Introduction. No previous studies have attempted to measure parental satisfaction and service quality in regards to paediatric orthopaedic service inpatient care. We performed a prospective observational study to assess parental satisfaction with the level of service provided for paediatric orthopaedic inpatient care in our unit. Methods. We employed the validated Swedish parent satisfaction questionnaire to generate parental satisfaction data from 104 paediatric orthopaedic hospital inpatients between August 2009 and May 2010 (49 elective and 55 trauma paediatric orthopaedic admissions, median age range 2–6 years). Questions focused on eight domains of quality: Information on illness, information on routines, accessibility, medical treatment, care processes, staff attitudes, parent participation and staff work environment. Scores generated were a percentage of the maximum achievable for that quality index, for example 100% would correspond to a parent awarding all questions for that index the highest possible score. Results. Overall combined scores for the care indices were highest for parent's perception of ‘medical treatment’ (95%) and ‘staff attitudes’ (95%). The medical treatment index includes questions regarding staff member's skill and competence. Lowest scores corresponded to the index' information routines' (86%). Conclusion. Information routines applies to parental awareness of ward rounds, to whom questions should be directed and which doctors/nursing staff are responsible for their child's care. Lower scores in relation to this index were substantiated by comments from relatives requesting greater information provision. The types of information parents required was routinely provided suggesting that retention rather than lack of information is the main issue. Provision of information pamphlets tailored to common injuries or elective procedures might prove an effective method for improving this aspect of care and increasing overall parental satisfaction with paediatric orthopaedic inpatient service

The upper age limit for Paediatric Orthopaedic referrals and admissions has recently been increased from 14 to 16 years. This has many benefits but will change the volume of cases as well as influencing both case mix and the resources required. We analysed the operations and admissions in our department for the year preceding and succeeding the change in age limit in order to evaluate the impact on the service. Our outcome measures were number of trauma and elective cases treated, time spent operating, case mix and cost to the service. Admission and operative logs for the aforementioned years were analysed to obtain number of admissions, length of stay and operative intervention as well as time in theatre. National reference data from Information Services Division Scotland was used in order to get accurate costs for theatre time and inpatient stays in our hospital. Results showed an increase in total number of cases from 438 per year to 499. Trauma cases increased from 133 (30.4%) to 202 (40.5%). Of these, 35 (17.3%) were over 14 years. The number of children over 14 years which had an operation, doubled from 51 to 102. Hours spent operating increased from 681.25 to 830.25. The percentage time operating on those aged over 14 increased from 13.2% to 23.8%. Theatre costs increased by £148005 (21.9%) to £822442.50. The change in age limit has significantly increased case variety and numbers. This has significant financial implications and as such needs adequately resourced to ensure high quality clinical care

The initial management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) can determine the occurrence of longterm disability due to complications. Previous surveys have concentrated on orthopaedic surgeons with a specialist paediatric interest. In many units in Scotland, the initial responsibility for management may be an admitting trauma surgeon with a different subspecialty interest. All Orthopaedic surgeons in Scotland participating in acute admitting were invited to complete a web based survey to ascertain current practice in the initial management of adolescents presenting with SUFE. 92/144 (64%) of surgeons approached responded. When faced with a severe stable slip, 53% of respondents were happy to pin in situ, whilst 47% would refer either to a colleague or specialist paediatric unit. With an unstable slip of similar magnitude, 38% would self-treat, 18% refer to a colleague and 44% refer to a paediatric orthopaedic unit. Of those treating, 58% stated their treatment was selected irrespective of timing of presentation. 79% of respondents had treated 5 or less cases in the preceding 5 years with 7% more than 10 cases. Universal prophylactic pinning was supported in 29%, selective in 62% and never in 9%. The responses obtained confirm the variance in management of SUFE that exists amidst acute admitting units in Scotland. Management of a stable slip is uncontroversial except possibly in severe cases. This contrasts with the acute unstable slip, in which various factors are thought to influence the outcome, such as instability and the issue of timing, which are not universally appreciated

The lateral pillar classification (LPC) is a widely used tool in determining prognosis and planning treatment in patients who are in the fragmentation stage of Perthes disease. The original classification has been modified to help increase the accuracy of the classification system by the Herring group. The purpose of our study was to independently assess this modified Herring classification. 35 standardized true antero-posterior radiographs of children in various stages of fragmentation were independently assessed by 6 senior observers on 2 separate occasions (6 weeks apart). Kappa analysis was used to assess the inter and intraobserver agreement between observations made. The degrees of agreement were as follows: poor, fair, moderate, good and very good. Intraobserver analysis revealed at best only moderate agreement for two observers. 3 observers showed fair consistency, whilst 1 remaining observer showed poor consistency between repeated observations (p<0.01). The highest scores for interobserver agreement varying between moderate to good could only be established between 2 observers. For the remaining observers results were just fair (p<0.01). This study highlights the lack of agreement between senior clinicians when applying the modified LPC. This has clinical implications when applying the classification to the decision making process in treating patients at risk of developing adverse outcomes from the disease. To our knowledge, this is the first time the modified LPC has been independently tested for its reproducibility by another specialist paediatric orthopaedic unit

Actually conservative treatment and/or minimal invasive surgical approach is considered the gold standard in the treatment of CF all around the world. Two main italian pediatric hospitals (Bambino Gesù in Rome and Meyer in Florence) will present own series in order to realize how the two methods (Ponseti in Rome and Seringe in Florence) can be used, the right indications for each method and sharp limits as well. The aim of this study is to compare two methods for evaluating their effectiveness and their applicability. Patients, Methods and Results. Rome series: from 1998 to 2009 pediatric hospital Bambino Gesù in Rome had treated 1350 patients with the Ponseti method (1980 feet). All feet had been scored according to Pirani classification. At age of 3–4 months, the 72% of feet treated had minimal surgery consisted in transversal tenotomy of achille's tendon. Casting for further 3 weeks and Denis-Brown splint wore full time until walking age and during the night only for 3 years after walking age. Surgery had been performed in 72% of case and surgery has been directly related to CF severity. Florence series: the Unit of Pediatric Orthopaedics Meyer Children's Hospital of Florence was born in January 2004 and therefore the series includes patients from January 2004 to December 2009. 173 patients (239 feet) were treated. Dimeglio's classification was used. At the age of 4–5 months were treated with tenotomy of Achille's tendon 51,9% of patients, mainly stage 3, and immobilization in long leg cast was used only for three weeks after surgery. Discussion. Minimally invasive treatment for CF is universally considered one of the best way to correct the deformity without using the extensive surgery that often causes stiffness, pain and shoes discomfort in adulthood. The long-term results of two series are similar and this enhance our mind that not invasive method for CF treatment is effective, low-cost, with very low rate of recurrence, only if applied following strictly the protocol. In our series in fact the highest rate of recurrence concerns the missing of Denis-Brown device or early dismission of Denis-Brown as well. The adherence to the protocol is chiefly recommended by the authors when surgery is not performed and therefore the risk of recurrence is higher. The French method especially needs a skill panel of physical therapist that are in confidence with the bandage manoeuvres. Only medical operators in confidence with the methods are able to guarantee good results and a low rate of recurrence as well. For this reason the method recommended by Dr. Seringe is easy exported in geographic areas where health service and health support are well represented

Aims

The management of completely displaced fractures of the distal radius in children remains controversial. This study evaluates the outcomes of surgical and non-surgical management of ‘off-ended’ fractures in children with at least two years of potential growth remaining.