Introduction. Pain after trauma has received relatively little research attention compared with surgical techniques and functional outcomes, but is important to patients. We aimed to describe nerve dysfunction and pain characteristics using tibial fractures as a model. We hypothesized that early nerve dysfunction was associated with neuropathic and chronic pain. Materials and Methods. Adult patients with isolated open or closed tibial diaphyseal fractures were prospectively observed for 1-year in 5 Major Trauma Centres. Nerve dysfunction was assessed using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, acute pain with the visual numerical rating scale (VNRS), neuropathic pain with the doleur neuropathique-4 score and quality of life (QOL) using the EQ-5D score. Results. Of 77 included patients, twenty-six (33.8%) had Gustilo-Anderson grade II or worse injuries. Forty-six (63.0%) had operative repair; 0 operation notes reported nerve injury. Mean VNRS pain scores one week post-injury were 4.6/10 (SD 2.4). Seventeen patients (23.3%) presented with impaired sensation, persisting in 11 (15.1%) at 3-months. Neuropathic pain affected 16 (20.8%) patients one week post-injury; a further 20 (26.0%) had >2 symptoms of nerve pain. Only four (11.1%) received anti-neuropathic drugs. At 6-months, twenty-three (31.5%) reported mobility problems, 21 (28.8%) difficulty completing normal activities, 25 (34.2%) pain and 15 (20.5%) anxiety and depression. Conclusions. Nerve dysfunction and neuropathic pain are common early features in patients with tibial fractures, but are poorly recognised and inadequately treated. Pain has long-term effects on patients’ QOL. Future work should aim to improve identification and management of neuropathic pain

Pain is a common presenting symptom of patients with shoulder conditions, yet there has been little work done to accurately describe its distribution and nature. We studied all patients attending the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital shoulder clinic from August 2012 – 2013. Patients completed a questionnaire detailing their Oxford Shoulder Score and a validated neuropathic pain questionnaire. Patients were given diagrams to draw on their perceived location of pain or abnormal sensation. We analysed all patients with frozen shoulder (48), osteoarthritis (37) and rotator cuff arthropathy (17). We found that neuropathic pain is common in patients with shoulder conditions identified in 39% of OA patients, 42% with rotator cuff arthropathy and 57% with frozen shoulder. Pain outside the shoulder was reported in over 50% of patients, commonly the forearm, hand, neck and chest. Frozen shoulder was especially associated with pain outside of the shoulder with 39% describing symptoms in the neck or chest, 21% into the forearm and 18% into the hand. Interestingly, neuropathic pain radiating down the arm was not described in the rotator cuff arthropathy group. The high prevalence of neuropathic symptoms and pain felt outside the shoulder aids diagnosis and more accurately identifies these conditions

Peripheral nerve injuries (PNI) occur in 10% of combat casualties. In the immediate field-hospital setting, an insensate limb can affect the surgeon's assessment of limb viability and in the long-term PNI remain a source of considerable morbidity. Therefore the aims of this study are to document the recovery of combat PNI, as well as report on the effect of current medical management in improving functional outcome. In this study, we present the largest series of combat related PNI in Coalition troops since World War II. From May 2007 – May 2010, 100 consecutive patients (261 nerve injuries) were prospectively reviewed in a specialist PNI clinic. The functional recovery of each PNI was determined using the MRC grading classification (good, fair and poor). In addition, the incidence of neuropathic pain, the results of nerve grafting procedures, the return of plantar sensation, and the patients' current military occupational grading was recorded. At mean follow up 26.7 months, 175(65%) of nerve injuries had a good recovery, 57(21%) had a fair recovery and 39(14%) had a poor functional recovery. Neuropathic pain was noted in 33 patients, with Causalgia present in 5 cases. In 27(83%) patients, pain was resolved by medication, neurolysis or nerve grafting. In 35 cases, nerve repair was attempted at median 6 days from injury. Of these 62%(22) gained a good or fair recovery with 37%(13) having a poor functional result. Forty-two patients (47 limbs) initially presented with an insensate foot. At final follow up (mean 25.4 months), 89%(42 limbs) had a return of protective plantar sensation. Overall, 9 patients were able to return to full military duty (P2), with 45 deemed unfit for military service (P0 or P8). This study demonstrates that the majority of combat PNI will show some functional recovery. Adherence to the principles of war surgery to ensure that the wound is clear of infection and associated vascular and skeletal injuries are promptly treated will provide the optimal environment for nerve recovery. Although neuropathic pain affects a significant proportion of casualties, pharmacological and surgical intervention can alleviate the majority of symptoms. Finally, the presence of an insensate limb at initial surgery, should not be used as a marker of limb viability. The key to recovery of the PNI patient lies in a multi-disciplinary approach. Essential to this is regular surgical review to assess progress and to initiate prompt surgical intervention when needed. This approach allows early determination of prognosis, which is of huge value to the rehabilitating patient psychologically, and to the whole rehabilitation team

Persistent post-surgical pain remains a problem after knee replacement with some studies reporting up to 20% incidence. Pain is usually felt by those who do not operate to be a monolithic entity. All orthopaedic surgeons know that this is not the case. At its most basic level, pain can be divided into two categories, mechanical and non-mechanical. Mechanical pain is like the pain of a fresh fracture. If the patient does not move, the pain is less. This type of pain is relieved by opiates. Mechanical pain is seen following knee replacement, but is fortunately becoming less frequent. It is caused by a combination of malrotations and maltranslations, often minor, which on their own would not produce problems. The combination of them, however, may produce a knee in which there is overload of the extensor mechanism or of the medial stabilizing structures. If these minor mechanical problems can be identified, then corrective surgery will help. Non-mechanical pain is present on a constant basis. It is not significantly worsened by activities. Opiates may make the patient feel better, but they do not change the essential nature of the pain. Non-mechanical pain falls into three broad groups, infection, neuropathic and perceived pain. Infection pain is usually relieved by opiates. Since some of this pain is probably due to pressure, its inclusion in the non-mechanical pain group is questionable, but it is better left there so that the surgeon always considers it. Low grade chronic infection can be extremely difficult to diagnose. Loosening of noncemented knee components is so rare that when it is noted radiologically, infection should be very high on the list of suspicions. The name neuropathic pain suggests that we know much more about it than we do in reality. Causalgia or CRPS-type two is rare following knee replacement. CRPS type one or reflex sympathetic dystrophy probably does exist, but it is probably over-diagnosed especially by the author of this abstract. The optimum treatment I have found is lumbar sympathetic blocks. Perceived pain is the largest group. It does not matter what you tell the patient, some believe a new knee should be like a new car, i.e. you step into it and drive away. The fact that they have to work to make it work is horrifying. Some of this pain is actually mechanical, especially in those with no benefits such as hairstylists. Perceived pain is widespread. The classic treatise on this is Dr. Ian McNabb's book “Backache”. It should be studied by all orthopaedic surgeons, who wish to understand pain complaints. Any experienced knee surgeon will have his list of red flags or caveats. These are often politically incorrect and this information is transferred to young surgeons, usually in dim bars late at night. I will list only a few. If the patient comes in with a form asking for a disability pension on the first visit. If the patient's mother answers the questions. If the patient comes in taking massive doses of opiates. If the patient is referred to you by a surgeon, who does more knee replacements than you do. There is also the recently described Fern Silverman's syndrome

Osteoid osteoma is a benign bone-forming lesion, characterized by its small size, its clearly demarcated outline and by the usual presence of a surrounding zone of reactive bone formation. It often poses a diagnostic challenge due to its ambiguous presentation. The aetiology of osteoid osteoma is poorly understood. The previous suggestion that osteoid osteoma was not associated with trauma or infection has been challenged by more recent literature raising the possibility that it could be a reactive or healing response or a phenomenon associated with the revascularisation process. This case report describes an unusual presentation of a post-traumatic osteoid osteoma. Two years following a diaphyseal, spiral tibial fracture treated nonoperatively, the patient developed new pain at the previous fracture site. The pain was constant, relieved by non-steroidal analgesia and not associated with systemic upset. It was initially attributed to other more likely diagnoses such as osteomyelitis and neuropathic pain. Multiple investigations and interventions were undertaken prior to the definitive diagnosis being obtained by surgical excision of the lesion and histological studies five years after the injury and three years following the initiation of the discomfort. In both English and foreign language literature there are only seven case reports that document osteoid osteoma following fracture, these are predominantly in the lower limb with no predominance to operative or nonoperative management. This case report should raise the index of clinical suspicion of osteoid osteoma occurring post fracture

Introduction. Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) has been designed to treat complex tibial, foot and ankle deformities using computer software. We have performed various osteotomies in combination with different soft tissue procedures, with the use of TSF. Material and Methods. A retrospective study of 20 consecutive patients operated by, senior author SSM, from 2004 onwards who underwent surgical correction of tibia, ankle, midfoot and hind foot including lateral column lengthening, calcaneal and midfoot osteotomies. Demographic details, diagnosis, procedures (including previous operations), length of follow-up, outcome and complications were recorded. Of the 20 patients, 13 were men and 7 women. The mean age was 39 years (range 18 to 70). 5 patients had TSF for malunion or non-union of ankle fractures, malunion of tibia (5), congenital talipes equino-varus(3), acute fracture of ankle (2), one patient each for spina bifida, Poliomyelitis, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, equino-varus due to periventricular leuco-encephalopathy and avascular necrosis of the talus. Bilateral TSF for torsional malalignment of tibia (1). Results. Follow up 6 to 54 months (mean 19.4). Patient based foot and ankle outcome criteria were used. Of the 20 patients, 16 had no pain and satisfactory range of movement and function at the last follow up. Post-operative complications included pin site infection(2) and frame hardware malfunction (2)patients, residual deformity requiring surgical correction at 22 months, (1) delayed union, neuropathic pain in (1), residual equinus deformity requiring Botox injections(1) and osteomyelitis requiring debridement(1). Conclusion. We present this series of complex congenital and acquired conditions of the foot and ankle treated with corrective osteotomies and Taylor Spatial Frame with good results

Persistent post-surgical pain (PPSP) remains a problem after knee replacement with some studies reporting up to 20% incidence. Pain is usually felt by those who do not operate to be a monolithic entity. All orthopaedic surgeons know that this is not the case. At its most basic level, pain can be divided into two categories, mechanical and non-mechanical. Mechanical pain is like the pain of a fresh fracture. If the patient does not move, the pain is less. This type of pain is relieved by opiates. Mechanical pain is seen following knee replacement, but is becoming less frequent. It is caused by a combination of malrotations and maltranslations, often minor, which on their own would not produce problems. The combination of them, however, may produce a knee in which there is overload of the extensor mechanism or of the medial stabilizing structures. If these minor mechanical problems can be identified, then corrective surgery will help. Non-mechanical pain is present on a constant basis. It is not significantly worsened by activities. Opiates may make the patient feel better, but they do not change the essential nature of the pain. Non-mechanical pain falls into three broad groups, infection, neuropathic and perceived pain. Infection pain is usually relieved by opiates. Since some of this pain is probably due to pressure, its inclusion in the non-mechanical pain group is questionable, but it is better left there so that the surgeon always considers it. Low grade chronic infection can be extremely difficult to diagnose. Loosening of noncemented knee components is so rare that when it is noted radiologically, infection should be very high on the list of suspicions. The name neuropathic pain suggests that we know much more about it than we do in reality. Causalgia or CRPS-type two is rare following knee replacement. CRPS-type one or reflex sympathetic dystrophy probably does exist, but it is probably over-diagnosed. The optimum treatment I have found is lumbar sympathetic blocks. Lyrica, Gabapentin and Cymbalta may also help. Perceived pain is the largest group. It does not matter what you tell the patient, some believe a new knee should be like a new car, i.e. you step into it and drive away. The fact that they have to work to make it work is horrifying. Perceived pain is widespread. The classic treatise, Dr. Ian McNabb's book “Backache”, should be studied by all who wish to understand pain complaints. Any experienced knee surgeon will have his list of red flags or caveats. I will list only a few. If the patient comes in with a form asking for a disability pension on the first visit. If the patient's mother answers the questions. If the patient comes in taking massive doses of opiates. If the patient is referred to you by a surgeon who does more knee replacements than you do. There are other issues such as good old fibromyalgia, which appears to have gone the way of the dodo. It has been replaced by something equally silly called central sensitization. The theory of central sensitization is that if one has pain somewhere or other for three months or six months or whatever, there are going to be changes in the brain and spinal cord. It then does not matter what happens to the original pain, i.e. whether or not it goes away, the pain will persist because of the changes in the brain, hence, the title of the pain in the brain syndrome. If this theory was correct, we might as well all go home because we have all been wasting our time for the last 30 years because none of our patients would get any better. After all, all of our patients have had pain for a lot longer than three months, many of them have been involved in trauma and sometimes, compensation is at issue. The pain in the brain theory, therefore, sounds about as realistic as the flat earth society or the treatment of Galileo

Proximal Release of Gastrocnemius (PROG) is a procedure which can be performed to treat various disorders of the foot and ankle. Gastrocnemius contracture/tightening is a condition which can lead to many chronic debilitating foot conditions like Metatarsalgia, Hallux Valgus, Plantar Fascitis, Diabetic foot ulcers etc, which in turn can significantly affect patient's quality of life. In this study we present eight cases who presented with forefoot pain, were treated with PROG and showed a complete resolution of their condition. The test used to determine Gastrocnemius contracture is the “SILFVERSKIOLD TEST”. It measures the dorsiflexion (DF) of the foot at the ankle joint (AJ) with knee extended & flexed to 90 degrees. The test is considered positive when DF at the AJ is greater with knee flexed than extended. We studied eight patients who presented to the orthopaedic outpatients between 2005 and 2010 with diverse foot conditions and having relative equinism. Six out of eight patients suffered from forefoot pain, out of which three had associated diabetic neuropathy and one out of these three had a diabetic foot ulcer. One was in association with arthritis of Talonavicular & Transmetatarsal joint, another had callosity under the head of second metatarsal. One patient had claw toes with associated Rheumatoid Arthritis. One of our patients presented with spasticity in his left calf, severe Hallux Valgus & dislocated MTPJ. He had an unsuccessful Strayer procedure on the same leg in the past. The final case had Achilles tendonitis & spurs. A finding common to all of them pre operatively was a positive Silfverskiold test, all having ZERO degree DF at the AJ with knee extended. Surgical release of the aponeurotic head of gastrocnemius was performed in prone position through a transverse incision. A cam walker was used for two weeks in those patients who were permitted to weight-bear, else a plaster for two weeks. No surgical complications occurred. Success was measured both in returning the ability to dorsiflex and resolution of related condition. DF in extension improved from an average of zero to 16(sixteen) degrees. Seven out of eight patients(including the patient with planter ulcer)had resolution of associated condition. One failure was a patient who continued to experience neuropathic pain. None of the patients complained of any weakness as a result of release. PROG is a straightforward procedure and should be considered in patients where gastrocnemius tightening is likely to be the contributing factor. This seems to improve the success of related procedures

A schwannoma is a benign nerve sheath tumour originating from schwann cells. It is the most commonly occurring peripheral nerve sheath tumour. The common sites of occurrence are the head and neck followed by the upper and lower limbs. Diagnosis is straightforward and is made clinically. Schwannomas of the tibial nerve pose a problem. The literature describes them as causes of chronic, intractable lower limb pain because their diagnosis is often delayed for several years. The main reason postulated is that a lump is not always palpable in the early phases and hence chronic cramping pain in the calf or foot is attributed to lumbosacral radiculopathy or local neuropathy. We report the largest case series of twenty-five patients diagnosed with a tibial nerve schwannoma. Only three cases were diagnosed within a year of initial presentation. The mean time to diagnosis was eighty-six months. The most common site of pain was the sole of the foot (eighteen cases). A Tinel's sign was elicited in nineteen cases. MRI confirmed the diagnosis in all the twenty cases where it was performed. Surgical resection was performed in all cases yielding excellent results. Only one patient required further neurolysis for persisting pain. In patients with a long history of neuropathic lower limb pain, where lumbar and pelvic lesions have been excluded, a high index of suspicion should be maintained for a peripheral nerve tumour. Delay in diagnosis is commonly due to lack of familiarity with peripheral nerve pathology and the absence of a palpable lump. The delay can result in numerous unnecessary medical and surgical interventions in this group of distressed patients. The Tinel's sign is the key to identifying a tumour of neural origin in the absence of a palpable lump. Surgical resection of the tumour remains safe and effective in providing symptomatic relief

We reviewed 234 benign solitary schwannomas treated between 1984 and 2004. The mean age of the patients was 45.2 years (11 to 82). There were 170 tumours (73%) in the upper limb, of which 94 (40%) arose from the brachial plexus or other nerves within the posterior triangle of the neck. Six (2.6%) were located within muscle or bone. Four patients (1.7%) presented with tetraparesis due to an intraspinal extension.

There were 198 primary referrals (19 of whom had a needle biopsy in the referring unit) and in these patients the tumour was excised. After having surgery or an open biopsy at another hospital, a further 36 patients were seen because of increased neurological deficit, pain or incomplete excision. In these, a nerve repair was performed in 18 and treatment for pain or paralysis was offered to another 14.

A tender mass was found in 194 (98%) of the primary referrals. A Tinel-like sign was recorded in 155 (81%). Persistent spontaneous pain occurred in 60 (31%) of the 194 with tender mass, impairment of cutaneous sensibility in 39 (20%), and muscle weakness in 24 (12%).

After apparently adequate excision, two tumours recurred. No case of malignant transformation was seen.

Drug therapy forms an integral part of the management of many orthopaedic conditions. However, many medicines can produce serious adverse reactions if prescribed inappropriately, either alone or in combination with other drugs. Often these hazards are not appreciated. In response to this, the European Union recently issued legislation regarding safety measures which member states must adopt to minimise the risk of errors of medication.

In March 2014 the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and NHS England released a Patient Safety Alert initiative focussed on errors of medication. There have been similar initiatives in the United States under the auspices of The National Coordinating Council for Medication Error and The Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. These initiatives have highlighted the importance of informing and educating clinicians.

Here, we discuss common drug interactions and contra-indications in orthopaedic practice. This is germane to safe and effective clinical care.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:434–41.