Evidence that L5 transverse process fracture indicates pelvic instability is insufficient and controversial. Because of unstable pelvis fractures have high mortality rate, they require urgent treatment and good follow-up. The lumbar region is also affected by high-energy traumas in the pelvis region, which causes damage to the muscles and ligamentous structures that adhere to the lumbar transverse process. For this reason, L5 transverse process fracture is thought to be an indicator showing pelvic instability. However, our study shows that this is not like that. This study was carried out in order to investigate the effect of L5 transvers process fracture on pelvic instability and lack of sufficient data in the literature. Between 2017–2020, 86 Patient who were hospitalized and treated with a diagnosis of pelvic fracture were retrospectively studied in our clinic. Pelvic X-Ray and tomography was taken pre-op for all patient. Demographic features, pre-op and post-op hemoglobin counts, how many units of blood transfusion needed in total, fixation method, surgical intervention, presence of additional injury, mechanism of injury for all patient were analyzed and the patients were categorized by investigating L5 transvers process fracture in their tomography. Fractures of patients were classified according toTyle classification. The patients were divided into two main groups as who stabil and unstabil pelvic fractures and L5 transvers process fracture and without. On stabil pelvic fractures and unstabil pelvic fractures, in term of instability effects of L5 transvers process fractures and those without were investigated. Also, changes in preop and post op hemoglaobin counts were investigated in pelvis with and without L5 transvers process fractures. With these, in terms of blood transfusion need the patients were evaluated whether there was a difference between those with L5 transvers process fractures and who did not. Again, whether the blood transfusion was statistically different in stable and unstable pelvis fractures was among the parameters looked at. In statistical analysis, no correlation was found between pelvic instability and L5 transvers process fracture. (p=0,933) No statistically significant difference was found in the evalution of blood transfusion between those with and without L5 transvers process fractures. (P=0,409)When the same parameter was evaluated in terms of stability and instability of the pelvis, it was seen that stability did not significantly affect the need for blood transfusion. (P=0,989) Pre-op and post-op hemoglobin changes of the patients who with L5 transvers process fracture and without were also analized. İn the analysis performed, there was no significant difference in patients with and without L5 transvers process fractures on pre-op and post-op hemoglobin values. (p=0.771/p=0.118)However, Postoperative hemoglobin values were significanly lower in patient with L5 transvers process fracture compared to preopetative hemoglobin values. (p=0.001). L5 transvers process fracture is not a parameter to showing pelvic instability. Stabil and unstabil fractures did not change the need for blood transfusion. The literatüre still needs much more study on this topic

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is an essential part of orthopaedic surgeries in preventing life-threatening thromboembolic events such as Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and Pulmonary Embolism (PE). Orthopaedic surgery has the highest incidence rate of thromboembolic events as compared to any other surgical specialities, making it an essential component in managing any orthopaedic case. At Queen's Medical Centre (QMC), a major trauma centre in the United Kingdom (UK), sees up to 750 NOF fracture cases annually, making it one of the busiest trauma and orthopaedic centres in the UK. Our study aims to evaluate how VTE Prophylaxis is conducted in a UK Major Trauma Centre for NOF and pelvic fragility fractures and how human factors can improve its efficacy. The Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH) Trust has implemented new guidelines from August 2019 that patients with fragility fractures such as NOF and pelvic fractures are prescribed with 28 days VTE prophylaxis with Enoxaparin, or their own anti-coagulants if risk of thrombosis exceed the risk of bleeding. This is an adaptation from the trust to align their guidelines closer to the NICE 2018 guidelines. We will be evaluating the initial compliance of VTE Prophylaxis, identify and utilise human factors, then re-analyse the department after implementing interventions on the same batch of junior doctors working in the department. Data of 100 patients with fragility fractures were collected, 50 consecutive patients in the pre-intervention window during August 2019 and 50 in the post-intervention window during November 2019. The pre-intervention data had 43 NOF and 7 Pelvic fractures. Our study showed that 93% of NOF fracture and 100% of pelvic fracture received the correct course of VTE prophylaxis. The data was presented at the local department junior doctor academic session. Three simple human factor interventions were implemented over the course of September and October: Education to the trauma and orthopaedic department on the new guideline, extended VTE labels on drug charts for patients with fragility fractures, VTE reminder labels at doctors' stations. Another 50 consecutive patients' data were collected during November 2019. Data shows that 97.8% of NOF (p>0.05) and 60% of pelvic fracture (p>0.05) received the correct course of VTE prophylaxis. Our data has shown an increase in correct VTE prescription for NOF fracture patients, which is the main bulk of our fragility fracture patients whilst we see a drop in pelvic fracture patients. Due to the limited time frame of four months where junior doctors in the UK rotate between specialities, we are only able to collect data during the first month, implement interventions between datasets and collect data on the final month of the four-month rotation. A future bigger study might provide a more significant result on the department. We believe that the key to achieving 100% VTE prophylaxis in the T&O department is optimising human factors, educating junior doctors, who are not orthopaedic trained, with sufficient information of the guidelines, and evidence of the risk and benefits of providing prolonged VTE prophylaxis for orthopaedic patients. In conclusion, we found that QMC, a major trauma centre with high patient volume and turnover, has a high level of compliance with VTE prophylaxis for fragility fractures and it is imperative that utilising human factors will inch the department closer to its goal of 100% VTE compliance

Pelvic fractures in children are uncommon. Despite their potentially serious nature, there is little information in the literature regarding their epidemiology. We performed a retrospective review of case notes and radiographs, if available, of all patients admitted with bony pelvic injuries to our unit over a 28 year period (1980-2008). Sixty-four children with pelvic fractures were identified (median age 8 years, 75% male). 58% were pedestrians involved in road traffic accidents (RTA), 19% were caused by a fall from a height and 8% were crush injuries. There was seasonal variability, with a 50% increase in pelvic injuries in Autumn and 33% decrease in Winter - compared to Spring/Summer months (in contrast to the peak in overall fracture incidence in the Summer). Median length of stay was 8 days (range 1-180), 11% requiring direct admission to ITU and 5% to HDU. There is a high incidence of associated major injuries - for Stable fractures 52%, Partially stable fractures 60% and Unstable fractures 100%. Five required surgery to the bony pelvis, and 6 for-non pelvic orthopaedic injury. 3 required operative intervention from other specialities, 1 urological repair, 1 laparotomy and 1 lobectomy. Pelvic fractures in children are potentially serious injuries with a high proportion of major associated injuries. Multiple injuries were sustained in 55% of pedestrian/RTA accidents, 100% of crush injuries and 58% of falls from a height. In this series, 52% of “Stable” pelvic injuries were associated with other major injuries. All paediatric pelvic injuries, even stable pubic rami fractures should be approached with caution, full ATLS assessment and close monitoring

Summary. Application of RSA in supine and standing positions allows pelvic fracture stability to be measured more accurately than current techniques. RSA may enable a better understanding of these injuries. Introduction. The in vivo stability of the pelvic ring after fracture stabilisation remains unknown. Plain radiographs have a low accuracy in diagnosing loss of fracture reduction over time. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is an accurate imaging measurement method that has previously been applied to measure the healing of other fractures. This pilot study investigated the potential application of RSA in supine and standing positions to measure pelvic fracture stability over time and under weightbearing load. Methods. Five patients with a similar type C pelvic ring disruption who were all operated on using the same surgical technique and had RSA markers inserted at the time of surgery. All five patients had a unilateral comminuted sacral fracture lateral to the sacral foramina treated with posterior plating and pubic rami fractures stabilised by external fixation for six weeks. All patients were mobilised partial weight bearing after regaining leg control. RSA examinations at 2, 4, 12, 26 and 52 weeks included three radiographic pairs taken in supine, standing and supine positions at each time point. Two additional RSA examinations were performed the day prior and post pin removal at 6 weeks. Results. All patients ambulated before the 2 week follow-up and progressed uneventfully. At latest follow-up, there were no complications. Minimal displacements (translations less than 0.3mm and rotations less than 0.5°) were recorded between the supine exams pre and post standing at 2 weeks. Hence, the supine examination was found to be a reliable position to measure the migration of the ilium over time. No loss of reduction was identifiable on plain radiographs over time. At 52 weeks, in contrast to plain radiographic results, RSA measurements revealed that one patient had a fracture migration greater than 4mm. Such large displacements could result in sacral nerve root transection, leading to devastating consequences, such as incontinence, for patients whose sacral fractures are through or medial to the sacral foramina. In one patient, the migration recorded for the apparent uninjured posterior complex side exceeded the migration of the injured side suggesting an unrecognised bilateral injury. Comparative RSA examinations pre and post external fixator removal demonstrated that in three patients the injured hemipelvis migrated greater than 2mm after the removal of the external fixator, which may be indicative that the fixator was removed prematurely. Discussion and Conclusion. The application of RSA allows accurate measurement of pelvic fracture stability which is difficult, if not impossible, to identify and quantify with any other imaging techniques. Hence, RSA has the capacity to enable a better understanding of pelvic ring injuries and optimise their treatment