The best surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis remains uncertain. Recently radiofrequency microtenotomy (RFMT) has been proposed as a suitable surgical treatment. We aim to compare open release with RFMT and present the results of our randomised controlled trial. Patients with symptoms of tennis elbow for at least 6 months who had failed to respond to conservative management were included in the trial. They were randomised to open release or RFMT. Outcome measures included grip strength, pain and DASH scores. 41 patients were randomised, 23 to RFMT and 18 to open release, 2 patients withdrew from the study. Our results show that both treatments give a significant benefit at all time points for DASH and pain scores, but only open release gives a significant improvement in grip strength. Comparing the two treatments the only significant difference is the open group have better pain scores at 6 weeks, but this is not seen at later follow up. In conclusion both groups have shown benefit from the treatments, but one is not shown to be clearly superior

Aim: To assess the outcome of open release of the common extensor origin in the management of tennis elbow after the failure of non operative treatment methods. Methods: 18 patients (24 elbows) between the age group of 38 to 59 who underwent open release of the common extensor origin by the same team after a mean waiting time of 23 months from the onset of pain and a trial of failed non operative methods like analgesics/nsaids, physiotherapy, local steroid injections were contacted and asked to score the effectiveness of surgery after a gap of six months. Since the predominant troubling symptom for all patients was pain they were asked to score the pain relief correlating with the surgery. Results: In 15 patients (83%) excellent pain relief (defined as an 8 or more out of 10 improvement) was achieved and they regained normal use of the limb. One patient (5%) had moderate improvement (score between 6 and 7 out of 10) and two further (11%) patients gained minimal benefit with persistent symptoms (score 5 out of 10). None of the patients suffered deterioration as a result of surgery. Conclusion: This study proves that despite new advances in the treatment of tennis elbow, release of the extensor origin by the open method which is a simple and economical day case procedure, still remains an excellent option in cases where trial of non operative management has failed

CTEV is a difficult condition to treat with chances of recurrence, re-operation rate and over correction. Recent literature based on evidence is favourable with the Ponseti management. The aim of the study was to review our surgical results over a 5-year period using the Cincinnati approach. Children with failure of conservative serial stretching and casting for 6 months underwent open release. The records and radiographs were reviewed retrospectively from 1997–2002. 60 patients were identified with 92 feet undergoing primary sub radical releases using the Cincinnati approach in 40 male and 20 female children. The mean age at surgery was 10 months. 55 patients were idiopathic with 3 syndromal and 2 teratological. Consultants performed > 75% of operations, with k-wire stabilisation done in 46 patients and primary wound closure in 25; the majority of wounds were left open. The timing of plaster change varied, with the majority at 2 weeks. Wound problems occurred in 4 patients (significant in 2). All patients but one wore splints for an average length of 13 months. Complication rate was 20% comprising infection, over- correction and recurrence. Re-operation rate for early recurrence was 12%. Further surgery in the form of tibialis anterior transfer and derotation osteotomy was performed on 15% and 10% of feet respectively. 6 feet in 4 patients showed signs of significant over correction. Wound healing by secondary intention of the Cin-cinnati approach is safe. Results and complications are comparable to other series, but not to the Ponseti non-operative management. Practice is now changed to the latter based on evidence

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome and complications of endoscopic versus open release for the treatment of de Quervain’s tenosynovitis. Patients with this condition were randomised to undergo either endoscopic (n = 27) or open release (n = 25). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores were measured at 12 and 24 weeks after surgery. Scar satisfaction was measured using a VAS scale. The mean pain and DASH scores improved significantly at 12 weeks and 24 weeks (p <  0.001) in both groups. The scores were marginally lower in the endoscopic group compared to the open group at 12 weeks (p = 0.012 and p = 0.002, respectively); however, only the DASH score showed a clinically important difference. There were no differences between the groups at 24 weeks. The mean VAS scar satisfaction score was higher in the endoscopic group at 24 weeks (p < 0.001). Transient superficial radial nerve injury occurred in three patients in the endoscopic group compared with nine in the open release group (p = 0.033). We conclude that endoscopic release for de Quervain’s tenosynovitis seems to provide earlier improvement after surgery, with fewer superficial radial nerve complications and greater scar satisfaction, when compared with open release. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:947–51

Aim:. To investigate the clinical outcomes of elbows with post-traumatic stiffness treated by open surgical release. Methods:. A retrospective review was completed on thirty-five consecutively managed patients who underwent an open elbow release for post-traumatic stiffness between 2007 and 2012. Pre-operative and post-operative range of motion (ROM), pain scores and functional outcomes were recorded. Results:. Mean follow-up was 31 months (6–84). The cohort consisted of 20 male and 15 female patients with an average age at time of surgery of 34 years (17–59). The interval from injury to time of release was 26 months (6–180). An improvement in mean ROM from 49° (0°–105°) to 102° (55°–150°) was obtained. The improvement in ROM in patients with pre-operative heterotopic bone was 61° compared to 45° in patients without heterotopic bone. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved from 44 pre-operatively to 82 at most recent follow-up. Mean VAS scores improved from 5.9 pre-operatively to 2.8 at most recent follow-up. Patients rated the affected elbow a mean of 73% as compared to the contralateral/normal side (50–100%). Apart from a 10% incidence of transient ulnar nerve neurapraxia in patients who had a medial or combined approach, complication rates and functional outcomes were comparable between medial, lateral and combined approaches. Conclusion:. Open release for post-traumatic elbow stiffness results in satisfactory functional outcomes in the majority of cases, with no significant differences between medial, lateral or combined approaches

We conducted a prospective randomised controlled trial. 45 patients (total of 47 elbows) underwent either a formal open release or a percutaneous tenotomy (24 open, 23 percutaneous). All patients had pre-operative assessment by the DASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) scoring system. The surgery was performed by 1 surgeon (BN Muddu). Both groups were followed up for a minimum of 12 months and re-assessed using the DASH scores, time for return to work and patient satisfaction. Statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney and repeated measures ANOVA were performed. The groups were similar in respect of demographic and pre-test variables. Statistical analyses using Mann-Whitney showed significant differences for patient satisfaction (p=0.012), time to return to work (p=0.0001), improvements in DASH Score (p=0.002) and improvement in sporting activities (p=0.046). There was a trend to improvement in work related activity. Repeated measures ANOVA comparing the pre-operative data for each group were also significant for standardized DASH scores (p=0.0082) and sporting activities (p=0.043). Our study has shown that there is a significant difference in outcome in the two patient groups. Those patients undergoing a percutaneous release returned to work on average 3 weeks earlier and their symptoms as shown from their DASH scores improved significantly more than those undergoing an open procedure. The percutaneous procedure is a quicker, simpler procedure to perform than an open procedure. Our study has shown that patients have significantly better outcome measures after a percutaneous procedure

Abstract. Background. Lateral and medial epicondylitis, more commonly known as Tennis and Golfer's elbow, can cause chronic pain and significant functional impairment in working-age patients. For patients with refractory epicondylitis, platelet rich plasma (PRP) of which ACP is a type, is commonly used as an alternative to surgical intervention, but its efficacy is unproven. Objective. To assess the mid-term outcomes of ultrasound guided ACP injections for patients with refractory epicondylitis who have failed conventional conservative treatment. Methods. 77 patients who were treated with PRP for refractory epicondylitis were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 50.3 years (range 36–70), with 30% men and 70% women. The Oxford Elbow Score (OES) and progression to surgery were used to assess the mid-term outcomes. Results. The mean follow up duration was 2.1 years (range 1.0 – 4.2). Post-procedure OES was recorded for thirty-three patients, of these, thirty-one patients (94.0%) demonstrated an improvement in their OES at mid-term follow-up compared to their pre-op score. The mean change in OES was +16 (range −7 to +34), 81.8% exhibited a minimally important change (MIC) in OES of greater than 8.2 points. Of all seventy-seven patients, seventeen (22.1%) underwent open release and twenty-seven (35.1%) patients were lost to follow up. Conclusion. Ultrasound guided ACP injections can be an effective treatment for refractory epicondylitis and is likely to prevent the need for surgery. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Introduction: The Ponseti method has been adopted by many pediatric orthopaedic centers throughout Europe in the last years. The minimal invasive approach and the short duration of the active treatment phase have been the main reasons to change to the Ponseti method at our institution. We report the short term results of patients treated with the Ponseti method for idiopathic clubfeet and discuss experiences and pitfalls. Material and Methods: From the end of 2002 on we have applied the treatment regime strictly as described by Ponseti himself. For this study we analyzed a group of patients comprising all patients treated for congenital idiopathic clubfoot according to the Ponseti protocol within the first three weeks after births. The need for open release surgery was the main outcome measurement in this group. Results: Between December 2002 and July 2004 we treated a total of 59 clubfeet in 37 patients with the Ponseti method. Our patient population consisted of 14 female and 23 male patients. The mean Dimeglio score was 9.2 points (5–15 points). Using the Pirani score the mean midfoot score was 1.7 points (1–3 points), the mean hindfoot score was 2 points (0.5–3 points) and the mean total score was 3.8 points (2–6 points). Three feet in two patients were treated with Ponseti casting only (5 %) and did not need a percutaneous achilles tenotomy (pAT) or open release surgery. Fifty-two feet in 33 patients (88 %) were successfully treated with Ponseti casting and pAT. Four cases in two patients had to undergo a McKay Simons procedure (7 %). Thereby 93% of all cases were treated without open release surgery. Mean follow-up after the last cast was 7.4 months (3–16 months). A recurrence was seen in one patient representing two cases after about 8 months after pAT. The parents were non compliant with the abduction bar protocol and could not be convinced of the importance of the orthosis; a McKay Simons procedure was performed. No other cases of recurrence were observed during the follow up period. Discussion: The Ponseti method should be applied as originally described, and especially, if more people are involved in the treatment, a standard treatment regime is desirable. As the compliance of the parents is a crucial factor, everything should be done to ensure that the treatment is made as easy for them as possible. Only if a full support for questions or problems with the casts and especially with the braces is available, a good compliance can be ensured. The minimal invasive approach utilized by the percutaneous tenotomy is the lead argument in favor of the Ponseti method. In cases of recurrence or residual deformity when open surgery is necessary, this secondary procedure is in fact primary surgery. Thereby the danger of massive scaring associated with limited range of motion, pain and disability after a second procedures is prevented

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release has the advantage over open release of reduced tissue trauma and postoperative morbidity. Limited open carpal tunnel release has also been shown to have comparable results, but is easier to perform and is safer. We have compared the results of both techniques in a prospective, randomised trial. Thirty patients with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome had simultaneous bilateral release. The technique of release was randomly allocated to either two-portal endoscopic release (ECTR) or limited open release using the Strickland instrumentation (LOCTR). The results showed that the outcome was similar at follow-up of one year using both techniques. However, the LOCTR group had significantly less tenderness of the scar at the second and fourth postoperative week (p < 0.01). There was also less thenar and hypothenar (pillar) pain after LOCTR. Subjective evaluation showed a preference for LOCTR

The advantages and disadvantages of endoscopic compared with open carpal tunnelreleasearecontroversial. We have performed a prospective, randomised, blinded assessment in a district general hospital in order to determine if there was any demonstrable advantage in undertaking either technique. Twenty-five patients with confirmed bilateral idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome were randomised to undergo endoscopic release by the single portal Agee technique to one hand and open release to the other. Independent preoperative and postoperative assessment was undertaken by a hand therapist who was blinded to the type of treatment. Follow-up was for 12 months. The operating time was two minutes shorter for the open technique (p < 0.005). At all stages of postoperative assessment, the endoscopic technique had no significant advantages in terms of return of muscle strength and assessment of hand function, grip strength, manual dexterity or sensation. In comparison with open release, single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release has a similar incidence of complications and a similar return of hand function, but is a slightly slower technique to undertake

Aims. Few studies have examined the long-term outcome of carpal tunnel release (CTR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the patient-reported long-term outcome of CTR for electrophysiologically severe carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Patients and Methods. We reviewed the long-term outcome of 40 patients with bilateral severe CTS who underwent 80 CTRs (46 open, 34 endoscopic) between 2002 and 2012. The outcomes studied were patient-reported outcomes of numbness resolution, the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) score, and patient satisfaction. Results. The mean follow-up was 9.3 years. Complete resolution of numbness was reported by 93.8% of patients, persistent numbness by 3.8%, and recurrent numbness by 2.5%. The mean BCTQ symptom score was 1.1 (. sd. 0.3; 1.0 to 2.55) and the mean Boston function score was 1.15 (. sd. 0.46; 1.0 to 3.5). 72.5% of patients were asymptomatic and had no functional impairment. Men had poorer outcomes than women and patients < 55 years had poorer outcomes than patients ≥ 55 years. All patients who had undergone endoscopic CTR reported complete resolution of numbness compared with 89.1% of those who had undergone open release (p = 0.047). There was no significant difference in outcome between dominant and non-dominant hands. Patient satisfaction rates were good. There were no adverse events. Conclusion. CTR has a favourable outcome and good rates of satisfaction, even in patients with bilateral severe CTS at a mean of nine years after surgery. Endoscopic CTR has a higher rate of numbness resolution than open surgery. There were no significant differences in outcome between the dominant and non-dominant hand. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1348–53

Introduction and Aims: To compare the outcome of percutaneous release and fonnal open release for tennis elbow. Method: We conducted a prospective randomised controlled trial. 45 patients (total of 47 elbows) underwent either a formal open release or a percutaneous tenotomy (24 open, 23 percutaneous). All patients had pre-operative assessment by the DASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) scoring system. The surgery was performed by one surgeon (BN Muddu). Both groups were followed up for a minimum of 12 months and re-assessed using the DASH scores, time for return to work and patient satisfaction. Statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney and repeated measures ANOV A were performed. Results: The groups were similar in respect of demographic and pre-test variables. Statistical analyses using Mann-Whitney showed significant differences for patient satisfaction (p=O.OI2), time to return to work (p=O.OOOI), improvements in DASH Score (p=O. OO2) and improvement in sporting activities (p=O. O46). There was a trend to improvement in eight in work related activity. Repeated measures ANOV A comparing the pre-operative data for each group were also significant for standardised DASH scores (p=O. OO82) and sporting activities (p=O.O43). Conclusion: Our study has shown that there is a significant difference in outcome in the two patient groups. Those patients undergoing a percutaneous release returned to work on average three weeks earlier and their symptoms as shown from their DASH scores improved significantly more than those undergoing an open procedure. The percutaneous procedure is a quicker, simpler procedure to perform than an open procedure. Our study has shown that patients have significantly better outcome measures after a percutaneous procedure

Aims of the Study: To compare the outcome of percutaneous release and formal open release for tennis elbow. Material and Methods: We conducted a prospective randomised controlled trial. 45 patients (total of 47 elbows) underwent either a formal open release or a percutaneous tenotomy (24 open, 23 percutaneous). All patients had pre-operative assessment by the DASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) scoring system. The surgery was performed by 1 surgeon (BN Muddu). Both groups were followed up for a minimum of 12 months and re-assessed using the DASH scores, time for return to work and patient satisfaction. Statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney and repeated measures ANOVA were performed. Results: The groups were similar in respect of demographic and pre-test variables. Statistical analyses using Mann-Whitney showed significant differences for patient satisfaction (p=0.012), time to return to work (p=0.0001), improvements in DASH Score (p=0.002) and improvement in sporting activities (p=0.046). There was a trend to improvement in work related activity. Repeated measures ANOVA comparing the pre-operative data for each group were also significant for standardized DASH scores (p=0.0082) and sporting activities (p=0.043). Discussion/Conclusion: Our study has shown that there is a significant difference in outcome in the two patient groups. Those patients undergoing a percutaneous release returned to work on average 3 weeks earlier and their symptoms as shown from their DASH scores improved significantly more than those undergoing an open procedure. The percutaneous procedure is a quicker, simpler procedure to perform than an open procedure. Our study has shown that patients have significantly better outcome measures after a percutaneous procedure

Outcomes following carpal tunnel release are generally favorable. Understanding factors that contribute to inferior outcomes may allow for strategies targeted at improving results in these patients. Our purpose was to determine if patients' underlying personality traits, specifically resiliency and catastrophization, impact their post-operative outcomes following carpal tunnel release. A prospective case series was performed. Based on our power analysis, 102 patients were recruited. Patients completed written consent, the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and the Brief Resiliency Scale (BRS). A single surgeon, or his resident under supervision, then performed an open carpal release under local anaesthetic. Our primary outcome measure was a repeat BCTQ at three- and six-months. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to assess the correlation between PCS and BRS scores and final BCTQ scores. Forty-three and sixty-three participants completed the BCTQ at three and six months respectively. All patients showed improvement in their symptoms (p = 0.001). There was no correlation between patients PCS or BRS and the amount of improvement. There was also no correlation between PCS or BRS and the patients' raw scores at baseline or follow-up. Patients self-assessed resiliency and degree of pain catastrophization has no correlation with the amount of improvement they have three or six months post-operatively. Most patients improved following carpal tunnel release, and patients with low resiliency and high levels of pain catastrophization should expect comparable outcomes to patients without these features

The results of surgical treatment of post-traumatic elbow contractures in adolescence have been conflicting in the literature. Some authors suggest that contracture release in this age group is less predictable and results less favorable than in adults. A retrospective review of the senior author’s patients produced 16 patients under the age of 21 that had post-traumatic elbow contracture releases. Three patients with arthroscopic releases and one patient lost to follow up were excluded from this study. Twelve adolescent patients (mean age 16.7 years, range 13–21) had open release of post-traumatic elbow contractures. All releases were initiated through a lateral approach with anterior capsular release and were supplemented by posterior release (in 4 patients) through the same incision. Medial-sided pathology was addressed through a separate medial incision in 3 patients. In three patients the radial head was excised. Muscle lengthening was used in only one patient. The mean follow-up was 18.9 months (range 10–42 months). Preoperative flexion was increased from 113 to 129deg (p< 0.01), extension from −51 to −15deg (p< 0.001) for a mean total gain of 54deg in the flexion-extension arc (p< 0.001). Pronation was improved from 58 to 77deg and supination from 56 to 62deg, but these improvements did not reach statistical significance. At the final follow-up the patients maintained 93% of the motion that was achieved intraoperatively. All patients achieved a functional ROM of at least 100deg in the flexion-extension arc. No patient lost motion. One patient had a superficial infection that was treated conservatively. Our experience with post-traumatic contracture release in adolescent patients has been rewarding; all patients reached a functional range of motion. The advantage of the lateral approach used in these patients is that it allows simple and safe access to the anterior capsule, which is often adequate to regain full extension. Through the same approach the posterior structures can also be addressed without violating the lateral collateral ligament. The medial approach is more demanding and was reserved only for patients with medial sided pathology. Fractional musculotendinous lengthening was rarely necessary in post-traumatic contractures. Open release in adolescent patients with congruent stiff elbows has yielded satisfactory results in our hands

The aim of this study was to review the effectiveness of percutaneous release of the common extensor origin for tennis elbow. The operative technique is similar to that previously reported by Hohmann in 1949. There were 29 patients (31 elbows) that underwent the procedure between 1991 and 1998. There were 14 males and 15 females; 19 were right handed, and 17 had the dominant arm involved. The mean age was 51.8 years (range 34–65); the mean duration of symptoms was 21.7 months (range 8–60 months). All patients had a minimum of 12 months of conservative treatment including NSAIDs, splinting, physical therapy and local anaesthetic and steroid injections (2–6 injections). All operations were performed as day case procedures, with the majority (25) done under local anaesthetic. 24 patients were independently reviewed using Hospital for Special Surgery Elbow Assessment and a questionnaire. Grip strength measurements were performed using JAMAR Dynanometer and the level of patient satisfaction was recorded. 5 patients could not attend the special review clinics. They were contacted over the phone and necessary data recorded. The mean follow up was 45.2 months (range 8–88 months). 24 patients scored above 70 points and were very satisfied, 6 patients were considered failures as their symptoms warranted formal open release operation; only two reported an improvement following the open releases, with the remainder still symptomatic at the last follow up. An overall success rate of 81% was recorded. Complications were rare - one patient who had bruising of forearm after the procedure. In conclusion this procedure can be recommened as an efficacious first line of surgical treatment, with advantages of being safe, quick to perform and with minimal morbidity

Background. Congenital vertical talus (CVT) is a rare deformity of the foot. It has been historically treated with extensive soft tissue releases with significant associated complications. Recently, reverse Ponseti-type casting followed by minimally invasive or percutaneous reduction and fixation has been described with excellent results in separate cohorts of either idiopathic or teratologic cases of CVT. There are currently no studies that compare the outcomes between the two types. Methods. We present a prospective cohort of 13 patients (21 feet) in which this technique has been used in both idiopathic and teratologic associated cases of CVT. Clinical, radiographic and parent-reported outcomes were obtained at a mean follow up of 36 months (range 8–57). Clinical and radiographic scoring was according to the system of Adelaar and parent-reported outcomes were assessed using the POSNA paediatric outcomes data collection instrument (PODCI). Results. Six patients (9 feet) had associated neuromuscular conditions or syndromes; seven patients (11 feet) were idiopathic. Initial correction was achieved in all patients with significant improvement in all radiographic parameters. The recurrence rate was 48%; there was no statistical significance between idiopathic and teratologic cases for rate of recurrence. Further treatment was required in the form of casting in 2 feet and open release in 6 feet. Adelaar scores were significantly lower in the recurrence group than in those with no recurrence. PODCI scores for global functioning at latest follow-up were a mean of 72 (range 18–98). Pain/comfort scoring was uniformly good with an average score of 99. Conclusions. The reverse Ponseti-type technique is effective in initial correction of both idiopathic and teratologic cases of CVT. Recurrence is a problem in both these groups, with higher rates than first reported in the original paper. However, these rates are less than those reported for open surgical releases. Level of evidence: II

Elbow contracture is a well recognised sequel of neuromuscular disorders and can be a rather debilitating condition. Non operative treatment, such as physiotherapy and splinting, results in an improved range of motion, but since musculoskeletal pathology in neuromuscular diseases is progressive, an open surgical release of the elbow is often required. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to assess the results of surgical treatment of elbow stiffness in patients suffering from neuromuscular disorders. Between January 2000 and October 2008, 11 patients with neuromuscular diseases underwent surgical treatment of elbow contracture. The mean age of the patients was 21 years. Eight patients had cerebral palsy, 2 arthrogryposis and 1 brachial plexus palsy. Pre-operatively the lag of elbow flexion and extension was 45° and 38° respectively. In 6 patients releases were performed through a lateral approach, while 3 required an additional medial incision. In 2 patients the pathology was addressed through a posterior approach. The mean follow up was 26 months. Postoperatively one patient developed skin necrosis which was treated conservatively. Furthermore, another patient developed transient ulnar neuritis, and finally one more presented with medial collateral ligament insufficiency. All patients had an improved functional arc of motion. Namely, the lag of elbow flexion and extension was reduced to 22° and 10° respectively. At the final follow up the patients maintained 90% of the range of motion that was achieved immediately postoperatively. Open release of the elbow contracture in neuromuscular diseases yield satisfactory results. Therefore, it can be expected that patients will obtain a functional range of motion

Introduction: Carpal tunnel syndrome is frequent in children with mucopolysaccharidosis. Diagnosis is difficult according to the slow progression of compression of the medial nerve and treatment is controversial. Material & Methods: Twelve children were studied: 8 Hurler’s, 2 Hunter’s and 2 Maroteaux-Lamy’s diseases. All had clinical and EMG evaluation. Eight of them were operated, both sides. Results: All the children had progressive and severe hypoesthesia before surgery. Nerve conduction velocity was very slow compared to normal values. After the open surgical release (16 cases) and synovectomy of flexor tendons (13 of 16 cases), all the patients were improved. The histology of the synovitis showed less glycosaminoglycans in patients who had a bone marrow transplantation. Surgical treatment must be an open release of the anterior ligament associated with a synovectomy of flexor tendons and a ventral epineurotomy. Discussion: According to the literature, carpal tunnel syndrome is observed in two third of patients of type I, II and VI mucopolysaccharidosis. Diagnosis is often difficult when cervical compression of the spinal cord is an associated factor. The diagnosis is made with clinical and EMG evaluation. Treatment must be early. MRI is an alternative to evaluate the morphology of the nerve: its compression below the carpal ligament and its bulky aspect just proximal to the carpal tunnel are clearly shown

Aims

In patients with a failed radial head arthroplasty (RHA), simple removal of the implant is an option. However, there is little information in the literature about the outcome of this procedure. The aim of this study was to review the mid-term clinical and radiological results, and the rate of complications and removal of the implant, in patients whose initial RHA was undertaken acutely for trauma involving the elbow.