Purpose. To assess the impact of implementing a joint Neurosurgical/Orthopaedic Spinal on-call rota on the referral patterns to the Neurosurgical Department at James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough. Methods. A joint spinal rota was implemented at James Cook University Hospital in April 2008, to provide 24-hour on-call availability of a Spinal specialist. Using the Neurosurgical Referral Database (Microsoft Access), the referrals received for the 12 months prior to, and subsequent to, the implementation were analysed. Results. There was a 13.4% increase in total spinal referrals in the 12 months post-implementation of the new spinal rota, compared with pre-implementation. Total admissions from these referrals increased by 11.7%. There was an increase of 5.5% in lumbar degenerative referrals (including cauda equina referrals), a 10.5% decrease in cervical degenerative referrals, and most significantly, a 42.9% increase in spinal injury referrals, including fractures, and spinal cord injuries. Conclusions. The implementation of a joint Neurosurgical and Spinal Orthopaedic on-call rota for Spinal Surgery has resulted in the availability of a Spinal Consultant on-call 24hrs a day, 7 days a week to cover Spinal emergencies. The resulting change in referrals to the Neurosurgical Department has seen an increase in both referrals and admissions, although it is uncertain whether this is a result of a general increase in referral rate, or a direct result of the change in service provision

To assess concordance between hospital coding and clinician coding for patients undergoing spinal instrumentation procedures and determine if our coding systems result in accurate financial reimbursement from the primary care trust (PCT).

We conducted a one year retrospective review of 41 patients who underwent spinal instrumentation procedures. Data collected from IT systems included: operation description, clinician procedure code, hospital procedure code, Hospital Health Resource grouping (HRG), clinician HRG, instrumentation costs and PCT reimbursement fees. From this data we compared coding based re-imbursement fees and actual surgical costs, taking into account exact instrumentation prices.

In all cases the primary hospital and clinician coding values differed. Using the clinician code would have altered the HRG group in 16 patients. Using solely clinician coding would have generated less financial reimbursement than using hospital coding.

In 23 patients undergoing complex spinal procedures, instrumentation costs represented a significant proportion of the final fee obtained from the PCT, thus leaving a small proportion for the associated hospital stay costs. This suggests instrumentation costs are inadequately reimbursed from the PCT.

Hospital coding appears more accurate than clinician coding and results in greater financial reimbursement. On the whole, we found there to be insufficient reimbursement from the PCT. The variable and sometimes substantial cost of spinal instrumentation procedures results in inadequate reimbursement for many procedures. We feel the payment by results (PBR) scheme is suboptimal for such procedures and adequate reimbursement can only be achieved by direct billing on an individual case basis.

Background

Persistent low back and leg pain is a common and highly disabling musculoskeletal condition. Many patients seek the opinion of a neurosurgeon with a view to surgical intervention. Few data are available which document the experiences of patients at these consultations.

To determine presenting features, treatment modalities and associated outcome following treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas in a tertiary centre.

Retrospective cohort study of patients with SDAVF assessed at a single tertiary referral centre, between 1999 and 2009. Medical records were used to identify intervention type, pre- and post-intervention Aminoff-Logue disability score (ALDS), recurrence rate, follow-up time and discharge status. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon signed rank.

26 patients were identified with 23 receiving intervention. Two were unavailable for follow up. Endovascular embolization was performed successfully in 13 patients, recurrence occurred in 6 of these, 3 of which were subsequently treated surgically. Surgery was the initial treatment for 10 patients due to either unsuccessful embolization attempt or proximity of the fistula to spinal artery feeders; only 1 of these recurred. ALDS-gait reduced (improved) by a mean of 0.33 points following intervention but this was not statistically significant (P=0.0645). There was negligible change in micturition and bowel ALDS. Improvement in ALDS was greater in patients treated with surgery first and also in patients whose fistula did not recur. Mean follow-up was 38 months with 56% of working age patients returning to work.

Both embolisation and surgery achieved the primary aim of reducing disease progression, leading to an improved ALDS. Outcome was superior if initially treated surgically and recurrence occurred more frequently in patients treated endovascularly. The small number of patients in our cohort emphasise the need for further studies into this group of patients.

With the identification of literature shortfalls on the techniques employed in intraoperative navigated (ION) spinal surgery, we outline a number of measures which have been synthesised into a coherent operative technique. These include positioning, dissection, management of the reference frame, the grip, the angle of attack, the drill, the template, the pedicle screw, the wire, and navigated intrathecal analgesia. Optimizing techniques to improve accuracy allow an overall reduction of the repetition of the surgical steps with its associated productivity benefits including time, cost, radiation, and safety.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(3):371–375.

Objectives:. To establish the demand, referral pathways, utility and patient satisfaction of a physiotherapy led post operative spinal surgery review clinic. Methods:. From July 2014 to January 2015 a pilot physiotherapy led clinic was established. The following clinic data was collected: number of patients reviewed, surgical procedure, outcome of clinic assessment, numbers requiring further investigation, numbers requiring review in the consultant led clinic and adverse events. A patient satisfaction survey was also administered to all English speaking patients. Patients were asked to rate the ease of getting through to the service by phone, length of wait, time spent with the clinician, answers to questions, explanation of results, advice about exercise and return to activities, the technical skills of the clinician, their personal manner and their overall visit. Data was anonymised and inserted into an excel spreadsheet for analysis. Descriptive statistical analysis was undertaken. Results:. 28 patients were reviewed in the pilot clinic. 17 (61%) patients were reviewed and discharged. 11 (39%) patients required discussion with the consultant. The outcome was: Referral for further imaging: n=5 (18%), referral to other specialist: n=2 (6%), consultant led OPD clinic review n=4 (14%) and surgical review of wound n=1 (4%). 84% (n=21/25) of eligible patients completed a post operative satisfaction survey. 86% (n= 18/21) rated their overall visit as excellent. There were no adverse events reported. Conclusion:. The pilot clinic has informed the development of a permanent physiotherapy led post op clinic in the National Neurosurgical Spinal Service and demonstrates the value of interdisciplinary care in this population