Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 8 of 8
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 17 - 17
10 Feb 2023
Weber A Dares M
Full Access

Percutaneous flexor tenotomy involves cutting the flexor digitorum tendons to correct claw toe deformity to treat apical pressure areas and prevent subsequent infection in patients with peripheral neuropathy. Performing this under ultrasound guidance provides reassurance of complete release of the tendon and increases procedural safety. This study is a retrospective case series evaluating the effectiveness, safety, and patient satisfaction of performing percutaneous ultrasound-guided flexor tenotomy in an outpatient setting. People with loss of protective sensation, a digital flexion deformity, and an apical toe ulcer or pre-ulcerative lesion who presented to our institution between December 2019 and June 2022 were included in this study. Participants were followed-up at a minimum of 3 months. Time to ulcer healing, re-ulceration rate, patient satisfaction, and complications were recorded. An Australian cost analysis was performed comparing this procedure performed in rooms versus theatres. There were 28 ulcers and 41 pre-ulcerative lesions. A total of 69 tenotomy procedures were performed on 38 patients across 52 episodes of care. The mean time to ulcer healing was 22.5 +/- 6.4 days. There were 2 cases of re-ulceration. 1 patient sustained a transfer lesion. There were four toes that went onto require amputation, all in the setting of pre-existing osteomyelitis. 94% of patients strongly agreed that they were satisfied with the outcome of the procedure. Costs saved were estimated to be $1426. Flexor tenotomy is a minimally invasive procedure that can be performed in the outpatient setting, and therefore without delay to treatment, reducing risk of ulcer progression and need for subsequent amputation. This is the first study to report on flexor tenotomy under ultrasound-guidance. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous flexor tenotomy is safe and effective, with high patient satisfaction and low recurrence rates. This performance in the outpatient setting ensures significant time and cost savings for both the practitioner and patient


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 2 - 2
1 Jun 2023
Tay KS Langit M Muir R Moulder E Sharma H
Full Access

Introduction. Circular frames for ankle fusion are usually reserved for complex clinical scenarios. Current literature is heterogenous and difficult to interpret. We aimed to study the indications and outcomes of this procedure in detail. Materials & Methods. A retrospective cohort study was performed based on a prospective database of frame surgeries performed in a tertiary institution. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing complex ankle fusion with circular frames between 2005 and 2020, with a minimum 12-month follow up. Data were collected on patient demographics, surgical indications, comorbidities, surgical procedures, external fixator time (EFT), length of stay (LOS), radiological and clinical outcomes, and adverse events. Factors influencing radiological and clinical outcomes were analysed. Results. 47 patients were included, with a mean follow-up of three years. The mean age at time of surgery was 63.6 years. Patients had a median of two previous surgeries. The median LOS was 8.5 days, and median EFT was 237 days. Where simultaneous limb lengthening was performed, the average lengthening was 2.9cm, increasing the EFT by an average of 4 months. Primary and final union rates were 91.5% and 95.7% respectively. At last follow-up, ASAMI bone scores were excellent or good in 87.2%. ASAMI functional scores were good in 79.1%. Patient satisfaction was 83.7%. 97.7% of patients experienced adverse events, most commonly pin-site related, with major complications in 30.2% and re-operations in 60.5%. There were 3 amputations. Adverse events were associated with increased age, poor soft tissue condition, severe deformities, subtalar fusions, peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, and prolonged EFT. Conclusions. Complex ankle fusion using circular frames can achieve good outcomes in complicated clinical scenarios, however patients can expect a prolonged time in the frame and high rates of adverse events. Multiple risk factors were identified for poorer outcomes, which should be considered in patient counselling and prognostication


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Nov 2019
Makvana S Faroug R Venturini S Alcorn E Gulati A Gaur A Mangwani J
Full Access

Introduction. Hindfoot surgery is assumed to be more painful than midfoot/forefoot procedures with the former often requiring an inpatient stay for pain relief. Poorly controlled pain is associated with adverse patient outcomes and consequently, peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) have become popular for their effective pain control. Aim. To investigate whether hindfoot procedures are more painful than forefoot/midfoot procedures by measuring pain scores, assessing effectiveness of PNBs and patient satisfaction in foot and ankle surgery. Method. In total 140 patients were prospectively studied. Inclusion criteria: Adults undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery. Exclusion criteria: Paediatric patients 16 years and under, those with alternate sources of pain, peripheral neuropathy or incomplete pain scores. Pain was measured via the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 3 intervals; immediately, 6 hours and at 24 hours post-operatively. A Johnson patient satisfaction assessment was conducted at 2 weeks. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v.18.0. Results. Forefoot/midfoot surgery vs. hindfoot surgery pain scores showed that there was no significant difference at any post-operative interval. PNB vs. no PNB pain scores showed that there was no significant difference at the first two intervals, except at 24 hours post-operatively, p = 0.024. Patients' who had a PNB experienced rebound pain at 24 hours. Overall 94% of patients were satisfied with their experience and anaesthetic. Conclusion. Hindfoot surgery is not more painful than forefoot/midfoot surgery when PNBs are used. Additionally, patients who have a PNB experience rebound pain at 24 hours post-operatively, a finding that requires further research


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 70 - 70
1 Apr 2019
Chimento G Patterson M Thomas L Bland K Nossaman B Vitter J
Full Access

Introduction. Regional anesthesia is commonly utilized to minimize postoperative pain, improve function, and allow earlier rehabilitation following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The adductor canal block (ACB) provides effective analgesia of the anterior knee. However, patients will often experience posterior pain not covered by the ACB requiring supplemental opioid medications. A technique involving infiltration of local anesthetic between the popliteal artery and capsule of knee (IPACK) targets the terminal branches of the sciatic nerve, providing an alternative for controlling posterior knee pain following TKA. Materials and Methods. IRB approval was obtained, a power analysis was performed, and all patients gave informed consent. Eligible patients were those scheduled for an elective unilateral, primary TKA, who were ≥ 18 years old, English speaking, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA PS) classification I-III. Exclusion criteria included contraindication to regional anesthesia or peripheral nerve blocks, allergy to local anesthetics, allergy to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), chronic renal insufficiency with GFR < 60, chronic pain not related to the operative joint, chronic (> 3 month) opioid use, pre-existing peripheral neuropathy involving the operative limb, and body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. . Patients were randomized into one of two treatment arms: Continuous ACB with IPACK (IPACK Group) block or Continuous ACB with sham subcutaneous saline injection (No IPACK Group). IPACK Group received single injection of 20 mL 0.25% Ropivacaine. Postoperatively, all patients received a standardized multimodal analgesic regimen. The study followed a double-blinded format. Only the anesthesiologist performing the block was aware of randomization status. Following surgery, a blinded medical assessor recorded cumulative opioid consumption, average and worst pain scores, and gait distance. Results. 72 people were enrolled in the study and three withdrew. There were 35 people in the IPACK group and 34 in the NO IPACK group. There was no difference demographically between the groups. In the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU), the average (P=0.0122) and worst (P=0.0168) pain scores at rest were statistically lower in the IPACK group. There was no difference in the pain scores during physical therapy. (P=0.2080) There was no difference in opioid consumption in the PACU (P=0.7928), at 8 hours (P=0.2867), 16 hours (P=0.2387), 24 hours (P=0.7456), or 30 hours (P=0.8029). There was no difference in pain scores on POD 1 in the AM (P=0.4597) or PM (P=0.6273), nor was there any difference in walking distance (P=0.5197). There was also no difference in length of stay in the PACU (P=0.9426) or hospital (P=0.2141) between the two groups. Discussion/Conclusion. Overall, pain was well controlled between the two groups. The IPACK group had lower pain scores at rest in the PACU, but this may not be clinically significant. The routine use of the IPACK is not supported by the results of this study. There may be use of the IPACK block as a rescue block or in patients whom have contraindications to our standard multimodal treatment regimen, or in patients with chronic pain or opioid dependence


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 25 - 25
1 Dec 2015
Fernandes L Barbosa N Carvalho L Aleixo H Castro D Lino T Da Cunha AL Pereira N
Full Access

Osteomyelitis is usually related to trauma, surgery, immunocompromised patients, IV drug abuse, poor vascular supply, diabetes, sickle cell disease or peripheral neuropathy. We report an unusual case of femur osteomyelitis without any of these risk factors. A 31 years old male, light smoker, presented at the Emergency Room for pain in the left thigh for about a month, without any previous event. He had 2 previous visits to the hospital with similar diffuse complaints interpreted as irradiated low back pain. He was pale, feverish but no signs of local inflamation. His left knee ROM was 30°-15°-0°. He had no neurologic deficits. Blood tests showed high WBC count and PCR (400mg/L). After contrasted CT showing an 1,2×6×2,5cm abcess the patient was taken to the OR for irrigation and debridment. The day after the patient did a MRI that showed extended femur osteomyelitis and adjacent myositis (images). He underwent new surgery for a more extensive irrigation and debridment, femur medular canal included, from where a large pus quantity erupted. The hemocultures and bone biopsys, revealed a Multissensible Strep. Alfa-hemolitic (S. anginosus) and appropriate antibiotherapy was implemented (Amoxicillin/Clavulanate). He slowed improve till 11th day when he showed rise of PCR and a new MRI showed the same inflammatory process. He underwent new surgery but no pus was visible. He gradually improved, started hyperbaric oxygen therapy and was discharged on the 28th day after the first surgery, continuing antibiotherapy at home for a total of 8 weeks. Transthoracic Ecography was normal, as well Brucella, HIV, and other serologies. Three weeks later, the patient again presented to the ER with fever and rise of inflammatory markers in blood, consistent with recurrence of the infection. The patient was taken to the OR for surgical debdridment and irrigation, but this time the cultures showed a multissensible Gemella haemolysans, possible contamination during the hyperbaric oxygen therapy sessions. This is the case of a healthy young adult with an idiopathic femur osteomyelitis, initially misinterpreted for irradiated low back pain, that recurred after the first medical and surgical successful treatment, with an unusual agent


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXI | Pages 136 - 136
1 May 2012
D. W A. J M. R C. R J. I
Full Access

Background. Patients with diabetes who sustain an ankle fracture are at increased risk for complications including higher rates of in-hospital mortality, in-hospital post-operative complications, length of stay and non-routine discharges. Aim. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the complications associated with operatively treated ankle fractures in a group of patients with uncomplicated diabetes versus a group of patients with complicated diabetes. Complicated diabetes was defined as diabetes associated with end organ damage such as peripheral neuropathy, nephropathy and/or PAD. Uncomplicated diabetes was defined as diabetes without any of these associated conditions. Our hypothesis was that patients with uncomplicated diabetes would experience fewer complications than those patients with complicated diabetes. Methods. We compared the complication rates of ankle fracture repair in 46 patients with complicated diabetes and 59 patients with uncomplicated diabetes and calculated odds ratios (OR) for significant findings. At a mean follow up of 21.4 months we found that patients with complicated diabetes had 3.8 times increased risk of overall complications, 3.4 times increased risk of a non-infectious complication (malunion, nonunion or Charcot arthropathy) and 5 times higher likelihood of needing revision surgery/arthrodesis when compared to patients with uncomplicated diabetes. Open ankle fractures in this diabetic population were associated with a three times higher rate of complications and 3.7 times higher rate of infection. Conclusion. Patients with complicated diabetes have an increased risk of complications after ankle fracture surgery compared to patients with uncomplicated diabetes. Careful pre-operative evaluation of the neurovascular status is mandatory, since many patients with diabetes do not recognise that they have neuropathy and/or peripheral artery disease


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 131 - 131
1 Feb 2012
White T Guy P Kennedy S Droll K Blachut P O'Brien P
Full Access

Background. The optimal treatment for pilon fractures remains controversial. We have used early single-stage open reduction and internal fixation to treat these injuries and the purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of this strategy. Methods. A cohort of 95 patients with AO type C tibial pilon fractures underwent primary ORIF. Of these patients, 21 had open fractures. Sixty-eight fractures were sustained in falls, 21 in motor vehicle collision, 5 in crushes and one in an aircraft crash. The principal outcome measure was wound dehiscence or infection requiring surgery. Radiological and functional outcomes were assessed at a mean of five years using the SF36 and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score. Results. Primary ORIF was performed within 48 hours of admission in 98% cases. Reduction was anatomical in 90% cases. Six (6%) patients developed a wound infection or dehiscence that required surgical débridement, giving a wound complication rate of 4/21 (19%) for open fractures and 2/74 (2.7%) for closed fractures. Of the two closed fractures, one occurred in a patient with local scarring from previous trauma, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and chronic alcohol abuse, and the other in a patient with schizophrenia, diabetes and peripheral neuropathy. Radiographic follow-up revealed 74% patients had normal appearances or mild osteoarthritic degeneration only. Functional outcomes revealed a reduced level of general health and mild disability. Conclusions. Provided surgery is performed expeditiously by experienced orthopaedic trauma surgeons, AO type C pilon fractures can be stabilised safely and effectively by primary ORIF, with very low rates of wound complications, a high quality of reduction, and a good long term outcome. These results compare favourably with the published results for all other methods of treatment


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 2 | Pages 283 - 288
1 Feb 2017
Hughes A Heidari N Mitchell S Livingstone J Jackson M Atkins R Monsell F

Aims

Computer hexapod assisted orthopaedic surgery (CHAOS), is a method to achieve the intra-operative correction of long bone deformities using a hexapod external fixator before definitive internal fixation with minimally invasive stabilisation techniques.

The aims of this study were to determine the reliability of this method in a consecutive case series of patients undergoing femoral deformity correction, with a minimum six-month follow-up, to assess the complications and to define the ideal group of patients for whom this treatment is appropriate.

Patients and Methods

The medical records and radiographs of all patients who underwent CHAOS for femoral deformity at our institution between 2005 and 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Records were available for all 55 consecutive procedures undertaken in 49 patients with a mean age of 35.6 years (10.9 to 75.3) at the time of surgery.