Introduction. Despite generally excellent patient outcomes for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), there remains a contingent of patients, up to 20%, who are not satisfied with the outcome of their procedure. (Beswick, 2012) There has been a large amount of research into identifying the factors driving these poor patient outcomes, with increasing recognition of the role of non-surgical factors in predicting achieved outcomes. However, most of this research has been based on single database or registry sources and so has inherited the limitations of its source data. The aim of this work is to develop a predictive model that uses expert knowledge modelling in conjunction with data sources to build a predictive model of TKR patient outcomes. Method. The preliminary Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) developed and presented here uses data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, a National Institute of Health funded observational study targeting improved diagnosis and monitoring of osteoarthritis. From this data set, a pared down subset of patient outcome relevant preoperative questionnaire sets has been extracted. The BBN structure provides a flexible platform that handles missing data and varying data collection preferences between surgeons, in addition to temporally updating its predictions as the patient progresses through pre and postoperative milestones in their recovery. In addition, data collected using wearable activity monitoring devices has been integrated. An expert knowledge modelling process relying on the experience of the practicing surgical authors has been used to handle missing cross-correlation observations between the two sources of data. Results. The model presented here has been internally cross validated and has some interesting facets, including the strongest single predictive question of bad outcome for the patient being the presence of lower back pain. Clinical implementation and long term predictive accuracy result collection is ongoing. Discussion. Unsatisfied patients represent a significant minority of TKR recipients, with multiple, multifaceted causal factors both in surgery and out implicated. Historically, focus has been on the role of management and improvement of the surgical factors, which is linked to the fact that surgical factors can often lead to far more disastrous consequences for the patient and the basic principle that “you only improve what you measure.” Growing collection of Patient Reported Outcome Measures by registries around the world has exposed the fact that management of patient factors has lagged behind. (Judge, 2012) Increasingly, the pivotal role of unmet expectations in determining patient satisfaction (Noble, 2006) and the “expectation gap” (Ghomrawi, 2012) between surgeons and patients has been exposed as an opportunity to improve patient outcomes. By developing a model that uses existing surgical expert knowledge to integrate research identified preoperative factors that can be accurately and practically gathered in a clinical setting, a workflow that manages patient expectations in order to optimize outcomes could reduce dissatisfaction rates in TKR recipients. Future work should focus on improving clinical integration and, in the absence of sufficiently wide, deep and complete patient response and predictor datasets, ways of harnessing existing expert knowledge into an evolving predictive tool of patient outcomes

Aims. Despite the increase in the surgical repair of proximal hamstring tears, there exists a lack of consensus in the optimal timing for surgery. There is also disagreement on how partial tears managed surgically compare with complete tears repaired surgically. This study aims to compare the mid-term functional outcomes in, and operating time required for, complete and partial proximal hamstring avulsions, that are repaired both acutely and chronically. Methods. This is a prospective series of 156 proximal hamstring surgical repairs, with a mean age of 48.9 years (21.5 to 78). Functional outcomes were assessed preinjury, preoperatively, and postoperatively (six months and minimum three years) using the Sydney Hamstring Origin Rupture Evaluation (SHORE) score. Operating time was recorded for every patient. Results. Overall, significant improvements in SHORE scores were seen at both six months and mid-term follow-up. Preoperatively, acute patients (median score 27.1 (interquartile range (IQR) 22.9)) reported significantly poorer SHORE scores than chronic patients (median score 42.9 (IQR 22.1); p < 0.001). However, this difference was not maintained postoperatively. For partial tears, acutely repaired patients reported significantly lower preoperative SHORE scores compared to chronically reapired partial tears (median score 24.3 (IQR 15.7) vs median score 40.0 (IQR 25.0); p < 0.001) but also significantly higher SHORE scores at six-month follow-up compared to chronically repaired partial tears (median score 92.9 (IQR 10.7) vs. median score 82.9 (IQR 14.3); p < 0.001). For complete tears, there was only a difference in preoperative SHORE scores between acute and chronic groups. Overall, acute repairs had a significantly shorter operating time (mean 64.67 minutes (standard deviation (SD) 12.99)) compared to chronic repairs (mean 74.71 minutes (SD = 12.0); t = 5.12, p < 0.001). Conclusion. Surgical repair of proximal hamstring avulsions successfully improves patient reported functional outcomes in the majority of patients, irrespective of the timing of their surgery or injury classification. However, reducing the time from injury to surgery is associated with greater improvement in patient outcomes and an increased likelihood of returning to preinjury functional status. Acute repair appears to be a technically less complex procedure, as indicated by reduced operating times, postoperative neurological symptoms and number of patients requiring bracing. Acute repair is therefore a preference among many surgeons. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(10):1419–1427

Introduction. Variation in resection thickness of the femur in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) impacts the flexion and extension tightness of the knee. Less well investigated is how variation in patient anatomy drives flexion or extension tightness pre- and post- operatively. Extension and flexion stability of the post TKA knee is a function of the tension in the ligaments which is proportional to the strain. This study sought to investigate how femoral ligament offset relates to post-operative navigation kinematics and how outcomes are affected by component position in relation to ligament attachment sites. Method. A database of TKA patients operated on by two surgeons from 1-Jan-2014 who had a pre-operative CT scan were assessed. Bone density of the CT scan was used to determine the medial and lateral collateral attachments. Navigation (OmniNav, Raynham, MA) was used in all surgeries, laxity data from the navigation unit was paired to the CT scan. 12-month postoperative Knee Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (KOOS) score and a postoperative CT scan were taken. Preoperative segmented bones and implants were registered to the postoperative scan to determine change in anatomy. Epicondylar offsets from the distal and posterior condyles (of the native knee and implanted components), resections, maximal flexion and extension of the knee and coronal plane laxity were assessed. Relationships between these measurements were determined. Surgical technique was a mix of mechanical gap balancing and kinematically aligned knees using Omni (Raynham, MA) Apex implants. Results. 119 patients were identified in the database. 60% (71) were female and the average age was 69.0 years (+/− 8.1). The average distal femoral bone resection was 7.5 mm (+/− 1.6) medially and 5.4 mm (+/− 2.1) laterally, and posterior 10.2 mm (+/− 1.7) medially and 8.4 mm (+/− 1.8) laterally, with implant replacement thicknesses 9 mm distally and 11 mm posterior. Maximum flexion of the knee post implantation was 121.5° (+/− 8.1) from a preoperative value of 117.9° (+/− 9.5). Change in the collateral ligament offsets brought on by surgery had significant correlations with several laxity and flexion measures. Increase in the posterior offset of the medial collateral attachment brought on by surgery was shown to decrease the maximum flexion attained (coefficient = −0.53, p < 0.001), Figure 1. Increased distal medial offset post-operatively compared to the posterior offset is significantly correlated with improved KOOS pain outcomes (coefficient = 0.23, p = 0.01). Similarly, a decrease in the distal offset of the lateral collateral ligament increased the coronal plane laxity in extension (coefficient = 0.37, p < 0.001), while the posterior lateral resection was observed to correlate with postoperative coronal laxity in flexion (coefficient = 0.42, p < 0.001). Conclusions. Accounting for variation in ligament offset during surgically planning may improve balancing outcomes. Although new alignment approaches, such as kinematic alignment, have been able to demonstrate improvements in short term outcomes, elimination of postoperative dissatisfaction has not been achieved. The interaction of an alignment strategy with a given patient's specific anatomy may be the key to unlocking further TKA patient outcome gains

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of passively collecting objective data from a commercially available smartphone-based care management platform (sbCMP) and robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty (raTKA).

Even though primary total knee arthroplasty involves resurfacing the joint with metal and plastic it is much more of a soft tissue operation than it is a bony procedure. The idea that altering the planned bony resection by a few degrees on either the tibial or femoral side of the joint might somehow eliminate the multifactorial pain complaints and reduced patient satisfaction seen in some 20% or more of cases in reported clinical series is clearly overly optimistic. Axial alignment is important, but no more so than the level of distal femoral resection, tibial and femoral rotation, tibial resection level and downslope and femoral sagittal plane alignment. The real problem is that errors in component positioning are common, rarely made one at a time, and are made more common by greater procedural complexity. No matter the resection method (let alone the resection target!) errors are commonly linked and iterative. For example: femoral malrotation on an under-resected distal femur (in a knee with minimal arthritic wear to begin with) can contribute to corresponding tibial malrotation helped by a “floated” tibial trial on an all too often overly resected and downsloped tibial surface that has been recut to allow full extension with the under-resected femur (and now also results in AP laxity in flexion). Small changes in the alignment target will not fix this!

On the other hand: Kinematic alignment individualised to the patient's anatomy as a means of reducing soft tissue imbalance and minimizing ligamentous releases is actually a reasonable objective and a laudable goal on the surface. The problem with operationalizing this widely relates to what is currently required to try and reliably achieve this goal using currently available implants and technology. In the early 1980's the proponents of “anatomic” alignment with a residual 2- to 3-degree varus tibial resection and corresponding joint obliquity were Hungerford and Krackow. This concept was widely adopted but proved to be fraught with difficulty in the hands of community based surgeons in that era due to common excessive varus tibial resection errors and resulting premature implant failures. Recent reports on kinematic alignment involve a plethora of technology combinations including pre-operative CT (or MRI) for 3D reconstruction and planning, custom jig fabrication, and navigated bony preparation or individualised bony cuts off of patient specific jigs. The goal is to allow customised resections that “estimate” original cartilage thickness and bone erosion and seek to replicate the original however native anatomy and provide better precision for bone resection. Even when successful this is often followed by placement of a standard implant not too different from those in the 80's and 90's which may well have one femoral articular “J curve” for all patents, a single patellofemoral groove design and anatomic shape for all, and that makes use of a central keel on a nonanatomic tibial design with limited sizing increments, all implanted into a patient without an ACL and not infrequently PCL deficient as well. And all of this is done with the hope of restoring the normal original knee kinematics!

The frequent combination of several of the above factors clinically in a single knee may help explain some of the variability in results of kinematic alignment reported by some authors even after excluding certain pre-operative deformities (excess valgus or varus).

For now mechanical alignment methods and instrumentation should remain the standard of care for routine TKA practice for most, and in complex primary cases for all.

Conventional total knee arthroplasty aims to place the joint line perpendicular to the mechanical axis resulting in an overall neutral mechanical alignment. This objective is promulgated despite the fact healthy adult populations are on average in varus with few proximal tibias being neutral to the mechanical axis. The goal of a neutral mechanical axis is based largely on historical studies and the fact that it is easier to make a neutral tibial cut with conventional jigs and the eye. In order to balance the flexion and extension gaps to accommodate a neutral tibial cut, in most patients, asymmetrical distal and posterior femoral cuts are required. The resulting position of the femoral component could be considered to be “mal-rotated” with respect to the patient's soft tissue envelope. Soft tissue releases are often required to “balance” the knee. Planning and execution of the surgery are largely based off 2-dimensional radiographs which grossly oversimplifies the concept of alignment to the coronal plane, largely ignoring what happens to the knee in 3-dimensions through range of motion and 4-dimensions with respect to gait, stair climbing, etc. Subsequently, neutral mechanical for all engenders the “looks good, feels bad” phenomenon seen in many patients that may in part drive the higher dissatisfaction rates seen in knee arthroplasty globally compared to hip arthroplasty.

Additionally, because most tibias are in varus in the native state, placement of the tibial component in a neutral position results in a valgus orientated position during weight bearing post-operatively. Placing the tibial component in a varus, kinematic aligned position negates this deleterious condition and has been linked to improved outcomes in recent studies.

New imaging and surgical techniques allow for the identification of patient specific alignment targets and the ability to more precisely execute the surgical plan with respect to 3-dimensional placement of the components. Long-term outcomes studies as well as more recent studies on “kinematic” positioning suggest that deviation away from a neutral mechanical target is safe with respect to survivorship and provides better function with a more “natural” feeling knee.

Introduction

Surgical complications are common and most of them are preventable. Up to 70 % of surgical errors originate outside theatre and recent studies have shown that pre-op checklists can reduce such problems. We hypothesized that in our institution outcomes could be improved by introducing a safety checklist.

Aim

Staphylococcus epidermidis has emerged as an important opportunistic pathogen causing orthopedic device-related infections (ODRIs). In this prospective clinical and laboratory study, we have investigated the association of genome variation and phenotypic features of the infecting S. epidermidis isolate with the clinical outcome of the infected patient.

Developments in plate technology have increased interest in the operative fixation of Colles' fracture. The vast majority of patients are treated non-operatively, yet there are few medium or long-term outcome studies.

The aim of this study was to evaluate medium-term outcome of a cohort of patients who previously received treatment in a plaster cast. 236 patients entered two previous prospective, randomised control studies comparing closed reduction techniques or plaster cast type. Both studies showed no difference in clinical or radiological outcome between groups. 43% of this cohort had a final dorsal tilt of > 10° and 44% had final radial shortening of >2mm. All patients now have a minimum follow-up of five years and 60 have died. The remaining 176 patients were contacted by post and asked to complete two validated patient-based questionnaires: a modified Patient Evaluation Measure and a quickDASH. 112 replies were received. The mean age of patients is 67 years (range 23 – 91 years). 31 patients are employed and 57 retired. 77% of patients had a quickDASH score of less than 20. 59% of patients never experience wrist pain whilst 8% of patients have daily pain.

All Patient Evaluation Measures have shown a median score of 12 or less (0=excellent, 100= terrible). The best score was for pain (median 4; IQR 2-12) and the worst for grip strength (median 12; IQR 4 – 41). No radiological outcome 5 weeks after injury correlated with any outcome score, except for dorsal tilt, which correlated with difficulty with fiddly tasks (p=0.04) and carpal malalignment which correlated with interference with work (p=0.04).

In conclusion, our results show a good functional outcome five years after non-operative management of Colles' fracture. A degree of malunion is acceptable and in the light of our results the economic impact of surgery must be evaluated.

Separation of the ACL into anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) fibre bundles has been widely accepted. The bundles act synergistically to restrain anterior laxity throughout knee flexion, with the PL bundle providing the more important restraint near extension and its obliquity better restraining tibial rotational laxity.

10% of ACL injuries involve isolated rupture to one of these bundles causing patients to present with instability symptoms or pain. As knowledge about the influence of the ACL bundles on knee kinematics has increased, isolated reconstruction of either PL or AM bundle has been advocated. However only one cohort study of 17 patients has been presented in the clinical literature.

KOOS (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) and IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee Form) scores at 1yr post op were obtained for 12 patients who had undergone isolated ACL augmentation between 2007 and 2009. These were compared with previously published outcome scores for standard ACL reconstruction procedures. In addition examination under anaesthesia (EUA) assessments were analysed to see if a pattern of laxity for isolated AM and PL rupture could be determined.

There were 5 patients with isolated AM bundle rupture and 7 with isolated PL bundle rupture. EUA analysis demonstrated that patients with isolated PL bundle rupture had increased pivot shift and Lachman test laxity, whereas the AM bundle rupture group had increased laxity with the anterior drawer test. Compared to previously published IKDC scores, there were no difference between isolated bundle augmentation and standard ACL reconstruction. However the KOOS scores showed significantly increased Sports function scores which was significantly better in the isolated bundle augmentations (93/100 v's 74/100). Differences between isolated AM and PL bundle reconstructions were not distinguishable.

Isolated ACL bundle tears make up a significant proportion ACL injuries. Although technically more difficult than standard ACL reconstruction, isolated bundle augmentation appears to result in improved sports function when compared to standard ACL reconstruction.

Aim

Two different techniques to release subscapularis during total shoulder replacement (TSR) have been described (tenotomy and osteotomy) with no consensus as to which is superior. In this study we review the clinical outcomes of a sequential series of patients in whom a TSR for primary osteoarthritis had been performed using either technique at our institution. Subscapularis function was tested using a new graded belly press test, a modification of the traditional belly press test which is described for the first time here.

Significance. In spite of evidence that total knee replacement (TKR) surgery is effective, numerous studies have demonstrated that approximately 20 percent of patients who have undergone TKR surgery are not satisfied. This relatively high rate of patients who are not satisfied is the result of unmet patient expectations. The strongest predictor of dissatisfaction after TKR is unmet expectations (RR = 10.7, Bourne, Chesworth, et al, 2010). This is confirmed by Dunbar, Richardson, and Robertsson (2013): “Unmet expectation seems to be a major cause of unsatisfactory outcomes and satisfaction is most strongly correlated with relief of pain, followed by improvement in physical function.” Objective: To develop patient reported outcome (PRO) recovery graphs for knee function, activity level, and pain relief to be used as a shared decision making tool for total knee replacement surgery. Methods. A proprietary joint arthroplasty database of patient reported outcomes (PROs) was analyzed to determine the recovery curve means and standard deviations of four PROs at six time points: pre-operatively, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-operatively for total knee replacement surgery. The recovery graphs are stratified by percentile (10%, 26%, 50%, 75%, and 90%) The PROs analyzed were: (1) European quality of life (EQ-5D); Oxford Knee Score (OKS); (3) Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS); and (4) Likert Pain Scale (LPS). The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated using a distribution method where the MCID equals one half the standard deviation of the score change, MCID = σΔ/2. The LEAS and LPS are used to measure patients’ expectations for pain relief and activity improvement. Prior to discussing surgery, patients are asked to report their pre-operative pain and activity levels and to specify their expected pain relief and activity improvement one year after surgery. Results. EQ-5D: MCID 0.086, mean pre-op 0.695, 1 year post op 0.845, mean change 0.150 (1.74 MCIDs). Oxford Knee Score: MCID 4.55, mean pre-op 25.7, 1 year post op 39.7, mean change 14.0 (3.08 MCIDs). Lower Extremity Activity Scale: MCID 1.61, mean pre-op 9.08, 1 year post op 10.82, mean change 1.74 (1.08 MCIDs). Likert Pain Scale: MCID 1.26, mean pre-op 5.98, 1 year post op 1.41, mean change −4.57 (3.63 MCIDs). Stratified recovery graphs for Oxford Knee Score, Lower Extremity Activity Scale, and Likert Pain Scale are attached. Conclusions. Pain relief (3.63 MCIDs) and improved knee function (3.08 MCIDs) will be the most dramatic improvements for patients undergoing total knee replacement surgery. Stratified recovery graphs can be used as a shared decision making tool to manage both realistic and unrealistic expectations. The recovery graphs delineate the time course for rehabilitation. Patients typically do not exceed their pre-operative activity level until three months after surgery

We examined data from a large prospectively collected dataset which followed up patients after Exeter total hip replacement (THR) - the Exeter Primary Outcome Study. We studied 78 patients who had total hip replacement for osteoarthritis on a morphologically normal hip, and in whom the other hip was also morphologically normal for comparison. All selected patients had complete patient outcome data at 1 and 5 years, and x-rays at 1 year were available. We measured accuracy of reconstruction on AP Pelvis radiographs. The parameters measured were difference in height of lesser trochanter from horizontal pelvic line (LLD); length from ASIS to greater trochanter (indicating abductor length, AL); length from symphysis to centre of femoral head (SFH); length from centre of head to axis of femur (offset). We examined clinical outcomes including gain of Oxford Hip Score (DOHS) at 1 and 5 years, absolute OHS at 1 and 5 years, and absolute SF-36 Physical Functioning and Role Physical scores at 1 and 5 years. Examining the ratios of AL, SFH, Offset, Offset to SFH ratio and LLD between side of THR and unaffected side all showed marked variation. Thus the ratio of SFH varied from 0.85 to 1.11. For further analysis we divided the patients into 3 groups on the basis of variability of the ratio from 1; we examined whether the clinical scores above varied between these 3 groups. 1 way ANOVA demonstrated no significant difference for any of the clinical outcomes for any of the 5 grouped x-ray variables. Accuracy of reconstruction has been shown to affect the risk of dislocation after THR. Our results indicate that clinical outcomes of total hip replacement appear resilient to some degree of surgical inaccuracy. Future trials of navigation should be designed to demonstrate not only improved accuracy but also improved clinical outcome

Objectives. This study examines variations in knee arthroplasty patient reported outcome measures according to patient age. Methods. We analysed prospectively collected outcome data (OKS, Eq5D, satisfaction, and revision) on 2456 primary knee arthroplasty patients. Patients were stratified into defined age groups (< 55, 55–64, 65–74, 75–84, and ≥85 years). Oxford Knee Score and Eq5D were analysed pre-operatively, and postoperatively at 6 months and 2 years. Absolute scores and post-operative change in scores were calculated and compared between age groups. Satisfaction scores (0–100) were analysed at 6 months post-operatively. Linear, logistic and ordinal regression modelling was used to describe the association between age and outcomes, for continuous, binary and ordinal outcomes, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to describe revision rates at 2 years. Results. Patients aged 65–85 years demonstrated better preoperative status than those aged under 65 (OKS, p=0.03; Eq5D, p=0.048), and over 85 years (OKS, p=0.03). Postoperatively, no significant difference in OKS or Eq5D was observed between age groups. Postoperative change in score showed a linear trend for a greater post-operative change in younger patients at 6-months and 2-years (p< 0.04). Overall satisfaction score was 84.9, but patient satisfaction was significantly lower in those aged < 55 years compared to all other age groups (78.1 Vs. 84.8, p=0.031). Cumulative overall 2-year revision rate was 1.3%. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that good early outcomes, as measured by the OKS and Eq5D, can be anticipated following knee replacement regardless of the patient's age, although younger patients gain greater improvement. However, the lower satisfaction in those aged < 55 years is a concern and suggests that outcome is not fully encapsulated by the OKS and Eq5D alone. This raises the question as to whether the OKS alone is an appropriate measure of pain and function in the younger, more active population

Introduction. Most studies now use Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) as the preferred and only method for assessing ‘functional outcome’ following surgery. It is thought that these questionnaires accurately reflect the patient's pain and physical function. We hypothesised that comprehensive functional examination would therefore correlate strongly with PROMS following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. We prospectively assessed the function of 100 consecutive knee replacement patients, pre-operatively, then at 8, 26 and 52 weeks post-operatively. PROMS employed were the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the Short Form-36. Additionally, leg strength (Leg Extensor Power Rig(tm)), a validated battery of timed functional tasks (Aggregated Locomotor Function, ALF) and pain scores (numerical rating scale) were also assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using the Minitab version 15 software. Level of significance was set as p = < 0.05. Results. Seven patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 93 data sets available for analysis. All of the individual outcome measures showed statistically significant improvement between each of the assessment periods (paired sample t-test, p = < 0.05). Strong correlation was observed between the two PROMS (r = 0.74). Comparatively small correlations were identified between the PROMS and physical assessments (r = < 0.41). The pain scores correlated modestly well with the OKS (r = 0.61) but comparatively poorly with the physical assessments (r = < 0.37). Conclusion. PROMS correlate well with pain, but less well with function following TKA. These results suggest that PROMS may not fully represent actual physical function, but rather the patient's perception of their function. With the advancement of PROMS as the prime outcome measure of most studies, it is important to acknowledge that the assessment provided may be incomplete and, though a useful means of assessing large cohorts, their limitation in assessing functional outcome should be recognised

Military patients have high functional requirements of the upper limb and may have lower pre-operative PROM scores than civilian patients i.e. their function is high when benchmarked, but still insufficient to perform their military role thereby mandating surgery. Our aim was to compare the pre-operative Oxford Shoulder Instability Scores in military and civilian patients undergoing shoulder stabilisation surgery.

We undertook a prospective, blinded cohort-controlled study (OCEBM Level 3b). The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in the Oxford Shoulder Instability Scores between military and civilian groups. A power calculation showed that 40 patients were required in each group to give 95% power with 5% significance. A clinical database (iParrot, ByResults Ltd., Oxford, UK) was interrogated for consecutive patients undergoing shoulder stabilisation surgery at a single centre. The senior author - blinded to the outcome score - matched patients according to age, gender and diagnosis. Statistical analysis showed the data to be normally distributed so a paired samples t-test was used to compare the two groups. 110 patients were required to provide a matched cohort of 80 patients.

There were 70 males and 10 females. Age at the time of surgery was 16-19yrs (n=6); 20-24yrs (n=28); 25-29 (n=16); 30-34(n=12); 35-49(n=12); 40-44(n=6). 72 patients (90%) had polar group one and 8 patients (10%) had polar group two instability. The mean Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in the civilian group was 17 and the in military group was 18. There was no statistical difference between the two groups (p=0.395).

This study supports the use the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score to assess military patients with shoulder instability.

Military patients have high functional requirements of the upper limb and may have lower pre-operative PROM scores than civilian patients i.e. their function is high when benchmarked, but still insufficient to perform their military role thereby mandating surgery.

Our aim was to compare the pre-operative Oxford Shoulder Instability Scores in military and civilian patients undergoing shoulder stabilisation surgery.

We undertook a prospective, blinded cohort-controlled study (OCEBM Level 3b). The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in the Oxford Shoulder Instability Scores between military and civilian groups. A power calculation showed that 40 patients were required in each group to give 95% power with 5% significance. A clinical database (iParrot, ByResults Ltd., Oxford, UK) was interrogated for consecutive patients undergoing shoulder stabilisation surgery at a single centre. The senior author - blinded to the outcome score - matched patients according to age, gender and diagnosis. Statistical analysis showed the data to be normally distributed so a paired samples t-test was used to compare the two groups.

110 patients were required to provide a matched cohort of 80 patients. There were 70 males and 10 females. Age at the time of surgery was 16–19 yrs (n=6); 20–24yrs (n=28); 25–29 (n=16); 30–34 (n=12); 35–39 (n=12); 40–44 (n=6). 72 patients (90%) had polar group one and 8 patients (10%) had polar group two instability. The mean Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in the civilian group was 17 and the in military group was 18. There was no statistical difference between the two groups (p=0.395).

This study supports the use the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score to assess military patients with shoulder instability.

Introduction

The Constant Score (CS) and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) are shoulder scoring systems routinely used in the UK. Patients with Acromio-Clavicular Joint (ACJ) and Sterno-Clavicular Joint (SCJ) injuries and those with clavicle fractures tend to be younger and more active than those with other shoulder pathologies. While the CS takes into account the recreational outcomes for such patients the weighting is very small. We developed the Nottingham Clavicle Score (NCS) specifically for this group of patients.

Electronic PROMs have many potential uses in orthopaedic practice. The primary objective of this three-phase pilot study was to measure uptake using a web-based ePROM system following the introduction of two separate process improvements.

80 consecutive new elective orthopaedic patients in a single surgeon's practice were recruited. Group 1 (n=26) received a reminder letter, Group 2 (n=31) also received a SMS message via mobile or home telephone and Group 3 (n=23) also had access to Tablet Computer in clinic.

Overall 79% of patients had Internet access. 35% of Group 1, 55% of Group 2 and 74% of Group 3 recorded an ePROM score (p=0.02). There was no significant age difference between groups. In Group 3, 94% of patients listed for an operation completed an ePROM score (p=0.006).

Collecting PROM data effectively in everyday clinical practice is challenging. Electronic collection should improve healthcare delivery, but is in its infancy. This pilot study shows that the combination of SMS reminder and access to Tablet Computer within clinic setting enabled 94% of patients listed for an operation to complete a score on a clinical outcomes web-based system. Further process improvements, such as additional staff training and telephone call reminders, may further improve uptake.

Source of the study: University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has benefits for patients with appropriate indications. However, UKA has a higher risk of revision, particularly for low-usage surgeons. The introduction of robotic-arm assisted systems may allow for improved outcomes but is also associated with a learning curve. We aimed to characterise the learning curve of a robotic-arm assisted system (MAKO) for UKA in terms of operative time, limb alignment, component sizing, and patient outcomes. Operative times, pre- and post-surgical limb alignments, and component sizing were prospectively recorded for consecutive cases of primary medial UKA between 2017 and 2021 (n=152, 5 surgeons). Patient outcomes were captured with the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) and re-operation events up to two years post-UKA. A Cumulative Summation (CUSUM) method was used to estimate learning curves and to distinguish between learning and proficiency phases. Introduction of the system had a learning curve of 11 cases. There was increased operative time of 13 minutes between learning and proficiency phases (learning 98 mins vs. proficiency 85 mins; p<0.001), associated with navigation registration and bone preparation/cutting. A learning curve was also found with polyethylene insert sizing (p=0.03). No difference in patient outcomes between the two phases were detected for patient-reported outcome measures, implant survival (both phases 98%; NS) or re-operation (learning 100% vs. proficiency: 96%; NS). Implant survival and re-operation rates did not differ between low and high usage surgeons (cut-off of 12 UKAs per year). Introduction of the robotic-arm assisted system for UKA led to increased operative times for navigation registration and bone preparation, but no differences were detected in terms of component placement or patient outcomes regardless of usage. The short learning curve regardless of UKA usage indicated that robotic-arm assisted UKA may be particularly useful for low-usage surgeons