Objectives. The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire are patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used for clinical and research purposes. Methodological high-quality clinimetric studies that determine the measurement properties of these PROMs when used in patients with a distal radial fracture are lacking. This study aimed to validate the PRWE and DASH in Dutch patients with a displaced distal radial fracture (DRF). Methods. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for test-retest reliability, between PROMs completed twice with a two-week interval at six to eight months after DRF. Internal consistency was determined using Cronbach’s α for the dimensions found in the factor analysis. The measurement error was expressed by the smallest detectable change (SDC). A semi-structured interview was conducted between eight and 12 weeks after DRF to assess the content validity. Results. A total of 119 patients (mean age 58 years (. sd. 15)), 74% female, completed PROMs at a mean time of six months (. sd. 1) post-fracture. One overall meaningful dimension was found for the PRWE and the DASH. Internal consistency was excellent for both PROMs (Cronbach’s α 0.96 (PRWE) and 0.97 (DASH)). Test-retest reliability was good for the PRWE (ICC 0.87) and excellent for the DASH (ICC 0.91). The SDC was 20 for the PRWE and 14 for the DASH. No floor or ceiling effects were found. The content validity was good for both questionnaires. Conclusion. The PRWE and DASH are valid and reliable PROMs in assessing function and disability in Dutch patients with a displaced DRF. However, due to the high SDC, the PRWE and DASH are less useful for individual patients with a distal radial fracture in clinical practice. Cite this article: Y. V. Kleinlugtenbelt, R. G. Krol, M. Bhandari, J. C. Goslings, R. W. Poolman, V. A. B. Scholtes. Are the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire used in distal radial fractures truly valid and reliable? Bone Joint Res 2018;7:36–45. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0081.R1

Introduction. This study aims to investigate the relationship between ulnar fixation and postoperative satisfaction among patients with distal radius fractures accompanied by ulna styloid fractures, with a particular focus on how sociodemographic factors influence outcomes. Method. A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 120 patients aged 26-53 who underwent surgical treatment for distal radius fractures with concomitant ulna styloid fractures between January 2018 and December 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether ulnar fixation was performed. Sociodemographic data, including age, gender, socioeconomic status, education level, and occupation, were collected. All patients underwent similar physical therapy protocols in the postoperative period, and no complications were observed in any patient. Postoperative satisfaction was assessed using the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores at 6 and 12 months post-surgery. Statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate the influence of ulnar fixation and sociodemographic factors on patient satisfaction. Result. Patients who underwent ulnar fixation (n=60) reported significantly higher satisfaction levels compared to those who did not (n=60), as evidenced by lower PRWE and DASH scores (p < 0.05). Age, gender, and socioeconomic status were significant predictors of postoperative satisfaction. Younger patients, females, and those with higher socioeconomic status exhibited greater improvements in functional outcomes and satisfaction. However, education level and occupation did not significantly influence satisfaction scores. Conclusion. Ulnar fixation in the surgical treatment of distal radius fractures accompanied by ulna styloid fractures is associated with improved postoperative satisfaction. Sociodemographic factors, particularly age, gender, and socioeconomic status, play a crucial role in patient-reported outcomes. Tailoring postoperative care to address these sociodemographic differences may enhance overall patient satisfaction and recovery