Introduction. Legg-Calve-Perthes (Perthes Disease) was first recognised by three physicians, Arthur Legg (1874–1939), Jacqui Calve (1875–1954) and George Perthes (1869 – 1927) in 1910. Perthes disease is a rare childhood condition that affects the hip. It occurs when the blood supply to the femoral head is disrupted. Without this blood supply, the bone cells die and avascular necrosis can occur. The Herring classification is used to diagnose the stages of Perthes Disease. It is an important prognostic factor. There are three classifications, Herring A, B and C. Herring A has no involvement of the lateral pillar with no density changes noted on x-ray. Herring B has at least 50% of the lateral pillar height maintained on x-ray. Herring C has less than 50% of the lateral pillar height on x-ray (Herring et al, 1992). Children with Perthes disease require specialist Limb Reconstruction team throughout their treatment journey, this includes Orthopaedic surgery and therapy (Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy). The National Limb Reconstruction Therapy Team is based at the National Orthopaedic Hospital, Cappagh. The therapy team consists of 1 Clinical Specialist Physiotherapist, 1 Senior Physiotherapist and 1 Senior Occupational Therapist who provide input to this cohort. This study aims to analyse the importance of a comprehensive pre-operative assessment by the therapy team (Physiotherapist and Occupational Therapist) to maximise patient outcomes post operatively. Methodology. This is a quantitative research study conducted by the National Limb Reconstructive Therapy Service of the National Orthopaedic Hospital in Cappagh, Dublin. The inclusion criteria for this study consisted of:. Age – Patient must be part of the Paediatric Service, i.e., under the age of 16. Diagnosis – Patient must have a diagnosis of Perthes Disease with a Herring Classification documented. Application of a Hip Distractor Frame formed part of the patient's surgical management. Surgery was completed by Mr Connor Green. Surgery was completed between January 2021 and December 2022. Patient were required to have their external hip distractor frame removed by December 2022. Exclusion Criteria: Those not meeting the above inclusion criteria. Following the inclusion criteria, a number of cases were identified of which 10 cases were selected at random. A retrospective analysis of these samples was completed. The medical charts were reviewed as well as patient electronic healthcare records. Microsoft Excel was utilised to analyse the data and capture results. Results. From analysing the data, the following results were identified:. 80% of the sample cohort had a length of stay of 5 days following surgery. There were two outliers due to infection who had a length of stay of 14 days. 90% of the sample received a pre-operative Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy assessment. This assessment included information gathering regarding the child's home and social environment; their functional baseline and anticipated post-operative needs. Standardised and non-standardised assessments were used. 88.89% of those who completed a pre-operative assessment required referral to community Occupational Therapy teams for equipment provision (wheelchair, transfer aids) to allow for timely discharge. On average, each patient in the sample required 17 physiotherapy outpatient sessions prior to handover to the community teams. 100% of our sample required post operation onward referral for MDT input in the community (Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy). Conclusions. The importance of a multi-disciplinary approach towards family and children was highlighted in this study. A comprehensive pre-operative therapy assessment optimizes care for this cohort by preparing them in terms of equipment provisions, local team input and expectations for therapy. The data suggests future Limb Reconstruction team should include Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy as part of the multi-disciplinary team, in the treatment of children with Perthe's Disease. We suggest an MDT pre-assessment is completed to optimize patient care, reduce length of stay and improve patient satisfaction in the acute hospital setting

Introduction. The number of hip fracture admissions is rising; with reduced hospital bed capacity and increasing patient numbers, care pathways must be optimised to maximise inpatient bed efficiency. There is currently significant interest in improving healthcare services across all 7 days in the United Kingdom. It is unclear whether lack of allied healthcare professional review at the weekend is detrimental to hip fracture patient care. This study aims to examine whether providing 7-day physiotherapy and occupational therapy (7DPOT) service improves outcomes for fractured neck of femur patients compared to a 5-day service (5DPOT). Methods. All patients admitted with an acute neck of femur fracture were grouped into three cohorts, depending on provision of 7DPOT services: the initial cohort received 5DPOT between December 2012 and March 2013. Seven-day physiotherapy and occupational therapy was introduced for one year from October 2014 until September 2015 (2. nd. cohort). The service then reverted to 5DPOT between January to June 2016 (3. rd. cohort). The third cohort was utilised to nullify changes in the overall service which had occurred which were not attributable to 7DPOT. Data was collected prospectively using a specially designed audit tool. Results. 580 patients were included, with 533 patients followed out to 120 days. Introduction of 7DPOT saw improvement of documented first mobilisation with a physiotherapist from mean 1.38 days to 0.98 days (p<0.05). No significant differences were seen in inpatient length of stay between the three groups or when comparing all 5DPOT to 7DPOT. Use of 7DPOT did not lead to significant differences in initial discharge location. Mortality at 120-day follow up was observed to improve over time but was not attributable to 7DPOT. Conclusion. This study has not shown any significant improvement in outcomes for hip fracture patients receiving 7DPOT compared 5DPOT. Given the current financial constraints on healthcare services, widespread adoption cannot be recommended

The availability of seven-day NHS services for patients is currently receiving widespread national attention. Rehabilitation services including physiotherapy and occupational therapy are not routinely available at the weekend. The aim of this pilot study was to determine if seven-day rehabilitation services led to improved outcomes for hip fracture patients. All proximal femur fractures were included and formed into two cohorts. Data were collected prospectively in each cohort. Cohort one underwent standard five-day rehabilitation (n=79). Cohort two received seven-day rehabilitation (n=338). Both groups were followed up to 120 days. No significant differences were observed between the cohorts for pre-fracture place of residence, ASA score or age. Combined median length-of-stay in hospital and rehabilitation improved from 28 to 21 days (p=0.054) Combined median length of stay for patients admitted from home improved from 26 to 19 days (p=0.016). This pilot study suggests that a seven-day physiotherapy and occupational therapy service may result in decreased total length-of-stay in hospital and subsequent rehabilitation. This is a clear benefit for our patients but also for our hospitals and rehabilitation units where beds are at such a premium. A wider study across multiple institutions within NHS Scotland is now needed to investigate this further

In 2008 The Christie was chosen by Manchester United Football Club to form a unique partnership. This funded a specialist Physiotherapist and Occupational Therapist to work exclusively on the Young Oncology Unit, creating the first posts of their kind in the UK. The YOU treats patients between 16–24 years old with a diagnosis of cancer, sarcoma being one of the most common in this age group. All patients attending the YOU now receive a fully comprehensive Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy service to address their rehabilitation needs. The NICE guidelines (2005) indicate that cancer care for young adults needs to be age specific, age appropriate and undertaken by appropriately trained staff; hence the importance of having specialist therapists on the YOU. The needs of teenagers and young adults with cancer, both physically and psychologically, are more critical than at any other time in life. During their treatment patients will experience stressful events, such as alopecia, weight loss or gain, altered physical appearance, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, absence from education, and reduced contact with peers. The Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy roles are essential in enabling young adults to adapt to their diagnosis and learn coping strategies to deal with the stressful events they encounter through their cancer experience. During this presentation we will describe the unique role of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy with teenagers and young adults, using case studies to illustrate the benefits of having dedicated YOU therapists. We will also share with you the innovative ways in which the Manchester United training facilities have been used for different initiatives that have greatly benefitted and motivated our patients and their families. The partnership between two local organisations, one of the biggest football clubs in the world and a world class Cancer Centre has been a unique and positive liaison

The February 2024 Wrist & Hand Roundup. 360. looks at: Occupational therapy for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis?; Age and patient-reported benefits from operative management of intra-articular distal radius fractures: a meta-regression analysis; Long-term outcomes of nonsurgical treatment of thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: a cohort study; Semi-occlusive dressing versus surgery in fingertip injuries: a randomized controlled trial; Re-fracture in partial union of the scaphoid waist?; The WALANT distal radius fracture: a systematic review; Endoscopic carpal tunnel release with or without hand therapy?; Ten-year trends in the level of evidence in hand surgery

Background. To aid recovery, rehabilitation is an important adjunct to surgery. Acknowledging the MRC framework for complex interventions we assessed the evidence-base for components of comprehensive rehabilitation in total hip (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) pathways. Methods. We conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCT) of pre-surgical exercise and education, occupational therapy and post-operative physiotherapy. In feasibility RCTs we explored acceptability of pain self-management and occupational therapy before THR, and physiotherapy after TKR. We searched trial registers for ongoing RCTs. Results. Pre-surgical interventions. Systematic review identified 38 interventions targeting physical function before THR and TKR. Interventions showed functional benefit compared with controls, standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.32 (95% CI 0.20, 0.44; p<0.00001). In 27 studies targeting in-hospital recovery, intervention patients had lower anxiety, SMD 0.38 (95% CI 0.13, 0.63; p=0.003), and earlier mobilisation by 4 hours (95% CI 0.04, 0.30; p=0.009). In 20 studies, interventions targeting long-term recovery showed no benefit for function or pain. We randomised 88 patients into a feasibility RCT of group-based pain self-management. Attendees were highly satisfied but participation was low. Pre-operatively, many patients may perceive that only surgery can treat their symptoms. Occupational therapy. Systematic review identified 7 small RCTs in THR. Function improved in patients receiving occupational therapy, SMD 0.40 (95%CI 0.09, 0.70; p=0.01) but this was not sustained post-surgery. In our feasibility study with 44 patients randomised to pre-operative provision of aids and appliances or usual care, the intervention was delivered successfully and acceptable to participants. We identified no ongoing studies. Post-discharge physiotherapy. Systematic review identified 7 small studies suggesting that physiotherapy after TKR gives functional benefit at 3–4 months, SMD 0.37 (95%CI 0.12, 0.62; p=0.004) but not at later follow up. As noted in a recent review in THR, quality of evidence was limited. Our feasibility study evaluated six weeks of group-based activity-orientated rehabilitation in 46 TKR patients. The programme was well-received and attendance good. A fully-powered RCT is underway. We identified two ongoing studies targeting patients at risk of, or with, poor recovery. Conclusion. The evidence-base for comprehensive rehabilitation in THR and TKR is growing. Pre-surgical interventions may be effective but, in isolation, not acceptable to many patients. Ongoing definitive trials in TKR physiotherapy will guide future care. Well-designed trials of physiotherapy after THR and occupational therapy are needed. Ultimately, rehabilitation interventions throughout THR and TKR pathways may provide optimal care but this will need appropriate evaluation

In Asia, traditional bands are placed around limbs of children to ward off evil spirits and ensure good health. This practice may lead to the Rubber Band Syndrome (RBS) a rare paediatric condition described mainly in Asia which results from a forgotten thread or elastic band applied to the limb of a child. Because pressure necrosis beneath the band is slow, rapid healing of tissues over the band can obscure its presence. This makes the condition difficult to diagnose and distinguish from other infective conditions. This study presents the first case of RBS reported in South Africa. Case: The patient aged 18 months presented with a swollen hand, circumferential scar and discharging sinus on the wrist. A radiograph was negative. In theatre the volar wound was explored. Debridement revealed a yellow rubber band deep to the wrist flexors and neurovascular bundles but superficial to the extensor retinaculum. Complete removal of the rubber band and antibiotics was followed by rehabilitation with Occupational Therapy. At a 3 month follow up, there was no evidence of infection, sensation was normal and motor function of the hand restored. In this case, the structures through which the band had already passed were intact and overlay the band. It would appear that as the band slowly eroded the underlying structures it was followed by healing along the tract until the band exited deep to these structures. The band may come to rest on bone causing osteomyelitis if allowed to progress. A high index of suspicion of RBS is needed in children presenting with a circumferential scar and a non-healing wound, especially on the wrist or ankle. Careful debridement and complete removal of the band are essential to resolve symptoms and restore function

Background and Aims:. In 2009 a combined clinic was formed by the orthopaedic Surgeons and Developmental Paediatricians in our hospital. The aim was to help improve the assessment and management of patients with Cerebral Palsy. Included in the assessment team, are the paediatric orthopaedic surgeons, the developmental paediatricians, physiotherapists and occupational therapists. Our aim was to audit the patients presenting to this clinic over a 15 month period to look at the demographic data, clinical severity and decisions taken for these patients. Methods:. We looked at patients seen in the clinic from January 2013 to March 2014. We recorded the age, gender and primary caregiver. We also recorded the reason for referral. Clinically we wanted to know the type and distribution of the CP, GMFCS score, attainment of milestones and type of schooling. We recorded underlying aetiologies and HIV status of the patients. Finally the access the patients had to physiotherapy and Occupational therapy. Results:. We saw 41 patients in total with 18 males and 23 females. The ages ranged from 5 months to 9 years (mean 4.9 years). 36 of 41 (88%) had spastic CP, 2 (5%) dystonic, 1 (2%) mixed and 2 (5%) were not recorded. Diplegic and hemiplegic predominated with 15 (37%) and 14 (34%) respectively, there were 6 (15%) quadriplegics, 1 double hemiplegic and 5 were not recorded. 13 (31%) of patients had birth asphyxia as an aetiology, 13 (31%) had brain anomalies, 9 (22%) were premature babies, the remaining 16% comprised HIV, post natal sepsis and injury. 38 (93%) were cared for by at least one parent and the remaining 3 (7%) were cared for by a grandparent. 39 (95%) had access to physiotherapy and 30 (73%) had access to occupational therapy. 21 (51%) had no access to appropriate schooling. 9 (22%) were known to be HIV positive. The recommended orthopaedic interventions were continued physiotherapy for 17 (41%) and botox in 22(54%). Discussion:. The combined clinic has highlighted the diverse nature of cerebral palsy and the challenges facing our patients. It is an invaluable tool in the goal directed management of complex cases

Introduction. Current CMS reimbursement policy for total joint replacement is aligned with more cost effective, higher quality care. Upon implementation of a standardized evidenced-based care pathway, we evaluated overall procedural costs and clinical outcomes over the 90-day episode of care period for patients undergoing TKA with either conventional (Conv.) or robotic-assisted (RAS) instrumentation. Methods. In a retrospective review of the first seven consecutive quarters of Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) Model 2 participation beginning January 2014, we compared 90-day readmission rates, Length of Stay (LOS), discharge disposition, gains per episode in relation to target prices and overall episode costs for surgeons who performed either RAS-TKA (3 surgeons, 147 patients) or Conv. TKA (3 surgeons, 85 patients) at a single institution. All Medicare patients from all surgeons performing more than two TKA's within the study period were included. An evidence-based clinical care pathway was implemented prior to the start of the study that standardized pre-operative patient education, anesthesia, pain management, blood management, and physical/occupational therapy throughout the LOS for all patients. Physician specific target prices were established from institutional historical payment data over a prior three year period. Results. RAS and Conv-TKA procedures exhibited an average gain per episode of $7,600 and $5,579, respectively. The average total cost per 90-day episode was $2,085 lower for patients receiving RAS-TKA ($28,943 versus $31,028), with the majority of cost savings in reduced SNF usage ($1,481) and readmissions ($944). Discharge to home versus Sub-acute Rehabilitation Facilities (SAR's) was 14% higher in the RAS group (62% vs 48%, p<0.05). Conclusions. Implementation of a standardized care pathway across all service departments and physicians resulted in a reduction in overall episode of care costs, with further reductions in cost and discharge to SARs observed with the use of RAS

Purpose of Study/Background. To identify whether patients were satisfied with the overall educational component of the specialist nurse (CNS)/occupational therapist (OT) led pre-operative assessment clinic in order to identify areas which required improvement. The pre-operative specialist nurse led clinic was set up in 2002. The aim was to provide high quality information to patients undergoing elective spinal surgery in order to manage expectations and optimise post-operative recovery. Initially the clinic was specialist nurse led however, in 2006 occupational therapy input was introduced in order to provide an increased depth of information in regard to function and activities of daily living post operatively. In addition this has allowed assistive equipment to be provided pre-operatively. The format of this clinic has enhanced the patient's journey by facilitating reduced length of stay and more timely discharge. Methodology. A questionnaire was forwarded to a random sample of two hundred patients who attended for pre-operative assessment in the twelve-month period between April 2014 & March 2015. Sixty questionnaires were returned (30% response rate). Results/Summary. Patients were asked 17 questions in total, 3 general, 6 regarding CNS and 8 regarding OT. The responses were rated ‘very good’; ‘good’ ‘average; ‘poor’. In the returned audits no ‘poor’ responses were recorded. Clarity of information given: Very Good-56%; Good-39%; Average-5%. Overall experience of pre-operative assessment: Very Good-66%; Good- 32%; Average-2%. Advice given by OT: Very Good-82%; Good-16%; Average-2%. Information given by CNS: Very Good-75%; Good-23%; Average-2%. Conclusions. The results indicate that the OT and CNS specialist education sessions are considered valuable by patients. We believe that we have achieved this through good team-working in a multidisciplinary setting. Patients who attend these clinics are often anxious regarding surgery, have un-realistic expectations in relation to what to expect post-operatively. A significant number of our patients are elderly and have multiple pathologies which we take into account. The education sessions link into our patient information leaflets which, expand on this allowing patients to clarify matters and ask questions. No Conflicts of Interest. No Funding Obtained

Around 1% of the 185,000 primary hip and knee arthroplasties performed in the UK are followed by prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Although PJI affects a small percentage of patients, it is one of the most devastating complications associated with this procedure. Treatment usually involves further major surgery which can adversely affect patients' quality of life. Understanding current service provision provides valuable information needed to design and evaluate support interventions for patients. The aim of this survey was to identify usual care pathways and support in UK NHS orthopaedic centres for this population. The 20 highestvolume UK NHS orthopaedic centresfor hip and knee arthroplasty account for 33–50% of all cases treated for prosthetic joint infection. Infection leads at each centre were invited to participate in a survey about usual care provision and support for PJI. Questions exploredfollow up time-points; use of standard outcome measures; multidisciplinary care plans; supportive in-patient care and care after treatment; and onward referrals. Survey responses were recorded on a standardised proforma. Data were entered into Excel for analysis, then reviewed and coded into categories and frequency statistics to describe categorical data. A descriptive summary was developed based on these categories. Eleven of the highestvolume orthopaedic centres completed the survey. Follow-up of patients varied greatly across centres; some centres reviewed patients at weekly or 2 week intervals, while all centres saw patients at 6 weeks. Long-term follow-up varied across centres from 3–4 monthsto 12 monthly. Length of follow-up period varied from until the infection had cleared toindefinitely. Follow-up timepoints were only standardised in 4 out of 11 centres. Only 1 centre had a dedicated infection clinic. Advice on who patients should contact if they had concerns included the consultant, community nurse, extended scope practitioner or the ward, while 3 centres told patients to avoid calling their GP. Only half of the centres routinely used standardised outcome measures with patients with PJI. The majority of centres provided standard physiotherapy and occupational therapy (OT) to in-patients while approximately half also offered social support. Only one centre provided dedicated physiotherapy and OT on a separate infection ward. Three centres provided hospital at home or community services to patients in-between operative stages. Only 3 out of 11 centres stated they had specific multidisciplinary care plans in place for patients. Once discharged most patients were provided with physiotherapy, OT and social services if needed. Common barriersto referral included complexities of referring patients outside the hospital catchment area;lack of availability of community services, and shortage of staff including physiotherapists. Delays in rehab and social services could also be problematic. Findings show wide variation intreatment pathways and support for patients treated for PJI, both as inpatients and in the community. Only one of the 11 centreswho participated had a dedicated infection clinic. Only one centre suggested they individualised their physiotherapy support. A number of barriers exist to referring patients on to other support services after revision surgery

To collate and present epidemiological data collected by Scottish National Brachial Injury Service over the past decade. The Brachial Plexus Injury Service is based at the Victoria Infirmary, Glasgow and has been a designated National Service since 2004. It provides an integrated multidisciplinary service for traumatic brachial plexus injury and plexus tumours. The Service maintains an active archive recording details of all clinical referrals and procedures conducted by the Service over the past decade. The data presented here was derived from analysis of this database and information contained in the National Brachial Plexus Injury Service Annual Report 2010/11 & 2011/12. Data shows that there has been a steady rate in the number of referrals to the Service, particularly since 2004, with an average of 50 cases referred per annum. Of these, approximately 25% required formal surgical exploration for traumatic injury and a further 10% required surgery for brachial plexus tumour removal. The vast majority of referred cases are treated non-operatively, with appropriate support from specialist physiotherapy and occupational therapy. Referrals to the Service appear well distributed from around Scotland. However, data from 2011 shows that Greater Glasgow & Clyde is the greatest individual source of referrals and subsequent hospital admissions for surgical treatment. The commonest mechanism of brachial plexus injury appears to be secondary to falls and motorcycle RTA. Using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score, improved functional outcomes have been demonstrated consistently in patients who have undergone surgery for brachial plexus injuries within the Service. Over the past decade, the Brachial Plexus Injury Service has had a steady patient referral record from across the Scotland, particularly Glasgow. Data indicates that there is an on-going clinical need for provision of the service with improved outcomes and reduced functional disability in patients treated by the service. It is envisaged that data from the Service will also act as a useful planning model for the provision of UK national services in the future

Introduction: Recent studies have shown that Minimally Invasive Total Hip Replacements (MISTHRs) have not reduced hospital stay. We seek to demonstrate the importance of infrastructure allowing early mobilisation and discharge thereby gaining the full benefits of MISTHRs. We compared the early outcomes of 2 units where MISTHRs were carried out by the same surgical teams but had 2 different infrastructure set-ups. In the first unit a “Short Stay Programme” (SSP) was in place. This involved early pre-operative assessment by medical, physiotherapy and occupational therapy teams. Post-operative analgesia was augmented with the use of a pain pump administering local anaesthetic as a continuous infusion. Patients were mobilised at 4 hours after surgery and were supported in the community by an “Outreach Team”. In the second unit the patients had MISTHRs without changes to the conventional infrastructure. Methods: One surgeon carried out all operations, at 2 different hospitals using a mini-posterior approach with specific minimally-invasive instrumentation. Uncemented ABG II prostheses were used. Hospital discharge was only achieved after specific criteria were fulfilled. Discussion: A significant reduction in the length of stay of MISTHRs patients is achieved by the Short Stay Programme, with no difference in complications. The full advantages of MISTHRs are achieved only if the whole aim of the care pathway is to facilitate early, supported discharge. Trouble-shooting pre-operatively, effective analgesia and post-operative support are the key elements of this programme

Introduction. The number of revision hip arthroplasty procedures is rising annually with 7852 such operations performed in the UK in 2010. These are expensive procedures due to pre-operative investigation, surgical implants and instrumentation, protracted hospital stay, and pharmacological costs. There is a paucity of robust literature on the costs associated with the common indications for this surgery. Objective. We aim to quantify the cost of revision hip arthroplasty by indication and identify any short-fall in relation to the national tariff. Methods. Clinical, demographic and economic data were obtained for 305 consecutive revision total hip replacements in 286 patients performed at a tertiary referral centre between 1998 and 2008. These operations were categorised by indication into: aseptic loosening, dislocation, deep infection and peri-prosthetic fracture. Clinical data included length of stay, operative time, estimated blood loss, prosthesis and instrumentation required. Financial data was collected on cost of implants, materials and augmentation utilised at time of surgery, operating room costs, recovery, inpatient stay, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, pharmacy, radiographs and laboratory studies. Statistical analysis was undertaken using the SPSS version 16 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, Il). Non-parametric bootstrap samples were used to obtain consistent 95% confidence intervals. Analysis of variance between groups was performed (p < 0.05). Results. The mean total cost of revision surgery in aseptic cases (n=194) was £11897 +/− 4629, septic revision (n=76) £21937 +/− 10965, peri-prosthetic fractures (n=24) £18185 +/− 9124, and in dislocations (n=11) £10893 +/− 5476. Conclusion. Revision procedures for deep infection and peri-prosthetic fracture were associated with significantly longer operative time, increased blood loss and a higher number of complications compared with revisions for aseptic loosening. Total inpatient stay was also significantly greater p< 0.001. Our study shows that financial costs vary significantly between revision subtypes which is not reflected by current National Health Service tariff rates

Purpose. A comparison of patient satisfaction of service provided by independent sector treatment centres versus an index NHS hospital in total knee replacement surgery. Methods. Patients were all initially listed for total knee replacement (TKR) by a single consultant from the index NHS hospital, Derbyshire Royal Infirmary (DRI). Patients were sent a postal questionnaire and asked to rate the TKR service provided by a given hospital, based on recent inpatient experience. Questions covered quality of care delivered by hospital staff and quality of ward environment. Overall satisfaction was rated. Patients electing surgery under Patient Choice at an independent sector treatment centre (ISTC) were asked about factors that influenced their hospital choice. 100 consecutive patients undergoing TKR at DRI and 100 patients choosing ISTC hospitals were identified. All surgery occurred between April 2003 and September 2006. Results. Questionnaire response rates were 79% for DRI patients and 54% for ISTC. Overall patient satisfaction for TKR service was 95% for DRI and 87% for ISTC. An equal 61% rated the surgeons as excellent in both DRI and ISTC hospitals. Nurses and physiotherapists (& occupational therapists) both scored more highly in ISTC groups (Nurses 69% v 45%; physio/OT 57% v 35%). Ward environment rated excellent in 73% for ISTC and 24% for DRI. The most common reason for choosing ISTC was shorter waiting list (42%). Conclusion. ISTC hospitals scored more highly in terms of nurses, physiotherapy & occupational therapy, and ward environment. In part, this may arise from better staffing levels and newer facilities in the ISTC sector. Despite this, overall patient satisfaction for TKR service remained greater at the index NHS hospital. This suggests overall satisfaction depends on more complex factors than staff and ward environment. Further work is needed to compare objective clinical outcomes of TKR between hospital groups within the NHS

Our aim was to assess the impact of the increasing number of patients on orthopaedic waiting lists on general practitioners in New Zealand. A 10-point questionnaire was developed in association with the General Practice Department at the Wellington School of Medicine, and mailed to 250 randomly chosen general practitioners around New Zealand. One hundred and fifty general practitioners returned the survey. Sixty three per cent of general practitioners reported having between eleven and thirty patients on an orthopaedic waiting list in their practice. 85% of general practitioners reported spending up to an extra 6 hours per month looking after problems caused by having to provide extra care for the patients. In 90% of cases general practitioners reported that their patients required considerably greater community support in the form of extra physiotherapy, meals-on-wheels and occupational therapy. In 138 cases, general practitioners reported greater levels of stress in the families of patients on waiting lists. The majority of general practitioners reported an increased need for analgesia and night sedation during the period on a waiting list. They also reported substantial increases in paperwork necessary to access social supports. This study documents the burden on general practitioners produced by the increasing waiting lists, and the re-alignment of waiting lists. This burden is reducing the general practitioner’s ability to deal with routine general practice problems, and likely adversely affects the health of other New Zealanders. There is a need for a study of patients on waiting lists to further assess their needs

Purpose: Evaluation of a hands free crutch. This interesting device is intended for patients who have undergone foot and ankle surgery and should be non-weight bearing. It involves a knee tray attached to a vertical beam with a rubber foot. The crutch is strapped to the lower limb and weight is transferred though the proximal tibia. Methods: Five Volunteers were assessed using the crutch, the K9 walker and 2 standard crutches in a simulated environment. A comparison was made between this device and the K9 walker which has been shown to be a liberating walking aid indoors. Tasks from activities of daily living, productivity and transfers were included. Assessment was undertaken by the Occupational Therapy Team. The hands free crutch was also compared with non weight bearing using two crutches to gauge performance outdoors. Assessment of ease of use and safety was undertaken by the Physiotherapy Team. Results: Domestic chores including cleaning, cooking and shopping were possible using this device. Sitting activities were noted to be more difficult, because of the necessity to remove the crutch on each occasion. Although speed was significantly greater (p< 0.0001.) using two crutches, the hands free crutch permitted safe outdoor mobilisation on even or uneven ground, up and down slopes with a gradient of 1 in 10 and up and down stairs. Good single leg stance stability was predictive of ease of use and safety for the hands free crutch. Discussion: The hands free crutch is suited to motivated and physically able patients. Other lower limb pathology contraindicates the use of this device, but in patients with upper limb pathology it would permit non-weight bearing mobilisation. Good balance is paramount and perhaps a falls risk assessment should be performed prior to use

Aims

Multiple secondary surgical procedures of the shoulder, such as soft-tissue releases, tendon transfers, and osteotomies, are described in brachial plexus birth palsy (BPBP) patients. The long-term functional outcomes of these procedures described in the literature are inconclusive. We aimed to analyze the literature looking for a consensus on treatment options.