Background. Medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy is one of the common surgical procedures in treatment of knee deformities. Many methods have been proposed to fill the medial side osseous gap. The results of using allograft as void filler compared to iliac crest autograft has not been subject to a randomized clinical trial. The purpose of this study was to examine the results of medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy using iliac crest allograft as compared to iliac crest autograft. Materials & Methods. Forty-six patients with genovarum deformity were enrolled based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria and were randomly assigned into two groups. Medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy was done using iliac crest allograft (23 patients) or autograft (23 patients) and the osteotomy site was internally fixed using proximal tibial T-plate. All patients were followed-up to 12 months after surgery. Anatomical indices of proximal tibia, complications of treatment, and functional outcome (using WOMAC osteoarthritis index) were assessed for both groups. Results. The amount of correction (degrees), recurrence of the deformity and loss of correction and time to clinical or radiologic union were similar in both groups with no statistically significant difference. Duration of operation was significantly less in allograft group (66.6±3.6 versus 52.9±5.3 minutes, p<0.001). Incidence of surgical site infection did not significantly differ in two groups. No nonunion or delayed union was encountered in either group. Some patients reported more intense postoperative pain in iliac graft harvest site than tibial osteotomy site. Patients in both groups had statistically significant improvement in WOMAC index postoperatively (with no statistically significant difference between groups). Conclusions. According to the results of this study, iliac crest allograft may be safely used in medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with comparable efficacy to iliac crest autograft in patients who do not accept the morbidity of autograft harvest

We aimed to analyse complication rates following medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) for knee OA. A regional retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent HTO for isolated medial compartment knee OA from 2003–2013. 115 OWHTO were performed. Mean age = 47 (95%CI 46–48). Mean BMI = 29.1 (95%CI 28.1–30.1). Implants used: 72% (n=83) Tomofix, 21% (n=24) Puddu plate, 7% (n=8) Orthofix Grafts used: 30% (n=35) autologous, 35% (n=40) artificial and 35% (n=40) no graft. 25% (n=29) of patients suffered 36 complications. Complications included minor wound infection 9.6%, major wound infection 3.5%, metalwork irritation necessitating plate removal 7%, non-union requiring revision 4.3%, vascular injury 1.7%, compartment syndrome 0.9%, and other minor complications 4%. Apparent higher rates of non-union occurred with the Puddu plate (8.3%) relative to Tomofix (3.6%) but was not statistically significant. No other significant differences existed in complication rates relative to implant type, bone graft used, patient age or BMI. Serious complications following HTO appear rare. The Tomofix has an apparent lower rate of non-union compared to older implants but greater numbers are required to determine significance. There is no significant difference in union rate relative to whether autologous graft, artificial graft or no graft is used