Introduction. The outcome of periacetabular osteotomy in dysplastic hips is dependent on the absence of pre-operative osteoarthritis [OA]. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether Tonnis grading is a reliable predictor of OA in patients with hip dysplasia. Methods. Thirty patients were identified who had undergone hip arthroscopy surgery to assess their suitability for periacetabular osteotomy. Radiographs were assessed for anterior centre edge angle, lateral centre edge angle, Tonnis angle and Tonnis grade for OA changes. The radiographic grading of OA was compared with arthroscopic findings. Results. The average age at the time of arthroscopy was 35 [16–53 yrs] (28 females). Tonnis grade did not correlate with arthroscopic findings (p=0.082). There was a trend for patients with a higher Tonnis grade to have more OA changes. Of the 30 patients, all 3 with grade 0 were fit for periacetabular osteotomy, while only 8 out of 24 with grade I, and 1 out of 3 with grade II were fit for periacetabular osteotomy. Discussion. This study reports that even when radiographic grading showed minimal OA changes, arthroscopy findings indicated significant OA changes. Hence radiographic grading is a poor indicator of OA and other diagnostic modality should be sought before proceeding with joint preserving surgery in this highly selected subgroup of dysplastic hips

Introduction. Since its first description in 1988, periacetabular osteotomy has become the gold-standard worldwide in surgical treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Several long-term studies have proven the efficacy of this procedure. In this study, we evaluated the mean 30-years results of this procedure of the first 63 patients (75 hips) operated at the institution where this procedure had been developed. Objectives. We determined the (1) cumulative 30-year survivorship of symptomatic patients treated with this procedure, determined the (2) clinical and (3) radiographic outcomes of the surviving hips, and (4) identified factors predicting the need for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods. We retrospectively evaluated the first 63 patients (75 hips) who underwent periacetabular osteotomy between 1984–1989. The mean age of the patients at surgery was 29 years (range, 13–56 years), and preoperatively 24% presented with advanced grades of osteoarthritis (Tönnis ³ Grade 1). 31% had previous operations to attempt sufficient coverage. All patients were invited for a regular clinical and radiographical follow-up 30 years after surgery. (1) We calculated the cumulative survivorship of the hip according to Kaplan-Meier with conversion to THA as the only endpoint. In addition, we assessed the (1) Merle d'Aubigné and the Harris Hip Score and assessed (3) radiographic progression of osteoarthritis according to Tönnis in the surviving hips. (4) A Cox-regression model was used to calculate predictors for failure and a prognostic model. Results. (1) The cumulative survivorship of the hip at 30-years was 32% (95% confidence interval 17–42%). 40 hips (53%) had subsequently undergone THA (2) The mean Merle d'Aubigné score of the surviving hips was 16 (SD 2, range, 12–18), which was significantly higher compared to the 10 years, and 20-years results and even to the preoperative value. (3) The minority of the preserved hips presented with radiographic progression of osteoarthritis. (4) The following predictors for failure were identified: age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05), decreased preoperative internal rotation (HR 1.03), decreased preoperative external rotation (HR 1.03), preoperative limb (HR 1.57), positive preoperative impingement sign (HR 4.7), preoperative radiographic osteoarthritis (HR 2.8). Conclusion. Thirty years postoperatively, almost one third of hips undergoing PAO for DDH can be preserved. Periacetabular osteotomy is an effective technique for treating symptomatic developmental dysplasia

Abstract. Introduction. Recurrent groin pain following periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a challenging problem. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the position and dynamics of the psoas tendon as a potential cause for recurrent groin pain following PAO. Methods. Patients with recurrent groin pain following PAO were identified from a single surgeon series. A total of 13 patients with 18 hips (4.7%) out of a 386 PAO, had recurrent groin pain. Muscle path of the psoas tendon was accurately represented using 3D models from CT data were created with Mimics software. A validated discrete element model using rigid body springs was used to predict psoas tendon movement during hip circumduction and walking. Results. Five out of the 18 hips did not show any malformations at the osteotomy site. Thirteen hips (72%) showed malformation secondary to callus at the superior pubic ramus. These were classified into: osteophytes at the osteotomy site, hypertrophic callus or non-union and malunion at the osteotomy. Mean minimal distance of the psoas tendon to osteophytes was found to be 6.24 mm (n=6) and to the osteotomy site was 14.18 mm (n=18). Conclusions. Recurrent groin pain after PAO needs a thorough assessment. One need to have a high suspicion of psoas issues as a cause. 3D CT scan may be necessary to identify causes related to healing of the pubic osteotomy. Dynamic ultrasound of the psoas psoas tendon may help in evaluating for psoas impingement as a cause of recurrent groin pain in these cases

Higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation have been associated with worse health outcomes. The influence of socioeconomic deprivation on patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) has not previously been investigated. A total of 217 patients (171 female, 46 male; median age 23.4 years) who underwent PAO by a single surgeon were identified. Patients were categorised into three groups according to their New Zealand Deprivation (NZDep) Index: minimal deprivation (NZDep Index 1–3, n=89), moderate deprivation (NZDep Index 4–6, n=94), and maximal deprivation (NZDep Index 7–10, n=34). The three groups were compared with respect to baseline variables, surgical details, complications, and pre-operative and two-year post-operative functional scores (including International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), EQ-5D quality of life score, and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score). Multivariate regression was undertaken to assess for the effect of NZDep Index on patient outcomes. Patients in the maximal deprivation group were more likely to be Māori (p<0.001) and have surgery in a public rather than a private hospital (p=0.004), while the minimal deprivation group demonstrated a lower BMI (p=0.005). There were otherwise no other significant differences in baseline variables, surgical details, complications, nor pre-operative or two-year post-operative functional scores between the three groups (all p>0.05). Multivariate analysis identified a higher NZDep Index to be independently predictive of a lower pre-operative UCLA activity score (p=0.014) and a higher two-year iHOT-12 score (p<0.001). Our results demonstrate an inequality in access to PAO, with patients exposed to higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation under-represented in our study population. When provided access to PAO, these vulnerable patients achieve significant functional improvement at least as great as patients with less socioeconomic deprivation. Initiatives to improve access to hip preservation care in socioeconomically deprived populations appear warranted

The influence of patient age on functional outcomes after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for acetabular dysplasia remains unclear, with previous studies utilising scores developed for older, arthritic patients. The purpose of this study is to assess the influence of patient age on International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) scores, two years after PAO. Eighty-six patients (72 female, 14 male; mean age 26.9 years) who underwent PAO by a single surgeon and had completed a minimum of two years follow up were identified. Patients were categorised into three groups according to age at the time of surgery: adolescent (11–20 years; n=29), young adult (21–30 years; n=29), and mature (≥31 years; n=28). The three groups were compared with respect to baseline variables and functional outcomes (iHOT-12, EQ-5D quality of life score, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, pain visual analogue score (VAS)). Multivariate regression was undertaken to assess for independent predictors of two-year iHOT-12 score. The adolescent group demonstrated a lower BMI (p=0.004) while the mature group had a greater American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) score (p=0.049). There were otherwise no significant differences in baseline variables between the three groups (all p>0.05). The three groups demonstrated significant post-operative improvements across all functional outcome measures. There were no significant differences in two-year iHOT-12, EQ-5D, UCLA score or pain VAS between the three groups (all p>0.05). Regression modelling found that patient age at the time of surgery did not have an independent effect on two-year iHOT-12 score (p=0.878). We found that patient age at the time of surgery did not influence functional outcomes two years after PAO. Our results suggest that patient age should not be considered in isolation as an indication or contraindication for PAO

Introduction. Acetabular retroversion is an accepted cause of Pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement. There is increasing evidence that acetabular retroversion is rather a rotational abnormality of the pelvis than an overgrowth of the acetabular wall or even a dysplasia of the posterior wall. Initially, patients with a retroverted acetabulum were treated with an open rim trimming through a surgical hip dislocation (SHD) based on the early understanding of the pathomorphology. Theoretically, the reduction of the anterior wall can decrease the already small joint contact area in retroverted hips to a critical size. Based on the most recent literature, anteverting periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) seems to be the more appropriate surgical treatment. With this technique, the anterior impingement conflict can be treated efficiently without compromising the joint contact area. However, it is unknown whether this theoretical advantage in turn results in better mid term results of treatment. Objectives. We asked if anteverting PAO results in better clinical and radiographical mid term results compared to rim trimming through a surgical hip dislocation. Methods. We performed a retrospective comparative study based on 257 hips (221 patients) with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion. Acetabular retroversion was defined by a cross-over sign, a posterior wall sign, and a positive ischial spine sign. We then formed two matched groups consisting of 73 hips undergoing open acetabular rim trimming and 54 hips with an anteverting periacetabular osteotomy. Patients with incomplete radiographic documentation, previous surgery, and hip dysplasia (LCE < 20°) were excluded. Some patients were excluded due to a matching process (Fig. 1). Patients were generally followed clinically and radiographically after two, five and ten years. A Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed using the following endpoints: a low clinical score, radiographic progression of osteoarthritis, and/or the conversion to total hip arthroplasty. The Log Rank Score was used to compare the two survivorship curves. Results. Patients undergoing anteverting PAO for acetabular retroversion had a significantly increased survivorship (82%, 95% confidence interval, 72–91%) at seven years in comparison to open surgical rim trimming (63%, 95%CI, 49–76%, p<0.0001). The two survivorship curves are comparable for the first four years with a substantial drop for the rim trimming group after year five (Fig. 2). Conclusion. This study proofs for the first time that the theoretical advantages of anteverting periacetabular osteotomy in hips with symptomatic acetabular retroversion results in an increased survivorship at mid term follow-up in comparison to open rim trimming. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Introduction. Several reports demonstrated the overcoverage of the anterior acetabulum. Anterior CE angle over 46°may be a probable risk factor for pincer FAI syndrome after a rotational acetabular osteotomy. In addition, a highly anteverted femoral neck, reported as a risk factor for posterior impingement, has been found in DDH patients. These findings indicate proper acetabular reorientation is essential to avoid anterior or posterior impingement after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between acetabular three-dimensional (3D) alignment reorientation and clinical range of motion (ROM) after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). Methods. A total of 53 patients who underwent curved PAO (CPO) for DDH from January 2014 to April 2017 were selected. Three (5.7%) of them were lost to follow-up. Therefore, the data from 58 hips, contributed by 50 patients (44 women and 6 men), were included in the analysis. Pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans from the pelvis to the knee joint were performed and transferred to a 3D template software (Zed Hip; Lexi, Tokyo, Japan). The pelvic plane axis was defined according to the functional pelvic plane. The pre- and postoperative lateral and anterior 3D center-edge (CE) angles were measured on the coronal and sagittal views through the center of the femoral head. The pre- and postoperative 3D center-edge (CE) angles and femoral anteversion were measured and compared with clinical outcomes, including postoperative ROM. Results. The radiographical outcomes of our study are demonstrated in Figure 1. The mean values of pre- and postoperative lateral CE angles were 12.6º±8.7 and 30.2º±9.7, respectively (p<0.001), and mean pre- and postoperative anterior CE angles were 42.4º±15.3 and 63.9º±12.1, respectively (p<0.001). Both CE angles were significantly improved. The correlation between pre- and postoperative acetabular coverage and postoperative ROM was evaluated. Postoperative abduction and internal rotation ROM were significantly associated with postoperative lateral CE angles (abduction; p < 0.001, internal rotation; p = 0.028); flexion and internal rotation ROM was significantly associated with postoperative anterior CE angles (flexion; p < 0.001, internal rotation; p = 0.028). Femoral anteversion was negatively correlated with postoperative abduction (p = 0.017) and external rotation (p = 0.047) ROM (Table 1). Postoperative abduction ROM was strongly positively correlated with femoral anteversion, whereas postoperative external rotation was strongly negatively correlated (Table 2). The total anteversion was strongly correlated with pre- or postoperative ROMs during flexion and internal rotation ROM (Table 2). Conclusion. Postoperativeanterior acetabular coverage may affect internal rotation ROM more than the lateral coverage. Therefore, the direction of acetabular reorientation should be carefully determined according to 3D alignment during PAO. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Developmental dysplasia of the hip is a condition in which the acetabulum provides insufficient coverage of the femoral head in the hip joint. This configuration gives poor biomechanical load distribution, with increased stress at the superior aspect of the joint surfaces, and can often lead to degenerative arthritis. Morphologically, the poor coverage may be due to an acetabulum that is too shallow or oriented in valgus. The dysplastic deformity can be treated surgically with a group of similar procedures, often labeled periacetabular osteotomies or rotational acetabular osteotomies. Each involves separating the acetabulum from the pelvis and fixating the fragment back to the pelvis in an orientation with increased coverage of the femoral head. This redistributes the biomechanical loads relative to acetabulum. Bone remodeling at the level of trabeculae is an accepted concept under research; however, it is unclear whether the hip undergoes gross morphology changes in response to changes in biomechanical loading. An understanding of the degree to which this remodeling occurs (if at all) may have an impact on surgical planning. In this retrospective study, computed tomography (CT) scans of 13 patients (2 male, 11 female, 40 ± 9 years of age) undergoing unilateral periacetabular osteotomies were examined; scans were taken both pre-operatively and at least a year post-operatively with an in-plane resolution of 0.55 mm and a slice thickness of 1.25 mm. Scans were segmented to produce triangulated meshes for the proximal femurs and the pelvis. These scans were manually processed to isolate the articular portions of the femoral heads and acetabulums, respectively; the fovea, acetabular fossa, any osteophytes and any segmentation artifacts were excluded. Post-operative meshes were registered to their pre-operative counterparts for both the femoral head and the acetabulum, for both the operative and non-operative hips, using the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm to 20 iterations. To account for differences in defining the edges of the articular surfaces in the manual isolation, metrics were only calculated using points that were within 0.3 mm of a normal from the opposing mesh. With the resulting matched data, nearest neighbour distances were calculated to form the remodeling metrics. Select spurious datapoints were removed manually. For the operative femoral heads, the registered post-operative points were 0.24±0.53 mm outside of the pre-operative points. The maximum deviation was on average 1.94 mm with worst-case of 2.99 mm; the minimum deviation was −0.62 mm with worst-case of −2.06 mm. Positive numbers indicate the post-operative points are ‘outside’ of the pre-operative points – that is, farther from the head centre. The non-operative femoral heads have similar deviation values, 0.21±0.46 mm outside, with maximum and minimum deviation averaging to 1.24 mm and −0.74 mm respectively, with worst cases of 2.99mm and −1.80mm. For the operative acetabulums, the post-operative deviations were −0.08±0.43mm. The maximum and minimum deviations averaged to 0.62mm and −0.82mm, with worst cases of 2.14mm and −1.51mm across the set. Again, the non-operative acetabulums were very similar; post-operative deviations were −0.02±0.43mm, maximum and minimum deviations averaged to 1.24mm and −0.65mm, with worst cases of 1.97mm and −2.00mm. These quantitative measurements were reflected in manual examination of the meshes; generally speaking, there were small deviations with no overarching patterns across the anatomy. All metrics were very similar across the same anatomy (that is, femoral head or acetabulum) regardless of whether the hip operative or non-operative. Femurs tended to ‘grow’ slightly post-operatively, but by less than a half voxel in size. Given that the CT voxels are large compared to the measured deviations, it is possible the results may be sensitive to the manual segmentations used as source data. Manual examination of the deviations indicated a few potential trends. Seven operative and eleven non-operative acetabulums had a small patch of positive deviation (1mm to 1.5mm) in the anterosuperior aspect. This can be seen in the plot as the yellow-red area near the top right of the leftmost rendering. Other high-deviation areas included the superior aspect of the acetabulum (both positive and negative) and the superior aspect of the femoral head (generally positive). The edges of the mesh were often a source of high deviation. This is likely an artifact of over-inclusion the manual isolation of the articular surfaces, as joint surfaces become non-articular as they move away from the joint interface. Overall, the superior and anterosuperior aspects of the acetabulum and the superior aspect of the femoral head showed some indication of systemic changes; further study may clarify whether these data represent consistent anatomical changes. However, as the magnitude of the deviations between pre- and post-operative scans are on or below the order of the CT voxel size, we conclude that (in the absence of other strongly compelling evidence) periacetabular osteotomies for adults should be planned without the expectation of gross remodeling of the articular surfaces

The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a well-established procedure in the management of symptomatic hip dysplasia. The associated Smith-Petersen exposure offers excellent visualization of the acetabulum and control of acetabular osteotomy and mobilization. The traditional exposure of the true pelvis involves osteotomy of the iliac wing in order to mobilize the sartorial and inguinal ligament insertion. However, full osteotomy of the iliac spine may necessitate screw fixation if a relatively large segment of bone is included. A known complication with screw fixation of the iliac wing osteotomy involves failure of fixation and screw back out. Moreover, the screw may be irritative to the patient even in the setting of adequate fixation. A larger osteotomy may also injure the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve as it travels near the anterior superior spine. To minimize the risk of these potential complications, a wafer osteotomy may be used to develop a sleeve of tissue involving the sartorial insertion. Markings may be made so that the curvilinear incision is centered about the anterior-superior iliac spine (ASIS). The sartorial sleeve also mobilizes the entirety of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve medially as it runs and branches to varying degrees in a fatty tissue layer in the tensor-sartorius interval directly beneath the subcutaneous layer, thereby affording protection throughout the procedure. When the ASIS is first osteotomized as a several millimeter-thick mobile fragment and reflected, the sartorius attachment to the mobile fragment of the wafer osteotomy may be preserved. Furthermore, the wafer osteotomy may be re-fixed to the stable pelvis during closure with simple heavy suture fixation alone, avoiding screw insertion or associated removal. Because only a wafer or bone is taken during the spine osteotomy, more bone is available at the ASIS for fixation of the mobile fragment after repositioning. In this technical note, we describe the wafer osteotomy technique in further detail. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Purpose. Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a versatile acetabular reorienting procedure that is most commonly used to provide greater femoral head coverage in adolescent hip dysplasia. However, PAO can also be used to reorient the acetabulum in the opposite direction to treat femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) due to acetabular over-coverage. We describe the indications, surgical technique, and early results of reverse PAO to reduce femoral head coverage in symptomatic hips with FAI due to acetabular over-coverage. Methods. IRB approval was obtained to retrospectively review cases of symptomatic acetabular over-coverage treated with reverse PAO and that had a minimum of two years follow-up. All hips had atypical intraoperative positioning of the acetabular fragment to uncover the lateral and anterior aspects of the femoral head, with or without anteverting the acetabulum. Prospectively collected pre- and post-operative demographics, WOMAC scores, Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS), and radiographic measurements consisting of the lateral center edge angle (LCEA), Tönnis angle (TA), and anterior center edge angle (ACEA) were compared using student's t-test. Results. Between 2004 and 2015, 31 hips (18 left, 13 right) in 26 patients (18 female, 8 male) met the inclusion criteria. Average age at the time of surgery was 19.4 years. Average length of follow-up was 30.4 months. After reverse PAO, femoral head coverage significantly decreased (LCEA 41.7° to 35.3°, p<.001; TA −7.4° to −3.7°, p<.01; ACEA 44.0° to 35.3°, p<.0001). Patients experienced improved post-operative pain, with decreases in WOMAC pain score (from 8.8 to 4.2, p<.001) and WOMAC stiffness score (from 3.5 to 1.9, p<.001). Patients also experienced improvements in function and quality of life with improvements in WOMAC function score (from 24.8 to 10.0, p<.001) and MHHS (from 60.8 to 83.2, p<.0001). Conclusion. Reverse PAO is a technically challenging procedure that provides clinical and radiographic improvement in patients with symptomatic FAI due to acetabular over-coverage. Significance. Reverse PAO is an especially useful and appropriate alternative to arthroscopic acetabular rim-trim in complex FAI pathomorphologies

INTRODUCTION. The efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) to reduce blood loss in various surgical procedures has been proven. However, there is little data about the effect of TXA on blood loss, rate of blood transfusion and thromboembolic events during periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). The reduction of blood loss during PAO promotes postoperative mobilization and reduces the risk of complications, associated with blood transfusions. The aim of the following study was to determine, if TXA can reduce both blood loss and the rate of blood transfusions. In addition we analyzed whether TXA was associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. METHODS. A consecutive series of 96 PAO procedures was reviewed to compare the groups immediately prior to and following the routine implementation of TXA. The TXA group received a continuous infusion of TXA with a rate of 10mg/kg/h. The outcome was blood transfusion rate, total blood loss, length of hospital stay, and thromboembolic events. RESULTS. The rate of autogenic and allogeneic blood transfusion decreased from 62.5% to 12.5% (p<0.001) between the non-TXA and TXA group. The average blood loss (1.9 l ± 0.9 vs. 1.5 l ± 0.7, p <0.01) was significantly reduced in the patients receiving TXA. No cases of postoperative thromboembolic events were identified in either group. The hospital stay was reduced from 10 days to 9 days in the TXA group. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. The utilization of TXA reduced the transfusion rate and blood loss after PAO, without additional adverse effects such as an increased rate of thromboembolic events

Background. Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an effective treatment method for early or mild osteoarthritis caused by developmental dysplasia of the hip. Since the procedure is performed from late eighties of the past century it is still a very demanding procedure performed only by high skilled surgeons in high volume orthopaedic centres. The idea was to develop a custom-made surgical tool to improve the accuracy of the two osteotomies of the iliac bone and help us to avoid inadvertent intraarticular osteotomy of the acetabulum. Methods. Firstly CT scans of pelvises of two cadavers were performed. The DICOM format files were up-loaded into EBS software (Ekliptik d.o.o., Ljubljana, Slovenia), application for preoperative planning, constructing and designing different templates, where the three-dimensional (3D) model of each pelvis was created. On the virtual pelvis models the PAO lines on each of four acetabuls were placed and virtual PAOs were performed [Fig. 1]. For the execution of the two iliac bone osteotomies the osteotome or saw guiding jigs were virtually created and exported in STL format in ProJet 3500 HDPlus printer which created custom made jigs made from VisiJet Crystal biocompatible plastic material (3D systems, Rock Hill, South Carolina, USA) for each of the four acetabula. The next step was the surgery on aforementioned cadavers. Extended Smith-Petrson approach was performed on each of four cadaveric hips and Bernese PAOs were performed using custom-made jigs. After performing the acetabular correction the cadavers were carefully dissected to study any possible posterior column damage or damage of the acetabular wall. None of them were damaged and the osteotomies were performed according to the virtual plan. Next step was the real procedure on 47-years old female patient with bilateral acetabular dysplasia. The procedure was executed on right side using the extended Smith-Peterson approach. Preoperatively native X-ray of both hips and the CT scan of pelvis were performed. According the CT scan (DICOM format) the virtual 3D model of the pelvis was created and virtual osteotomy lines were decided and production of the appropriate jig was manufactured in the same manner as for the cadavers [Fig. 2]. Preoperative and postoperative centre-edge (CE) angles were measured. Results. Preoperatively the patient had a Tönnis grade I osteoarthritis of the right hip. The preoperative CE angle was 19.1° and the postoperative CE angle is 36.7° [Fig. 3] which indicates good improvement in coverage of the femoral head. Patient had an uneventful postoperative course, with no neuro-vascular damage. The intraoperative blood loss was 250 ml and the patient was discharged from hospital on seventh postoperative day, walking with crutches loading 15 kg. Conclusion. Custom-made jig for iliac bone osteotomy in PAO procedures is a helpful tool, which improves accuracy of the osteotomy lines, safety of the patient and considerably reduces surgical time. We are planning to create also jigs for screw placement and the device to verify intraoperatively the level of PAO correction

Introduction. The goal of this work is to develop a system for three-dimensional tracking of the acetabular fragment during periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) using x-ray images. For PAO, the proposed x-ray image-based navigation provides geometrical and biomechanical assessment of the acetabular fragment, which is unavailable in the conventional procedure, without disrupting surgical workflow or requiring tracking devices. Methods. The proposed system combines preoperative planning with intraoperative tracking and near real-time automated assessment of the fragment geometry (radiographic angles) and biomechanics (contact pressure distribution over the acetabular surface). During PAO, eight fiducial beads are attached to the patient after incision and prior to performing osteotomy. Four of the beads attach to the iliac wing above the expected superior osteotomy (these are termed confidence points), and four attach on the expected fragment (denoted fragment points). At least two x-ray images are obtained before and after osteotomy. In each set of images, image processing routines segment the fiducials and triangulate the 2D fiducial projections in 3D space. A paired-point registration between the confidence points triangulated from the two x-ray image sets aligns the imaging frames. We measured the transformation between the fragment points with respect to the confidence points to quantify the motion of the acetabular fragment. Applying an image-based 2D-3D registration to the measured acetabular transformation localises the reoriented acetabular fragment with respect to an anatomical coordinate system. We present the surgeon with visualisation and automatic estimations of radiographic angles and biomechanics of the reoriented acetabular fragment. We conducted an experiment to evaluate feasibility and accuracy of the proposed system using a high density pelvic sawbone. Stainless steel beads were glued to the sawbone as fiducials. X-ray images were selected from cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans with an encoded motorised C-arm. Fiducial segmentation from reconstructed volumes of the CBCT scans provided a ground truth for the experiment. Results. We used four images spaced at 45° to perform the 2D/3D registration. The measured fragment transformation errors in translation and rotation about a fixed axis when compared to the CBCT-computed transformation were 0.37°, 0.34mm for the x-ray image based approach (with 3 images spaced at 20°) and 1.49°, 4.39mm for the optical tracker. Conclusion. We developed and evaluated x-ray image-based navigation to track the acetabular fragment in 3D Cartesian space during PAO. Capturing the fragment transformation allows automated algorithms to assess the biomechanics and geometry of the realigned acetabulum that are unavailable in 2D. The error between the measured positions of the beads and the triangulated positions is attributed to three main sources: 1) fiducial segmentation error; 2) geometric calibration error; and 3) localisation of fiducials in volumetric reconstructions of the CBCT scans. These small reported errors suggest the procedure is a viable approach for conducting x-ray image-based navigation of PAO

It has been reported that 60-85% of patients who undergo PAO have concomitant intraarticular pathology that cannot be addressed with PAO alone. Currently, there are limited diagnostic tools to determine which patients would benefit from hip arthroscopy at the time of PAO to address intra-articular pathology. This study aims to see if preoperative PROMs scores measured by IHOT-33 scores have predictive value in whether intra-articular pathology is addressed during PAO + scope. The secondary aim is to see how often surgeons at high-volume hip preservation centers address intra-articular pathology if a scope is performed during the same anesthesia event.

A randomized, prospective Multicenter trial was performed on patients who underwent PAO and hip arthroscopy to treat hip dysplasia from 2019 to 2020. Preoperative PROMs and intraoperative findings and procedures were recorded and analyzed. A total of 75 patients, 84% Female, and 16% male, with an average age of 27 years old, were included in the study. Patients were randomized to have PAO alone 34 patients vs. PAO + arthroscopy 41 patients during the same anesthesia event. The procedures performed, including types of labral procedures and chondroplasty procedures, were recorded. Additionally, a two-sided student T-test was used to evaluate the difference in means of preoperative IHOT score among patients for whom a labral procedure was performed versus no labral procedure.

A total of 82% of patients had an intra-articular procedure performed at the time of hip arthroscopy. 68% of patients who had PAO + arthroscopy had a labral procedure performed. The most common labral procedure was a labral refixation which was performed in 78% of patients who had a labral procedure performed. Femoral head-neck junction chondroplasty was performed in 51% of patients who had an intra-articular procedure performed. The mean IHOT score was 29.3 in patients who had a labral procedure performed and 33.63 in those who did not have a labral procedure performed P- value=0.24.

Our findings demonstrate preoperative IHOT-33 scores were not predictive in determining whether intra-articular labral pathology was addressed at the time of surgery. Additionally, we found that if labral pathology was addressed, labral refixation was the most common repair performed. This study also provides valuable information on what procedures high-volume hip preservation centers are performing when performing PAO + arthroscopy.

Objective:. Periacetabular spherical osteotomy for the treatment of dysplastic hip is effective but technically demanding. To help surgeons perform this difficult procedure reliably and safely, a computer assisted navigation technique has been developed and evaluated. Methods:. Computed tomographic scans of 5 cadaveric pelvises were obtained and three-dimensional models were generated. The osteotomy was planned preoperatively. The pelvises were registered using an optimized algorithm. Periacetabular spherical osteotomy was performed at one side of each pelvis with navigation and at another side without navigation. The deviation of the real osteotomized surface from the planned surface was measured. Results:. The computer assisted navigation system supported preoperative planning and provided real time display of the surgical procedure. The deviation of the real osteotomized surface from the planned surface was 1.59 ± 0.18 mm in the group with navigation, while 4.81 ± 1.67 mm in the group without navigation. The difference of the deviations has statistical significance (p < 0.003). Conclusion:. A computer assisted navigation technique is able to help increase accuracy and safety of periacetabular spherical osteotomy, and thus facilitate performing this difficult procedure

Purpose

To validate a small, easy to use and cost-effective augmented marker-based hybrid navigation system for peri-acetabular osteotomy [PAO] surgery.

Introduction

We perform PAO via a modified Smith-Petersen approach. The purpose of this study was to investigate the result of PAO via a modified Smith-Petersen approach at a minimum 10-years' follow-up.

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) – enlarged, aspherical femoral head deformity (cam-type) or retroversion/overcoverage of the acetabulum (pincer-type) – is a leading cause for early hip osteoarthritis. Although anteverting/reverse periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) to address FAI aims to preserve the native hip and restore joint function, it is still unclear how it affects joint mobility and stability. This in vitro cadaveric study examined the effects of surgical anteverting PAO on range of motion and capsular mechanics in hips with acetabular retroversion. Twelve cadaveric hips (n = 12, m:f = 9:3; age = 41 ± 9 years; BMI = 23 ± 4 kg/m2) were included in this study. Each hip was CT imaged and indicated acetabular retroversion (i.e., crossover sign, posterior wall sign, ischial wall sign, retroversion index > 20%, axial plane acetabular version < 15°); and showed no other abnormalities on CT data. Each hip was denuded to the bone-and-capsule and mounted onto a 6-DOF robot tester (TX90, Stäubli), equipped with a universal force-torque sensor (Omega85, ATI). The robot positioned each hip in five sagittal angles: Extension, Neutral 0°, Flexion 30°, Flexion 60°, Flexion 90°; and performed hip internal-external rotations and abduction-adduction motions to 5 Nm in each position. After the intact stage was tested, each hip underwent an anteverting PAO, anteverting the acetabulum and securing the fragment with long bone screws. The capsular ligaments were preserved during the surgery and each hip was retested postoperatively in the robot. Postoperative CT imaging confirmed that the acetabular fragment was properly positioned with adequate version and head coverage. Paired sample t-tests compared the differences in range of motion before and after PAO (CI = 95%; SPSS v.24, IBM). Preoperatively, the intact hips with acetabular retroversion demonstrated constrained internal-external rotations and abduction-adduction motions. The PAO reoriented the acetabular fragment and medialized the hip joint centre, which tightened the iliofemoral ligament and slackenend the pubofemoral ligament. Postoperatively, internal rotation increased in the deep hip flexion positions of Flexion 60° (∆IR = +7°, p = 0.001) and Flexion 90° (∆IR = +8°, p = 0.001); while also demonstrating marginal decreases in external rotation in all positions. In addition, adduction increased in the deep flexion positions of Flexion 60° (∆ADD = +11°, p = 0.002) and Flexion 90° (∆ADD = +12°, p = 0.001); but also showed marginal increases in abduction in all positions. The anteverting PAO restored anterosuperior acetabular clearance and increased internal rotation (28–33%) and adduction motions (29–31%) in deep hip flexion. Restricted movements and positive impingement tests typically experienced in these positions with acetabular retroversion are associated with clinical symptoms of FAI (i.e., FADIR). However, PAO altered capsular tensions by further tightening the anterolateral hip capsule which resulted in a limited external rotation and a stiffer and tighter hip. Capsular tightness may still be secondary to acetabular retroversion, thus capsular management may be warranted for larger corrections or rotational osteotomies. In efforts to optimize surgical management and clinical outcomes, anteverting PAO is a viable option to address FAI due to acetabular retroversion or overcoverage

During a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), intra-operative assessment of correction of acetabular parameters is typically performed using fluoroscopy of the hip, a technique that has not been shown to produce predictable measurements. Furthermore, paralysing agents are used in order to facilitate dissection and fragment mobilization. The effect of paralysing agents on spino-pelvic posture is yet to be investigated. This study aims to: 1. Compare the reliability of intra-operative x-rays versus hip fluoroscopy in the assessment of acetabular fragment correction and 2. Evaluate the effect of changes in spino-pelvic alignment on the assessment of acetabular correction. An IRB approved, retrospective review of all patients who underwent a PAO at our institution between 2006–2018 was performed. Patient demographic data was collected and all available imaging studies were retrieved. Patients were excluded if there was no available to review intra-operative AP pelvis x-ray or intra-operative fluoroscopic PA image of the hip. Using a validated hip analysis software (Hip2Norm), the lateral center edge angle (LCEA) and acetabular index (AI) of plain radiographs were measured. The sacro-femoral-pubic angle (SFP), along with the LCEA and AI of the fluoroscopic image were measured using ImageJ. A oneway ANOVA was used to detect differences between measured parameters in the intra-operative x-ray, the post-operative x-ray and the fluoroscopic image. A total of 93 patients were identified. 26 patients were excluded due to missing data. The mean LCEA in the post-operative, intra-operative, and fluoroscopic groups were as follows: 33.67° (range 5.3° to 52.4°), 30.71°(range 9° to 55.6°), and 29.23°(range 12.4° to 51.4°) respectively. The mean AI in the post-operative, intra-operative, and fluoroscopic groups were as follows: −0.65° (range −18.10° to 27.30°), 0.35°(range −16.10° to 17.20°), and 5.54°(range −11.66° to 27.83°) respectively. When comparing intra-operative to post-operative plain radiographs, there was no statistically significant difference in AI (ΔAI −1±1.29° p=0.71) or LCEA (ΔLCEA 2.95±1.38° p=0.09). When comparing fluoroscopy to post-operative plain radiographs, there was a statistically significant difference in AI (ΔAI −6.21±1.29° p < 0 .0001) as well as LCEA (ΔLCEA 4.44±1.38° p < 0 .0001). Statistical analysis revealed no influence of demographics (age, BMI, gender), on acetabular correction parameters. The mean SPF angles measured from intra-operative and post-operative x-rays were 69.32±5.11° and 70.45±5.52°. There was a statistically significant difference between these 2 measurements with a ΔSFP of 1.03° (p < 0 .0001). The results of our study show that the use of intra-operative x-ray for the assessment of LCEA and AI is more reliable than fluoroscopic images. Further, we found a difference in SFP angle, which offers an indirect assessment of pelvic tilt, between the intra-operative and the post-operative plain x-rays. This suggests that there are changes in pelvic tilt during the surgery, which can be attributed to either patient positioning or changes in spino-pelvic posture secondary to the paralysing agents used by the anesthetists. The use of intra-operative x-rays as well as the effect of paralysing agents on spino-pelvic alignment should be considered by surgeons performing PAO's

Arthrosis of the hip joint can be a significant source of pain and dysfunction. While hip replacement surgery has emerged as the gold standard for the treatment of end stage coxarthrosis, there are several non-arthroplasty management options that can help patients with mild and moderate hip arthritis. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to review early prophylactic interventions that may help defer or avoid hip arthroplasty. Nonoperative management for the symptomatic hip involves minimizing joint inflammation and maximizing joint mobility through intra-articular joint injections and exercise therapy. While weight loss, activity modifications, and low impact exercises is generally recommended for patients with arthritis, the effects of these modalities on joint strength and mobility are highly variable. Intra-articular steroid injections tended to offer reliable short-term pain relief (3–4 weeks) but provided unreliable long-term efficacy. Additionally, injections of hyaluronic acid do not appear to provide improved pain relief compared to other modalities. Finally, platelet rich plasma injections do not perform better than HA injections for patients with moderate hip joint arthrosis. Primary hip joint arthrosis is rare, and therefore treatment such as peri-acetabular osteotomies, surgical dislocations, and hip arthroscopy and related procedures are aimed to minimise symptoms but potentially aim to alter the natural history of hip diseases. The state of the articular cartilage at the time of surgery is critical to the success or failure of any joint preservation procedures. Lech et al. reported in a series of dysplastic patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomies that one third of hips survived 30 years without progression of arthritis or conversion to THA. Similarly, surgical dislocation of the hip, while effective for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement, carries a high re-operation rate at 7 years follow up. Finally, as the prevalence of hip arthroscopic procedures continues to rise, it is important to recognise that failure to address the underlying structural pathologies can lead to failure and rapid joint destruction. In summary, several treatment modalities are available for the management of hip pain and dysfunction in patients with a preserved joint space. While joint preservation procedures can help improve pain and function, they rarely alter the natural history of hip disease. The status of the articular cartilage at the time of surgery is the most important predictor of treatment success or failure