Introduction. Legg-Calve-Perthes (Perthes Disease) was first recognised by three physicians, Arthur Legg (1874–1939), Jacqui Calve (1875–1954) and George Perthes (1869 – 1927) in 1910. Perthes disease is a rare childhood condition that affects the hip. It occurs when the blood supply to the femoral head is disrupted. Without this blood supply, the bone cells die and avascular necrosis can occur. The Herring classification is used to diagnose the stages of Perthes Disease. It is an important prognostic factor. There are three classifications, Herring A, B and C. Herring A has no involvement of the lateral pillar with no density changes noted on x-ray. Herring B has at least 50% of the lateral pillar height maintained on x-ray. Herring C has less than 50% of the lateral pillar height on x-ray (Herring et al, 1992). Children with Perthes disease require specialist Limb Reconstruction team throughout their treatment journey, this includes Orthopaedic surgery and therapy (Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy). The National Limb Reconstruction Therapy Team is based at the National Orthopaedic Hospital, Cappagh. The therapy team consists of 1 Clinical Specialist Physiotherapist, 1 Senior Physiotherapist and 1 Senior Occupational Therapist who provide input to this cohort. This study aims to analyse the importance of a comprehensive pre-operative assessment by the therapy team (Physiotherapist and Occupational Therapist) to maximise patient outcomes post operatively. Methodology. This is a quantitative research study conducted by the National Limb Reconstructive Therapy Service of the National Orthopaedic Hospital in Cappagh, Dublin. The inclusion criteria for this study consisted of:. Age – Patient must be part of the Paediatric Service, i.e., under the age of 16. Diagnosis – Patient must have a diagnosis of Perthes Disease with a Herring Classification documented. Application of a Hip Distractor Frame formed part of the patient's surgical management. Surgery was completed by Mr Connor Green. Surgery was completed between January 2021 and December 2022. Patient were required to have their external hip distractor frame removed by December 2022. Exclusion Criteria: Those not meeting the above inclusion criteria. Following the inclusion criteria, a number of cases were identified of which 10 cases were selected at random. A retrospective analysis of these samples was completed. The medical charts were reviewed as well as patient electronic healthcare records. Microsoft Excel was utilised to analyse the data and capture results. Results. From analysing the data, the following results were identified:. 80% of the sample cohort had a length of stay of 5 days following surgery. There were two outliers due to infection who had a length of stay of 14 days. 90% of the sample received a pre-operative Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy assessment. This assessment included information gathering regarding the child's home and social environment; their functional baseline and anticipated post-operative needs. Standardised and non-standardised assessments were used. 88.89% of those who completed a pre-operative assessment required referral to community Occupational Therapy teams for equipment provision (wheelchair, transfer aids) to allow for timely discharge. On average, each patient in the sample required 17 physiotherapy outpatient sessions prior to handover to the community teams. 100% of our sample required post operation onward referral for MDT input in the community (Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy). Conclusions. The importance of a multi-disciplinary approach towards family and children was highlighted in this study. A comprehensive pre-operative therapy assessment optimizes care for this cohort by preparing them in terms of equipment provisions, local team input and expectations for therapy. The data suggests future Limb Reconstruction team should include Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy as part of the multi-disciplinary team, in the treatment of children with Perthe's Disease. We suggest an MDT pre-assessment is completed to optimize patient care, reduce length of stay and improve patient satisfaction in the acute hospital setting

In Asia, traditional bands are placed around limbs of children to ward off evil spirits and ensure good health. This practice may lead to the Rubber Band Syndrome (RBS) a rare paediatric condition described mainly in Asia which results from a forgotten thread or elastic band applied to the limb of a child. Because pressure necrosis beneath the band is slow, rapid healing of tissues over the band can obscure its presence. This makes the condition difficult to diagnose and distinguish from other infective conditions. This study presents the first case of RBS reported in South Africa. Case: The patient aged 18 months presented with a swollen hand, circumferential scar and discharging sinus on the wrist. A radiograph was negative. In theatre the volar wound was explored. Debridement revealed a yellow rubber band deep to the wrist flexors and neurovascular bundles but superficial to the extensor retinaculum. Complete removal of the rubber band and antibiotics was followed by rehabilitation with Occupational Therapy. At a 3 month follow up, there was no evidence of infection, sensation was normal and motor function of the hand restored. In this case, the structures through which the band had already passed were intact and overlay the band. It would appear that as the band slowly eroded the underlying structures it was followed by healing along the tract until the band exited deep to these structures. The band may come to rest on bone causing osteomyelitis if allowed to progress. A high index of suspicion of RBS is needed in children presenting with a circumferential scar and a non-healing wound, especially on the wrist or ankle. Careful debridement and complete removal of the band are essential to resolve symptoms and restore function

Background and Aims:. In 2009 a combined clinic was formed by the orthopaedic Surgeons and Developmental Paediatricians in our hospital. The aim was to help improve the assessment and management of patients with Cerebral Palsy. Included in the assessment team, are the paediatric orthopaedic surgeons, the developmental paediatricians, physiotherapists and occupational therapists. Our aim was to audit the patients presenting to this clinic over a 15 month period to look at the demographic data, clinical severity and decisions taken for these patients. Methods:. We looked at patients seen in the clinic from January 2013 to March 2014. We recorded the age, gender and primary caregiver. We also recorded the reason for referral. Clinically we wanted to know the type and distribution of the CP, GMFCS score, attainment of milestones and type of schooling. We recorded underlying aetiologies and HIV status of the patients. Finally the access the patients had to physiotherapy and Occupational therapy. Results:. We saw 41 patients in total with 18 males and 23 females. The ages ranged from 5 months to 9 years (mean 4.9 years). 36 of 41 (88%) had spastic CP, 2 (5%) dystonic, 1 (2%) mixed and 2 (5%) were not recorded. Diplegic and hemiplegic predominated with 15 (37%) and 14 (34%) respectively, there were 6 (15%) quadriplegics, 1 double hemiplegic and 5 were not recorded. 13 (31%) of patients had birth asphyxia as an aetiology, 13 (31%) had brain anomalies, 9 (22%) were premature babies, the remaining 16% comprised HIV, post natal sepsis and injury. 38 (93%) were cared for by at least one parent and the remaining 3 (7%) were cared for by a grandparent. 39 (95%) had access to physiotherapy and 30 (73%) had access to occupational therapy. 21 (51%) had no access to appropriate schooling. 9 (22%) were known to be HIV positive. The recommended orthopaedic interventions were continued physiotherapy for 17 (41%) and botox in 22(54%). Discussion:. The combined clinic has highlighted the diverse nature of cerebral palsy and the challenges facing our patients. It is an invaluable tool in the goal directed management of complex cases

Introduction. Current CMS reimbursement policy for total joint replacement is aligned with more cost effective, higher quality care. Upon implementation of a standardized evidenced-based care pathway, we evaluated overall procedural costs and clinical outcomes over the 90-day episode of care period for patients undergoing TKA with either conventional (Conv.) or robotic-assisted (RAS) instrumentation. Methods. In a retrospective review of the first seven consecutive quarters of Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) Model 2 participation beginning January 2014, we compared 90-day readmission rates, Length of Stay (LOS), discharge disposition, gains per episode in relation to target prices and overall episode costs for surgeons who performed either RAS-TKA (3 surgeons, 147 patients) or Conv. TKA (3 surgeons, 85 patients) at a single institution. All Medicare patients from all surgeons performing more than two TKA's within the study period were included. An evidence-based clinical care pathway was implemented prior to the start of the study that standardized pre-operative patient education, anesthesia, pain management, blood management, and physical/occupational therapy throughout the LOS for all patients. Physician specific target prices were established from institutional historical payment data over a prior three year period. Results. RAS and Conv-TKA procedures exhibited an average gain per episode of $7,600 and $5,579, respectively. The average total cost per 90-day episode was $2,085 lower for patients receiving RAS-TKA ($28,943 versus $31,028), with the majority of cost savings in reduced SNF usage ($1,481) and readmissions ($944). Discharge to home versus Sub-acute Rehabilitation Facilities (SAR's) was 14% higher in the RAS group (62% vs 48%, p<0.05). Conclusions. Implementation of a standardized care pathway across all service departments and physicians resulted in a reduction in overall episode of care costs, with further reductions in cost and discharge to SARs observed with the use of RAS

Introduction. The number of revision hip arthroplasty procedures is rising annually with 7852 such operations performed in the UK in 2010. These are expensive procedures due to pre-operative investigation, surgical implants and instrumentation, protracted hospital stay, and pharmacological costs. There is a paucity of robust literature on the costs associated with the common indications for this surgery. Objective. We aim to quantify the cost of revision hip arthroplasty by indication and identify any short-fall in relation to the national tariff. Methods. Clinical, demographic and economic data were obtained for 305 consecutive revision total hip replacements in 286 patients performed at a tertiary referral centre between 1998 and 2008. These operations were categorised by indication into: aseptic loosening, dislocation, deep infection and peri-prosthetic fracture. Clinical data included length of stay, operative time, estimated blood loss, prosthesis and instrumentation required. Financial data was collected on cost of implants, materials and augmentation utilised at time of surgery, operating room costs, recovery, inpatient stay, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, pharmacy, radiographs and laboratory studies. Statistical analysis was undertaken using the SPSS version 16 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, Il). Non-parametric bootstrap samples were used to obtain consistent 95% confidence intervals. Analysis of variance between groups was performed (p < 0.05). Results. The mean total cost of revision surgery in aseptic cases (n=194) was £11897 +/− 4629, septic revision (n=76) £21937 +/− 10965, peri-prosthetic fractures (n=24) £18185 +/− 9124, and in dislocations (n=11) £10893 +/− 5476. Conclusion. Revision procedures for deep infection and peri-prosthetic fracture were associated with significantly longer operative time, increased blood loss and a higher number of complications compared with revisions for aseptic loosening. Total inpatient stay was also significantly greater p< 0.001. Our study shows that financial costs vary significantly between revision subtypes which is not reflected by current National Health Service tariff rates

Purpose. A comparison of patient satisfaction of service provided by independent sector treatment centres versus an index NHS hospital in total knee replacement surgery. Methods. Patients were all initially listed for total knee replacement (TKR) by a single consultant from the index NHS hospital, Derbyshire Royal Infirmary (DRI). Patients were sent a postal questionnaire and asked to rate the TKR service provided by a given hospital, based on recent inpatient experience. Questions covered quality of care delivered by hospital staff and quality of ward environment. Overall satisfaction was rated. Patients electing surgery under Patient Choice at an independent sector treatment centre (ISTC) were asked about factors that influenced their hospital choice. 100 consecutive patients undergoing TKR at DRI and 100 patients choosing ISTC hospitals were identified. All surgery occurred between April 2003 and September 2006. Results. Questionnaire response rates were 79% for DRI patients and 54% for ISTC. Overall patient satisfaction for TKR service was 95% for DRI and 87% for ISTC. An equal 61% rated the surgeons as excellent in both DRI and ISTC hospitals. Nurses and physiotherapists (& occupational therapists) both scored more highly in ISTC groups (Nurses 69% v 45%; physio/OT 57% v 35%). Ward environment rated excellent in 73% for ISTC and 24% for DRI. The most common reason for choosing ISTC was shorter waiting list (42%). Conclusion. ISTC hospitals scored more highly in terms of nurses, physiotherapy & occupational therapy, and ward environment. In part, this may arise from better staffing levels and newer facilities in the ISTC sector. Despite this, overall patient satisfaction for TKR service remained greater at the index NHS hospital. This suggests overall satisfaction depends on more complex factors than staff and ward environment. Further work is needed to compare objective clinical outcomes of TKR between hospital groups within the NHS

Aims

Deprivation underpins many societal and health inequalities. COVID-19 has exacerbated these disparities, with access to planned care falling greatest in the most deprived areas of the UK during 2020. This study aimed to identify the impact of deprivation on patients on growing waiting lists for planned care.

Aims

Elective orthopaedic services have had to adapt to significant system-wide pressures since the emergence of COVID-19 in December 2019. Length of stay is often recognized as a key marker of quality of care in patients undergoing arthroplasty. Expeditious discharge is key in establishing early rehabilitation and in reducing infection risk, both procedure-related and from COVID-19. The primary aim was to determine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic length of stay following hip and knee arthroplasty at a high-volume, elective orthopaedic centre.

Aims

Restarting planned surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic is a clinical and societal priority, but it is unknown whether it can be done safely and include high-risk or complex cases. We developed a Surgical Prioritization and Allocation Guide (SPAG). Here, we validate its effectiveness and safety in COVID-free sites.