The goal of this study was to identify the effect of mismatches in the subchondral bone surface at the native:graft interface on cartilage tissue deformation in human patellar osteochondral allografts (OCA). Hypothesis: large mismatches in the subchondral bone surface will result in higher stresses in the overlying and surrounding cartilage, potentially increasing the risk of graft failure. Nano-CT scans of ten 16mm diameter cadaveric patellar OCA transplants were used to develop simplified and 3D finite element (FE) models to quantify the effect of mismatches in the subchondral bone surface. The simplified model consisted of a cylindrical plug with a 16 mm diameter (graft) and a washer with a 16 mm inner diameter and 36 mm outer diameter (surrounding native cartilage). The thickness of the graft cartilage was varied from 0.33x the thickness of native cartilage (proud graft subchondral bone) to 3x the thickness of native cartilage (sunken graft subchondral bone; Fig. 1). The thickness of the native cartilage was set to 2 mm. The surface of the cartilage in the graft was matched to the surrounding native cartilage. A 1 MPa pressure was applied to the fixed patellar cartilage surface. Scans were segmented using Dragonfly and meshed using HyperMesh. FE simulations were conducted in Abaqus 2019. The simplified model demonstrated that a high stress region occurred in the cartilage at the sharp bony edge between the graft and native subchondral bone, localized to the region with thinner cartilage. A 20% increase in applied pressure occurs up to 50μm away from the graft edge (primarily in the graft cartilage) for grafts with proud subchondral bone but varies little based on the graft cartilage thickness. For grafts with sunken subchondral bone, the size of the high stress region decreases as the difference between graft cartilage and native cartilage thickness decreases (Fig. 2-4), with a 200 μm high stress region occurring when graft cartilage was 3x thicker than native cartilage (i.e., greater graft cartilage thickness produces larger areas of stress in the surrounding native cartilage). The 3D models reproduced the key features demonstrated in the simplified model. Larger differences between native and graft cartilage thickness cause larger high stress regions. Differences between the 3D and simplified models are caused by heterogeneous cartilage surface curvature and thickness. Simplified and 3D FE analysis confirmed our hypothesis that greater cartilage thickness mismatches resulted in higher cartilage stresses for sunken subchondral bone. Unexpectedly, cartilage stresses were independent of the cartilage thickness mismatch for proud subchondral bone. These FE findings did not account for tissue remodeling, patient variability in tissue mechanical properties, or complex tissue loading. In vivo experiments with full-thickness strain measurements should be conducted to confirm these findings. Mismatches in the subchondral bone can therefore produce stress increases large enough to cause local chondrocyte death near the subchondral surface. These stress increases can be reduced by (a) reducing the difference in thickness between graft and native cartilage or (b) using a graft with cartilage that is thinner than the native cartilage. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. The degree of cartilage degeneration assessed intraoperatively may not be sufficient as a criterion for patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, single-photon emission tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) is useful for detecting osteoarthritic involvement deeper in the subchondral bone. The purpose of the study was to determine whether SPECT/CT reflected the cartilage lesion underneath the patella in patients with end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) and whether clinical outcomes after TKA without patellar resurfacing differed according to the severity of patellofemoral (PF) OA determined by visual assessment and SPECT/CT findings. Methods. This study included 206 knees which underwent TKA. The degree of cartilage degeneration was graded intraoperatively according to the International Cartilage Repair Society grading system. Subjects were classified into four groups according to the degree of bone tracer uptake (BTU) on SPECT/CT in the PF joint. The Feller's patella score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were assessed preoperatively and postoperative 1 and 2 years. Results. The increased BTU in the PF joint was associated with more severe degenerative cartilage changes underneath the patella (P < 0.001). The risk for the presence of denudated cartilage was greater in the high uptake group (odds ratio = 5.89). There was no association between clinical outcomes and visual grading of patellar cartilage degeneration or the degree of BTU on SPECT/CT. Discussion and Conclusions. The visual assessment of the degree of cartilage degeneration underneath the patella and preoperative SPECT/CT evaluation of the PF joint were not predictive of clinical outcome after TKA with unresurfaced patella

Whether or not to resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. Several methods of dealing with the patella exist: ALWAYS resurface; NEVER resurface; SOMETIMES resurface. There is good reason to consider selective patellar resurfacing. First, in an age of partial knee arthroplasty we have become more tuned in to analyzing patterns of arthritis. In TKA there is a high percentage of patients who do not have significant patellar cartilage wear or anterolateral knee pain. These patients may be candidates for leaving the patella unresurfaced in TKA. Arno et al found that 42% of patients had no significant patellar arthritis at the time of TKA. Roberts et al found that only 15% of patients should undergo patella resurfacing based on the presence of exposed bone on the patella; the other 85% could be considered suitable for leaving the patella unresurfaced. Second, despite a cumulative incidence of less than 5–10%, problems related to patellar resurfacing account for perhaps the most catastrophic complications encountered, with treatments that have limited success. These complications include fracture, avascular necrosis, extensor mechanism disruption, and anterior knee pain. Third, it is a fallacy to think that anterior knee pain (AKP) does not exist despite primary patellar resurfacing in TKA. Meftah (Ranawat) et al found that AKP persists in 30% of patients and new AKP develops in 10% of patients after TKA with patellar resurfacing. Barrack et al found that with patellar resurfacing the incidence of AKP is 28% in patients without preop AKP and 9% in those with preop AKP. They also found that without patellar resurfacing the incidence of new AKP was 14% and persistent AKP was 23%. Fourth, only roughly 44–64% of patients who undergo secondary patellar resurfacing for AKP after TKA with an unresurfaced patella actually get relief of their pain, suggesting that there is some other etiology of anterior knee pain. Residual component malalignment, boxy femoral components, PF overstuffing, referred pain or asymmetric resurfacing may explain ongoing pain. Finally, the data in well-designed studies show that selective patellar resurfacing can produce similar outcomes with and without resurfacing, particularly in those without significant patellar arthritis. In multiple studies, higher rates of secondary surgery occur when the patella is left unresurfaced in primary TKA, but this is for “pain” without clear etiology. On the other hand secondary surgery is rarely performed in TKA with patellar resurfacing for “pain” only, despite its high incidence. The quality of patellar cartilage at the time of primary TKA should be considered, as that may be the best indicator of whether a knee will do well without patellar resurfacing (that is, selective patellar resurfacing may be a better idea than never resurfacing the patella). While patellar resurfacing remains controversial in modern TKA, excellent outcomes are achievable with, and without, primary patellar resurfacing. Selectively leaving the patella unresurfaced when there is limited patellar arthritis may not only be highly effective, but it may also limit the incidence of secondary resurfacing that may occur with more substantial patellar arthritis while also minimizing the risk of some of the devastating complications that can occur due to patellar resurfacing in TKA

Since 2005, the author has performed nearly 1000 Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasties (UKA) using a mobile bearing. The indications are 1) Isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis with ‘bone-on-bone’ contact, which has failed prior conservative treatment, 2) Medial femoral condyle avascular necrosis or spontaneous osteonecrosis, which has failed prior conservative treatment. Patients are recommended for UKA only if the following anatomic requirements are met: 1) Intact ACL, 2) Full thickness articular cartilage wear limited to the anterior half of the medial tibial plateau, 3) Unaffected lateral compartment cartilage, 4) Unaffected patellar cartilage on the lateral facet, 5) Less than 10 degrees of flexion deformity, 6) Over 100 degrees of knee flexion, and 7) Varus deformity not exceeding 15 degrees. Exclusion criteria for surgery are BMI of more than 30, prior high tibial osteotomy, and inflammatory arthritis. All cases were performed with a tourniquet inflated using a minimally-invasive incision with a quadriceps-sparing approach. Both femoral and tibial components were cemented. Most patients were discharged home the next morning; bilaterals usually stayed a day longer. We have previously described our results and the factors determining alignment. In a more recent study, we have compared the coronal post-operative limb alignment and knee joint line obliquity after medial UKA with a clinically and radiologically (less than Grade 2 medial OA) normal contralateral lower limb. In our series, we have had 1 revision for aseptic loosening of both components, conversion to TKRs in a patient with bilateral UKAs who developed rheumatoid arthritis 3 years later, and 9 meniscal dislocations. There have been no cases of wound infections and thromboembolism. We have reviewed our patients with a minimum 10-year follow-up which will be presented. The vast majority of our patients have been generally very satisfied with the results. Our study shows that most patients (who have no disease in the contralateral knee) regain their ‘natural’ alignment and joint line obliquity comparable to their contralateral limb. Over the past few years our percentage of UKAs has been steadily rising to about a third of our knee cases. UKA serves as a definitive procedure in the elderly. We see it as a suitable procedure in middle-aged patients who want an operation that provides a quick recovery, full function and range of motion, and near-normal kinematics, with the understanding that they have a small chance of conversion to a total knee arthroplasty in the future

Since 2005, the author has performed 422 Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasties (UKA) using a mobile bearing. There were 263 females and 119 males, (40 patients had bilateral UKAs) with a mean age of 62 years. The indications were: Isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis with ‘bone-on-bone’ contact, which had failed prior conservative treatment; Medial femoral condyle avascular necrosis or spontaneous osteonecrosis, which had failed prior conservative treatment. Patients were recommended UKA only if the following anatomic requirements were met: Intact ACL, Full thickness articular cartilage wear limited to the anterior half of the medial tibial plateau, Unaffected lateral compartment cartilage, Unaffected patellar cartilage on the lateral facet, Less than 10 degrees of flexion deformity, Over 100 degrees of knee flexion, Varus deformity not exceeding 15 degrees. Exclusion criteria for surgery were BMI of more than 30, prior high tibial osteotomy, and inflammatory arthritis. All cases were performed with a tourniquet inflated using a minimally-invasive incision with a quadriceps-sparing approach. Both femoral and tibial components were cemented. Rehabilitation consisted of teaching the patients 6 exercises to regain strength and range of motion, and weight-bearing as tolerated with a cane began from the evening of surgery. Most patients were discharged home the next morning; bilaterals usually stayed a day longer. We have previously described our results and the factors determining alignment. In a more recent study we have compared the coronal postoperative limb alignment and knee joint line obliquity after medial UKA with a clinically and radiologically (less than Grade 2 medial OA) normal contralateral lower limb. In our series of 423 cases, we have had 1 revision for aseptic loosening of both components, and 4 meniscal dislocations. There have been no cases of wound infections and thromboembolism. We are currently undertaking a review of the 2–10 year follow-up of our cases. The vast majority of our patients have been generally very satisfied with the results. Our study shows that most patients (who have no disease in the contralateral knee) regain their ‘natural’ alignment and joint line obliquity comparable to their contralateral limb. Over the past few years our percentage of UKAs has been steadily rising. UKA serves as a definitive procedure in the elderly. We see it as a suitable procedure in middle-aged patients who want an operation that provides a quick recovery, full function and range of motion, and near-normal kinematics, with the understanding that they have a small chance of conversion to a total knee arthroplasty in the future

Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the shape of patella relative to the femoral epicondylar axis and to find sex differences. Materials and methods. Computed tomography (CT) images of 100 knees with tibiofemoral osteoarthritis in 100 patients were prospectively collected. All patients were diagnosed as varus-type osteoarthritis with no destructive patellar deformity. Fifty patients were male and 50 female. The average male age was 70.8±14.6 (mean ± SD) years and the average female age was 73.3±6.7 years. Forty nine knees were right and 51 knees were left. The average height of males was 162.6±7.4 cm and that of females 149.6±5.7 cm. Males were significantly taller than females. The CT scan was performed with 2mm-interval slices in the vertical plane to the long axis of femoral shaft. Every CT image was examined to determine the maximum distance between the medial and lateral femoral epicondyle (inter-epicondylar distance, IED) along the epicondylar axis. The maximum patellar width and thickness were also measured at the image which had these maximum distances, while patellar cartilage thickness in anteroposterior diameter was not measured in this study. For evaluating the patellar size, each measured value was divided by IED and calculated each ratio. The ratio of patellar width to patellar thickness was also calculated. All parameters were compared between males and females. Statistical software Statview ver.5.0 (SAS Institute Inc.) was used for all analyses with significance being set at the 5% level. Results. Measured values are presented on Table 1. The average IED, patellar width and patellar thickness of males were all significantly larger than those of females. As shown in Table 2, by contrast, each ratio to IED was almost the same between the sexes and there were no significant differences. The ratio of patellar width to patellar thickness was 46.7±2.6% in males and 46.6±2.9% in females. Discussion. Although some studies have assessed the actual measurement values of patella, no prior study, to our knowledge, has morphologically evaluated the patella relative to the femur. This is the first study to investigate the configuration and location of patella relative to femoral epicondylar axis. Our results showed the configuration of patella relative to the femoral epicondylar axis was the same between sexes. The patellar width is approximately 56% and TGD is approximately 39% of IED. The most common complications after the surgery are related to patellofemoral problems. The ideal thickness of the resurfaced patella has not been clearly investigated. Patellar disabilities are associated with both decreased and increased patellar thickness— a thin patella could lead to anteroposterior patellar instability and a thick patella could increase the risk of stiffness of the knee and patellar subluxation. Therefore, it is desirable to restore the original patellar thickness during surgery. The results of current study showed that the ratio of patellar width to the patellar thickness was about 47%, which is useful to determine the thickness of patella during surgeries for severely damaged knees or revision surgeries