Aims. Patients undergoing limb reconstruction surgery often face a challenging and lengthy process to complete their treatment journey. The majority of existing outcome measures do not adequately capture the patient-reported outcomes relevant to this patient group in a single measure. Following a previous systematic review, the Stanmore Limb Reconstruction Score (SLRS) was designed with the intent to address this need for an effective instrument to measure patient-reported outcomes in limb reconstruction patients. We aim to assess the face validity of this score in a pilot study. Methods. The SLRS was designed following structured interviews with several groups including patients who have undergone limb reconstruction surgery, limb reconstruction surgeons, specialist nurses, and physiotherapists. This has subsequently undergone further adjustment for language and clarity. The score was then trialled on ten patients who had undergone limb reconstruction surgery, with subsequent structured questioning to understand the perceived suitability of the score. Results. Ten patients completed the score and the subsequent structured interview. Considering the tool as a whole, 100% of respondents felt the score to be comprehensible, relevant, and comprehensive regarding the areas that were important to a patient undergoing limb reconstruction surgery. For individual questions, on a five-point Likert scale, importance/relevance was reported as a mean of 4.78 (4.3 to 5.0), with ability to understand rated as 4.92 (4.7 to 5.0) suggesting high levels of relevance and comprehension. Flesch-Kincaid reading grade level was calculated as 5.2 (10 to 11 years old). Conclusion. The current SLRS has been shown to have acceptable scores from a patient sample regarding relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness. This suggests face validity, however further testing required and is ongoing in a larger cohort of patients to determine the reliability, responsiveness, precision, and criterion validity of the score in this patient group. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(9):705–709

Thoracic hyperkyphosis (TH – Cobb angle >40°) is correlated with rotator cuff arthropathy and associated with anterior tilting and protraction of scapula, impacting the glenoid orientation and the surrounding musculature. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a reliable surgical treatment for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy and recent literature suggests that patients with TH may have comparable range of motion after RTSA. However, there exists no study reporting the possible link between patient-reported outcomes, humeral retroversion and TH after RTSA. While the risk of post-operative complications such as instability, hardware loosening, scapular notching, and prosthetic infection are low, we hypothesize that it is critical to optimize the biomechanical parameters through proper implant positioning and understanding patient-specific scapular and thoracic anatomy to improve surgical outcomes in this subset of patients with TH. Patients treated with primary RTSA at an academic hospital in 2018 were reviewed for a two-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria were as follows: no pre-existing chest radiographs for Cobb angle measurement, change in post-operative functional status as a result of trauma or medical comorbidities, and missing component placement and parameter information in the operative note. As most patients did not have a pre-operative chest radiograph, only seven patients with a Cobb angle equal to or greater than 40° were eligible. Chart reviews were completed to determine indications for RTSA, hardware positioning parameters such as inferior tilting, humeral stem retroversion, glenosphere size/location, and baseplate size. Clinical data following surgery included review of radiographs and complications. Follow-up in all patients were to a period of two years. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score was used for patient-reported functional and pain outcomes. The average age of the patients at the time of RTSA was 71 years old, with six female patients and one male patient. The indication for RTSA was primarily rotator cuff arthropathy. Possible correlation between Cobb angle and humeral retroversion was noted, whereby, Cobb angle greater than 40° matched with humeral retroversion greater than 30°, and resulted in significantly higher ASES scores. Two patients with mean Cobb angle of 50° and mean humeral retroversion 37.5° had mean ASES scores of 92.5. Five patients who received mean humeral retroversion of 30° had mean lower ASES scores of 63.7 (p < 0 .05). There was no significant correlation with glenosphere size or position, baseplate size, degree of inferior tilting or lateralization. Patient-reported outcomes have not been reported in RTSA patients with TH. In this case series, we observed that humeral stem retroversion greater than 30° may be correlated with less post-operative pain and greater patient satisfaction in patients with TH. Further clinical studies are needed to understanding the biomechanical relationship between RTSA, humeral retroversion and TH to optimize patient outcomes

While clinically important improvements in Oxford Shoulder Scores have been defined for patients with general shoulder problems or those undergoing subacromial decompression, no threshold has been reported for classifying improvement after shoulder replacement surgery. This study aimed to establish the minimal clinically important change (MCIC) for the Oxford Shoulder Score in patients undergoing primary total shoulder replacement (TSR). Patient-reported outcomes data were sourced from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Program. These included pre- and 6-month post-operative Oxford Shoulder Scores and a rating of patient-perceived change after surgery (5-point scale ranging from ‘much worse’ to ‘much better’). Two anchor-based methods (using patient-perceived improvement as the anchor) were used to calculate the MCIC: 1) mean change method; and 2) predictive modelling, with and without adjustment for the proportion of improved patients. The analysis included 612 patients undergoing primary TSR who provided pre- and post-operative data (58% female; mean (SD) age 70 (8) years). Most patients (93%) reported improvement after surgery. The MCIC derived from the mean change method was 6.8 points (95%CI 4.7 to 8.9). Predictive modelling produced an MCIC estimate of 11.6 points (95%CI 8.9 to 15.6), which reduced to 8.7 points (95%CI 6.0 to 12.7) after adjustment for the proportion of improved patients. For patient-reported outcome measures to provide valuable information that can support clinical care, we need to understand the magnitude of change that matters to patients. Using contemporary psychometric methods, this analysis has generated MCIC estimates for the Oxford Shoulder Score. These estimates can be used by clinicians and researchers to interpret important changes in pain and function after TSR from the patient's perspective. We conclude that an increase in Oxford Shoulder Scores of at least 9 points can be considered a meaningful improvement in shoulder-related pain and function after TSR

While clinically important improvements in Oxford Shoulder Scores have been defined for patients with general shoulder problems or those undergoing subacromial decompression, no threshold has been reported for classifying improvement after shoulder replacement surgery. This study aimed to establish the minimal clinically important change (MCIC) for the Oxford Shoulder Score in patients undergoing primary total shoulder replacement (TSR). Patient-reported outcomes data were sourced from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Program. These included pre- and 6-month post-operative Oxford Shoulder Scores and a rating of patient-perceived change after surgery (5-point scale ranging from ‘much worse’ to ‘much better’). Two anchor-based methods (using patient-perceived improvement as the anchor) were used to calculate the MCIC: 1) mean change method; and 2) predictive modelling, with and without adjustment for the proportion of improved patients. The analysis included 612 patients undergoing primary TSR who provided pre- and post-operative data (58% female; mean (SD) age 70 (8) years). Most patients (93%) reported improvement after surgery. The MCIC derived from the mean change method was 6.8 points (95%CI 4.7 to 8.9). Predictive modelling produced an MCIC estimate of 11.6 points (95%CI 8.9 to 15.6), which reduced to 8.7 points (95%CI 6.0 to 12.7) after adjustment for the proportion of improved patients. For patient-reported outcome measures to provide valuable information that can support clinical care, we need to understand the magnitude of change that matters to patients. Using contemporary psychometric methods, this analysis has generated MCIC estimates for the Oxford Shoulder Score. These estimates can be used by clinicians and researchers to interpret important changes in pain and function after TSR from the patient's perspective. We conclude that an increase in Oxford Shoulder Scores of at least 9 points can be considered a meaningful improvement in shoulder-related pain and function after TSR

Introduction. We aimed to determine whether there are differences in patient-reported quality of life (QoL) outcome between local flap versus free flap. Materials and Methods. All patients admitted with lower limb open fractures were retrospectively reviewed. Patient notes were assessed for demographics, time to fracture union, wound healing and patient-reported QoL with EQ-5D-5L, alongside a novel flap assessment tool. Results. A total of 40 patients had flap reconstruction of their lower limb injury; 23 local flap (Group I) and 17 free flaps (Group II). The average length of follow-up was 33.8 months. Group I - 10 revisions of flaps (43.5%) and 14 surgical complications (60.9%). Fracture union was 171 days and wound healing 130 days. EQ-5D index and EQVAS scores were 0.709 and 79.3, respectively. Group II – 8 revision of flaps (47.1%) and 12 surgical complications (70.6%). Fracture union was 273 days and wound healing 213 days. EQ-5D index and EQ-VAS scores were 0.525 and 57.2, respectively. Aesthetic appeal - 48% Group I vs. 66% Group II. Significant differences were found between the two flap groups with higher scores for daily living in Group I (p–0.007) compared to higher overall flap ratings in Group II (p–0.049). Both groups were comparable in terms of complications, while flap congestion and dehiscence were more common with free flaps. statistical interrogation did not elicit significance (p > 0.05). Conclusions. Local flap and free flap techniques offer distinct advantages. Local flaps have a better surgical outcome and patient-reported QoL in the first few years post soft tissue reconstruction. Differences between local and free reconstructive techniques in terms of patient health and function are ameliorated in the longer term

Increased collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) in registries enables international comparison of patient-centered outcomes after knee and hip replacement. We aimed to investigate 1) variations in PROM improvement, 2) the possible confounding factor of BMI, and 3) differences in comorbidity distributions between registries. Registries affiliated with the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR) or OECD membership countries were invited to report aggregate EQ-5D, OKS, OHS, HOOS-PS and KOOS-PS values. Eligible patients underwent primary total, unilateral knee or hip replacement for osteoarthritis within three years and had completed PROMs preoperatively and either 6 or 12 months postoperatively, excluding patients with subsequent revisions. For each PROM cohort, Chi-square tests were performed for BMI distributions across registries and 12 predefined PROM strata (male/female, age 20-64/65-74/>75, high or low preoperative PROM scores). Comorbidity distributions were reported for available comorbidity indexes. Thirteen registries from 9 countries contributed data, n~130000 knee (range 140 to 79848) and n~113000 hip (range 137 to 85281). Mean EQ-5D index values (10 registries) ranged from 0.53 to 0.71 (knee) and 0.50 to 0.70 (hips) preoperatively and 0.78 to 0.85 (knee) and 0.83 to 0.87 (hip) postoperatively. Mean OKS (6 registries) ranged from 19.3 to 23.6 preoperatively and 36.2 to 41.2 postoperatively. Mean OHS (7 registries) ranged from 18.0 to 23.2 preoperatively and 39.8 to 44.2 postoperatively. Four registries reported KOOS-PS and three reported HOOS-PS. Proportions of patients with BMI >30 ranged from 35 to 62% (10 knee registries) and 16 to 43% (11 hip registries). For both knee and hip registries, distributions of patients across six BMI categories differed significantly among registries (p30 were for patients in the youngest age groups (20 to 64 and 65 to 74 years) with the lowest baseline scores. Additionally, females with lowest preoperative PROM scores had highest BMI. These findings were echoed for the OHS and OKS cohorts. Proportions of patients with ASA scores ≥3 ranged from 7 to 42% (9 knee registries) and 6 to 35% (8 hip registries). PROM-score improvement varies between international registries, which may be partially explained by differences in age, sex and preoperative scores. BMI and comorbidity may be relevant to adjust for

Introduction. LIMB-Q Kids is a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for children with Lower limb differences (LLDs). The objective is to conduct an international field test study. Materials & Methods. A mixed method multiphase approach was used to develop LIMB-Q Kids. In phase one, a systematic review was conducted to identify concepts from existing PROMs used in research with children with LLDs. A preliminary conceptual framework derived from the systematic review informed an international qualitative study. The data from qualitative interviews were used to form the LIMB-Q Kids, which was further refined through multiple rounds of cognitive debriefing interviews with children. Input was obtained from parents and healthcare professionals from Australia, Canada, Ethiopia, India, UK, and the USA. LIMB-Q Kids was translated and culturally adapted into multiple languages. Results. The final field-test version consists of 11 scales (159 items) that measure appearance, physical function, symptoms (hip, knee, ankle, foot, and leg), leg-related distress, and school, social and psychological function. This version was rigorously translated into Danish and German. Translations that are in progress include Arabic, Finnish, Hindi, Swahili, Portuguese, Spanish, and Luganda. An international field-test study is underway in nine countries (15 sites with a target recruitment of 150 participants per country). At the time of abstract submission, 190 patients from seven sites have completed LIMB-Q Kids. The UK collaborative has worked on language adaption for the UK and is currently validating the score across five paediatric limb reconstruction units. Conclusions. No internationally applicable PROM exists for children with LLDs. We present the current progress in developing and validating such a score. Data from the international field-test study will be used to reduce items and perform psychometric testing of LIMB-Q Kids. The rigorous translation and cultural adaption process will provide versions of LIMB-Q Kids in different languages. Once completed, the LIMB-Q Kids will provide a common metric for outcome assessment for children with lower limb differences internationally

The Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) have partnered to advance international patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) collection and reporting standards for hip and knee arthroplasty. This project is part of the OECD's Patient-Reported Indicator Survey (PaRIS) initiative, which aims to address the need for internationally comparable patient-reported outcome and experience measures in order to better monitor health system performance and drive continuous improvement. PROMs are in varying stages of implementation across OECD health systems, with differences in collection and reporting practices across existing programs. CIHI and the OECD are leading an international working group for PROMs in hip and knee replacement surgery in order to build consensus on PROMs data collection standards and develop indicators for international reporting. Working group members include patient representatives, clinicians, national arthroplasty registries, the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR), experts in PROMs measurement, and government representatives of several OECD member countries. Activities of the working group focus on two main priorities: 1) Use existing PROMs programs to maximize pilot comparable reporting in OECD's Health at a Glance 2019 report, and 2) Advance new PROMs standards and data collection to maximize comparable reporting beyond Health at a Glance 2019. An environmental scan of PROMs in hip and knee arthroplasty found that a number of countries are collecting this data, however, there are variations in survey instruments as well as administration and reporting methods within and across countries. As part of priority 1, the working group has achieved consensus on a number of aspects around pilot reporting. The project is compiling data from existing PROMs programs in order to report results in the Health at a Glance 2019 publication. For priority 2, the most notable challenge is establishing an agreement across countries on common survey tools, as well as a minimum data set that works for all, given the disparities of existing collection across countries. Many international programs lack the flexibility to change PROMs tools or collections methods, and have concerns regarding the break in trend for PROMs data within their own countries if they were to change methods. The project is exploring the use of crosswalks and other opportunities for comparable reporting, such as the use of single-item anchor questions. To date, the working group continues to develop consensus on international standards for PROMs collection and reporting. Results of the international consensus building and work to date will be shared. PROMs incorporate the patient's perspective into the delivery of treatments and care – such as hip and knee arthroplasty – that aim to improve a patient's quality of life. Alignment of standards in PROMs collection across countries will make comparable data available for reporting, in order to inform quality improvement initiatives within health systems to provide better care for patients. CIHI and the OECD will continue to work with member countries to develop international data collection and reporting standards for PROMs, and encourage the adoption of common approaches across countries

Introduction. There are concerns that patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) currently used for adults requiring, undergoing or after undergoing lower limb reconstruction (LLR) are not adequately capturing the range of experiences important to these patients. The ‘Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Lower Limb Reconstruction’ (PROLLIT) study developed a conceptual framework of outcomes identified as important and relevant by adult LLR patients. This review explored whether existing PROMs address these outcomes, and exhibit content validity in this population. Materials & Methods. A range of key PROMs was selected (n=32). Systematic and hand-searches were employed to find studies assessing content validity of these PROMs in the adult LLR population, along with PROM content and development information. A systematic review of content validity of the measures was carried out following ‘COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments’ (COSMIN) guidance, alongside conceptual mapping of the content of the PROMs against the PROLLIT conceptual framework. Results. The searches uncovered very few content validity studies assessing the PROMs when applied in adult LLR patients. The COSMIN review found that these measures lacked content validity when applied in this population. The conceptual mapping found that PROMs did not capture all concepts identified as important and relevant in the PROLLIT framework. Conclusions. Existing PROMs applied in the adult LLR population lack content validity and fail to adequately capture relevant outcomes for this patient group. There is a need for a new, dedicated PROM designed for adult LLR patients

Over 500 supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHF) are treated at our institution each year. Our standard post-operative pathway includes a 3-week visit for splint removal, wire removal, and radiographs. Subsequent follow-up occurs at 12 weeks for a clinical examination. In an effort to minimize unnecessary follow-up visits, we investigated whether photographs and/or patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores could identify patients who do not need routine 3-month in-person follow-up. At the 3-month visit, 248 SCHF patients (mean 6.2 yrs; 0.75-11yrs) had bilateral elbow motion (ROM) and carrying angles measured; and photographs documenting frontal and sagittal alignment of both injured and uninjured upper extremities, in both maximum elbow flexion and extension. Two independent assessors made the same measurements off the clinical photographs to compare these with the clinical measurements. Two PROMs: Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ: 0 best to 14 worst) and QuickDASH (0 best to 100 worst) were completed at the 3-month visit. Inter-rater reliability of the photograph measurements was excellent (Kappa: 0.88-0.93), but weakly concordant with clinical measurements (carrying angle Kappa=0.51;max flexion Kappa=0.68;max extension Kappa=0.64). SAQ moderately correlated with QuickDASH (Kappa=0.59) and performed better at identifying patients with abnormalities. SAQ score ≥ 4 identified patients meeting 3-month follow-up criteria, with sensitivity: 36.1%; specificity: 96.8% and negative-predictive-value (NPV): 87%. We did not find that photographs were reliable. Although SAQ-score has high NPV, a more sensitive fracture-specific PROM is needed to identify patients who do not need a 3-month follow-up visit

The aim of this study was to determine the floor and ceiling effects for both the QuickDASH and PRWE following a fracture of the distal radius. Secondary aims were to determine the degree to which patients with a floor or ceiling effect felt that their wrist was ‘normal’, and if there were patient factors associated with achieving a floor or ceiling effect. A retrospective cohort study of patients sustaining a distal radius fracture and managed at the study centre during a single year was undertaken. Outcome measures included the QuickDASH, the PRWE, EuroQol-5 Dimension-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L), and the normal wrist score. There were 526 patients with a mean age of 65yrs (20–95) and 421 (77%) were female. Most patients were managed non-operatively (73%, n=385). The mean follow-up was 4.8yrs (4.3–5.5). A ceiling effect was observed for both the QuickDASH (22.3%) and PRWE (28.5%). When defined to be within the minimum clinical important difference of the best available score, the ceiling effect increased to 62.8% for the QuickDASH and 60% for the PRWE. Patients that achieved a ceiling score for the QuickDASH and PRWE subjectively felt their wrist was only 91% and 92% normal, respectively. On logistic regression analysis, a dominant hand injury and better health-related quality of life were the common factors associated with achieving a ceiling score for both the QuickDASH and PRWE (all p<0.05). The QuickDASH and PRWE demonstrate ceiling effects when used to assess the outcome of fractures of the distal radius. Patients achieving ceiling scores did not consider their wrist to be ‘normal’. Future patient-reported outcome assessment tools for fractures of the distal radius should aim to limit the ceiling effect, especially for individuals or groups that are more likely to achieve a ceiling score

Background: Metal sensitivity following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has been of increased concern, but the impact of a patient-reported metal allergy on clinical outcomes has not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to report the incidence and impact of patient-reported metal allergy following total knee (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: This was a retrospective, IRB-approved investigation of patients undergoing a primary, elective TJA between 2009 and 2011. All patients completed a pre-operative questionnaire asking about drug and environmental allergies. In January of 2010, a specific question was added regarding the presence of a metal allergy. UCLA Activity, SF-12, Modified Harris Hip (MHHS), and Knee Society (KSS) scores were collected pre-operatively and at most recent follow-up. Overall cohorts of metal allergy and non-metal allergy patients were compared and a 1:2 matching analysis was also performed. Results: 906 primary THAs and 589 primary TKAs were included. The incidence of patient-reported metal allergy was 1.7% before January 2010 and 4.0% after (overall 2.3% of THAs and 4.1% of TKAs). 97.8% of metal allergy patients were female. Following TKA, post-operative KSS function, symptoms, satisfaction, and expectation scores were all decreased in the metal allergy cohort (p<0.001 to 0.002). Following THA, metal allergy patients had a decreased post-operative SF-12 MCS score and less incremental improvement in their SF-12 MCS score versus the non-metal allergy cohort (p<0.0001 and p<0.001). Conclusion: Patient-reported metal allergy is associated with decreased functional outcomes following TKA and decreased mental health scores following THA

In light of recent regulatory initiatives, medical devices now require additional clinical evidence to prove their safety and efficacy. At the same time, patients' own assessment of their devices' function and performance has gained in importance. The collection of these data allows for a more comprehensive picture of clinical outcomes and complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). These trends have led researchers to search for new methods of acquiring, interpreting and disseminating patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs). The current study assesses the feasibility of a digital platform for collecting PROMs that was recently adapted for TKA patients. It sought to determine patient engagement, survey completion rates, and satisfaction with this platform. Eighty-two patients (mean age, 63.7 years, 59% females) scheduled for TKA were enrolled from one US and six UK sites between January 12, 2018 and April 30, 2018. Patients were supplied with a mobile application (app) that collects a variety of PROMs, including four domains based on the Patient-Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS™): physical function, depression, pain interference and pain behavior. The platform electronically administers questionnaires using computer-adaptive tests (CATs), which reduce the burden on patients by tailoring follow-up questions to account for their previous answers. Satisfaction with the app was assessed in subset of patients who evaluated its ease-of-use (n=45), likelihood that they would recommend it to family/friends (n=35), and whether they successfully used the information it provided during their recovery (n=31). These scores were taken on a 1 to 10 (worst to best) scale. Patients demonstrated regular engagement with the platform, with 73% using the app at least once a week. Weekly engagement remained high throughout the seven-week post-operative period (Figure 1). There was a 69% completion rate of all PROMIS™ CAT surveys during the study. The four PROMIS™ CAT domains had similar survey completion rates (Figure 2). The subset of patients queried regarding their satisfaction with the app gave it favorable mean scores for ease-of-use (8.8), likelihood to recommend to a family member or friend (8.1), and their success at using its information to improve their recovery (7.4). Initial results support this digital platform's potential for successfully and efficiently collecting large volumes of PROMs. Patients reported high levels of engagement and satisfaction. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Many groups consider passive flexion to be a good indicator of postoperative success, to the point where this outcome directly influences certain outcome scores such as Knee Society Scores (KSS). However, it is alternatively believed that normal-like kinematics result in better TKA outcomes, and previous fluoroscopy studies have demonstrated that there are many parameters that affect weight-bearing range-of-motion. The objective of this study to investigate the correlations between patient-reported outcomes, passive flexion, and weight-bearing knee kinematics. Methods. The femorotibial kinematics, passive and weight-bearing range-of-motion, and KOOS and KSS for 291 TKA subjects were collected in a retrospective study. The average age, BMI, and post-op time was 69.2±7.2 years, 29.3±4.6, and 22.4±16.3 months, respectively. Pearson correlation analysis was used to find the statistical correlations between the various parameters, and two-tailed t-tests were carried out to find statistical differences. Results. Superior weight-bearing flexion was statistically correlated with both higher KOOS (r=0.2122, p=0.0094) and KSS (r=0.2986, p<.0001), shown in Table 1. Interestingly, there was no correlation with respect to passive flexion and KOOS (r=0.1363, p=0.0975). Correlations between KSS and passive flexion were not analyzed due to the inherent covariance between these parameters. Furthermore, subjects with paradoxical anterior sliding of either condyle had significantly lower KSS scores than those without anterior sliding (81.1±11.9 versus 84.4±12.4 for lateral, p=0.03, and 82.2±12.1 versus 85.1±12.5 for medial, p=0.02). Conclusion. The results of this study revealed that weight-bearing flexion and not passive flexion is a better predictor of TKA outcomes. Subjects having greater weight-bearing flexion demonstrated higher KOOS and KSS scores. Also, subjects that experienced a paradoxical anterior slide had a statistically lower KSS than those subjects that experienced posterior femoral rollback. Therefore, it may be more important to evaluate weight-bearing flexion during clinical exams. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Surgical outcome analysis has shifted from surgeon- to patient-reported outcome measures (PROM). High rates of dissatisfaction (13–20%) in PROM after TKA have persisted despite significant advances in pain-management, implant design and introduction of newer surgical techniques. The NAVIO robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) was introduced in May 2017 as an integrative approach to planning, execution and evaluation in TKA surgery. The goal of this study was to assess differences PROM scores between conventional instrumented TKA (CI-TKA) and RA-TKA. Methods. Starting in December 2016, prospective data collection of PROM's was initiated in a single-surgeon total joint arthroplasty registry. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was collected for all patients pre-operatively, at three months and at one year post-operatively. In Group A, from December 2016 through May 2017, patients were treated with CI-TKA instrumentation. In Group B, from June 2017 through December 2018, surgery was performed with the NAVIO RA-TKA technique. The Journey II total knee prosthesis was used for all cases. Peri-operative management was consistent for all patients in both groups. Results. A total of 625 patients were available for analysis. 270 RA-TKA and 355 CI-TKA. The results showed a trend toward higher scores for RA-TKA for KOOS overall (p-value = 0.20) and subspecialty scores at 1-year postop, especially for pain and quality of life (p-value = 0.13) and pain (p-value = 0.12). Discussion/Conclusion. In this preliminary study, patients undergoing RA-TKA demonstrated a trend toward higher PROM scores, especially in the categories of Quality of Life and Pain, when compared to CI-TKA. Due to the limited sample size, weighted 1.3:1 for CI-TKA, statistical significance was not shown. Because of the short timeframe available since the introduction of RA-TKA, further data collection and analysis will be necessary to re-assess statistically power in this comparison

One in five patients remain unsatisfied due to ongoing pain and impaired mobility following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is important if surgeons can pre-operatively identify which patients may be at risk for poor outcomes after TKA. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is an association between pre-operative measures and post-operative outcomes in patients who underwent TKA.

This study included 28 patients (female = 12 / male = 16, age = 63.6 ± 6.9, BMI = 29.9 ± 7.4 kg/m2) with knee osteoarthritis who were scheduled to undergo TKA. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon (GD), and a subvastus approach was performed for all patients. Patients visited the gait lab within one-month of surgery and 12 months following surgery. At the gait lab, patients completed the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), a timed up and go (TUG), and walking task. Variables of interest included the five KOOS sub-scores (symptoms, pain, activities of daily living, sport & recreation, and quality of life), completion time for the TUG, walking speed, and peak knee biomechanics variables (flexion angle, abduction moment, power absorption). A Pearson's product-moment correlation was run to assess the relationship between pre-operative measures and post-operative outcomes in the TKA patients.

Preliminary analyses showed the relationship to be linear with all variables normally distributed, as assessed by Shapiro-Wilk's test (p > .05), and there were no outliers. There were no statistically significant correlations between any of the pre-operative KOOS sub-scores and any of the post-operative biomechanical outcomes. Pre-operative TUG time had a statistically significant, moderate positive correlation with post-operative peak knee abduction moments [r(14) = .597, p < .001] and peak knee power absorption [r(14) = .498, p = .007], with pre-operative TUG time explaining 36% of the variability in peak knee abduction moment and 25% of the variability in peak knee power absorption. Pre-operative walking speed had a statistically significant, moderate negative correlation with post-operative peak knee abduction moments [r(14) = -.558, p = .002] and peak knee power absorption [r(14) = -.548, p = .003], with pre-operative walking speed explaining 31% of the variability in peak knee abduction moment and 30% of the variability in peak knee power absorption.

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), such as the KOOS, do indicate the TKA is generally successful at relieving pain and show an overall improvement. However, their pre-operative values do not correlate with any biomechanical indicators of post-operative success, such as peak knee abduction moment and knee power. Shorter pre-operative TUG times and faster pre-operative walking speeds were correlated with improved post-operative biomechanical outcomes. These are simple tasks surgeons can implement into their clinics to evaluate their patients. Future research should expand these findings to a larger sample size and to determine if other factors, such as surgical approach or implant design, improves patient outcomes.

Introduction

Open fractures are complex injuries associated with substantial morbidity. These injuries are associated with harm to both physical and emotional health as well as preclusion of work, social, and leisure activities. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and health related quality of life are critical indicators of successful rehabilitation following open fracture treatment. This study aimed to measure the PROMs for patients with open lower limb fractures and investigate the relationship with injury severity.

Using general practitioner records, hospital medical notes and through direct telephone conversation with patients, we investigated the accuracy of nine patient-reported complications after elective joint replacement surgery of the hip and knee. A total of 402 post-discharge complications were reported after 8546 elective operations that were undertaken within a three-year period. These were reported by 136 men and 240 women with an overall mean age of 71.8 years (34.3–93.2). A total of 319 (79.4%; 95% confidence interval, 75.4%–83.3%) reported complications were confirmed to be correct. Very high rates of correct reporting were demonstrated for infection (94.5%) and further surgery (100%), whereas the rates of reporting deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarct and stroke were lower (75%–84.2%). Dislocation, periprosthetic fractures and nerve palsy were associated with modest rates of correct reporting (36%–57.1%). More patients who had had knee surgery delivered incorrect reports of dislocation (p = 0.001) and DVT (p = 0.013). Despite these variations in accuracy, it appears that post-operative complications may form part of a larger patient-reported outcome programme for monitoring outcome after elective joint replacement surgery

Background. Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) has long been the standard treatment for cases in which non-surgical alternatives have failed to improve pain and function in hip osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Outcomes from THA have improved over time with better surgical techniques and improved implant designs. While conventional neck-sacrificing implants have been associated with favorable outcomes, there is evidence to suggest biomechanical advantages of newer, femoral neck-preserving short-stem implants, including the Corin MiniHip. However, there is a still a gap of knowledge regarding the potential benefits of the MiniHip stem over conventional neck-sacrificing stems in regards to patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In this study, we investigated the differences between a neck-sacrificing stem design and neck-preserving short-stem design (MiniHip, Corin Inc.) arthroplasty concerning PROs, and considering the known features of the short stem design, we hypothesized that MiniHip THA would be associated with improved PROs in comparison to a neck-sacrificing implant system. We further sought to investigate gender effects related to MiniHip or conventional stem surgery. Methods. Neck-sacrificing implant patients (n=90, age 57±7.9 years, female=58, male=32) and a matched (matching criteria: follow-up period, BMI, age) cohort group of MiniHip patients (n=105, age 55.16±9.88 years, female: 25, male: 80) reported both pre-operative and post-operative Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOS) at a minimum interval of 6 months post-operatively and up to three years postoperatively. We applied MANCOVA analysis to compare patient-reported outcome subscores from each group using follow-up period as a covariate and employing gender as an additional grouping factor to evaluate gender effects. Statistical significance was set at α=0.05 and Bonferroni corrections were applied to account for multiple comparisons. Results. There was a main effect of time, showing that all HOOS subscores of both groups increased significantly after surgery (p<0.001). There was a main effect of surgery for subscores Symptoms (p=0.038), ADL (p=0.046), and Sports and Recreation (p=0.039). There was a gender effect only for the subscore Symptoms (p=0.007). There were significant time by surgery interactions for HOOS subscores Symptoms (p=0.002), Pain (p=.009), Sports and Recreation (p=0.004), and QOL (p<0.001) subscores. We also observed a significant time by gender interaction effect for all HOOS subscores (p<0.001). Discussion. The interaction effects regarding most HOOS subscores and surgery/implant type indicate an advantage of MiniHip surgery regarding post-operative reported outcomes. The observed results may be due to previously described improved physiological loading and native hip structure preservation with neck-preserving short-stem designs. While longer-term studies are required for further investigation, evidence suggests the MiniHip may provide a significant benefit to primary THA patients. The additional gender/time interaction effect observed in our study highlights the necessity to consider potential sex differences regarding both the potential/expected improvement in PROs from THA and the requirement to account for such differences when designing osteoarthritis outcome studies based on PROs

Source of the study: University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand and University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are predictors of knee arthroplasty revision. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is effective for patients with the correct indications, however has higher revision rates than total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Different revision thresholds for the procedures have been postulated. Our aims were to investigate: 1) if PROMs could predict knee arthroplasty revision within two years of the score at six months, five years and ten years follow-up, and 2) if revision ‘thresholds’ differed between TKA and UKA.

All TKAs and UKAs captured by the New Zealand Joint Registry between 1999 and 2019 with at least one OKS response at six months (TKA n=27,708, UKA n=8,415), five years (TKA n=11,519, UKA n=3,365) or ten years (TKA n=6,311, UKA n=1,744) were included. were propensity-score matched 2:1 with UKAs for comparison of revision thresholds.

Logistic regression indicated that for every one-unit decrease in OKS, the odds of TKA and UKA revision decreased by 10% and 11% at six months, 10% and 12% at five years and 9% and 5% at ten years. Fewer TKA patients with ‘poor’ outcomes (≤25) subsequently underwent revision compared with UKA at six months (5.1% vs. 19.6%, p<0.001), five years (4.3% vs. 12.5%, p<0.001) and ten years (6.4%vs. 15.0%, p=0.02). Compared with TKA, UKA patients were 2.5 times more likely to undergo revision for ‘unknown’ reasons, bearing dislocations and disease progression.

The OKS is a strong predictor of subsequent knee arthroplasty revision within two years of the score from early to late term. A lower revision threshold was found with UKA when compared with a matched TKA cohort. Higher revision rates of UKA are associated with both lower clinical thresholds for revision and additional modes of UKA failure.