Despite the widespread success of total hip arthroplasty (THA), postoperative pain management remains a concern. Opioids have classically been administered for pain relief after THA, but their side effect profile, in addition to the cognizance of the growing opioid epidemic, has incited a shift toward alternative pain modalities. Although the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) diclofenac is a promising addition, its impact on immediate THA outcomes has not previously been investigated. Thus, in the present study, we evaluate the effects of adjunctive diclofenac on: 1) postoperative pain intensity, 2) opioid consumption, 3) discharge destination, 4) length of stay, and 5) patient satisfaction in primary THA patients. A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients who underwent primary THA by a single surgeon between May 1 and September 31, 2017. Patients were stratified into a study group (n=25), who were treated with postoperative diclofenac in addition to the standard pain control regimen, and a control group (n=88), who did not receive adjunctive diclofenac. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA)/analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and chi-square/logistic regression analysis were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Patients receiving adjunctive diclofenac were more likely to be discharged home than to inpatient facilities (O.R. 4.02, p=0.049). In addition, patient satisfaction with respect to how well and how often pain was controlled (p= 0.0436 and p=0.0217, respectively) was significantly greater in the diclofenac group. Finally, patients who received diclofenac had lower opioid consumption on postoperative days one and two (−67.2 and −129 mg, respectively, p=0.001 for both). The rapid growth of THA as an outpatient procedure has intensified the urgency of improving postoperative pain management. The present study demonstrates that THA patients receiving adjunctive diclofenac were more likely to be discharged home, had reduced opioid consumption, and experienced greater satisfaction. This will, in turn, decrease complications and total hospital costs, leading to a more cost-effective pain control regimen. In order to further investigate the optimal regimen, future studies comprising larger cohort, as well as a comparison of diclofenac to other NSAIDs, are warranted

Introduction. Opioids are an integral part of pain management following total joint replacement procedures; however, to date, no evidence-based guidelines which regulate opioid prescribing practices exist. In order to determine an appropriate number of opioids required to control pain for post-arthroplasty patients, it is important to understand why patients are using them. We sought to identify the causes of pain which necessitated opioid consumption for patients following total knee (TKA) and total hip (THA) arthroplasty. Methods. The study cohort consisted of 55 patients (29 females, 26 males) who underwent either primary unilateral TKA (n=28) or THA (n=27). Prior to discharge, patients were provided with a pain diary in which to record details regarding the type of pain medication used, the time of use, pain score at the time of use, and the specific reason for use. Subjects returned the completed logs once they ceased opioid use post-operatively. Based on responses, we categorized reasons for use into either Activity, which was further classified into ADL and Exercise, or Rest, which was further classified into Sleeping, Sitting, and Laying Down. Average and frequency of opioid consumption was calculated for each category, along with the pain score at the time of use for each category. All dependent variables were compared between TKA and THA patients using separate independent samples t-tests or Chi-square tests. Results. Overall, 13 patients did not consume any opioids during the post-operative period, and data regarding the specific reason for opioid use were available for 33 patients (16 THA, 17 TKA). For THA patients, the most common reason for opioid consumption was Sleeping (47%), followed by Exercise (20%), Sitting (16%), ADL (10%), and Laying Down (7%). Conversely, TKA patients reported the most frequent opioid use for pain during Exercise (32%), Sitting (28%), ADL (14%), Sleeping (14%), and Laying Down (12%). The frequency of consumption was greater for THA patients during Sleeping (p<0.001), but reduced during Exercise (P<0.001) and Sitting (p<0.001) compared to TKA patients. The average number of opioid pills consumed during ADL (p=0.05) and Exercise (p=0.02) was greater for TKA patients compared to THA. Pain scores reported during Exercise (p=0.33) and Sleeping (p=0.08) were similar between groups; however, TKA patients reported higher pain scores during Resting (p=0.047). Conclusion. Our results demonstrate that the causes associated with opioid consumption following arthroplasty procedures differ between TKA and THA patients. Opioid use was most common at night during sleeping for THA patients, while TKA patients reported greater usage during the day while exercising or sitting. Our data can be used to counsel patients regarding pain expectations following TKA or THA and create standardized prescribing and tapering guidelines to effectively manage pain while limiting opioid use

Orthopaedic surgeons prescribe more opioids than any other surgical speciality. Opioids remain the analgesic of choice following arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery. There is growing evidence that opioid-sparing protocols may reduce postoperative opioid consumption while adequately addressing patients’ pain. However, there are a lack of prospective, comparative trials evaluating their effectiveness. The objective of the current randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy of a multi-modal, opioid-sparing approach to postoperative pain management in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder and knee surgery. The NO PAin trial is a pragmatic, definitive RCT (NCT04566250) enrolling 200 adult patients undergoing outpatient shoulder or knee arthroscopy. Patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an opioid-sparing group or standard of care. The opioid-sparing group receives a three-pronged prescription package consisting of 1) a non-opioid prescription: naproxen, acetaminophen and pantoprazole, 2) a limited opioid “rescue prescription” of hydromorphone, and 3) a patient education infographic. The control group is the current standard of care as per the treating surgeon, which consists of an opioid analgesic. The primary outcome of interest is oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption up to 6 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcomes are postoperative pain scores, patient satisfaction, quantity of OMEs prescribed and number of opioid refills. Patients are followed at both 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Data analysts and outcome assessors are blinded to the treatment groups. As of December 1, 2021 we have enrolled 166 patients, reaching 83% of target enrolment. Based on the current recruitment rate, we anticipate that enrolment will be completed by the end of January 2022 with final follow-up and study close out completed by March of 2022. The final results will be released at the Canadian Orthopaedic Association Meeting in June 2022 and be presented as follows. The mean difference in OME consumption was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in OMEs prescribed was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in Visual Analogue Pain Scores (VAS) and patient satisfaction are XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The absolute difference in opioid refills was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The results of the current study will demonstrate whether an opioid sparing approach to postoperative outpatient pain management is effective at reducing opioid consumption while adequately addressing postoperative pain in patients undergoing outpatient shoulder and knee arthroscopy. This study is novel in the field of arthroscopic surgery, and its results will help to guide appropriate postoperative analgesic management following these widely performed procedures

Orthopaedic surgeons prescribe more opioids than any other surgical speciality. Opioids remain the analgesic of choice following arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery. There is growing evidence that opioid-sparing protocols may reduce postoperative opioid consumption while adequately addressing patients’ pain. However, there are a lack of prospective, comparative trials evaluating their effectiveness. The objective of the current randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy of a multi-modal, opioid-sparing approach to postoperative pain management in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder and knee surgery. The NO PAin trial is a pragmatic, definitive RCT (NCT04566250) enrolling 200 adult patients undergoing outpatient shoulder or knee arthroscopy. Patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an opioid-sparing group or standard of care. The opioid-sparing group receives a three-pronged prescription package consisting of 1) a non-opioid prescription: naproxen, acetaminophen and pantoprazole, 2) a limited opioid “rescue prescription” of hydromorphone, and 3) a patient education infographic. The control group is the current standard of care as per the treating surgeon, which consists of an opioid analgesic. The primary outcome of interest is oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption up to 6 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcomes are postoperative pain scores, patient satisfaction, quantity of OMEs prescribed and number of opioid refills. Patients are followed at both 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Data analysts and outcome assessors are blinded to the treatment groups. As of December 1, 2021 we have enrolled 166 patients, reaching 83% of target enrolment. Based on the current recruitment rate, we anticipate that enrolment will be completed by the end of January 2022 with final follow-up and study close out completed by March of 2022. The final results will be released at the Canadian Orthopaedic Association Meeting in June 2022 and be presented as follows. The mean difference in OME consumption was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in OMEs prescribed was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in Visual Analogue Pain Scores (VAS) and patient satisfaction are XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The absolute difference in opioid refills was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The results of the current study will demonstrate whether an opioid sparing approach to postoperative outpatient pain management is effective at reducing opioid consumption while adequately addressing postoperative pain in patients undergoing outpatient shoulder and knee arthroscopy. This study is novel in the field of arthroscopic surgery, and its results will help to guide appropriate postoperative analgesic management following these widely performed procedures

Introduction. Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial and few reports exist using contemporary pain protocols and tranexamic acid (TXA). This study aimed to examine whether a modern TKA protocol without a tourniquet results in less blood loss, patient-reported pain, and opioid consumption compared to TKAs with a tourniquet. Methods. A retrospective study was performed on 210 consecutive primary cemented TKAs using computer-assisted navigation with or without tourniquet. The tourniquet was inflated the entire procedure or not at all, and sterile CO2 gas was used to maximise cement interdigitation in non-tourniquet knees. All patients received identical implants and underwent the same TKA perioperative protocols. Standardised inpatient pain level targets were utilised and medication titrated to control postoperative pain. Pain on a 10 point scale in the first 24 hours after surgery and blood loss (preoperative to postoperative day 1 decline in hemoglobin, total blood loss in liters, drain output in milliliters, and drain output per hour) were analyzed relative to tourniquet use. Results. After exclusions for confounds, 184 consecutive TKAs (93 tourniquet; 91 tourniquetless) were analyzed. Age (p = 0.561) and BMI (p = 0.580) did not differ between the two groups. By chance, there were significantly more females in the tourniquet group (55.9%) compared to the no tourniquet group (44.1%) (p = 0.019). Consequently, outcome analyses were performed separately for females and males. Median pain in the first 24 hours was significantly lower for women without a tourniquet (1.9 vs. 2.7, p = 0.002). This corresponded to significantly less opioid consumption in the first 24 hours among women without tourniquets (18.8 vs. 42.8 Me, p < 0.0001). Neither pain nor opioid consumption in the first 24 hours differed based on tourniquet use in men (p ≥ 0.114). Not surprisingly, significantly more blood loss was observed on all four metrics in tourniquetless knees for both women (p ≤ 0.040) and men (p ≤ 0.020). Discussion. In contemporary TKA using multi-modal pain protocols and TXA, not using a tourniquet resulted in less pain and lower narcotic consumption in the first 24 hours after surgery for women, but not for men. It is possible that women may be more affected by tourniquet-induced ischemia in the early postoperative period. These results are timely with current national initiatives to minimise perioperative opioid consumption

Introduction. Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial and few reports exist using contemporary pain protocols and tranexamic acid (TXA). This study aimed to examine whether a modern TKA protocol without a tourniquet results in less blood loss, patient-reported pain, and opioid consumption compared to TKAs with a tourniquet. Methods. A retrospective study was performed on 210 consecutive primary cemented TKAs using computer-assisted navigation with or without tourniquet. The tourniquet was inflated the entire procedure or not at all, and sterile CO2 gas was used to maximise cement interdigitation in non-tourniquet knees. All patients received identical implants and underwent the same TKA peri-operative protocols. Standardised inpatient pain level targets were utilised and medication titrated to control post-operative pain. Pain on a 10 point scale in the first 24 hours after surgery and blood loss (pre-operative to post-operative day 1 decline in hemoglobin, total blood loss in liters, drain output in milliliters, and drain output per hour) were analyzed relative to tourniquet use. Results. After exclusions for confounds, 184 consecutive TKAs (93 tourniquet; 91 tourniquetless) were analyzed. Age (p = 0.561) and BMI (p = 0.580) did not differ between the two groups. By chance, there were significantly more females in the tourniquet group (55.9%) compared to the no tourniquet group (44.1%) (p = 0.019). Consequently, outcome analyses were performed separately for females and males. Median pain in the first 24 hours was significantly lower for women without a tourniquet (1.9 vs. 2.7, p = 0.002). This corresponded to significantly less opioid consumption in the first 24 hours among women without tourniquets (18.8 vs. 42.8 Me, p < 0.0001). Neither pain nor opioid consumption in the first 24 hours differed based on tourniquet use in men (p ≥ 0.114). Not surprisingly, significantly more blood loss was observed on all four metrics in tourniquetless knees for both women (p ≤ 0.040) and men (p ≤ 0.020). Discussion. In contemporary TKA using multi-modal pain protocols and TXA, not using a tourniquet resulted in less pain and lower narcotic consumption in the first 24 hours after surgery for women, but not for men. It is possible that women may be more effected by tourniquet-induced ischemia in the early post-operative period. These results are timely with current national initiatives to minimise peri-operative opioid consumption

We performed a randomized feasibility trial to examine the impact of preoperative femoral nerve block (FNB) on elderly patients with hip fractures, including those with mild to moderate cognitive impairment. We evaluated the impact of preoperative FNB on the following outcomes within 5 days of surgical fixation: 1. Pain levels, 2. Total narcotic consumption, 3. Postoperative mobilization. Randomized allocation of 73 patients in a 2:1 intervention:control ratio. To allow comparison between the 2 groups as well as sub- analysis of the intervention group to examine treatment fidelity (i.e. the ability to deliver the intervention as planned). Inclusion criteria: Patient age≥ 65 years admitted with a low energy hip fracture, ambulatory preinjury, Mini Mental State Exam MMSE score≥13 (moderate dementia), Able to provide direct or proxy consent. Exclusion criteria: Admission ≥ 30 hours after injury, prior regular use of opiates. Potential participants were identified and either participants or proxy respondents provided signed informed consent. Participants allocated to the intervention group received a FNB administered by the UAH acute pain service (APS) within 20 hours of admission to hospital in addition to the usual care. Participants in the control group received usual care. Participants were followed for 5 days postoperatively with daily assessment of pain, narcotic consumption, delirium and mobility. Main outcome measure: (1) Pain at rest and activity (2) Preoperative and postoperative opioid consumption, (3) Mobilization in POD#1. Overall, 73 participants were enrolled (23 Control: 50 FNB). The FNB group was slightly older (mean [SD] 80.1 [8.7] vs. 76.2 [9.2], p=0.09) and had more males (21 [42%] vs. 5 [22%], p=0.09) than the Control group. The mean MMSE score for both groups was >24 (p=0.35 for group comparison), suggesting minimal cognitive impairment of participants. The FNB group reported significantly less pain at rest and activity than the control group over time (p < 0 .001 for both). Opioid consumption were non-significantly higher and more variable in the control group preoperatively (Median [25, 75 quartile] 10.6 [0, 398] vs 7.5 [0, 125], p=0.26) and postoperatively (13.1 [0, 950] vs 10 [0, 260], p=0.31). 41 (85%) of FNB participants mobilized on day 1 vs. 16 (73%) of control participants (p=0.21). Preoperative FNB significantly reduced pain. Opioid consumption was not significantly different, but more variable in the control group. Although not significant, more FNB patients successfully mobilized on day 1 postoperatively. Participants with cognitive impairment were not enrolled due to difficulty in obtaining proxy consent. A definitive randomized trial would be feasible and add valuable information about pain management following hip fracture

Introduction. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multi-disciplinary approach for establishing procedure–specific, evidence-based perioperative protocols to optimize patient outcomes. ERAS evidence is predominantly for non-orthopaedic procedures. We review the impact of ERAS protocol implementation on total joint arthroplasty (TJA) outcomes at our institution. Methods. All primary total hip and knee arthroplasties performed one year before and after ERAS implementation were identified by current procedural terminology code. Length of stay (LOS), disposition, readmission and opioid usage were analyzed before and after ERAS implementation and statistically analyzed with student t-test and chi-square test. Results. 2105 total patients were identified (967 THA, 494 pre-ERAS and 473 post-ERAS;1138 TKA, 575 pre-ERAS and 563 post-ERAS). TKA. After ERAS implementation, opioid consumption decreased for hospital day one (45.5MME to 36.2MME; p=0.000) and overall hospitalization (101.9MME to 83.9MME; p =0.000). Average LOS decreased (73.28hrs to 66.44hrs; p=0.000), blood transfusion rate trended down (3.3% to 1.95%; p=0.155), and disposition to home over skilled nursing facility increased (57.8% to 71.6%; p=0.000). Unplanned return-to-hospital encounters were unchanged (13.22% to 12.79%; p=0.8504). 30-day and 90-day readmission rates decreased (7.30% to 3.02%; p=0.0020 and 8.5% to 4.8%; p=0.0185, respectively). THA. After ERAS implementation, opioid consumption decreased for hospital day one (49.5MME to 35.4MME; p=0.000) and overall hospitalization (79.5MME to 59.5MME; p=0.000). Average LOS decreased (57.84hrs to 51.87hrs; p=0.011), blood transfusion rate was unchanged (4.25% to 3.81%; p=0.725), and disposition to home over skilled nursing facility increased (80.4% to 82.5%; p= 0.022). Unplanned return-to-hospital encounters were unchanged (8.51% to 8.88%; p=0.8486). Readmission trended up during postoperative days 0–30 and trended down during postoperative days 31–90. (1.42% to 2.96%; p=0.1074) and (1.21% to 0.85%; p=0.5748), respectively. Conclusion. ERAS protocols reduce postoperative opioid consumption, decrease hospital LOS, and increase patient disposition to home without adversely affecting short-term readmission rates

Dexmedetomidine, an alpha 2 agonist, has been approved for providing sedation in the intensive care unit. Along with sedative properties, it has analgesic activity through its highly selective action on alpha 2 receptors. Recent studies have examined the use of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to prolong the duration of peripheral nerve blocks. Studies showing effectiveness of dexmedetomidine for adductor canal block in knee surgery are small. Also, its effectiveness has not been compared to Epinephrine which is a strong alpha and beta receptor agonist. In a previous study, we showed that motor sparing knee blocks significantly increased the duration of analgesia compared with periarticular knee infiltration using local anesthetic mixture containing Epinephrine following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In this study, we compared two local anesthetic mixtures: one containing Dexmedetomidine and the other Epinephrine for prolongation of motor sparing knee block in primary TKA patients. After local ethics board approval and gaining Notice of Compliance (NOC) from Health Canada for use of Dexmedetomidine perineurally, 70 patients between the ages 18 – 95 of ASA class I to III undergoing unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty were enrolled. Motor sparing knee block − 1) Adductor canal continuous catheter 2) Single shot Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve block 3) Single shot posterior knee infiltration was performed in all patients using 60 ml mixture of 0.5% Ropivacaine, 10 mg Morphine, 30 mg Ketorolac. Patients randomized into the Dexmedetomidine group (D) received, in addition to the mixture, 1mcg/kg Dexmedetomidine and the Epinephrine (E) group received 200mcg in the mixture. The primary outcome was time to first rescue analgesia as a surrogate for duration of analgesia and secondary outcomes were NRS pain scores up to 24 hours and opioid consumption. The time to first rescue analgesia was not significantly different between Epinephrine and dexmedetomidine groups, Mean and SD 18.45 ± 12.98 hours vs 16.63 ± 11.80 hours with a mean difference of 1.82 hours (95% CI −4.54 to 8.18 hours) and p value of 0.57. Pain scores at 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours were comparable between groups. Mean NRS pain scores Epinephrine vs Dexmedetomidine groups were 1.03 vs 0.80 at 4 hours, 1.48 vs 3.03 at 6 hours, 3.97 vs 4.93 at 12 hours, 5.31 vs 6.18 and 6.59 v 6.12 at 24 hours. Opioid consumption was also not statistically significant between both groups at 6, 12 18, 24 hours (p values 0.18, 0.88, 0.09, 0.64 respectively). Dexmedetomidine does not prolong the duration of knee motor sparing blocks when compared to Epinephrine for total knee arthroplasty. Pain scores and opioid consumption was also comparable in both groups. Further studies using higher dose of dexmedetomidine are warranted

Introduction. Day stay surgery for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions is an increasingly common practice and has driven clinicians to come up with postoperative pain regimes that allow same day mobilisation and a safe and timely discharge. There is a paucity of literature surrounding the use of intraosseous (IO) ropivacaine used as a Bier's block to provide both intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in lower limb surgery. Methods. This patient blinded, pilot study randomised 15 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction to receive either IO ropivacaine 1.5 or 2.0 mg/kg; or 300 mg of ropivacaine as local infiltration (standard of care). Toxic plasma levels of ropivacaine have been defined in the literature and therefore the primary outcome for this study was arterial plasma concentration of ropivacaine as a means to determine its safety profile. Samples were taken via an arterial line at prespecified times after tourniquet deflation. Secondary outcomes that we were interested in included immediate postoperative pain scores using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and perioperative opioid equivalent consumption. Results. Participants had a mean age of 27.8 (SD 9.2) years and 87% (13/15) were male. All patients in the intervention group receiving IO ropivacaine had plasma concentrations well below the threshold for central nervous system (CNS) toxicity (0.60 µg/ml). The highest plasma concentration was achieved in the intervention group receiving 1.5 mg/kg dose of ropivacaine reaching 3.59 mg/ml. This would equate to 0.22 µg/ml of free plasma ropivacaine. There were no differences across the three groups regarding pain scores or perioperative opioid consumption. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that IO administration of 0.2% ropivacaine is both safe and effective in reducing perioperative pain in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. There may be scope to increase the IO dose further or utilise other analgesics via the IO regional route to improve perioperative pain relief

INTRODUCTION. The benefits of combining enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) interventions with an outpatient THA/TKA program are uncertain. The primary objective was to compare adverse event rate and secondly to compare pain management, functional recovery, PROMs and patients' satisfaction. METHODS. We conducted an ambidirectional single subject cohort study on 48 consecutive patients who experienced both a standard-inpatient and an ERAS-outpatient THA/TKA (contralaterally). We compared complications according to Clavien-Dindo scale and Comprehensive Complications Index (CCI), and unplanned episodes of care. Postoperative pain assessed with a numeric rating scale, opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents, functional recovery, patient-reported outcome measures (WOMAC, KOOS, HOOS, Forgotten Joint Score and Patient Joint Perception) and patients' satisfaction were also evaluated. RESULTS. Following the ERAS-outpatient surgery, complication rates were reduced by more than 50% (2.1 vs 4.4, p<0.001), CCI was significantly lower (12.3 vs 19.1, p<0.001), and similar unplanned episodes of care were observed (p>0.999). In the first 8 postoperative hours, perceived pain was similar (p>0.805) while opioid consumption was significantly reduced with ERAS-outpatient care (9.3 vs 26.5 MME, p<0.001). Patients walked, climbed stairs, showered, performed activities of daily living, practised sports, went back to work sooner after ERAS-outpatient surgery (p<0.001), but PROMs were similar between groups at the last follow-up (p> 0.188). Patients were more satisfied with hospital stay, pain management, functional recovery, wound management, and overall experience of the ERAS-outpatient pathway and recommended it significantly more (p <0.002). DISCUSSION. Most studies comparing outpatient to inpatient programs conclude that outpatient surgeries did not increase complication or readmission rates, and, overall, were not inferior. We found that compared to std-inpatient practice, ERAS-outpatient program reduced complications by half while not resulting in more unplanned episodes of care. Moreover, it resulted in similar pain relief with fewer opioids, faster early functional recovery and higher satisfaction. Patients were significantly more inclined to recommend the ERAS-outpatient pathway after having personally experienced both outpatient and inpatient protocols. These finding are likely multifactorial and linked to the specific ERAS interventions. CONCLUSION. Results of this study highlight the importance of following ERAS principles when implementing an outpatient THA/TKA program

Aims. Currently, there is no single, comprehensive national guideline for analgesic strategies for total joint replacement. We compared inpatient and outpatient opioid requirements following total hip arthroplasty (THA) versus total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in order to determine risk factors for increased inpatient and outpatient opioid requirements following total hip or knee arthroplasty. Methods. Outcomes after 92 primary total knee (n = 49) and hip (n = 43) arthroplasties were analyzed. Patients with repeat surgery within 90 days were excluded. Opioid use was recorded while inpatient and 90 days postoperatively. Outcomes included total opioid use, refills, use beyond 90 days, and unplanned clinical encounters for uncontrolled pain. Multivariate modelling determined the effect of surgery, regional nerve block (RNB) or neuraxial anesthesia (NA), and non-opioid medications after adjusting for demographics, ength of stay, and baseline opioid use. Results. TKAs had higher daily inpatient opioid use than THAs (in 5 mg oxycodone pill equivalents: median 12.0 vs 7.0; p < 0.001), and greater 90 day use (median 224.0 vs 100.5; p < 0.001). Opioid refills were more likely in TKA (84% vs 33%; p < 0.001). Patient who underwent TKA had higher independent risk of opioid use beyond 90 days than THA (adjusted OR 7.64; 95% SE 1.23 to 47.5; p = 0.01). Inpatient opioid use 24 hours before discharge was the strongest independent predictor of 90-day opioid use (p < 0.001). Surgical procedure, demographics, and baseline opioid use have greater influence on in/outpatient opioid demand than RNB, NA, or non-opioid analgesics. Conclusion. Opioid use following TKA and THA is most strongly predicted by surgical and patient factors. TKA was associated with higher postoperative opioid requirements than THA. RNB and NA did not diminish total inpatient or 90-day postoperative opioid consumption. The use of acetaminophen, gabapentin, or NSAIDs did not significantly alter inpatient opioid requirements. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-7:398–404

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) can occur after elective mid/hindfoot and ankle surgery. Effective treatment approaches for CPSP in this population have not been extensively investigated. The impact of multimodal strategies on CPSP following elective mid/hindfoot surgery is unknown due to both the heterogeneity of acute pain management and the lack of a recognized definition specific to this type of surgery. This study aimed to identify and evaluate current pain management strategies after elective mid/hindfoot and ankle surgery. We conducted a systematic review under Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Three databases (MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library) were electronically searched for English studies published between 1990 and July 2017. Reference lists of relevant systematic reviews were also manually searched. Comparative studies of adults undergoing elective mid/hindfoot and ankle surgery were included. Two reviewers independently reviewed studies and assessed their methodological quality. Of 1,159 studies, seven high-quality randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria. Though all studies examined regional anesthesia techniques, intervention heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Participants were typically followed up to 48 hours post-operatively. Interventions effective at reducing postoperative pain and/or opioid consumption included inserting popliteal catheters under ultrasound instead of nerve stimulation guidance, infusing perineural dexamethasone, bupivacaine, or ropivacaine perioperatively, and adding a femoral catheter infusion to a popliteal catheter infusion. Only one study assessed pain six months following elective mid/hindfoot and ankle surgery, demonstrating significant pain reduction with activity with the addition of a femoral to popliteal catheter infusion. There is an overwhelming lack of evidence regarding CPSP and its management for patients undergoing elective mid/hindfoot and ankle surgery. Although specific regional anesthesia techniques and adjuncts may be effective at reducing in-hospital pain and opioid consumption after elective mid/hindfoot and ankle surgery, our systematic review identified only seven studies addressing multimodal pain management in this population. Further comparative studies with longer-term follow-up are required

Chronic postoperative pain (CPP) can occur in elective mid/hindfoot and ankle surgery patients. Multimodal pain management has been reported to reduce postoperative pain and opioid use, which may prevent the development of CPP. However, few studies have examined the impact of multimodal pain management strategies on CPP following complex elective mid/hindfoot and ankle surgery. The purpose of this study was to 1) evaluate current pain management strategies and 2) determine current definitions, incidence, and prevalence of CPP after elective mid/hindfoot and ankle surgery. Three databases (MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library) were manually and electronically searched for English language studies published between 1990 and July 2017. For the first aim, we included comparative studies of adults undergoing elective mid/hindfoot and ankle surgery that investigated pre-, peri- or postoperative pain management. For the second aim, we included observational studies examining CPP definition, incidence, and prevalence. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, followed by full texts. Conflicts were resolved through discussion with a third reviewer. Reviewers also independently assessed the quality of studies meeting inclusion criteria using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. For the first aim, 1159 studies were identified by the primary search, and seven high quality randomized controlled trials were included. Ankle arthroplasty or fusion and calcaneal osteotomy were the most common procedures performed. The heterogeneity of study interventions, though all regional anesthesia techniques, precluded meta-analysis. Most investigated continuous popliteal, sciatic and/or femoral nerve blockade. Participants were typically followed up to 48 hours postoperatively to examine postoperative pain levels and morphine consumption in hospital. Interventions effective at reducing postoperative pain and/or morphine consumption included inserting popliteal catheters using ultrasound instead of nerve stimulation guidance, perineural dexamethasone, and adding continuous femoral blockade to continuous popliteal blockade. Using more than one analgesic was generally more effective than using a single agent. Only two studies examined longer term pain management. One found no difference in pain levels and opioid consumption at two weeks with perineural or systemic dexamethasone use. The other found that pain with activity was significantly reduced at six months postoperatively with the addition of a femoral catheter infusion to a popliteal catheter infusion. For the second aim, only two studies of the 747 identified were selected. One prospective observational study defined CPP as moderate-to-severe pain at one year after foot and ankle surgery, and reported 21% and 43% of patients as meeting their definition at rest and with activity, respectively. The other study was a systematic review that reported 23–60% of patients experienced residual pain after total ankle arthroplasty. There is no standardized definition of CPP in this population, and incidence and prevalence are rarely reported and vary largely based on definition. Although regional anesthesia may be effective at reducing in-hospital pain and opioid consumption, evidence is very limited regarding longer-term pain management and associated outcomes following elective mid/hindfoot and ankle surgery

Introduction. Despite the widespread use of opioids for pain control in post-operative joint arthroplasty patients, data regarding actual opioid consumption in opioid-naive patients during the recovery period are limited. We sought to determine postoperative opioid consumption for opioid-naïve patients undergoing total knee and hip arthroplasty (THA and TKA) procedures. Methods. The study cohort consisted of 55 patients (29 females, 26 males) who underwent either primary unilateral TKA (n=28) or THA (n=27). Prior to discharge, patients were provided with a medication log on which to track daily consumption of pain medicine. Patients were asked to provide details regarding the type of pain medication, quantity and frequency of use, and pain score at the time of use. Patients were contacted weekly by a member of the study team to monitor compliance. Specific opioid prescription information was acquired for each subject using their electronic medical record. Subjects returned the completed logs once they ceased opioid use post-operatively. Daily quantity was converted to daily Morphine Equivalent Dose (MED). Average daily, weekly, and total post-operative use was calculated for all opioid data variables. Descriptive statistics (mean, frequency, deviation) were used to analyze opioid data. All dependent variables were compared between TKA and THA patients using separate independent samples t-tests or Chi-square tests. Results. Overall, patients undergoing joint arthroplasty procedures were prescribed an average of 66.8±44.6 opioid pills during the post-operative period, with higher prescribed amounts for TKA patients compared to THA patients (42.5±8.7 vs. 86.6±51.9; p=0.01). However, patients reported consuming only an average of 31.1±36.8 pills for a total of 214.1±259.5 MED during the post-operative period, with higher consumption for TKA versus THA patients (100.5±112.2 vs. 323.6±311.8;p=0.005). The median number of unused pills was 32 for TKA patients and 27.5 for THA patients. Patients reported an average pain score of 4.3 at the time of consumption and stated that pain relief lasted an average of 4.9 hours. TKA patients reported higher pain scores compared to THA patients (p=0.032). On average, patients ceased opioid usage at 14.5±7.5 days post-operatively, with no patients requiring opioids past 31 days post-surgery. There were 13 patients (8 THA, 5 TKA) who utilized only acetaminophen for pain control, stating that they did not require opioids for pain management. Conclusion. Following total joint arthroplasty, patients consume an average of 31 opioid pills postoperatively, which is less than half of the average prescription quantity. Given the current opioid crisis in society, reducing the number of unused opioids is imperative. Our data show that opioid requirements for pain management following arthroplasty procedures are well below prescription rates. Our results can be used to help develop standardized opioid prescribing guidelines following joint replacement and help educate patients on proper pain control

Pain management following surgery continues to challenge patients, physician-extenders, and surgeons. A recent survey of 300 patients following surgery found that 86% experienced pain following surgery with 75% describing moderate or severe pain. Pain management in 2017 has to better address patient's needs as Pain has become the “5th Vital Sign” and is used in many patient reported outcomes (for better or worse). Multimodal therapy has been defined as “Synchronous administration of ≥ 2 pharmacological agents or approaches, each with a distinct mechanism of action”. Mounting evidence supports the use of a multimodal approach to peri-operative pain management in all surgical subspecialties. A recent systematic review of intravenous ketamine showed a reduction total opioid consumption and an increase in the time to first analgesic dose needed across all studies. Gabapentin and pregabalin have both been shown to dramatically reduce the use of opioid consumption by 30%. We have worked with our anesthesia team and developed a multimodal analgesia program that includes ketorolac 10mg 3 tabs po qd × 3 days, then 10mg 2 tabs po × 2 days; gabapentin 300mg (<65 year old) or 100mg (>65 year old) 3 tabs po × 3 days; oxycodone 5mg po q 4–6 hours prn breakthrough pain and Tylenol 500mg 1–2 tabs po q 6 hours prn

Canada is second only to the United States worldwide in the number of opioid prescriptions per capita. Despite this, little is known about prescription patterns for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this study was to detail preoperative opioid use patterns and investigate the effect it has on perioperative quality outcomes in patients undergoing elective total hip and total knee arthroplasty surgery (THA and TKA). The study cohort was constructed from hospital Discharge Abstract Data (DAD) and National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS) data, using Canadian Classification of Health Intervention codes to select all primary THA and TKA procedures from 2017-2020 in Nova Scotia. Opioid use was defined as any prescription filled at discharge as identified in the Nova Scotia Drug Information System (DIS). Emergency Department (ED) and Family Doctor (FD) visits for pain were ascertained from Physician Claims data. Multivariate logistic regression was used to test for associations controlling for confounders. Chi-squared statistics at 95% confidence level used to test for statistical significance. In total, 14,819 TJA patients were analysed and 4306 patients (29.0%) had at least one opioid prescription in the year prior to surgery. Overall, there was no significant difference noted in preoperative opiate use between patients undergoing TKA vs THA (28.8% vs 29.4%). During the period 2017-2019 we observed a declining year-on-year trend in preoperative opiate use. Interestingly, this trend failed to continue into 2020, where preoperative opiate use was observed to increase by 15% and exceeded 2017 levels. Within the first 90 days of discharge, 22.9% of TKA and 20.9% of THA patients presented to the ED or their FD with pain related issues. Preoperative opiate use was found to be a statistically significant predictor for these presentations (TKA: odds ratio [OR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29 to 1.62; THA: OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.65). Preoperative opioid consumption in TJA remains high, and is independently associated with a higher risk of 90 day return to the FD or ED. The widespread dissemination of opioid reduction strategies introduced during the middle of the last decade may have reduced preoperative opiate utilisation. Access barriers and practice changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic may now have annulled this effect

Introduction. Regional anesthesia is commonly utilized to minimize postoperative pain, improve function, and allow earlier rehabilitation following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The adductor canal block (ACB) provides effective analgesia of the anterior knee. However, patients will often experience posterior pain not covered by the ACB requiring supplemental opioid medications. A technique involving infiltration of local anesthetic between the popliteal artery and capsule of knee (IPACK) targets the terminal branches of the sciatic nerve, providing an alternative for controlling posterior knee pain following TKA. Materials and Methods. IRB approval was obtained, a power analysis was performed, and all patients gave informed consent. Eligible patients were those scheduled for an elective unilateral, primary TKA, who were ≥ 18 years old, English speaking, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA PS) classification I-III. Exclusion criteria included contraindication to regional anesthesia or peripheral nerve blocks, allergy to local anesthetics, allergy to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), chronic renal insufficiency with GFR < 60, chronic pain not related to the operative joint, chronic (> 3 month) opioid use, pre-existing peripheral neuropathy involving the operative limb, and body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. . Patients were randomized into one of two treatment arms: Continuous ACB with IPACK (IPACK Group) block or Continuous ACB with sham subcutaneous saline injection (No IPACK Group). IPACK Group received single injection of 20 mL 0.25% Ropivacaine. Postoperatively, all patients received a standardized multimodal analgesic regimen. The study followed a double-blinded format. Only the anesthesiologist performing the block was aware of randomization status. Following surgery, a blinded medical assessor recorded cumulative opioid consumption, average and worst pain scores, and gait distance. Results. 72 people were enrolled in the study and three withdrew. There were 35 people in the IPACK group and 34 in the NO IPACK group. There was no difference demographically between the groups. In the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU), the average (P=0.0122) and worst (P=0.0168) pain scores at rest were statistically lower in the IPACK group. There was no difference in the pain scores during physical therapy. (P=0.2080) There was no difference in opioid consumption in the PACU (P=0.7928), at 8 hours (P=0.2867), 16 hours (P=0.2387), 24 hours (P=0.7456), or 30 hours (P=0.8029). There was no difference in pain scores on POD 1 in the AM (P=0.4597) or PM (P=0.6273), nor was there any difference in walking distance (P=0.5197). There was also no difference in length of stay in the PACU (P=0.9426) or hospital (P=0.2141) between the two groups. Discussion/Conclusion. Overall, pain was well controlled between the two groups. The IPACK group had lower pain scores at rest in the PACU, but this may not be clinically significant. The routine use of the IPACK is not supported by the results of this study. There may be use of the IPACK block as a rescue block or in patients whom have contraindications to our standard multimodal treatment regimen, or in patients with chronic pain or opioid dependence

Ankle fractures are common orthopedic injuries, often requiring operative intervention to restore joint stability, improve alignment, and reduce the risk of post-traumatic ankle arthritis. However, ankle fracture surgeries (AFSs) are associated with significant postoperative pain, typically requiring postoperative opioid analgesics. In addition to putting patients at risk of opioid dependence, the adverse effects of opioids include nausea, vomiting, and altered mental status which may delay recovery. Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) offer notable benefits to the postoperative pain profile when compared to general or spinal anaesthesia alone and may help improve recovery. The primary objective of this quality improvement (QI) study was to increase PNB administration for AFS at our institution to above 50% by January 2021. A root cause analysis was performed by a multidisciplinary team to identify barriers for PNB administration. Four interventions were chosen & implemented: recruitment and training of expert anesthesiologists in regional anesthesia techniques, procurement of additional ultrasound machines, implementation of a dedicated block room with training to create an enhanced learning environment, and the development of an educational pamphlet for patients outlining strategies to manage rebound pain, instructions around the use of oral multimodal analgesia, and the potential for transient motor block of the leg. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who received PNB for AFS. Secondary outcome measures included total hospitalization length of stay (LOS), post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption (mean oral morphine equivalent [OME]), proportion of patients requiring opioid analgesic in PACU, and proportion of patients experiencing post-operative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) requiring antiemetic in PACU. Thirty-day post-operative emergency department (ED) visits were collected as a balance measure. The groups receiving PNB and not receiving PNB included 78 & 157 patients, respectively, with no significant differences in age, gender, or ASA class between groups. PNB administration increased from less than 10% to 53% following implementation of the improvement bundle. Mean total hospital LOS did not vary significantly across the PNB and no PNB groups (1.04 days vs. 1.42 days, P = 0.410). Both mean PACU and mean 24-hour postoperative opioid analgesic consumption was significantly lower in the PNB group compared to the no PNB group (OME in PACU 38.96mg vs. 55.42mg [P = 0.001]; 24-hour OME 44.74mg vs. 37.71mg [P = .008]). A greater proportion of patients in the PNB group did not require any PACU opioid analgesics compared to those in the no PNB group (62.8% vs. 27.4%, P < 0.001). The proportion of patients experiencing PONV and requiring antiemetic both in the PACU did not vary significantly across groups. Thirty-day postoperative ED visits did not vary significantly across groups. By performing a root cause analysis and implementing a multidisciplinary, patient-centered QI bundle, we achieved significant increases in PNB administration for AFS. As a result, there were significant improvements in the recovery of patients following AFS, specifically reduced use of postoperative opioid analgesia. This multi-faceted approach provides a framework for an individualized QI approach to increase PNB administration and achieve improved patient outcomes following AFS

Purpose. To evaluate the effectiveness of post-operative pain management using the intra-operative peri-articular injection(PAI) and/or electromyography (EMG)-guided preoperative femoral nerve block (FNB) in total knee arthroplasty(TKA). Materials and Methods. From March 2013 to February 2014, 90 knees which underwent primary TKA by one surgeon were included in our study. The patients were classified into three groups; a single injection FNB with an EMG guide (Group I, 30 knees), intra-operative PAI (Group II, 30 knees) and both FNB and PAI (Group III, 30 knees). Pain at rest and moving was evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at postoperative 0, 4, 8, 24 and 48 hours. Postoperative range of motion, time to walking, total blood loss, amount of opioid consumption and complications were compared in each group. Results. VAS immediately after surgery was 67.9 in group I, 54.6 in group II and 54.7 in group III. VAS was significantly higher in group I than group II and III (p=0.005), but was not significantly different between group II and III (p>0.05). VAS at postoperative 4 and 8hr showed similar results. VAS at postoperative 24 hr was 49.6 in group I, 56.4 in group II and 46.7 in group III, which was significantly higher in group II than group I and III (p=0.043). After postoperative 48hr, there were no differences in group I, II and III. The total amount of opioid consumption in group III was smaller than that in group I and II (p=0.017). There were no differences in postoperative range of motion, time to walking and total blood loss. There was one case with temporary peroneal nerve palsy in group II and no infection in all cases. Conclusion. PAI was more effective than FNB for early (0∼8hr) postoperative period after TKA. However, PAI showed rebound pain at 24hr after TKA. PAI in combination with FNB could enhance the effect of postoperative pain management from immediate postoperative period to 24hr