In our department we use an enhanced recovery protocol for joint replacement of the lower limb. This incorporates the use of intravenous tranexamic acid (IVTA; 15 mg/kg) at the induction of anaesthesia. Recently there was a national shortage of IVTA for 18 weeks; during this period all patients received an oral preparation of tranexamic acid (OTA; 25 mg/kg). This retrospective study compares the safety (surgical and medical complications) and efficacy (reduction of transfusion requirements) of OTA and IVTA. During the study period a total of 2698 patients received IVTA and 302 received OTA. After adjusting for a range of patient and surgical factors, the odds ratio (OR) of receiving a blood transfusion was significantly higher with IVTA than with OTA (OR 0.48 (95% confidence interval 0.26 to 0.89), p = 0.019), whereas the safety profile was similar, based on length of stay, rate of readmission, return to theatre, deep infection, stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, myocardial infarction, pneumonia, deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The financial benefit of OTA is £2.04 for a 70 kg patient; this is amplified when the cost saving associated with significantly fewer blood transfusions is considered. Although the number of patients in the study is modest, this work supports the use of OTA, and we recommend that a randomised trial be undertaken to compare the different methods of administering tranexamic acid. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1556–61

Aim. The β-lactam penicillin is often used in the treatment of soft tissue infections and osteomyelitis caused by penicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Oral antibiotic treatment has been shown to be non-inferior to intravenous (IV) therapy when used during the first 6 weeks in complex orthopedic infections (OVIVA trial). However, the use of oral β-lactams in osteomyelitis treatment remains a topic of debate due to low and variable bioavailability. The aim was to assess the time for which the unbound penicillin concentration exceeded targeted minimum inhibitory concentrations (fT>MIC) in cancellous bone and subcutaneous tissue after IV (penicillin G) and oral (penicillin V) treatment in a porcine microdialysis model. Method. 12 female pigs (75kg) were assigned to standard clinical regimens of either three doses of IV penicillin G (1.2g) or oral penicillin V (0.8g) every 6h over 18h. Microdialysis catheters were placed for sampling in tibial cancellous bone and adjacent subcutaneous tissue. Data was collected in the first dosing interval (0–6h; prophylactic situation) and the third dosing interval (12–18h; assumed steady state). Plasma samples were collected for reference. MIC targets of 0.125μg/mL (Staph. aureus breakpoint), 0.25μg/mL (Strep. Group A, B, C and G breakpoint) and 0.5μg/mL (4xMIC) were applied. Results. For all investigated MIC targets, IV penicillin G resulted in a longer mean fT>MIC in cancellous bone during the first dosing interval, and in both cancellous bone and subcutaneous tissue during the third dosing interval compared to oral penicillin V. Across compartments, mean fT>MIC for IV penicillin G (MIC: 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5μg/mL) were ≥97%, ≥84% and ≥75% during the first dosing interval, and 100%, ≥95% and ≥88%, during the third dosing interval. The mean fT>MIC for oral penicillin V were ≥40%, ≥24% and ≥7% during the first dosing interval, and ≥42%, ≥36% and ≥18% during the third dosing interval. Conclusions. The findings suggest that standard clinical dosing of IV penicillin G provides superior fT>MIC in cancellous bone and subcutaneous tissue compared to oral penicillin V, particularly in the third dosing interval. This emphasizes the importance of appropriate route of administration when applying penicillin treatment. Acknowledgements. Funding was received from The Kirsten and Freddy Johansen Foundation, The Novo Nordisk Foundation, The Beckett Foundation, The Hede Nielsen Family Foundation, King Christian the 10. th. Foundation, The A.P. Møller Foundation, The Dagmar Marshalls Foundation, and The Carl and Ellen Hertz Foundation

Aims. Flucloxacillin is commonly administered intravenously for perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis, while oral administration is typical for prophylaxis following smaller traumatic wounds. We assessed the time, for which the free flucloxacillin concentration was maintained above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT > MIC) for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in soft and bone tissue, after intravenous and oral administration, using microdialysis in a porcine model. Methods. A total of 16 pigs were randomly allocated to either intravenous (Group IV) or oral (Group PO) flucloxacillin 1 g every six hours during a 24-hour period. Microdialysis was used for sampling in cancellous and cortical bone, subcutaneous tissue, and the knee joint. In addition, plasma was sampled. The flucloxacillin fT > MIC was evaluated using a low MIC target (0.5 μg/ml) and a high MIC target (2.0 μg/ml). Results. Intravenous administration resulted in longer fT > MIC (0.5 μg/ml) compared to oral administration, except for cortical bone. In Group IV, all pigs reached a concentration of 0.5 μg/ml in all compartments. The mean fT > MIC (0.5 μg/ml) was 149 minutes (95% confidence interval (CI) 119 to 179; range 68 to 323) in subcutaneous tissue and 61 minutes (95% CI 29 to 94; range 0 to 121) to 106 minutes (95% CI 76 to 136; range 71 to 154) in bone tissue. In Group PO, 0/8 pigs reached a concentration of 0.5 μg/ml in all compartments. For the high MIC target (2.0 μg/ml), fT > MIC was close to zero minutes in both groups across compartments. Conclusion. Although intravenous administration of flucloxacillin 1 g provided higher fT > MIC for the low MIC target compared to oral administration, concentrations were surprisingly low, particularly for bone tissue. Achievement of sufficient bone and soft tissue flucloxacillin concentrations may require a dose increase or continuous administration. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(1):60–67

Aim. Rifampicin and fluoroquinolone based therapy is generally considered as first-choice targeted oral antimicrobial therapy for staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections (PJI) treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR). Alternative equally effective antimicrobial strategies are urgently needed due to toxicity and drug-drug interactions that frequently occur with this strategy. Data from recent clinical studies suggests equipoise for other antimicrobial treatment regimens. The objective of the Rifampicin Combination Therapy versus Targeted Antimicrobial Monotherapy in the Oral Antimicrobial Treatment Phase of Staphylococcal Prosthetic Joint Infection (RiCOTTA)-trial is to evaluate whether monotherapy with clindamycin is non-inferior to rifampicin/fluoroquinolone combination therapy in patients with staphylococcal PJI that are treated with DAIR. Method. The RiCOTTA-trial is a multicenter, non-inferiority, open-label, randomized controlled trial evaluating clindamycin versus rifampicin/fluoroquinolone combination therapy in the oral treatment phase in patients with staphylococcal PJI managed with DAIR. The trial is performed in 16 hospitals in the Netherlands. Eligible patients are adults with staphylococcal knee or hip PJI managed by DAIR. Patients are included one to six days before antibiotic treatment is switched from intravenous to oral therapy. Patients with a contraindication for rifampicin, with a megaprosthesis or who receive intravenous antibiotics for more than three weeks after initial debridement are excluded. Primary outcome is treatment success one year after finishing antimicrobial treatment. Success is defined as the absence of: i. Infection related re-surgery, ii. New episode of antibiotic treatment for infection of the index joint after the initial treatment phase of 12 weeks, iii. Ongoing use of antibiotics for the index joint at the end of follow-up, iv. Death. The estimated treatment success of rifampicin combination therapy is 85% and the monotherapy strategy is considered not inferior when the difference in treatment success will be less than 10%. Enrolment of 158 patients per group (316 in total) is needed to confirm non-inferiority of monotherapy with a power of 80%. The trial is currently open for enrolment. The study is approved by the Medical Ethics Committee Leiden, the Hague, Delft, the Netherlands and registered under EU trial number 2022-501620-26-00 in Clinical Trial Information System. Conclusions. Currently, the RiCOTTTA study is the largest randomised clinical trial that compares targeted oral monotherapy with rifampicin combination treatment for staphylococcal PJI. Noninferiority of monotherapy would result in a change in national PJI guidelines and enable clinicians to use a more patient-tailored approach when considering antibiotics for patients during the oral treatment phase of PJI

Aim. There is a lack of data supporting the use of doxycycline as a single agent after removing infected orthopaedic metalwork. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of doxycycline compared with other single antibiotic regimens used at our specialist orthopaedic hospital. Methods. A retrospective observational study including all adult patients diagnosed with an orthopaedic metalwork infection due to staphylococci. All patients were managed with the removal of metalwork, and multiple intraoperative samples were sent for culture, followed by the administration of at least four weeks of oral antibiotics. Antibiotic selection was on the recommendation of an infection consultant. Infection outcome was assessed as the proportion of patients meeting the OVIVA Trial definition of definite failure at follow-up. The probability of definite failure for doxycycline and the alternatives group was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier survival method. All adverse drug reactions (ADR) during treatment were analysed. Results. Seventy-nine orthopaedic metalwork infections were identified between July 2017 and July 2021. Forty-four were prosthetic joints, and 35 were fracture-related metalwork. In 54 cases, the infecting organism was Staphylococcus aureus, and 25 were due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Forty-four were treated with doxycycline 100mg 12 hourly, and 35 were treated with alternatives (flucloxacillin 1g 6-hourly n=21 and clindamycin 450mg 6-hourly n=14). Overall, 70 patients (88.6%) were infection-free after a median follow-up of 23 months (IQR, 19 – 44). 38 (82.3%) were infection-free in the doxycycline group compared with 32 (91.4%) patients treated with alternatives. Of the failures in the alternatives group, all 3 received flucloxacillin. Survival analysis showed no significant difference in time to treatment failure between doxycycline and alternative antibiotics. Eighteen patients experienced an ADR: 2 nausea, one rash and one vaginal candidiasis due to doxycycline. Four diarrhoea, one reflux, two rashes and one headache due to clindamycin; 1 nausea and five diarrhoea due to flucloxacillin. Four patients required discontinuation therapy, two due to clindamycin and two due to flucloxacillin. Conclusions. In our cohort of patients, doxycycline monotherapy was an effective and well-tolerated oral option for treating staphylococcal infection following debridement and removal of orthopaedic metalwork

Aims. Current guidelines recommend surgery within 48 hours among patients presenting with hip fractures; however, optimal surgical timing for patients on oral anticoagulants (OACs) remains unclear. Individual studies are limited by small sample sizes and heterogeneous outcomes. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the effect of pre-injury OACs on time-to-surgery (TTS) and all-cause mortality among older adults with hip fracture treated surgically. Methods. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from inception to 14 October 2019 to identify studies directly comparing outcomes among hip fracture patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) prior to hospital admission to hip fracture patients not on OACs. Random effects meta-analyses were used to pool all outcomes (TTS, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day mortality). Results. A total of 34 studies (involving 39,446 patients) were included in our systematic review. TTS was 13.7 hours longer (95% confidence interval (CI) 9.8 to 17.5; p < 0.001) among hip fracture patients on OACs compared to those not on OACs. This translated to a three-fold higher odds of having surgery beyond the recommended 48 hours from admission (odds ratio (OR) 3.0 (95% CI 2.1 to 4.3); p = 0.001). In-hospital mortality was higher (OR 1.4 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.8); p < 0.03) among anticoagulated patients. Among studies comparing anticoagulants, there was no statistically significant difference in time-to-surgery between patients taking a DOAC compared to a VKA. Conclusion. Patients presenting with a hip fracture who were taking OACs prior to injury experience a delay in time-to-surgery and higher mortality than non-anticoagulated patients. Patients on DOACs may be at risk of further delays. Evaluating expedited surgical protocols in hip fracture patients on OACs is an urgent priority, with the potential to decrease morbidity and mortality in this group of high-risk patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):222–233

Aims. Hip fractures are a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and malnutrition is a crucial determinant of these outcomes. This meta-analysis aims to determine whether oral nutritional supplementation (ONS) improves postoperative outcomes in older patients with a hip fracture. Methods. A systematic literature search was conducted in August 2022. ONS was defined as high protein-based diet strategies containing (or not containing) carbohydrates, fat, vitamins, and minerals. Randomized trials documenting ONS in older patients with hip fracture (aged ≥ 50 years) were included. Two reviewers evaluated study eligibility, conducted data extraction, and assessed study quality. Results. There were 812 studies identified, of which 18 studies involving 1,522 patients met the inclusion criteria. The overall meta-analysis demonstrated that ONS was associated with significantly elevated albumin levels (weighted mean difference (WMD) 1.24 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95 to 1.53)), as well as a significant risk reduction in infective complications (odds ratio (OR) 0.54 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.76)), pressure ulcers (OR 0.54 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.88)), and total complications (OR 0.57 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.79)). Length of hospital stay (LOS) was also significantly reduced (WMD -2.36 (95% CI -4.14 to -0.58)), particularly in rehabilitation LOS (WMD -4.17 (95% CI -7.08 to -1.26)). There was a tendency towards a lower mortality risk (OR 0.93 (95% CI 0.62 to 1.4)) and readmission (OR 0.52 (95% CI 0.16 to 1.73)), although statistical significance was not achieved (p = 0.741 and p = 0.285, respectively). The overall compliance with ONS ranged from 64.7% to 100%, but no factors influencing compliance were identified. Conclusion. This meta-analysis is the first to quantitatively demonstrate that ONS could nearly halve the risk of infective complications, pressure ulcers, total complications, as well as improve serum albumin and reduce LOS. ONS should be a regular and integrated part of the perioperative care of these patients, especially given that the compliance with ONS is acceptable. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(11):1149–1158

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use is becoming more widespread in the geriatric population. Depending on the type of DOAC, several days are required for its anticoagulant effects to resorb, which may lead to surgical delays. This can have an important impact on hip fracture patients who require surgery. The goal of the current study is to compare surgical delays, mortality and complications for hip fracture patients who were on a DOAC to those who were not. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university hospital in Sherbrooke. All hip fracture patients between 2012 and 2018 who were on a DOAC prior to their surgery were included. These patients were matched with similar patients who were not on an anticoagulant (non-DOAC) for age, sex, type of fracture and date of operation. Demographic and clinical data were collected for all patients. Surgical delay was defined as time of admission to time of surgery. Mortality and complications up to one year postoperative were also noted. Each cohort comprised of 74 patients. There were no statistically signification differences in Charleson Comorbidty Index and American Society of Anesthesiologists scores between cohorts. Surgical delay was significantly longer for DOAC patients (36.3±22.2 hours vs. 18.6±18.9 hours, p < 0 .001). Mortality (6.1%) and overall complication (33.8%) rates were similar between the two cohorts. However, there were more surgical reinterventions in DOAC patients than non-DOAC ones (16.2% vs. 0.0%, p < 0 .001). Among DOAC patients, mortality was greater for those operated after 48 hours (23.1% vs. 3.3%, p < 0 .05) and complications were more frequent for those operated after 24 hours (52.0% vs. 37.5%, p < 0 .05). Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use in hip fracture patients is associated with longer surgical delays. Longer delays to surgery are associated with higher mortality and complication rates in hip fracture patients taking a DOAC. Hip fracture patients should have their surgery performed as soon as medically possible, regardless of anticoagulant use

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use is becoming more widespread in the geriatric population. Depending on the type of DOAC, several days are required for its anticoagulant effects to resorb, which may lead to surgical delays. This can have an important impact on hip fracture patients who require surgery. The goal of the current study is to compare surgical delays, mortality and complications for hip fracture patients who were on a DOAC to those who were not. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university hospital in Sherbrooke. All hip fracture patients between 2012 and 2018 who were on a DOAC prior to their surgery were included. These patients were matched with similar patients who were not on an anticoagulant (non-DOAC) for age, sex, type of fracture and date of operation. Demographic and clinical data were collected for all patients. Surgical delay was defined as time of admission to time of surgery. Mortality and complications up to one year postoperative were also noted. Each cohort comprised of 74 patients. There were no statistically signification differences in Charleson Comorbidty Index and American Society of Anesthesiologists scores between cohorts. Surgical delay was significantly longer for DOAC patients (36.3±22.2 hours vs. 18.6±18.9 hours, p < 0 .001). Mortality (6.1%) and overall complication (33.8%) rates were similar between the two cohorts. However, there were more surgical reinterventions in DOAC patients than non-DOAC ones (16.2% vs. 0.0%, p < 0 .001). Among DOAC patients, mortality was greater for those operated after 48 hours (23.1% vs. 3.3%, p < 0 .05) and complications were more frequent for those operated after 24 hours (52.0% vs. 37.5%, p < 0 .05). Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use in hip fracture patients is associated with longer surgical delays. Longer delays to surgery are associated with higher mortality and complication rates in hip fracture patients taking a DOAC. Hip fracture patients should have their surgery performed as soon as medically possible, regardless of anticoagulant use

Aim. Flucloxacillin is conventionally administered intravenously for perioperative prophylaxis, while oral administration is typical for bacterial inoculation prophylaxis following smaller traumatic wounds. We aimed to assess the time, for which the free flucloxacillin concentration was maintained above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC) for meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in soft and bone tissue, after intravenous and oral administration, using microdialysis in a porcine model. Method. 16 pigs were randomly allocated to either intravenous (Group IV) or oral (Group PO) flucloxacillin 1 g every 6 h during 24 h. Microdialysis was used for sampling in cancellous and cortical bone, subcutaneous tissue, and the knee joint. In addition, plasma was sampled. The flucloxacillin fT>MIC was evaluated using a low MIC target (0.5 μg/mL) and a high MIC target (2.0 μg/mL). Results. Intravenous administration resulted in longer fT>MIC (0.5 μg/mL) compared to oral administration, except for cortical bone. In Group IV all pigs reached a concentration of 0.5 μg/mL in all compartments. The mean fT>MIC (0.5 μg/mL) was 149 min in subcutaneous tissue and 61–106 min in bone tissue. In Group PO 0/8 pigs reached a concentration of 0.5 μg/mL in all compartments. For the high MIC target (2.0 μg/mL), fT>MIC was close to 0 min in both groups across compartments. Conclusions. Although intravenous administration of flucloxacillin 1g provided higher fT>MIC for the low MIC target compared to oral administration, concentrations were surprisingly low, particularly for bone tissue. Achievement of sufficient bone and soft tissue flucloxacillin concentrations may require a dose increase or continuous administration. Acknowledgement. The study was supported by the following grants: Sofus Carl Emil Friis Foundation, Aase & Ejnar Danielsens Foundation, the Augustinus Foundation, Direkt⊘r Emil Hertz og hustru Inger Hertz Foundation, and the Novo Nordisk Foundation

Aims. The aim of this study was to identify the most effective regimen of multiple doses of oral tranexamic acid (TXA) in achieving maximum reduction of blood loss in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients and Methods. In this randomized controlled trial, 200 patients were randomized to receive a single dose of 2.0 g of TXA orally two hours preoperatively (group A), a single dose of TXA followed by 1.0 g orally three hours postoperatively (group B), a single dose of TXA followed by 1.0 g three and nine hours postoperatively (group C), or a single dose of TXA followed by 1.0 g orally three, nine, and 15 hours postoperatively (group D). All patients followed a routine enhanced-recovery protocol. The primary outcome measure was the total blood loss. Secondary outcome measures were hidden blood loss (HBL), reduction in the level of haemoglobin, the rate of transfusion and adverse events. Results. Groups C (661.1 ml, . sd. 262.4) and D (597.7 ml, . sd. 219.6) had significantly lower mean total blood loss compared with groups A and B. The mean HBL was significantly lower in groups B (699.2 ml), C (533.1 ml) and D (469.9 ml) than in group A (p = 0.006, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). Groups C (2.22 ml, . sd. 0.91) and D (2.04 ml, . sd. 0.95) had a lower reduction in the level of haemoglobin than groups A and B. However, there were no differences between groups C and D in relation to the three parameters. Conclusion. The addition of two or three postoperative doses of TXA to one preoperative dose produced a significant reduction in blood loss. The two-dose postoperative regimen is the least necessary regimen for clinical efficacy in primary unilateral TKA. The three-dose regimen produced maximum reduction of blood loss. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1025–32

Aim. The risk of haematogenic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after dental procedures is discussed controversially. To our knowledge, no study has evaluated infections according to the origin of infection based on the natural habitat of the bacteria. We investigated the frequency of positive monomicrobial cultures involving bacteria from oral cavity in patients with suspected PJI compared to bone and joint infections without joint prosthesis. Method. In this retrospective study we included all patients with suspected PJI or bone and joint infection without endoprosthesis, hospitalized at our orthopaedic clinic from January 2009 through March 2014. Excluded were patients with superficial surgical site infections or missing data. Demographic, clinical and microbiological data were collected using a standardized case report form. Groups were compared regarding infections caused by oral bacteria. χ2 test or Fisher's exact test was employed for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables. Results. A total of 1673 patients were included, of whom 996 (60%) had a suspected PJI and 677 (40%) an osteoarticular infection without joint endoprosthesis (control group). In patients with suspected PJI the median age (standard deviation) was 67 (14) years; 407 (41%) were males. The anatomic location of the prosthesis was hip in 522 (52%) patients, knee in 437 (44%), megaprostheses in 14 (1%), shoulder in 8 (1%) and other endoprosthesis in 15 (2%) patients. In 437 (44%) of PJI cases pathogen(s) were detected, 271 (62%) were monomicrobial and 166 (38%) polymicrobial. Of 996 patients with suspected PJI, 2.4% (n = 24) had monomicrobial infections caused by bacteria belonging to the normal oral flora, predominantly oral streptococci (n = 21). In contrast, only 0.4% (n =3) of the control group without joint prosthesis had monomicrobial infections caused by oral bacteria. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.002), whereas the patient age (p = 0.058) and the anatomic location of the joint prosthesis (p = 0.622) did not have any effect on the infections due to oral bacteria. Conclusions. The incidence of infections caused by oral bacteria was significantly higher in patients with endoprosthesis than in other osteoarticular infections (2.4% versus 0.4%). This finding indicates that joint prostheses are at risk of haematogenous PJI originating from oral cavity. Future prospective studies need to determine the exact risk of haematogenic PJI caused by oral bacteria, as well as the potential of preventing these infections by antibiotic prophylaxis

Aim. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating and costly complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Use of extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis (EOAP) has become increasingly popular in the United States following a highly publicized study (Inabathula et al) from a single center demonstrating a significant protective effect (81% reduction) against PJI in ‘high-risk’ patients. However, these results have not been reproduced elsewhere and EOAP use directly conflicts with current antibiotic stewardship efforts. In order to study the role of EOAP in PJI prevention, consensus is needed for what defines ‘high-risk’ patients. The revision TJA (rTJA) population is an appropriate group to study due to having a higher incidence of PJI. The purpose of the current study was to rigorously determine which preoperative conditions described by Inabathula et al. (referred to as Inabathula criteria (IBC)) confer a higher rate of PJI in patients undergoing aseptic rTJA. Method. 2,256 patients that underwent aseptic rTJA at a single high-volume institution between 2016–2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics and comorbidities were recorded to determine if they had 1 or more ‘IBC’, a long list of preoperative conditions including autoimmune diseases, active smoking, body mass index (BMI)>35, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Reoperation for PJI at 90-days and 1-year was recorded. Chi-squared or Fischer's exact tests were calculated to determine the association between preoperative presence/absence of IBC and PJI. Multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to determine if specific comorbidities within the IBC individually conferred an increased PJI risk. Results. 1223 patients (54.2%) had at least one IBC condition. IBC-positive patients were more likely to be female, have an increased ASA score, and higher BMI. IBC-positive patients had a significant increase in PJI risk at both 90-days (relative risk (RR)=2.32, p<0.0001) and 1-year (RR=2.14, p=0.002) versus IBC-negative patients. Within IBC-positive patients, every additional IBC condition conferred a 1.8× odds increase for 90-day PJI (p<0.0001), and 1.76× odds increase in 1-year PJI (p<0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression identified active smoking, BMI>35, CKD, and diabetes mellitus as being independently associated with PJI development (p<0.05). Conclusions. Over half of rTJA patients meet IBC and could be eligible to receive EOAP in the United States. However, the specific presence of active smoking, BMI>35, CKD, and diabetes mellitus appear to be responsible for the increased risk of PJI. Prospective studies investigating EOAP use for patients with these specific conditions are urgently needed to prevent unnecessary antibiotic use

Introduction. Low serum Vitamin D (VitD) levels are often found in patients being investigated for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). VitD deficiency is associated with poor pre/post-operative functional scores and higher rate of complications. Studies report VitD as an important modifiable risk factor to improve outcomes post TKA. Aim. Aim of our study was 1) To examine the trajectory of VitD in TKA patients over 2 weeks, which included VitD sufficient and deficient patients who were supplemented orally or intramuscularly (IM) for comparision. 2) To compare early (2weeks) functional recovery in VitD sufficient and deficient patients. Material & Methods. We prospectively enrolled patients undergoing primary TKA by a single surgeon. Based on preoperative VitD levels (25OH VitD ≥30 being sufficient or <30 ng/mL being deficient) and means of supplementation(none, IM or Oral Injection Arachitol, Cholecalciferol IP 6,00,000 IU), we formed three groups: Group A (VitD sufficient, no supplementation); Group B (VitD deficient, IM supplementation); and Group C (VitD deficient, Oral supplementation). Study was approved by ethics committee. All patients gave informed consent and underwent TKA by same surgeon with uniform intra/post-operative protocols. VitD deficiency was supplemented orally/IM on the morning of surgery based on their randomization sequence. VitD levels (ng/mL) and outcome parameters of Flexion (degrees) and Timed up-and-go (TUG) test in seconds were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively on Day 3 and 14. 60 patients (20 per group) were enrolled. Demographics of all three groups were comparable. Results. VitD:. Group A:. Mean preoperative level of 42.3, fell to mean 40.4 by Day 3 (p < 0.001), and further to mean 38.9 by Day 14 (p<0.001). 6 and 4 patients became VitD deficient by Day 3 and Day 14 respectively. Group B:. Mean preoperative level of 21.5 rose to 31.2 by Day 3 (p=0.06), and further to 36.9 by Day 14 (p=0.001). 7 and 11 patients became sufficient by Day 3 and Day 14 respectively. Group C:. Mean preoperative level of 20.2 rose to mean 69.9 by Day 3 (p<0.001) and to a mean of 67.2 by Day 14 (p < 0.001). 19 and 20 patients became sufficient by Day 3 and Day 14 respectively. Outcome. Flexion:. Preoperative Flexion in Groups A, B, C was 133, 129 & 125 respectively (p=0.5). Day 3 Flexion was 88, 84 & 83 (p=0.2); Day 14 Flexion was 99, 90 & 95 (p=0.013) respectively. Posthoc Schaffe test showed statistical significance (p<0.05) only between Group A (99) and Group B (90) at Day 14. This indicated better flexion achieved in VitD sufficient patients at 2 weeks than in deficient patients with IM supplementation. TUG Test. was 17.1, 14.1 & 14.7 preoperatively in Groups A, B, C (p=0.5); on Day 3, it was 52.5, 62.6 & 58.2 (p=0.07); on Day 14, it was 33, 38.8 & 37.8 (p=0.2) respectively. Day 3 TUG time was longest (62.6) in Group B and shortest (52.5) in Group A indicating that IM supplemented patients had poor function compared to sufficient group though without statistical significance (p=0.07) with numbers available. Conclusion. We found that VitD deficient patients can be rapidly supplemented on the morning of surgery. High dose oral VitD increased levels by Day 3, whereas IM VitD increased levels only by Day 14 which remained significantly lesser than oral group. Interestingly, about 25% of VitD sufficient patients who were not supplemented, became deficient postoperatively. Flexion achieved on Day 14 was significantly better with VitD sufficiency, compared to deficient patients treated with IM VitD. Significance. VitD deficiency can be rapidly corrected by high dose oral supplementation on the morning of surgery. Also, TKA can deplete VitD and can make VitD sufficient patients deficient as early as Day 3 post surgery. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Aim. Patients use antibiotics for various reasons before elective joint replacement surgery, but it is not known how common this is. The aim of this study was to investigate patients' use of oral antibiotics before elective joint replacement surgery and how this affects the risk for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in a one-year follow-up. Method. Patients with a primary hip or knee replacement performed in a tertiary care hospital between September 2002 and December 2013 were identified (23 171 joint replacements, 10 200 hips and 12 971 knees). Information on oral antibiotics purchased within 90 days before the operation was gathered from a national database. The occurrence of a PJI, identified by prospective infection surveillance, in a one-year follow-up was the primary outcome. The occurrence of any surgical site infection was analyzed as a secondary outcome. The association between antibiotic use and subsequent infection was examined using a multivariable logistic regression model that included information on the operated joint, age, gender, body mass index and patients' chronic diseases (according to medication data). Results. During the one-year follow-up, 158 (0.68%) PJIs were identified. 4 106 (18%) of the joint replacement operations were preceded by one or more courses of oral antibiotics. The most commonly prescribed group of antibiotics was 1st generation cephalosporins. The incidence of PJI for patients with preoperative oral antibiotic use was 0.29% (12/4 106), compared to 0.77% (146/19 065) in patients without preoperative antibiotics. A preoperative oral antibiotic course decreased the risk for subsequent PJI both in the univariate (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21 – 0.69) and multivariable model (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.22–0.73). When superficial infection cases were included in the analysis, preoperative antibiotic use did not affect the overall risk for surgical site infection. Conclusions. The use of oral antibiotics before elective joint replacement surgery is common and is associated with a lower risk for subsequent PJI. Further studies are needed in order to confirm this finding and to evaluate factors affecting this result. Meanwhile, the indiscriminate use of antibiotics before elective joint replacement surgery cannot be recommended, even though the treatment of active infections remains important in the prevention of surgical site infections

Background. Optimal perioperative fluid management has not been established in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgical procedures. Our purpose was to investigate the effects of perioperative fluid management on patients experiencing TKA. Methods. One hundred thirty patients who met inclusion criteria undergoing primary unilateral TKA were prospectively randomized into traditional (TFG) vs. oral (OFG) perioperative fluid management groups. The TFG had a predetermined (4L) amount of intravenous fluids (IVF) administered in the perioperative period. The OFG began drinking a minimum of three, 20-ounces servings of clear fluids daily for three days prior to surgery. This cohort also drank 10-ounces of clear fluids 4 hours prior to surgery. Perioperative IVF were discontinued when the patient began oral intake or when the total amount of IVF reached 500mL. Outcome measures included: body-weight (BW) fluctuations, knee motion, leg girth, bioelectrical impendence, quadriceps activation, functional outcomes testing, KOOS JR, VR-12, laboratory values, vital signs, patient satisfaction, pain scores, and adverse events. Results. The TFG had increased BW the evening of surgery (7.0±4.3 vs. 3.0±3.9, p=0.000), post-operative day (POD) #1 (9.1±4.3 vs. 4.7±3.9, p=0.000), and POD #2 (6.2±5.0 vs. 4.4±4.0, p=0.032). Bioelectrical impedance showed less limb edema in the OFG (4.2±29.7 vs. 17.8±30.3, p=0.000) on POD#1. Urine specific gravity differences were seen preoperatively between groups (OFG, more hydrated, p=0.002). Systolic blood pressure decrease from baseline was greater in the OFG upon arrival to the floor (19.4±13.5 vs. 10.6±12.8, p=0.000) and 8 (23.4±13.3 vs. 17.0±12.9, p=0.006) and 16 (25.8±13.8 vs. 25.8±13.8, p=0.046) hours after floor arrival. The TFG had more UOP on POD#1 (3369mL±1343mL vs. 2435mL±1151mL). Conclusions. Oral fluid intake with IVF restriction in the perioperative period after TKA may offer short-term benefits with swelling and BW fluctuations. The authors continue to limit perioperative IVFs and encourage patient initiated fluid intake. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

BACKGROUND. Optimal perioperative fluid management has not been established in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgical procedures. Our purpose was to investigate the effects of perioperative fluid management on patients experiencing TKA. METHODS. One hundred thirty patients who met inclusion criteria undergoing primary unilateral TKA were prospectively randomized into traditional (TFG) vs. oral (OFG) perioperative fluid management groups. The TFG had a predetermined amount of intravenous fluids (IVF) administered in the perioperative period. The OFG began drinking a minimum of three, 20-ounces servings of clear fluids daily for three days prior to surgery. This cohort also drank 10-ounces of clear fluids 4 hours prior to surgery. Perioperative IVF were discontinued when the patient began oral intake or when the total amount of IVF reached 500mL. Outcome measures included: body-weight (BW) fluctuations, knee motion, leg girth, bioelectrical impendence, quadriceps activation, functional outcomes testing, KOOS JR, VR-12, laboratory values, vital signs, patient satisfaction, pain scores, and adverse events. RESULTS. The TFG had increased BW the evening of surgery (7.0±4.3 vs. 3.0±3.9, p=0.000), post-operative day (POD) #1 (9.1±4.3 vs. 4.7±3.9, p=0.000), and POD #2 (6.2±5.0 vs. 4.4±4.0, p=0.032). Bioelectrical impedance showed less limb edema in the OFG (4.2±29.7 vs. 17.8±30.3, p=0.000) on POD#1. Urine specific gravity differences were seen preoperatively between groups (OFG, more hydrated, p=0.002). Systolic blood pressure change from baseline was greater in the OFG upon arrival to the floor (19.4±13.5 vs. 10.6±12.8, p=0.000) and 8 (23.4±13.3 vs. 17.0±12.9, p=0.006) and 16 (25.8±13.8 vs. 25.8±13.8, p=0.046) hours after floor arrival. The TFG had more UOP on POD#1 (3369mL±1343mL vs. 2435mL±1151mL). CONCLUSIONS. Oral fluid intake with IVF restriction in the perioperative period after TKA may offer short-term benefits with swelling and BW fluctuations. The authors continue to limit perioperative IVFs and encourage patient initiated fluid intake

Aim. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) concerns up to 20% of all prosthesis revision procedures. The IDSA recommends at least 2 weeks of intravenous antimicrobial therapy while most of the appropriate antibiotics in these settings have very high oral bioavailability (e.g., rifampicin, cotrimoxazole, fluoroquinolone, clindamycin, fusidic acid, linezolid and doxycycline). Method. AVAPOM is a monocentric retrospective non-inferiority study which included patients who received at least one of the highly bioavailable antibiotics listed above as a documented treatment (i.e., following the intravenous empirical post-operative antibiotic treatment) for PJIs in order to compare the remission rate of infection and the length of hospital stay (LOS). Patients were split between intravenous group (IV, from 1st January 2013 to 31st December 2014) and complete oral group (PO; since 1st January 2015) and were compared on both the PJI outcome regarding the last news available and the length of stay (LOS). Results. Out of a total of 216 patients, our intermediary analysis included 141 patients, with 73 receiving IV treatment (IV) and 68 oral treatment (PO). Remission was recorded in 21.9% IV patients and in 25.0% PO patients after a mean follow-up of 410.4 days ± 36.3 days (p=0.26). The global mortality reached 6.41% in IV group versus 1.25% in PO group (p=0.15). The medium LOS was 16.9 and 12.5 days for respectively IV and PO groups (p=0.0001). Conclusions. Our preliminary results suggest that complete oral and intravenous documented antibiotic treatment for patients with PJIs are comparable with regards to the patients' outcome but oral treatment is associated with a significant reduction of LOS

Background. The clinical benefit of chronic suppression with oral antibiotics as a salvage treatment for periprosthetic joint infection is unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare infection-free prosthetic survival rates between patients who received chronic oral antibiotics and those who did not following irrigation and debridement with polyethylene exchange or two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection. Methods. We reviewed the records on all irrigation and debridement procedures with polyethylene exchange and two-stage revisions performed at our institution from 1996 to 2010 for hip or knee periprosthetic joint infection. Of 625 patients treated with a total of 655 eligible revisions, ninety-two received chronic oral antibiotics for a minimum of six months and were eligible for inclusion in our study. These patients were compared with a matched cohort (ratio of 1:3) who did not receive chronic oral antibiotics. Results. The five-year infection-free prosthetic survival rate was 68.5% (95% confidence interval = 59.2% to 79.3%) for the antibiotic-suppression group and 41.1% (95% CI = 34.9% to 48.5%) for the non-suppression group (hazard ratio = 0.63, p = 0.008). Stratification by the type of surgery and the infecting organism showed a higher five-year survival rate for the patients in the suppression group who underwent irrigation and debridement with polyethylene exchange (64.7%) compared with those in the non-suppression group who underwent irrigation and debridement with polyethylene exchange (30.4%, p < 0.0001) and a higher five-year survival rate for the patients in the suppression group who had a Staphylococcus aureus infection (57.4%) compared with those in the non-suppression group who had a Staphylococcus aureus infection (40.1%, p = 0.047). Conclusions. Chronic suppression with oral antibiotics increased the infection-free prosthetic survival rate following surgical treatment for periprosthetic joint infection. Patients who underwent irrigation and debridement with polyethylene exchange and those who had a Staphylococcus aureus infection had the greatest benefit

Aim. Current standard of care in the management of bone and joint infection commonly includes a 4–6 week course of intravenous (IV) antibiotics but there is little evidence to suggest that oral antibiotic therapy results in worse outcomes. The primary objective was to determine whether oral antibiotics are non-inferior to IV antibiotics in this setting. Method. This was a parallel group, randomised (1:1), open label, non-inferiority trial across twenty-six NHS hospitals in the United Kingdom. Eligible patients were adults with a clinical diagnosis of bone, joint or orthopaedic metalware-associated infection who would ordinarily receive at least six weeks of antibiotics and who had received ≤7 days of IV therapy from the date of definitive surgery (or the start of planned curative treatment in patients managed non-operatively). Participants were randomised to receive either oral or IV antibiotics for the first 6 weeks of therapy. Follow-on oral therapy was permitted in either arm. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants experiencing definitive treatment failure within one year of randomisation. The non-inferiority margin was set at 7.5%. Results. Of 1054 participants randomised (527 to each arm) endpoint data were available for 1015 (96.30%). Definitive treatment failure was identified in 141/1015 (13.89%) participants, 74/506 (14.62%) of those randomised to IV therapy and 67/509 (13.16%) of those randomised to oral therapy. In the intention to treat analysis, the imputed risk difference (PO-IV) for definitive treatment failure was −1.38% (90% CI: −4.94, 2.19), thus meeting the non-inferiority criterion (i.e. the upper limit of 95%CI being <7.5%). A complete cases analysis, a per-protocol analysis and sensitivity analyses for missing data confirmed this result. With the exception of intravenous catheter complications, there was no significant difference between the two arms in the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs). Health economic analysis suggests that the non-surgical treatment costs over one year for patients randomised to oral therapy were approximately £2,700 less than those of IV therapy. Conclusions. Oral antibiotic therapy is non-inferior to IV therapy when used during the first six weeks in the treatment for bone and joint infection, as assessed by definitive treatment failure within one year of randomisation. These findings challenge the current standard of care and provide an opportunity to realise significant benefits for patients, antimicrobial stewardship and the health economy. Funding. The OVIVA study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme (Project number 11/36/29)