Purpose of study. This study is to determine the survival and outcomes of the Birmingham Interlocking Triple Pelvic Osteotomy. A dysplastic hip predisposes to early arthritis. The Triple Pelvic Osteotomy (TPO) is a joint-preserving option for the treatment of young adults with hip dysplasia. The long term success of the procedure is not known. Patients and methods. The senior author has been performing Birmingham Interlocking Triple Pelvic Osteotomies for 18 years. The outcomes of the first 100 patients (117 TPOs) were reviewed using postal questionnaires, telephone interviews and radiograph review. The primary outcome measure of the study was the Kaplan—Meier survival curve for the TPO. Hip replacement or resurfacing were taken as failure points. The Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score were used as secondary outcome measures for the surviving osteotomies. The pre-and post-operative acetabular index and centre-edge angles were measured from surviving radiographs. Results. Follow-up was 93% for survivorship. The mean age at operation was 31 years (range of 7 to 57 years). The mean pre- and post-operative centre-edge angles were 19°and 50° and acetabular indices were 23° and 2°. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrates that the 10, 15 and 18-year survival rates are 76%, 57% and 50% respectively. Survival was 89% if the osteotomy was performed before 20 years of age. The median UCLA score was five (inter-quartile range three to seven). Median OHS was 41 (inter-quartile range 24 to 46). The UCLA and OHSs show that those with surviving osteotomies tend to have good hip function. Conclusions. The Birmingham Interlocking Pelvic Osteotomy provides a valuable tool to preserve dysplastic hip function and delay arthroplasty surgery, particularly in the younger patient. It is best performed early before arthritis sets in

Slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) is the most common hip disorder to affect adolescents. Controversy exists over the optimal treatment of severe slips, with a continuing debate between in situ fixation versus corrective surgery. We present our experience in a series of 57 patients presenting with severe unilateral SUFE (defined > 50°) managed with a subcapital cuneiform osteotomy.

Between 2001 and 2011, 57 patients (35 male, 22 female) with a mean age of 13.1 years (9.6 to 20.3, SD 2.3) were referred to our tertiary referral institution with a severe slip. The affected limb was rested in slings and springs before corrective surgery which was performed via an anterior Smith-Petersen approach. Radiographic analysis confirmed an improvement in mean head–shaft slip angle from 53.8^o (standard deviation (sd) 3.2) pre-operatively to 9.1^o (sd 3.1) post-operatively, with minimal associated femoral neck shortening. In total 50 (88%) patients were complication free at a mean follow-up of seven years (2.8 to 13.9 years, sd 3). Their mean Oxford hip score was 44 (37 to 48) and median visual analogue pain score was 0 out of 10 (interquartile range 0 to 4). A total of six patients (10.5%) developed avascular necrosis requiring further surgery and one (1.8%) patient developed chondrolysis but declined further intervention.

This is a technically demanding operation with variable outcomes reported in the literature. We have demonstrated good results in our tertiary centre.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1718–25.