAFF of 1.71 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 3.8) and of reoperation 2.56 (95% CI 1.3 to 5.2). Conclusion. AFFs do occur in association with prostheses. Longer duration of bisphosphonate therapy is an independent predictor of PAFF. Complication rates are higher following PAFFs compared with typical PFFs, particularly of reoperation and infection. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1285–1291

To investigate predictors of periprosthetic fracture level (around stem (Vancouver B) or distal to stem (Vancouver C/D) in cemented polished tapered femoral stems. Retrospective cohort study of 188 patients (mean age 79 (range 30–91); 99 (53%) male) with unilateral periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with CPT stems. Medical notes were reviewed and the following recorded: patient demographics, past medical history, drug history, date of prosthesis insertion, and date of injury. Radiographs analysis included Vancouver classification, cement restrictor type, cement mantle to implant tip distance, cortical thickness, femoral diameter and DORR classification. Univariate, multivariate and ROC curve analysis was performed. Fractures occurred at mean 7.5 years following primary procedure: 152 (83%) were B fractures; and 36 (19%) C/D. On univariate analysis female gender, lower BMI, osteoporosis, NSAID use, Bisphosphonate therapy, cortical thickness, distal cement mantle length and distal cement mantle length:femoral diameter ratio were significantly associated with C level fractures (p<0.05). Distal cement mantle lengths of >19.6mm (AUC 0.688, p<0.001) were associate with C level fractures. Multivariate analysis demonstrated female gender and distal cement mantle length:femoral diameter ratio to be independent predictors of C level periprosthetic fractures. Though female sex is the largest independent predictor of periprosthetic fractures distal to a CPT femoral stem, the relationship between cortical thickness and distal cement mantle length appears significant. As fractures distal to the stem are invariably managed by ORIF, whereas fractures around the stem frequently require revision arthroplasty, this has relevance at primary surgery in osteoporotic females to reduce the need for complex revisions

There are a number of periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) fixation failures. In several cases the effect of fracture configuration on the performance of the chosen fixation method has been underestimated. As a result, fracture movement within the window that seems to promote callus formation has not been achieved and fixations ultimately failed. This study tested the hypothesis that: PFF configuration and the choice of plate fixation method can be detrimental to healing. A series of computational models were developed, corroborated against measurements from a series of instrumented laboratory models and in vivo case studies. The models were used to investigate the fixation of different fracture configurations and plate fixation parameters. Surface strain and fracture movement were compared between the constructs. A strong correlation between the computational and experimental models was found. Computational models showed that unstable fracture configurations increase the stress on the plate fixation. It was found that bridging length plays a pivotal role in the fracture movement. Rigid fixations, where there is clinical evidence of failure, showed low fracture movement in the models (<0.05mm); this could be increased with different screw and plate configurations to promote healing. In summary our results highlighted the role of fracture configuration in PFF fixations and showed that rigid fixations that suppress fracture movement could be detrimental to healing

Periprosthetic femur fracture (PPF) are heterogeneous, complex, and thought to be increasingly prevalent. The aims were to evaluate PPF prevalence, casemix, management, and outcomes. This nationwide study included all PPF patients aged >50 years from 16 Scottish hospitals in 2019. Variables included: demographics; implant and fracture factors; management factors, and outcomes. There were 332 patients, mean age 79.5 years, and 220/332 (66.3%) were female. One-third (37.3%) were ASA1-2 and two-thirds (62.3%) were ASA3+, 91.0% were from home/sheltered housing, and median Clinical Frailty Score was 4.0 (IQR 3.0). Acute medical issues featured in 87/332 (26.2%) and 19/332 (5.7%) had associated injuries. There were 251/332 (75.6%) associated with a proximal femoral implant, of which 232/251 (92.4%) were arthroplasty devices (194/251 [77.3%] total hip, 35/251 [13.9%] hemiarthroplasty, 3/251 [1.2%] resurfacing). There were 81/332 (24.4%) associated with a distal femoral implant (76/81 [93.8%] were total knee arthroplasties). In 38/332 (11.4%) there were implants proximally and distally. Most patients (268/332; 80.7%) were treated surgically, with 174/268 (64.9%) requiring fixation only and 104/268 (38.8%) requiring an arthroplasty or combined solution. Median time to theatre was longer for arthroplasty versus fixation procedures (120 vs 46 hours), and those requiring inter-hospital transfer waited longer (94 vs 48 hours). Barriers to investigating PPF include varied classification, coding challenges, and limitations of existing registries. This is the first study to examine a national PPF cohort and presents important data to guide service design and research. Additional findings relating to fracture patterns, implant types, surgeon skill-mix, and outcomes are reported herein

Introduction. Periprosthetic femur fractures are a serious complication after hip replacement surgery. In an aging population these fractures are becoming more and more common. Open reduction and plate osteosynthesis is one of the available treatment options. Objective. To investigate hip stem stability and cement mantle integrity under cyclic loading conditions after plate fixation with screws perforating the cement in the proximal fragment. Methods. Polished tapered hip stems were implanted in 16 biomechanical testing femora with Palacos cement (3rd generation technique) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. 8 testing bones were osteotomised distal to the stem representing the fracture group (Vancouver Type C). The osteotomy was fixed with a polyaxial locking plate, the other 8 specimens served as a control group. The specimens were tested in a biaxial material testing machine under axial compression (including adduction and torsion moments) for 100.000 cycles at physiological loads. Stem subsidence was measured in 3 planes with a stereoscopic image correlation system during the tests. Subsequently the sliced and crack dyed specimens were investigated microscopically for cement cracks. Results. In the control group no specimen failed during testing. There were no statistically significant differences in stem subsidence along the longitudinal axis (control group mean ± SD −15.4 ± 12.2 μm, fracture group −14.1 ± 13.1 μm). In the fracture group two specimens fractured through the most proximal screw hole after 74.000 and 80.000 cycles. Overall 15 out of 36 screws in the proximal fragment had direct stem contact. No cement cracks were detected in the sliced specimens in both groups. Conclusion. Drilling the cement mantle and placing screws in the cement did not increase stem subsidence under cyclic loading. No cracks or cement mantle failure were observed. Large screw diameters proximally weaken the lateral cortex resulting in tension failure of the bone. Plate fixation of a periprosthetic femoral fracture with a stable, cemented prosthesis does not lead to early cement mantle failure

Aims

Femoral periprosthetic fractures are rising in incidence. Their management is complex and carries a high associated mortality. Unlike native hip fractures, there are no guidelines advising on time to theatre in this group. We aim to determine whether delaying surgical intervention influences morbidity or mortality in femoral periprosthetic fractures.

Aims

Prior to the availability of vaccines, mortality for hip fracture patients with concomitant COVID-19 infection was three times higher than pre-pandemic rates. The primary aim of this study was to determine the 30-day mortality rate of hip fracture patients in the post-vaccine era.

Aims

The purpose was to compare operative treatment with a volar plate and nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and over in a cost-effectiveness analysis.

INTRODUCTION. The lifetime of UHMWPE implants may be limited by wear and oxidative degeneration. Wear produced particles are in general biologically active, and may induce osteolysis. As threshold of PE wear rate below which osteolysis is rarely observed is postulated to be less tahn 0.1 mm per year. Moreover, PE delamination and breakage are consequences of the embrittlement of the PE due to oxidation. Both demonstrate, that improving the clinical behaviour of UHMWPE means reduction of wear particles. The first can be achieved by cross-linking the second by the anti-oxidative stabiliser vitamin E. The highly cross-linked PE vitamys ® used for the isoelastic monobloc cup RM Pressfit (Mathys AG Bettlach, Bettlach, Switzerland) is mixed with 0.1% of synthetic vitamin E and is the first and only highly cross-linked PE used in total hip replacement that meets all requirements for the best grade UHMWPE in yield strength, ultimate tensile strength and elongation at break. METHODS AND MATERIAL. With the first implantation of RM Pressfit vitamys® a prospective multicentre study was started. So far 256 cases in 7 clinics from Europe and New Zealand are included. This report presents the first clinical experiences of one Swiss clinic from the multicentre study. Prospective data collection includes Harris Hip score (HHS), patient satisfaction and radiographic analysis. Clinical and radiographic follow-up is done after 6 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months, and thereafter for long-term results. Standardized documentation of surgery and postoperative course is performed. RESULTS. 81 patients were included in the study. Mean age at implantation is 69 years. The indication was primary OA in 57% and secondary OA in 36%, the others were treated either for necrosis, fracture or hip dysplasia. 68% of the patients received a 36mm femoral head, 31% a 32mm and 1% a 28mm. Intraoperatively two minor complications occurred, one femur and one trochanter fissure. No complications occurred during implantation of the cup. Most of the cups (59%) were implanted with an inclination of 40°-50°, 30% with 35°-40°. There were no signs of early loosening and a good Harris Hip Score was achieved. DISCUSSION. The principals of this monobloc cup with its isoelastic property and the thin titanium coating is a proven concept. Ihle et al. (JBJS 2008) reported 91% survival rate with revision for aseptic loosening as endpoint after 20 years. They found an increase of cup revisions after 14 to 16 years after implantation due to osteolysis probably due to PE wear. At short term, we haven't encountered any problems related to the implantation of this cup. So far one patient in the entire multicentre study needed a stem revision after periprosthetic femur fracture. To prove the durability of this novel material a follow-up of 14 years and more will be required

Aims

Complex displaced osteoporotic acetabular fractures in the elderly are associated with high levels of morbidity and mortality. Surgical options include either open reduction and internal fixation alone, or combined with total hip arthroplasty (THA). There remains a cohort of severely comorbid patients who are deemed unfit for extensive surgical reconstruction and are treated conservatively. We describe the results of a coned hemipelvis reconstruction and THA inserted via a posterior approach to the hip as the primary treatment for this severely high-risk cohort.