Standard preoperative protocols in total joint arthroplasty utilize the International Normalized Ratio (INR) to determine patient coagulation profiles. However, the relevance of preoperative INR values in joint arthroplasty remains controversial. Acceptable INR cutoff values for joint replacement are inconsistent, and are often based on studies of primary arthroplasty, or even non-orthopedic procedures. This analysis examined the relationship between preoperative INR values and post-operative outcomes in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Optimal cutoff INR values correlated with specific outcomes were subsequently determined. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) was retrospectively queried for revision total hip arthroplasty procedures performed between 2006 and 2017. Patients with a preoperative INR collected no later than 1 day prior to surgery were further stratified for analysis. INR values which correlated with specific outcomes were determined using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves for each outcome of interest. The optimal cutoff INR value for each outcome was then obtained using univariate and multivariate models which determined INR values that maximized both sensitivity and specificity.Background
Methods
Although most joint surgeons have reached a consensus that preoperative risk assessment and appropriate medical intervention for elderly patients of primary total hip arthrplasty (PTHA) could significantly reduce postoperative complications and mortality, there is still lack of a detailed and comprehensive approach for risk stratifying and a systematic method for risk allaying. We aimed to explore the risk factors related to the aggravation of preoperative complications and the appearance of complications post-operation of primary total hip arthrplasty (PTHA) in elderly patients for hip fracture. We retrospectively reviewed the demographic and clinical data of 156 patients who underwent PTHA for hip fracture from January 2014 to December 2016, of which there were 61 male (39.1%) and 95 female (60.9%) patients; 111 patients aged 60–79 years (71.2%) and 45 patients ≥ 80 years old (28.8%); 125 patients of femoral neck fracture (80.1%) and 31 patients of inter-trochanteric fracture (19.9%); 109 patients of spinal anesthesia (69.9%) and 48 patients of general anesthesia (30.1%); 85 patients undergoing surgery within 3 days (54.5%) and 71 patients operated ≥ 4 days (45.5%) since admission. We evaluated the correlations among gender, age, type of fracture, methods of anesthesia, time of operation since admission, the aggravation of preoperative complications and the appearance of postoperative complications post PTHA using the IBM SPSS Statistics (version 21) and the Exce1 2016.Objectives
Patients and methods
Limited strong data exists in current literature comparing the 90-day morbidity and mortality following general or spinal anesthetic in patients who underwent total hip or knee arthroplasty, especially between matched cohorts. Because of this, there continues to be an ongoing debate regarding the risks and benefits of using general versus spinal anesthetic for patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for end-stage osteoarthritis. The Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute (ABJHI) database was searched to identify all patients who underwent either primary THA or TKA between April 2005 and December 2015. Those identified were matched 1:1 based on age, sex, type of joint replacement (THA or TKA), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and anesthetic type. Patients were stratified into two groups based on whether they received a general anesthesia (GA) or a spinal anesthesia (SA) at the time of their index surgery. Perioperative complications (medical events, mechanical events, deep infection, need for blood transfusion), length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, and 90-day mortality were compared between cohorts. Included in this study are 5,580 patients who underwent THA and 7,712 patient who underwent TKA. All were successfully matched based on similar categorical criteria (THA, 2,790 matched-pairs, TKA, 3,856 matched-pairs). Following stratifications of cohorts, no statistical differences were appreciated between patient baseline demographics. Patients who underwent GA showed a trend towards higher 90-day mortality, however no statistical differences were found between anesthetic type on rates of 90-day mortality following either THA or TKA (THA, p = 0.290, TKA, p = 0.291). Considering this, patients who underwent THA with SA experienced fewer 90-day complications (medical events, p = 0.022, mechanical events, p = 0.017), needed fewer blood transfusions (p < 0 .001), and required shorter LOS (p = 0.038). Moreover, patient who underwent TKA with SA had fewer blood transfusion (p < 0 .001), 30-day readmission rates (p = 0.011), and fewer deep infections (p = 0.030) that required additional surgery compared to those in the GA cohort. Regardless of surgery performed, patients in the SA cohorts were more commonly discharged home without requiring additional support (i.e. home care). General anesthesia during THA and TKA appears to be associated with increased 90-day morbidity and more frequent need for allogenic blood transfusion. No statistical difference in 90-day mortality is reported between cohorts for either THA or TKA, yet a trend is appreciated favoring SA. Surgeons who commonly perform these surgeries should consider the added benefits of spinal anesthesia for those patients who are candidates.
