Introduction. In the orthogeriatric model of care, orthopaedic surgeons, geriatricians, anesthesiologists, physiotherapists and the nursing staff work together with the aim to optimize the outcomes of vulnerable older patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. It is recommended that the orthogeriatric care of hip fracture patients should be based on systematic treatment guidelines. We describe here how operative and perioperative management of hip fracture patients changed between the first and the second year after initiation of orthogeriatric collaboration. Method. Data on all patients aged 65 years or over and experiencing a hip fracture between September 1st 2007 and August 31st 2009 were prospectively collected in a Finnish hospital district with a total of 200,000 inhabitants. The patients were evaluated 4–6 months postoperatively at the geriatric outpatient clinic. Starting from the second year, geriatrician's rounds 2–3 times a week at the orthopaedic ward were provided. In addition, a systematic treatment protocol agreed by orthopaedic surgeons, geriatricians and anesthesiologists was introduced to the hospital staff responsible for the care of hip fracture patients. Results. Data were available on 177 patients in the first and 232 patients in the second year (87 % and 95 % of eligible patients, respectively). There were no significant differences in the patient characteristics in regard with age, sex distribution, prefracture mobility level, living arrangements, number of medication used, body mass index, anesthesiological risk score or the type of the fracture between the two years. Compared to the first year, the patients were more likely to be operated by a consultant orthopaedic surgeon (74 % vs. 49 %, p<0.001) and to undergo hemiarthroplasty (64 % vs. 53 %, p=0.013) during the second year. Urinary catheters were also removed before discharge from the orthopaedic ward more frequently (28 % vs. 14 %, p=0.001). There was a trend towards shorter delay to operation (<24 hours in 40 % vs. 32 %, p=0.140) and more frequent use of blood transfusions (39 % vs. 32 %, p=0.128). There was no difference in the mean length of stay at the orthopaedic ward between the two years (6 days in the first vs. 7 days in the second year, p=0.081). The 4-month mortality was 20 % in the first and 17 % in the second year (p=0.436). Conclusions. The treatment practices showed changes towards guideline recommendations after initiation of orthogeriatric collaboration in the care of hip fracture patients without increasing the length of stay at the orthopaedic ward. Further follow-up is required to show how these improvements translate into longer-term outcomes and mortality

Aims

National hip fracture registries audit similar aspects of care but there is variation in the actual data collected; these differences restrict international comparison, benchmarking, and research. The Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) published a revised minimum common dataset (MCD) in 2022 to improve consistency and interoperability. Our aim was to assess compatibility of existing registries with the MCD.

Aims. This study aimed to identify risk factors (patient, healthcare system, and socioeconomic) for mortality after hip fractures and estimate their relative importance. Further, we aimed to elucidate mortality and survival patterns following fractures and the duration of excess mortality. Methods. Data on 37,394 hip fractures in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register from January 2014 to December 2018 were linked to data from the Norwegian Patient Registry, Statistics Norway, and characteristics of acute care hospitals. Cox regression analysis was performed to estimate risk factors associated with mortality. The Wald statistic was used to estimate and illustrate relative importance of risk factors, which were categorized in modifiable (healthcare-related) and non-modifiable (patient-related and socioeconomic). We calculated standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) comparing deaths among hip fracture patients to expected deaths in a standardized reference population. Results. Mean age was 80.2 years (SD 11.4) and 67.5% (n = 25,251) were female. Patient factors (male sex, increasing comorbidity (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade and Charlson Comorbidity Index)), socioeconomic factors (low income, low education level, living in a healthcare facility), and healthcare factors (hip fracture volume, availability of orthogeriatric services) were associated with increased mortality. Non-modifiable risk factors were more strongly associated with mortality than modifiable risk factors. The SMR analysis suggested that cumulative excess mortality among hip fracture patients was 16% in the first year and 41% at six years. SMR was 2.48 for the six-year observation period, most pronounced in the first year, and fell from 10.92 in the first month to 3.53 after 12 months and 2.48 after six years. Substantial differences in median survival time were found, particularly for patient-related factors. Conclusion. Socioeconomic, patient-, and healthcare-related factors all contributed to excess mortality, and non-modifiable factors had stronger association than modifiable ones. Hip fractures contributed to substantial excess mortality. Apparently small survival differences translate into substantial disparity in median survival time in this elderly population. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(7):884–893

Aims. The aim of this study was to describe the current pathways of care for patients with a fracture of the hip in five low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) in South Asia (Nepal and Sri Lanka) and Southeast Asia (Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philippines). Methods. The World Health Organization Service Availability and Readiness Assessment tool was used to collect data on the care of hip fractures in Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, and Nepal. Respondents were asked to provide details about the current pathway of care for patients with hip fracture, including pre-hospital transport, time to admission, time to surgery, and time to weightbearing, along with healthcare professionals involved at different stages of care, information on discharge, and patient follow-up. Results. Responses were received from 98 representative hospitals across the five countries. Most hospitals were publicly funded. There was consistency in clinical pathways of care within country, but considerable variation between countries. Patients mostly travel to hospital via ambulance (both publicly- and privately-funded) or private transport, with only half arriving at hospital within 12 hours of their injury. Access to surgery was variable and time to surgery ranged between one day and more than five days. The majority of hospitals mobilized patients on the first or second day after surgery, but there was notable variation in postoperative weightbearing protocols. Senior medical input was variable and specialist orthogeriatric expertise was unavailable in most hospitals. Conclusion. This study provides the first step in mapping care pathways for patients with hip fracture in LMIC in South Asia. The previous lack of data in these countries hampers efforts to identify quality standards (key performance indicators) that are relevant to each different healthcare system. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(9):676–681

For some years, there has been vast international interest in creating models for joint efforts between geriatricians and orthopedic surgeons. We present data from two such models. For the first time in Denmark, the Department of Orthopedics Bispebjerg University Hospital (BUP) recruited two full-time geriatricians in September 2009. They were assigned an independent unit meant for severely ill orthopaedic patients with high comorbidity and polypharmacy. These two geriatricians had, during the previous two years, consulted another orthopaedic department at Gentofte University Hospital (GUH) in a neighbouring community three times a week. The aim of their intervention was then to optimize treatment for comorbidity, to clarify indication of acute fall-assessment, osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment, presence of delirium and dementia. Methods. A total of 1344 hip fracture patients (age 70 years) divided into three populations were included in this study. Mortality data were collected from the Danish Civil Registry. Population 1 (P1), n = 645 was included at GUH from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2007. During the entire period, the patients had access to a senior consultant in geriatric medicine three times a week. In this population, the majority of patients were assessed for dementia (n = 636), delirium (n = 627) and Barthel Index (Barthel100) at admission (n = 394). Population 2 (P2), n = 381 included at BUH from September 1, 2009 until July 8, 2010 with orthogeriatric access. Population 3 (P3), n = 318 were included at BUH from September 28, 2008 until August 31, 2009 with no orthogeriatric access. Age mean (SD): P1 84.7 (6.8), P2 85.5 (7.3), P3 85.3 (14.3) P = 0.1(ANOVA) Sex ratio: females/males: P1 0.73/0.27, P2 0.80/0.20, P3 0.75/0.25 P = 0.09 Chi square). Results. In-hospital mortality rate: P1 4.8%, P2 6.3%, P3 9.1% P = 0.03 (Chi square). Three month mortality: In P1 dementia, delirium and Barthel Index (below 50 versus above 50) were all strong predictors: No dementia: 53/383 (13.8%) versus dementia present 68/253 (26.9%) died, P = 0001 (log-rank test). No delirium 69/456 (15.1%) versus delirium present 47/171 (27.5%) died F = 0.0004 (log-rank test) Barthel Index 50 38/372 (10.2%) versus Barthel<50 7/22 (31.8%) died P = 0.0004. Conclusion. This paper reports data from two different models with orthogeriatric service. Our data present delirium, dementia and Barthel Index to be very strong predictors for three month mortality (P1). Despite the time needed to implement a new orthogeriatric unit and the fact that the geriatricians only assessed a proportion of hip fracture patients, in-hospital mortality was reduced significantly for the total hip-fracture population (P2) within the first 10 months

Aims. To compare the early management and mortality of older patients sustaining major orthopaedic trauma with that of a younger population with similar injuries. Patients and Methods. The Trauma Audit Research Network database was reviewed to identify eligible patients admitted between April 2012 and June 2015. Distribution and severity of injury, interventions, comorbidity, critical care episodes and mortality were recorded. The population was divided into young (64 years or younger) and older (65 years and older) patients. Results. Of 142 765 adults sustaining major trauma, 72 942 (51.09 %) had long bone or pelvic fractures and 45.81% of these were > 65 years old. Road traffic collision was the most common mechanism in the young (40.4%) and, in older people, fall from standing height (80.4%) predominated. The 30 day mortality in older patients with fractures is greater (6.8% versus 2.5%), although critical care episodes are more common in the young (18.2% versus 9.7%). Older people are less likely to be admitted to critical care beds and are often managed in isolation by surgeons. Orthopaedic surgery is the most common admitting and operating specialty and, in older people, fracture surgery accounted for 82.1% of procedures. . Conclusion. Orthopaedic trauma in older people is associated with mortality that is significantly greater than for similar fractures in the young. As with the hip fracture population, major trauma in the elderly is a growing concern which highlights the need for a review of admission pathways and shared orthogeriatric care models. . Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1677–80

Introduction. The length of hospital stay following a hip fracture has decreased significantly during the past decades. Knowing that a hip fracture patient is often one with several comorbidities and high mortality, is it possible to further decrease the length of stay without compromising the quality of care?. Setting. Prior to November 2007 a hip fracture patient at Svendborg Hospital would be admitted to the orthopedic department. Postoperatively the patient would be treated by the orthopedic surgeons. If needed a geriatric consult could occur. If the patient was eligible she could be transferred to the geriatric department for further rehabilitation. After November 2007 eight orthopedic beds were dedicated to hip fracture patients, in an orthogeriatric setting. The patient was treated operatively by the orthopedic surgeons, and then a geriatric consultant was responsible for the rest of the stay. Nurses and therapists were dedicated to the care of hip fracture patients, and had recieved special training regarding. The patient would stay in the same bed throughout the hospitalisation. Material. 224 consecutive hip fracture patients prior to November 2007 treated in a classic orthopedic department compared to 224 consecutive hip fracture patients after November 2007 treated in the orthogeriatic department. Of the 224 patients treated prior to November 2007 117 were eventually transferred to the geriatric department. Result. the overall mean hospital stay in the classic orthopedic department was 17.5 days (range 2–58 days, 95% CI 15.9–18.8 days). Patients (N=107), who were not transferred to the geriatric department had a mean of 8,7 days, whereas those who were transferred had a mean stay of 25,5 days. After November 2007 the overall mean length of stay was 11.5 days (range 1–38, 95% CI 10.5–11.9 days). The hip fracture patients spent 1,388 less days in hospital when admitted to the orthogeriatric setting as compared to the classic orthopedic setting. The 30 day mortality was 11,3% in the group prior to November 2007 compared to 9,8% in the group after November 2007. Conclusion. Changing the setting in which hip fracture patients are treated, significantly reduces the overall length of stay (p<0.0000), without compromising mortality. It involves an interdisciplinary setting with dedicated nurses and therapists. The hip fracture patient is first and foremost regarded as a geriatric patient and thus treated postoperatively by geriatric consultants

Aims

The aim of this study was to describe services available to patients with periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPFF) in England and Wales, with focus on variation between centres and areas for care improvement.

Aims

Femoral periprosthetic fractures are rising in incidence. Their management is complex and carries a high associated mortality. Unlike native hip fractures, there are no guidelines advising on time to theatre in this group. We aim to determine whether delaying surgical intervention influences morbidity or mortality in femoral periprosthetic fractures.

Aims

The aim of this study was to explore current use of the Global Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) Minimum Common Dataset (MCD) within established national hip fracture registries, and to propose a revised MCD to enable international benchmarking for hip fracture care.

Aims

Patients with proximal femoral fractures (PFFs) are often multimorbid, thus unplanned readmissions following surgery are common. We therefore aimed to analyze 30-day and one-year readmission rates, reasons for, and factors associated with, readmission risk in a cohort of patients with surgically treated PFFs across Austria.

A simple classification system, NOF complexity classification, was developed at the Great Western Hospital Trauma and Orthopaedic department, allowing stratification of resources. This is a four-group classification system, each group with two elements, firstly the patients medical fitness and secondly the complexity of the fracture. (C0=medically fit + simple fracture, C1=medically fit + complex fracture, C2=medically unfit + simple fracture, C3=medically unfit + complex fracture). Between June 2008 and June 2009, data was collected retrospectively for 290 patients during a weekly MDT meeting to enter data that has been gathered into a departmental database to monitor our performance. The outcomes that we looked for to test the validity of this classification are the thirty-day mortality, annual mortality and length of hospital stay all stratified by complexity. Results showed that there has been a strong correlation between the complexity classification and the 30-day and annual mortality with P values of 0.015 and 0.008 respectively. This resulted in a 30-day mortality of 4.4%, which is half the national average. Our average length of stay was equal to the national average of 23 days. This classification system has allowed an improvement in service by adapting a classification system, which is understood by both the Orthogeriatric and Orthopaedic teams

Aims

Fractures of the distal radius are common, and form a considerable proportion of the trauma workload. We conducted a study to examine the patterns of injury and treatment for adult patients presenting with distal radius fractures to a major trauma centre serving an urban population.

Aims

We assessed the value of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) in the prediction of adverse outcome after hip fracture.

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of hospital-level service characteristics on hip fracture outcomes and quality of care processes measures.

Introduction. Over 300,000 patients present with fragility fractures each year. Following a hip fracture, the 30 days mortality is around 8.3 to 9.3%. Mortality increases to 20–24% after the first year and this risk may persist for at least 5 years. The most significant variables that influence mortality are age, gender, fracture type, prefracture residence, prefracture mobility and ASA scores. Common reported postoperative complications responsible for mortality in hip fracture patients include; heart failure, bronchopneumonia and infections. Most of the studies in the literature focus on management variables influencing mortality rather than the encountered postoperative medical problems leading to death. The aim of this study is to retrospectively analyze the postoperative medical complications which led to death in a cohort of patients, following a hip fracture. Methodology. This is a retrospective analysis of a cohort of 82, out of 648, patients with hip fractures who died over a period of 2 years (December 2006–January 2009). Forty nine females and 33 males (ratio 1.5:1) were included in the study with a mean age of 87.8 years (range 59–98 years). For mortality analysis, patients' co-morbidities and medical events leading to death were categorized according to the involved organ system. This included cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, gastrointestinal, neurological and musculoskeletal systems). The timing and decision of DNAR and palliation was noted for each patient. The 30 days and the overall mortality were the set outcome measures to be reviewed. Results. The 30 days mortality was 9.4% and 13.6% overall. The majority of patients had multiple co-morbidities; 75.6% had cardiac morbidities, 28% had respiratory problems, 19.5% had renal problems, 22% had neurological problems, 22% had endocrine problems and 34.1% had miscellaneous problems including cancer in 9 patients. Out of the 82 patients, 67 died postoperatively and 15 died preoperatively. Of the 67 postoperative deaths the main reported events that led to death were; respiratory in 59.7% (90% of which had chest infection), cardiac in 29.9% (60% of which had pulmonary edema) and sepsis in 35.8% (62.5% of which had chest infection). Of the 15 preoperative deaths the lead cause of death was the respiratory problems, reported in 73.3%, of which 81.8% were due to chest infection. X% of the patients had DNAR decision and x% were palliated. Documented decisions for DNAR and palliation were done by a senior house officers and registrars in the majority of cases (x%). Conclusion. The majority of deaths in our series were related to chest infection (54.9%), cardiac failure (15.9%) and sepsis mainly secondary to chest infection (32.9%, of which 62.9% were related to chest infection). Increased awareness of the encountered medical problems that can lead to death consolidates the need of a pre and postoperative orthogeriatric input to optimize these frail patients

Aims

The aim of this study was to describe variation in hip fracture treatment in Norway expressed as adherence to international and national evidence-based treatment guidelines, to study factors influencing deviation from guidelines, and to analyze consequences of non-adherence.

Aims

Within the UK, around 70,000 patients suffer neck of femur (NOF) fractures annually. Patients presenting with this injury are often frail, leading to increased morbidity and a 30-day mortality rate of 6.1%. COVID-19 infection has a broad spectrum of clinical presentations with the elderly, and those with pre-existing comorbidities are at a higher risk of severe respiratory compromise and death. Further increased risk has been observed in the postoperative period. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 infection on the complication and mortality rates of NOF fracture patients.

Aims

The impact of concomitant injuries in patients with proximal femoral fractures has rarely been studied. To date, the few studies published have been mostly single-centre research focusing on the influence of upper limb fractures. A retrospective cohort analysis was, therefore, conducted to identify the impact and distribution of concomitant injuries in patients with proximal femoral fractures.

Aims

The aim of this study to compare 30-day survival and recovery of mobility between patients mobilized early (on the day of, or day after surgery for a hip fracture) and patients mobilized late (two days or more after surgery), and to determine whether the presence of dementia influences the association between the timing of mobilization, 30-day survival, and recovery.