We report on the 5 year results of a randomized study comparing TKR performed using conventional instrumentation versus electromagnetic computer-assisted surgery. This study analysed patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 5 years utilising the American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Short Form 36 score and range of motion (ROM). Of the 200 patients enrolled 125 completed 5 year follow up, 62 in the navigated group and 63 in the conventional group. There were 28 deceased patients, 29 withdrawals and 16 lost to follow-up. There was improvement in clinical function in most PROMs from 1-5 year follow up across both groups. OKS improved from a mean of 26.6 (12–55) to 35.1 (5–48). AKSS increased from 75.3 (0–100) to 78.4 (−10–100), SF36 from 58.9 (2.5–100) to 53.2 (0–100). ROM improved by an average 7 degrees from 110 degrees to 117 degrees (80–135). There was no statistically significant difference in PROMs between the groups at 5 years. Patients undergoing revision surgery were identified from the dataset and global PACS. There were no revisions within 5 years in the navigated group and 3 revisions in the conventional group, two for infection and one for mid-flexion instability, giving an all cause revision rate of 3.06% at 5 years for this group. There appears to be no significant advantage in clinical function for patients undergoing TKR for
Risk of revision following total knee replacement is relatively high in patients under 55 years of age, but little is reported regarding non-revision outcomes. This study aims to identify predictors of dissatisfaction following TKR in patients younger than 55 years of age. We assessed 177 TKRs (157 consecutive patients) from 2008 to 2013. Data was collected on age, sex, implant, indication, BMI, social deprivation, range of motion, and prior knee surgery in addition to Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and SF-12 score. Postoperative data included knee range of motion, complications, and OKS, SF-12 score and satisfaction measures at one year. Overall, 24.9% of patients (44/177) were unsure or dissatisfied with their TKR. Significant predictors of dissatisfaction on univariable analysis (p<0.05) included: Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1/2 osteoarthritis; indication; poor preoperative OKS; postoperative complications; and poor improvements in OKS and pain component score (PCS) of the SF-12. Odds ratios for dissatisfaction by indication compared to primary OA: OA with previous meniscectomy 2.86;
This study aimed to determine the long-term functional,
clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with Schatzker IV
to VI fractures of the tibial plateau treated with an Ilizarov frame.
Clinical, functional and radiological assessment was carried out
at a minimum of one year post-operatively. A cohort of 105 patients
(62 men, 43 women) with a mean age of 49 years (15 to 87) and a
mean follow-up of 7.8 years (1 to 19) were reviewed. There were
18 type IV, 10 type V and 77 type VI fractures. All fractures united
with a mean time to union of 20.1 weeks (10.6 to 42.3). No patient
developed a deep infection. The median range of movement (ROM) of
the knee was 110o and the median Iowa score was 85. Our study demonstrates good long-term functional outcome with
no deep infection; spanning the knee had no detrimental effect on
the ROM or functional outcome. High-energy fractures of the tibial plateau may be treated effectively
with a fine wire Ilizarov fixator. Cite this article:
