Osteoid osteoma is a classically described benign bone tumour. Traditionally, the surgical treatment of choice was excision, but this can have significant morbidity. In recent years, percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) has grown in popularity as an alternative treatment. This study reports the outcomes using this technique in our regional bone tumour unit. Between May 2003 and October 2007, 14 patients (female, n=4; male, n = 10) aged 15 - 32yrs (mean age, 20.4yrs) underwent CT guided radiofrequency ablation treatment. These patients had typical radiograph, CT, MRI or isotope bone scan features of osteoid osteoma and had significant pain symptoms. The protocol for ablation in our institute is heating the tip of the electrode to 90°C for 6 minutes. All patients were subsequently offered follow up in the out-patient clinic. Outcomes were taken from the Scottish Bone Tumour Registry database. 11 patients (78.6%) patients had complete resolution of symptoms after one RF treatment. 3 (21.4%) cases were unsuccessful but 1 of these was due to technical failure. All 3 of the above patients had complete relief of symptoms after one further RF treatment. 1 (7.1%) patient initially had complete relief of symptoms, but suffered a recurrence after 9 months. This patient also had a second curative treatment. Follow up ranged from 3 – 18 months (mean 10 months). Percutaneous RFA for osteoid osteoma is an attractive treatment due to its efficacy and low morbidity. Our results showed a primary success rate of 78%, a secondary success rate of 100% (after one additional procedure) and a recurrence rate of 7.1%. These are comparable to previous reported series. We believe our results add to the growing literature supporting radiofrequency ablation as the treatment of choice for osteoid osteoma

The primary aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of osteoid osteoma (OO) between the group of patients with the presence of nidus on biopsy samples from radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with those without nidus. Secondly, we aimed to examine other factors that may affect the outcomes of OO reflecting our experience as a tertiary orthopaedic oncology centre. We retrospectively reviewed 88 consecutive patients diagnosed with OO treated with RFA between November 2005 and March 2015, consisting of 63 males (72%) and 25 females (28%). Sixty-six patients (75%) had nidus present in their biopsy samples. Patients’ mean age was 17.6 years (4-53). Median duration of follow-up was 12.5 months (6-20.8). Lesions were located in the appendicular skeleton in seventy-nine patients (90%) while nine patients (10%) had an OO in the axial skeleton. Outcomes assessed were based on patients’ pain alleviation (partial, complete, or no pain improvement) and the need for further interventions. Pain improvement in the patient group with nidus in histology sample was significantly better than the group without nidus (OR 7.4, CI 1.35-41.4, p=0.021). The patient group with nidus on biopsy demonstrated less likelihood of having a repeat procedure compared to the group without nidus (OR 0.092, CI 0.016-0.542, p=0.008). Our study showed significantly better outcomes in pain improvement in appendicular lesions compared to the axially located lesions (p = 0.005). Patients with spinal lesions tend to have relatively poor pain relief than those with appendicular or pelvic lesions (p=0.007). Patients with nidus on histology had better pain alleviation compared to patients without nidus. The histological presence of nidus significantly reduces the chance of repeat interventions. The pain alleviation of OO following RFA is better in patients with appendicular lesions than spinal or axially located lesions

Introduction. Hand tumors are usually rare and there is not much literature about series of cases. We have studied a series of 110 cases. Hand tumors do consists of both benign and malignant cases. Methods. We studied series of 110 cases at Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli and Mysore Medical College & Research Institute, Mysore. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 110 patients who underwent double ray amputations at our center over few years: few had amputations of the fourth and fifth rays and others amputation of the second and third rays. Mean age at surgery was 34 years (range, 10–45 years), and minimum follow up was 64 months (mean, 98 months; range, 64–136 months). Some patients had high-grade soft tissue sarcomas of the hand, synovial sarcomas, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, and undifferentiated sarcoma. No patients had detectable metastases at surgery. Results. All patients were completely disease-free at latest follow up. One patient was alive with lung metastases detected 32 months after surgery. No patients developed local tumor recurrence. Functional assessment showed a mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score of 24 (range, 19–28) and mean grip strength 24% of the contra lateral side (range, 17%–35%). Conclusions. The majority of osseous tumors of the hand are benign. The surgeon who evaluates and treats osseous tumors of the hand has to be familiar with limb anatomy, tumor biology, various presentations of the tumors and the range of treatment possibilities and their limitations. Lesions in the hand more often present earlier in their course than those at other sites, just because they are more likely to superficial and easily noticed. Ganglion cyst is the most frequently encountered comprising 50–70% of benign tumors of hand. Enchondroma was the next common benign bone tumour followed by osteoid osteoma, osteoblastoma, aneurismal bone cyst, giant cell tumor, epidermoid cyst, and osteochondroma. Although malignant neoplasms in the hand that arise from tissues other than the skin are very rare, the hand may be the site of distant breast, lung, kidney, esophagus, or colon adenocarcinoma metastases, most of which have a predilection for the distal phalanges. Malignant tumours of the hand are rare, although there remain many instances in which marginal excisions are performed for unsuspected malignant hand lesions. Suboptimal biopsy incisions and inadvertent contamination during these excisions may result in larger resections or amputations being necessary to ensure complete removal of the tumour with negative margins