The use of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) to stimulate bone growth has been recommended as an alternative to the surgical treatment of ununited scaphoid fractures, but has never been examined in acute fractures. We hypothesised that the use of PEMF in acute scaphoid fractures would accelerate the time to union by 30% in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. A total of 53 patients in three different medical centres with a unilateral undisplaced acute scaphoid fracture were randomly assigned to receive either treatment with PEMF (n = 24) or a placebo (n = 29). The clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed at four, six, nine, 12, 24 and 52 weeks. A log-rank analysis showed that neither time to clinical and radiological union nor the functional outcome differed significantly between the groups. The clinical assessment of union indicated that at six weeks tenderness in the anatomic snuffbox (p = 0.03) as well as tenderness on longitudinal compression of the scaphoid (p = 0.008) differed significantly in favour of the placebo group. We conclude that stimulation of bone growth by PEMF has no additional value in the conservative treatment of acute scaphoid fractures

Introduction. Delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) in the quadriceps is frequent in runners finishing a marathon race, and may result in several days of discomfort and pain. There is an increasing clinical evidence that noninvasive, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) can have physiological effect on inflammation and tissue repair. The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the effect of PEMF on quadriceps muscle soreness in marathon runners and to use the data to calculate an appropriate sample size for a subsequent study. Material and methods. The design was a randomized double-blind prospective study covering a 5 days period after completion of a beach marathon. After the marathon all 74 runners that completed the 42.195 km were asked to participate in the study. Forty-six agreed to enter the study and were block randomized into an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group received an active pulsed electromagnetic field device, and the control group received a sham device. The sham devices were used in exactly the same manner but produced no electromagnetic field. The active PEMF device does not produce heat or cause any sensation in the tissue allowing participants to be blinded to treatment. The pulsed electromagnetic field signals of a 2-msec burst of 27.12-MHz sinusoidal waves were repeated at two bursts per second. Peak magnetic field was 0.05 G, which induced an average electric field of 10 mV/cm in the tissue with an effect of 7.3 mW/cm3. All subjects were instructed to place the device on the most painful area of the quadriceps for 20 minutes four times a day. Pain intensity was measured three times a day with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) during a 90o squat with a self-administered questionnaire. Data were non-parametric and compared with a two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results. 39 of the 46 runners returned the questionnaire. There was no difference in characteristiscs between the groups. There was a clear trend towards a smaller amount of pain in the intervention group compared to the control group at day one and two. Subjects in the intervention group reported on average 20mm (40 %) less pain on day one and approximately 10mm (40 %) less pain on day two(p=0.17−0.27). At day three, four and five, there were no clear differences in pain intensity reported in the two groups. Using the data from the current pilot study a sample size of 41 subjects in each group are needed to show a statistically significant difference between groups((power 0.90, alpha 0.05 one-sided test)). Conclusion. This pilot study indicate that PEMF can reduce quadriceps DOMS following a marathon race. However a study with a larger sample-size is needed before any firm conclusions on the pain reducing effect of PEMF can be drawn