Cervical spine fractures are frequent in impact sports, such as rugby union. The consequences of these fractures can be devastating as they can lead to paraplegia, tetraplegia and death. Many studies have been conducted to understand the injury mechanisms but the relationship between player cervical spine posture and fracture pattern is still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of player cervical spine posture on fracture pattern due to an impact load. Nineteen porcine cervical spines (C2 to C6) were dissected, potted in PMMA bone cement and mounted in a custom made rig. They were impacted with a mean load of 6 kN. Eight specimens were tested in an axial position, five in flexion and six in lateral bending. All specimens were micro-CT imaged (Nikon XT225 ST Scanner, Nikon Metrology, UK) before and after the tests, and the images were used to assess the fracture patterns. The injuries were classified according to Allen-Ferguson classification system by three independent observers. The preliminary results showed that the main fracture modalities were consistent with those seen clinically. The main fractures for the axial orientation were observed in C5-C6 level with fractures on the articular process and endplates. These findings support the concept that the fracture patterns are related to the spine position and give an insight for improvements on sports rules in order to reduce the risk of injury

We studied 51 patients with osteo-articular tuberculosis who were divided into two groups. Group I comprised 31 newly-diagnosed patients who were given first-line antituberculous treatment consisting of isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol and pyrazinamide. Group II (non-responders) consisted of 20 patients with a history of clinical non-responsiveness to supervised uninterrupted antituberculous treatment for a minimum of three months or a recurrence of a previous lesion which on clinical observation had healed. No patient in either group was HIV-positive. Group II were treated with an immunomodulation regime of intradermal BCG, oral levamisole and intramuscular diphtheria and tetanus vaccines as an adjunct for eight weeks in addition to antituberculous treatment. We gave antituberculous treatment for a total of 12 to 18 months in both groups and they were followed up for a mean of 30.2 months (24 to 49). A series of 20 healthy blood donors served as a control group.

Twenty-nine (93.6%) of the 31 patients in group I and 14 of the 20 (70%) in group II had a clinicoradiological healing response to treatment by five months.

The CD4 cell count in both groups was depressed at the time of enrolment, with a greater degree of depression in the group-II patients (686 cells/mm³ (sd 261) and 545 cells/mm³ (sd 137), respectively; p < 0.05). After treatment for three months both groups showed significant elevation of the CD4 cell count, reaching a level comparable with the control group. However, the mean CD4 cell count of group II (945 cells/mm³ (sd 343)) still remained lower than that of group I (1071 cells/mm³ (sd 290)), but the difference was not significant. Our study has shown encouraging results after immunomodulation and antituberculous treatment in non-responsive patients. The pattern of change in the CD4 cell count in response to treatment may be a reliable clinical indicator.