Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) is the most common orthopaedic disorder in newborns. Whilst the
Simulated learning is increasingly prevalent in many surgical training programs as medical education moves towards competency based curricula. In orthopaedic surgery, developmental dysplasia of the hip is a commonly treated diagnosis where the standard of care in patients less than six months of age is an orthotic device such as the
There is no consensus regarding the optimum frequency of ultrasound for monitoring the response to
Debate currently exists regarding the economic viability for screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants. A retrospective study of infant hip dysplasia over the period of 1998–2008 (36,960 live births) was performed to determine treatment complexity and associated costs of disease detection and hospital treatment, related to the age at presentation and treatment modality. 179 infants (4.8/1000) presented with hip dysplasia. 34 infants presented late (>3 months of age) and required closed or open reduction. 145 infants presented at <3 months of age, 14 of whom failed early
Introduction. The standard plane imaging of Graf and the dynamic methods of Harcke are well established methods in assessing hip dysplasia but give limited information in the flexed-abducted treatment position used in the
Aims. Use of videos for patient education has grown in popularity. Literature promotes the use of videos to provide clearer information to patients and families. Information to patients are often provided via leaflets. In our regional (Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health board- CTM UHB) one stop clinic, we aimed to pilot the use of an educational video on developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) for parents and guardians and assess its usefulness. Methods. Parents and guardians of children being treated for DDH with Pavlick harness were invited to the partake in the pilot scheme. A short video provided by the ‘What? Why? Children in Hospital’ (WWCIH) organisation was shown on a tablet to parents and guardians. A ten question questionnaire was then provided post watching the video. The questionnaire consisted of short answer, multiple choice, and rating scale (1-10) questions. Results. 23 parents/guardians participated. All participants stated the video was of the right duration. Participants of all stages in the
The
The purposes of this study were to investigate whether twins and multiple births have a higher incidence of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH), and whether universal ultrasound scanning would be beneficial in this population. Methods. Records of all twin and multiple births between 1st January 2004 and 31st December 2008 at Addenbrooke's Hospital were obtained. Information regarding sex, gestation, birth weight, DDH risk factors, results of the neonatal hip examination and of any ultrasound scans were analysed. The incidence of DDH in singletons born during the same period was calculated from birth records and the DDH database. Results. Of the 990 twin and multiple births, 267 had ultrasound scans. Of those scanned, over 92% had a normal (bilateral Graf I) scan initially. Within the study cohort there was one case of DDH diagnosed on ultrasound and successfully treated with
Ultrasound (US) is the standard imaging modality used to screen for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants. Currently, radiologists or orthopaedic surgeons review scan images and judge them to be adequate or inadequate for interpretation. If considered adequate, diagnostic dysplasia metrics are determined; however, there is no standardised method for this process. There is significant inter-observer variability in this manual process which can affect misdiagnosis rates. To eliminate this subjectivity, we developed an automatic method to identify adequate US images and extract dysplasia metrics. The purpose of this study was to validate the efficacy of this automatic method by comparing results with observer-determined dysplasia metrics on a set of US images. A total of 693 US images from scans of 35 infants were analysed. Trained clinicians at a single institution labeled each image as adequate or inadequate, and subsequently measured alpha and beta angles on adequate images to diagnose dysplasia. We trained our image classifier on random sets of 415 images and used it to assess the remaining 278 images. Alpha and beta angles were automatically estimated on all adequate images. We compared the manual and automatic methods for discrepancies in adequacy determination, metric variability and incidences of missed early diagnosis or over-treatment. There was excellent agreement between the automatic and manual methods in image adequacy classification (Kappa coefficient = 0.912). On each adequate US image, alpha and beta angle measurements were compared, producing mixed levels of agreement between methods. Mean discrepancies of 1.78°±4.72° and 8.91°±6.437° were seen for alpha and beta angles, respectively. Standard deviations of the angle measures across multiple images from a single patient scan were significantly reduced by the automatic method for both alpha (p<0.05) and beta (p<0.01) angles. Additionally, the automatic method classified three hips (two patients) as Graf type II and two hips (two patients) as type III, while the manual method classified them as type I and II, respectively. Both cases flagged as type III patients by the automatic system subsequently failed