Aims. The aims of this study were to assess mapping models to predict the three-level version of EuroQoL five-dimension utility index (EQ-5D-3L) from the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and validate these before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. A retrospective cohort of 5,857 patients was used to create the prediction models, and a second cohort of 721 patients from a different centre was used to validate the models, all of whom underwent TKA. Patient characteristics, BMI, OKS, and EQ-5D-3L were collected preoperatively and one year postoperatively. Generalized linear regression was used to formulate the prediction models. Results. There were significant correlations between the OKS and EQ-5D-3L preoperatively (r = 0.68; p < 0.001) and postoperatively (r = 0.77; p < 0.001) and for the change in the scores (r = 0.61; p < 0.001). Three different models (preoperative, postoperative, and change) were created. There were no significant differences between the actual and predicted mean EQ-5D-3L utilities at any timepoint or for change in the scores (p > 0.090) in the validation cohort. There was a significant correlation between the actual and predicted EQ-5D-3L utilities preoperatively (r = 0.63; p < 0.001) and postoperatively (r = 0.77; p < 0.001) and for the change in the scores (r = 0.56; p < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that a lower utility was overestimated, and higher utility was underestimated. The individual predicted EQ-5D-3L that was within ± 0.05 and ± 0.010 (minimal clinically important difference (MCID)) of the actual EQ-5D-3L varied between 13% to 35% and 26% to 64%, respectively, according to timepoint assessed and change in the scores, but was not significantly different between the modelling and validation cohorts (p ≥ 0.148). Conclusion. The OKS can be used to estimate EQ-5D-3L. Predicted individual patient utility error beyond the MCID varied from one-third to two-thirds depending on timepoint assessed, but the mean for a cohort did not differ and could be employed for this purpose. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):573–581

Aims. The primary aim of this study was to assess whether the postoperative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) demonstrated a ceiling effect at one and/or two years after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The secondary aim was to identify preoperative independent predictors for patients that achieved a ceiling score after TKA. Methods. A retrospective cohort of 5,857 patients undergoing a primary TKA were identified from an established arthroplasty database. Patient demographics, body mass index (BMI), OKS, and EuroQoL five-dimension (EQ-5D) general health scores were collected preoperatively and at one and two years postoperatively. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent preoperative predictors of patients achieving postoperative ceiling scores. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to identify a preoperative OKS that predicted a postoperative ceiling score. Results. The ceiling effect was 4.6% (n = 272) at one year which increased significantly (odds ratio (OR) 40.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 30.4 to 53.3; p < 0.001) to 6.2% (n = 363) at two years, when defined as those with a maximal score of 48 points. However, when the ceiling effect was defined as an OKS of 44 points or more, this increased to 26.3% (n = 1,540) at one year and further to 29.8% (n = 1,748) at two years (OR 21.6, 95% CI 18.7 to 25.1; p < 0.001). A preoperative OKS of 23 or more and 22 or more were predictive of achieving a postoperative ceiling OKS at one and two years when defined as a maximal score or a score of 44 or more, respectively. Conclusion. The postoperative OKS demonstrated a small ceiling effect when defined by a maximal score, but when defined by a postoperative OKS of 44 or more the ceiling effect was moderate and failed to meet standards. The preoperative OKS was an independent predictor of achieving a ceiling score. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(11):1519–1526

Introduction. Many patients with obesity experience knee pain. Excess body weight is a modifiable risk factor for osteoarthritis (OA) and weight loss is encouraged in patients with OA. Bariatric surgery could improve or limit the progression of these conditions through significant weight loss. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a validated tool in the assessment of knee replacement surgery for OA. We present a novel application of the OKS to assess knee pain & function after weight loss surgery. The primary aim of this study was to assess whether there was a significant difference in mean OKS before and 24 months after weight loss surgery. Method. Eighteen female participants were included in this study. They underwent sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Patient demographics, body mass index (BMI) and OKS were collected pre- and 24 months post operatively. Result. There was an increase in the mean OKS from 31.8 (SD 11.8) pre surgery to 36.6 (SD 12.3) at 24 months. This was statistically significant (95% CI 0.99-10.5, p=0.02). Mean BMI reduced from 46.6 kg/m. 2. (SD 5.8) to 33.0 kg/m. 2. (SD 3.5). Conclusion. A significant improvement in mean OKS was seen after weight loss surgery. These findings demonstrate an improvement in knee pain & function with weight loss. This study contributes to a larger project evaluating the kinetic and kinematic changes to walking gait from weight loss

Purpose. To examine the clinical characteristics of patients undergoing knee arthroplasty with a pre-operative Oxford Knee Score >34 (‘good’/‘excellent’), and assess the appropriateness of surgical intervention for this group. Background. In the current cost-constrained health economy, justification of surgical intervention is increasingly sought. As a validated disease-specific outcome measure, the pre-operative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) has been suggested as a possible threshold measurement in knee arthroplasty. However, contrary to expectations, analysis of pre-operative OKS in the joint registry population demonstrates a normal distribution curve with a sub-group of high-scoring patients. This suggests that either the baseline OKS does not accurately define surgical threshold, or that patients with a high OKS are inappropriately having knee replacements. Methods. Retrospective case-note review of patients listed for primary Knee arthroplasty (n=1058), with a preoperative OKS >34 (n=44). Data was extracted, with analysis of referral criteria, clinical presentation, radiological changes (Kellgren-Lawrence), and content analysis of the appropriateness of knee arthroplasty. Age and gender differences were compared between OKS<34 and OKS>34 groups. Results. No significant difference was observed in age between groups. Gender distribution in the OKS>34 group was 2:1(M:F) compared with 1:1.3 (M:F) in the OKS<34 group. Once listed for surgery, 81.8% proceeded with arthroplasty, while 18.2% cancelled due to improvement in symptoms. A contralateral knee arthroplasty had been performed in 10(22.8%), and previous arthroscopy in 15(34.1%) cases. Advanced radiological changes were observed in 33(75.0%) cases. Based on available information, surgery was deemed appropriate in 54.5%, questionable 15.9%, and perhaps inappropriate in 4.5% cases (insufficient information for categorisation 25.0%). Conclusion. A small group of patients deemed appropriate for knee arthroplasty present with high pre-operative OKS. Pre-operative OKS appears insensitive to the individual factors involved in defining treatment allocation, and further assessment is required. Introduction of pre-operative threshold scores cannot be currently recommended for knee arthroplasty

Aim: To assess the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) for the assessment of soft tissue knee pathology?. Method: In a prospective study, we compared the OKS against the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC 2000) and the Lysholm Scores (Lys). We also assessed the OKS with retrograde and antegrade (as currently used in Oxford) numbering. All patients completed 3 questionnaires stating which was the simplest from their perspective. We recruited 73 patients from the orthopaedic and physiotherapy clinics, meeting the following criteria:. Results: Linear regression analysis revealed no significant difference between all 3 scores (R. 2. =0.7823, P< 0.0001). The OKS correlated best with the IKDC (r=0.7483, Fig1), but less so with the Lys (r=0.3278, Fig2). The reversed OKS did not correlate as well (R. 2. = 0.2603) with either the IKDC (r= −0.2978) or the Lys (r= −0.2586). ANOVA showed the OKS to be significantly easier than Lys to complete (p< 0.0001), but not significantly easier than IKDC (p> 0.05). Conclusion: The OKS is patient friendly and reliable in assessing soft tissue knee injury. This is particularly useful if the OKS is already in use within a department for measurement of severity of degenerative disease

Source of the study: University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand and University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a 12-item questionnaire used to track knee arthroplasty outcomes. Validation of such patient reported outcome measures is typically anchored to a single question based on patient ‘satisfaction’, however risk of subsequent revision surgery is also an important outcome measure. The OKS can predict subsequent revision risk within two years, however it is not known which item(s) are the strongest predictors. Our aim was to identify which questions were most relevant in the prediction of subsequent knee arthroplasty revision risk. . All primary TKAs (n=27,708) and UKAs (n=8,415) captured by the New Zealand Joint Registry between 1999 and 2019 with at least one OKS response at six months, five years or ten years post-surgery were included. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to assess prediction models at six months, five years and ten years. Q1 ‘overall pain’ was the strongest predictor of revision within two years (TKA: 6 months, odds ratio (OR) 1.37; 5 years, OR 1.80; 10 years, OR 1.43; UKA: 6 months, OR 1.32; 5 years, OR 2.88; 10 years, OR 1.85; all p<0.05). A reduced model with just three questions (Q1, Q6 ‘limping when walking’, Q10 ‘knee giving way’) showed comparable or better diagnostic ability with the full OKS (area under the curve (AUC): TKA: 6 months, 0.77 vs. 0.76; 5 years, 0.78 vs. 0.75; 10 years, 0.76 vs. 0.73; UKA: 6 months, 0.80 vs. 0.78; 5 years: 0.81 vs. 0.77; 10 years, 0.80 vs. 0.77). The three questions on overall knee pain, limping when walking, and knee ‘giving way’ were the strongest predictors of subsequent revision within two years. Attention to the responses for these three key questions during follow-up may allow for prompt identification of patients most at risk of revision

Aim. To assess the efficacy and ease of use of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) in soft tissue knee pathology. Method. In a prospective study, we compared the OKS against the International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 (IKDC) and the Lysholm Scores (Lys). We also assessed the OKS with retrograde (Reversed OKS: 48=worst symptoms, 0=asymptomatic) and antegrade (as currently used in Oxford) numbering. All patients completed 3 questionnaires (OKS, Lys, and IKDC, or RevOKS, Lys, and IKDC) stating which was the simplest from their perspective. We recruited 93 patients from the orthopaedic and physiotherapy clinics. All patients between the ages of 15 and 45 with soft tissue knee derangements, such as ligamentous, and meniscal injuries were included. Exclusions were made in patients with degenerative and/or inflammatory arthritidis. Patients who had sustained bony injuries or underwent bony surgery were also excluded. Results. The distribution of the soft tissue injuries was: Meniscal tears (35%), anterior cruciate ligament injuries (23%), anterior knee pain (22%), other injuries (12%), and collateral ligament damage (8%). Linear regression analysis revealed no significant difference between all 3 scores (R squared=0.7823, P<0.0001). The OKS correlated best with the IKDC (r=0.7483), but less so with the Lys (r=0.3278). The reversed OKS did not correlate as well (R squared= 0.2603) with either the IKDC (r= -0.2978) or the Lys (r=-0.2586). ANOVA showed the OKS to be significantly easier than Lys to complete (p<0.0001), but not significantly easier than IKDC (p>0.05). Conclusion. The OKS is patient friendly and reliable in assessing soft tissue knee injury. This is particularly useful if the OKS is already in use within a department for assessment of degenerative disease. The Oxford Knee score should be used in an antegrade fashion (with a score of 48/48 corresponding to maximum symptoms) to give the best results in objective assessment

A long surgical procedure length has been well associated with worse clinical outcomes, also in an economic climate where in the theatre, time is money, surgical procedures are done very rapidly. Few studies have documented the clinical outcomes of procedure speed. Using the New Zealand Registry we reviewed the operation time of 41,560 primary knee joint replacements. These were split into groups of time slots for the surgery from less than 40 minutes, 40–59, 60–89, 90–119, 120–179 and greater than 180mins. This was referenced to the oxford knee scores obtained and the revision rate. For operations done in less than 40 or greater than 180 minutes, the oxford knee score was lower by 5 years. The revision rate was also increased in these same groups. Operations done in greater than 180 minutes are generally the more complex non-osteoarthrtic and tumour cases and have a higher revision rate reflecting their complexity. Procedures done less than 40 minutes are more straight forward, but there is a relationship shown between this speed and revision rate and poorer outcome. The cause is likely multifactorial, but begs the question, does speed kill?

This study demonstrates a significant correlation between the American Knee Society (AKS) Clinical Rating System and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and provides a validated prediction tool to estimate score conversion. A total of 1022 patients were prospectively clinically assessed five years after TKR and completed AKS assessments and an OKS questionnaire. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated significant correlations between OKS and the AKS knee and function scores but a stronger correlation (r = 0.68, p < 0.001) when using the sum of the AKS knee and function scores. Addition of body mass index and age (other statistically significant predictors of OKS) to the algorithm did not significantly increase the predictive value. The simple regression model was used to predict the OKS in a group of 236 patients who were clinically assessed nine to ten years after TKR using the AKS system. The predicted OKS was compared with actual OKS in the second group. Intra-class correlation demonstrated excellent reliability (r = 0.81, 95% confidence intervals 0.75 to 0.85) for the combined knee and function score when used to predict OKS. Our findings will facilitate comparison of outcome data from studies and registries using either the OKS or the AKS scores and may also be of value for those undertaking meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:503–9

Purpose. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a validated and widely used PROM that has been successfully used in assessing the outcome of knee arthroplasty (KA). It has been adopted as the nationally agreed outcome measure for this procedure and is now routinely collected. Increasingly, it is being used on an individual patient basis as a pre-operative measure of osteoarthritis and the need for joint replacement, despite not being validated for this use. The aim of this paper is to present evidence that challenges this new role for the OKS. Method. We have analysed pre-operative and post-operative OKS data from 3 large cohorts all undergoing KA, totalling over 3000 patients. In addition we have correlated the OKS to patient satisfaction scores. We have validated our findings using data published from the UK NJR. Results. Our data confirms of the effectiveness of the OKS in assessing the results of KA in populations of patients. Nearly all patients who undergo KA have an improvement in their OKS, regardless of the pre-operative score. However, we have found that the pre-operative OKS cannot predict a poor outcome after KA and patients with the best pre-operative OKS have the best outcome as measured by patient satisfaction. Conclusion. These data suggest that the OKS remains an excellent tool for assessing the outcome of knee arthroplasty in cohorts of patients, but further evidence is required of its validity for decisions regarding individual patients. Great care should be taken in using the pre-operative OKS to predict outcome after KA and its use in ranking patients need for surgery cannot be supported

Abstract

Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) can be completed using paper and postal services (pPROMS) or via computer, tablet or smartphone (ePROMs). We have investigated whether there are differences in scores depending on the method of PROMs acquisition for the Oxford Knee (OKS) and the EQ-5D scores, at one and two years post operatively.

Patient demographics, mode of preferred data collection and pre-and post-operative PROMs for Total Knee Replacements (TKRs) performed between 1st January 2018 and 31st December 2018 were collected.

During the study period, 1573 patients underwent TKRs. The average OHS and EQ-5D pre-operatively scores was 19.47 and 0.40 respectively. 71.46% opted to undertake post-operative questionnaires using ePROMs. The remaining 28.54% opted for pPROMS. The one and two-year OHS for ePROMS patients increased to 37.64 and 39.76 while the OHS scores for pPROMS patients were 35.71 and 36.83. At the one and two-year post-operative time intervals, a Mann-Whitney test showed statistical significance between the modes of administration for OHS (P-Value = 0.044 and 0.01 respectively). The one and two-year EQ-5D for ePROMS patients increased to 0.76 and 0.78 while the EQ-5D scores for pPROMS patients were 0.73 and 0.76. The P-Value for Mann-Whitney tests comparing the modes of administration for EQ-5D were 0.04 and 0.07 respectively.

There is no agreed mode of PROMs data acquisition for the OKS and EQ-5D Scores. While we have demonstrated an apparent difference in scores depending on the mode of administration, further work is required to establish the influence of potentially confounding factors.

INTRODUCTION: The American Knee Society score (AKSS) and the Oxford Knee score (OKS) are widely used health outcome measures for total knee replacements. The AKSS is a surgeon-assessed, variable weighted knee score. The OKS is a patient assessed equally weighted score. Our aim was to evaluate whether patient self assessment is a viable alternative to clinical review and whether it can provide enough information to identify which patient would require a clinic visit. As there had been no previous studies correlating the two scoring systems, we investigated whether a correlation exists between the two scores at 2, 5 and 10 year periods. A correlation would allow us to determine what OKS value would achieve 90% sensitivity in identifying patients requiring clinical review at the above time points. This strategy would reduce the number of clinical visits required and its associated cost. METHODS: We reviewed the data gathered prospectively from January 2000 to April 2006. All patients were part of an ongoing multi-surgeon single institution Knee Arthroplasty Outcome Programme. Preoperative, 2, 5 and 10 year post-operative OKS and AKSS were gathered from different cohorts. This method of comparison has been validated by previous publications. The scores were then analyzed using the Pearson correlation and linear regression. Different OKS values were analyzed for sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: 175 patients completed both the OKS and AKSS questionnaires preoperatively. 312 completed both scores at 2 years; 124 at 5 years and 57 patients at 10 years. The mean OKS, and the two AKSS components, the Knee score and Functional score improved significantly 2 years postoperatively when compared to their preoperative values. The Functional score deteriorated significantly from 5 to 10 years (p< 0.0001). There was good correlation between the OKS and the Knee score and Functional score at 2 years and a moderate correlation at 5 to 10 years. OKS > 24 showed more than 90 % sensitivity in identifying poor Knee scores in the 2, 5 and 10 year periods. CONCLUSION: In this study, the good correlation of OKS and AKSS at 2-years suggests that postal Oxford questionnaire is sufficient in following up patients in the short term after total knee replacement. However, the moderate correlation at 5 and 10 years suggests that clinical evaluation is necessary. We recommend that at 2 years, all patients complete an OKS questionnaire and if this is above 24, a clinical evaluation maybe required. Using this OKS value as a screening technique would allow a reduction of up to 50% in clinic visits and outpatient costs at the 2 year follow-up. This reduction is not as great at the 5 and 10 year periods. At these time periods, we recommend a clinical follow-up

Aims. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate machine-learning-based computerized adaptive tests (CATs) for the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and the Oxford Elbow Score (OES) and its subscales. Methods. We developed CAT algorithms for the OHS, OKS, OSS, overall OES, and each of the OES subscales, using responses to the full-length questionnaires and a machine-learning technique called regression tree learning. The algorithms were evaluated through a series of simulation studies, in which they aimed to predict respondents’ full-length questionnaire scores from only a selection of their item responses. In each case, the total number of items used by the CAT algorithm was recorded and CAT scores were compared to full-length questionnaire scores by mean, SD, score distribution plots, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation (ICC), and the Bland-Altman method. Differences between CAT scores and full-length questionnaire scores were contextualized through comparison to the instruments’ minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Results. The CAT algorithms accurately estimated 12-item questionnaire scores from between four and nine items. Scores followed a very similar distribution between CAT and full-length assessments, with the mean score difference ranging from 0.03 to 0.26 out of 48 points. Pearson’s correlation coefficient and ICC were 0.98 for each 12-item scale and 0.95 or higher for the OES subscales. In over 95% of cases, a patient’s CAT score was within five points of the full-length questionnaire score for each 12-item questionnaire. Conclusion. Oxford Hip Score, Oxford Knee Score, Oxford Shoulder Score, and Oxford Elbow Score (including separate subscale scores) CATs all markedly reduce the burden of items to be completed without sacrificing score accuracy. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):786–794

Aims. To map the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and High Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS) items to a common scale, and to investigate the psychometric properties of this new scale for the measurement of knee health. Methods. Patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) data measuring knee health were obtained from the NHS PROMs dataset and Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial (TOPKAT). Assumptions for common scale modelling were tested. A graded response model (fitted to OKS item responses in the NHS PROMs dataset) was used as an anchor to calibrate paired HAAS items from the TOPKAT dataset. Information curves for the combined OKS-HAAS model were plotted. Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare common scale scores derived from OKS and HAAS items. A conversion table was developed to map between HAAS, OKS, and the common scale. Results. We included 3,329 response sets from 528 patients undergoing knee arthroplasty. These generally met the assumptions of unidimensionality, monotonicity, local independence, and measurement invariance. The HAAS items provided more information than OKS items at high levels of knee health. Combining both instruments resulted in higher test-level information than either instrument alone. The mean error between common scale scores derived from the OKS and HAAS was 0.29 logits. Conclusion. The common scale allowed more precise measurement of knee health than use of either the OKS or HAAS individually. These techniques for mapping PROM instruments may be useful for the standardization of outcome reporting, and pooling results across studies that use either PROM in individual-patient meta-analysis. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(10):624–635

Aims. The metabolic equivalent of task (MET) score examines patient performance in relation to energy expenditure before and after knee arthroplasty. This study assesses its use in a knee arthroplasty population in comparison with the widely used Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and EuroQol five-dimension index (EQ-5D), which are reported to be limited by ceiling effects. Methods. A total of 116 patients with OKS, EQ-5D, and MET scores before, and at least six months following, unilateral primary knee arthroplasty were identified from a database. Procedures were performed by a single surgeon between 2014 and 2019 consecutively. Scores were analyzed for normality, skewness, kurtosis, and the presence of ceiling/floor effects. Concurrent validity between the MET score, OKS, and EQ-5D was assessed using Spearman’s rank. Results. Postoperatively the OKS and EQ-5D demonstrated negative skews in distribution, with high kurtosis at six months and one year. The OKS demonstrated a ceiling effect at one year (15.7%) postoperatively. The EQ-5D demonstrated a ceiling effect at six months (30.2%) and one year (39.8%) postoperatively. The MET score did not demonstrate a skewed distribution or ceiling effect either at six months or one year postoperatively. Weak-moderate correlations were noted between the MET score and conventional scores at six months and one year postoperatively. Conclusion. In contrast to the OKS and EQ-5D, the MET score was normally distributed postoperatively with no ceiling effect. It is worth consideration as an arthroplasty outcome measure, particularly for patients with high expectations. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(3):129–137

Aims. The primary objective of this registry-based study was to compare patient-reported outcomes of cementless and cemented medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) during the first postoperative year. The secondary objective was to assess one- and three-year implant survival of both fixation techniques. Methods. We analyzed 10,862 cementless and 7,917 cemented UKA cases enrolled in the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry, operated between 2017 and 2021. Pre- to postoperative change in outcomes at six and 12 months’ follow-up were compared using mixed model analyses. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were applied to quantify differences in implant survival. Adjustments were made for patient-specific variables and annual hospital volume. Results. Change from baseline in the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and activity-related pain was comparable between groups. Adjustment for covariates demonstrated a minimally greater decrease in rest-related pain in the cemented group (β = -0.09 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.16 to -0.01)). Cementless fixation was associated with a higher probability of achieving an excellent OKS outcome (> 41 points) (adjusted odds ratio 1.2 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.3)). The likelihood of one-year implant survival was greater for cemented implants (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.35 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.71)), with higher revision rates for periprosthetic fractures of cementless implants. During two to three years’ follow-up, the likelihood of implant survival was non-significantly greater for cementless UKA (adjusted HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.40 to 1.04)), primarily due to increased revision rates for tibial loosening of cemented implants. Conclusion. Cementless and cemented medial UKA led to comparable improvement in physical function and pain reduction during the initial postoperative year, albeit with a greater likelihood of achieving excellent OKS outcomes after cementless UKA. Anticipated differences in early physical function and pain should not be a decisive factor in the choice of fixation technique. However, surgeons should consider the differences in short- and long-term implant survival when deciding which implant to use. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(5):401–410

Aims. The aims were to assess whether joint-specific outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was influenced by implant design over a 12-year follow-up period, and whether patient-related factors were associated with loss to follow-up and mortality risk. Methods. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial was undertaken. A total of 212 patients were allocated a Triathlon or a Kinemax TKA. Patients were assessed preoperatively, and one, three, eight, and 12 years postoperatively using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Reasons for patient lost to follow-up, mortality, and revision were recorded. Results. A total of 94 patients completed 12-year functional follow-up (62 females, mean age 66 years (43 to 82) at index surgery). There was a clinically significantly greater improvement in the OKS at one year (mean difference (MD) 3.0 (95% CI 0.4 to 5.7); p = 0.027) and three years (MD 4.7 (95% CI 1.9 to 7.5); p = 0.001) for the Triathlon group, but no differences were observed at eight (p = 0.331) or 12 years’ (p = 0.181) follow-up. When assessing the OKS in the patients surviving to 12 years, the Triathlon group had a clinically significantly greater improvement in the OKS (marginal mean 3.8 (95% CI 0.2 to 7.4); p = 0.040). Loss to functional follow-up (53%, n = 109/204) was independently associated with older age (p = 0.001). Patient mortality was the major reason (56.4%, n = 62/110) for loss to follow-up. Older age (p < 0.001) and worse preoperative OKS (p = 0.043) were independently associated with increased mortality risk. An age at time of surgery of ≥ 72 years was 75% sensitive and 74% specific for predicting mortality with an area under the curve of 78.1% (95% CI 70.9 to 85.3; p < 0.001). Conclusion. The Triathlon TKA was associated with clinically meaningful greater improvement in knee-specific outcome when compared to the Kinemax TKA. Loss to follow-up at 12 years was a limitation, and studies planning longer-term functional assessment could limit their cohort to patients aged under 72 years. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(10):911–919

Aims. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has higher revision rates than total knee arthroplasty (TKA). As revision of UKA may be less technically demanding than revision TKA, UKA patients with poor functional outcomes may be more likely to be offered revision than TKA patients with similar outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare clinical thresholds for revisions between TKA and UKA using revision incidence and patient-reported outcomes, in a large, matched cohort at early, mid-, and late-term follow-up. Methods. Analyses were performed on propensity score-matched patient cohorts of TKAs and UKAs (2:1) registered in the New Zealand Joint Registry between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2019 with an Oxford Knee Score (OKS) response at six months (n, TKA: 16,774; UKA: 8,387), five years (TKA: 6,718; UKA: 3,359), or ten years (TKA: 3,486; UKA: 1,743). Associations between OKS and revision within two years following the score were examined. Thresholds were compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Reasons for aseptic revision were compared using cumulative incidence with competing risk. Results. Fewer TKA patients with ‘poor’ outcomes (≤ 25) subsequently underwent revision compared with UKA at six months (5.1% vs 19.6%; p < 0.001), five years (4.3% vs 12.5%; p < 0.001), and ten years (6.4% vs 15.0%; p = 0.024). Compared with TKA, the relative risk for UKA was 2.5-times higher for ‘unknown’ reasons, bearing dislocations, and disease progression. Conclusion. Compared with TKA, more UKA patients with poor outcomes underwent revision from early to long-term follow-up, and were more likely to undergo revision for ‘unknown’ reasons, which suggest a lower clinical threshold for UKA. For UKA, revision risk was higher for bearing dislocations and disease progression. There is supporting evidence that the higher revision UKA rates are associated with lower clinical thresholds for revision and additional modes of failure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(3):269–276

Aims. Control of acute pain following knee arthroplasty (KA) with a perioperative peripheral nerve block (PNB) may improve functional outcomes and reduce the risk of chronic postoperative knee pain (CPKP). The aims of this study were to assess whether a PNB influences patient-reported outcomes and risk of CPKP at one year following KA. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted over a two-year period and included 3,338 patients who underwent KA, of whom 1,434 (43.0%) had a lower limb PNB. A total of 2,588 patients (77.6%) completed and returned their one-year follow-up questionnaire. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and pain component (OKS-PS), EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D), and EQ-visual analogue scale (VAS) were collected preoperatively and at one year postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was also recorded at one year. The OKS-PS was used to define CPKP at one year. Results. The PNB group were younger (mean difference (MD) 0.7 years, 95% CI 0.0 to 1.3; p = 0.039), had a worse OKS (MD 0.7, 95% CI 0.1 to 1.3; p = 0.027), and were more likely to have had a spinal anaesthesia relative to a general anaesthetic (odds ratio 4.2, 95% CI 3.23 to 5.45; p < 0.001). When adjusting for confounding factors, patients in the PNB group had a significantly reduced improvement in their OKS (MD -0.9, 95% CI -1.6 to -0.1; p = 0.022), which may not be clinically meaningful. There were no significant differences in the OKS-PS (p = 0.068), EQ-5D (p = 0.313), or EQ-VAS (0.855) between the groups when adjusting for confounding factors. When adjusting for confounding factors using binary regression analysis, there were no differences in patient satisfaction (p = 0.132) or in the risk of CPKP (p = 0.794) according to PNB group. Conclusion. PNBs were independently associated with worse knee-specific outcomes, but whether these are clinically meaningful is not clear, as the difference was less than the minimal clinically important difference. Furthermore, PNBs were not independently associated with differences in health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, or risk of CPKP. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2025;6(2):147–154

Aims. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have both been shown to be effective treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Many studies have compared the outcomes of the two treatments, but less so with the use of robotics, or individualized TKA alignment techniques. Functional alignment (FA) is a novel technique for performing a TKA and shares many principles with UKA. Our aim was to compare outcomes from a case-matched series of robotic-assisted UKAs and robotic-assisted TKAs performed using FA. Methods. From a prospectively collected database between April 2015 and December 2019, patients who underwent a robotic-assisted medial UKA (RA-UKA) were case-matched with patients who had undergone a FA robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) during the same time period. Patients were matched for preoperative BMI, sex, age, and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). A total of 101 matched pairs were eligible for final review. Postoperatively the groups were then compared for differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion (ROM), ability to ascend and descend stairs, and ability to kneel. Results. Both groups had significant improvements in mean FJS (65.1 points in the TKA group and 65.3 points in the UKA group) and mean Oxford Knee Score (OKS) (20 points in the TKA group and 18.2 in the UKA group) two years following surgery. The UKA group had superior outcomes at three months in the OKS and at one year in ROM (5°), ability to kneel (0.5 points on OKS question), and ascend (1.3 points on OKS question) and descend stairs (0.8 points on OKS question), but these were not greater than the minimal clinically important difference. There were no differences seen in FJS or OKS at one year postoperatively. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups at 24 months in all the variables assessed. Conclusion. FA-RATKA and RA-UKA are both successful treatments for medial compartmental knee arthritis in this study. The UKA group showed a quicker recovery, but this study demonstrated equivalent two-year outcomes in all outcomes measured including stair ascent and descent, and kneeling. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(12):1123–1129