Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 30
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 4 | Pages 554 - 560
1 Apr 2017
Tamai K Suzuki A Takahashi S Akhgar J Rahmani MS Hayashi K Ohyama S Nakamura H

Aims. We aimed to evaluate the temperature around the nerve root during drilling of the lamina and to determine whether irrigation during drilling can reduce the chance of nerve root injury. Materials and Methods. Lumbar nerve roots were exposed to frictional heat by high-speed drilling of the lamina in a live rabbit model, with saline (room temperature (RT) or chilled saline) or without saline (control) irrigation. We measured temperatures surrounding the nerve root and made histological evaluations. Results. In the control group, the mean temperature around the nerve root was 52.0°C (38.0°C to 75.5°C) after 60 seconds of drilling, and nerve root injuries were found in one out of 13 (7.7%) immediately, three out of 14 (21.4%) at three days, and 11 out of 25 (44.0%) at seven days post-operatively. While the RT group showed a significantly lower temperature around the nerve root compared with the control group (mean 46.5°C; 34.5°C to 66.9°C, p < 0.001), RT saline failed to significantly reduce the incidence of nerve root injury (ten out of 26; 38.5%; odds ratio (OR) 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.516 to 1.785; p = 0.563). However, chilled saline irrigation resulted in a significantly lower temperature than the control group (mean 39.0°C; 35.3°C to 52.3°C; p < 0.001) and a lower rate of nerve root injury (two out of 21; 9.5%, OR 0.13; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.703, p = 0.010). Conclusion. Frictional heat caused by a high-speed drill can cause histological nerve root injury. Chilled saline irrigation had a more prominent effect than RT in reducing the incidence of the thermal injury during extended drilling. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:554–60


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 102 - 102
1 Mar 2017
Xie T Zeng J
Full Access

Background. Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) has achieved favorable effects in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH), as a new surgical procedure. With its wide range of applications, a series of complications related to the operation has gradually emerged. Objective. To describe the type, incidence and characteristics of the complications following PEID and to explore preventative and treatment measures. Study Design. Retrospective, observational study. Setting. A spine center affiliated with a large general hospital. Method. In total, 479 cases of patients with LDH received PEID, which was performed by an experienced spine surgeon between January 2010 and April 2013. Data concerning the complications were recorded. Result. All of the 479 cases successfully received the procedure. A total of 482 procedures were completed. The mean follow-up time was 44.3 months, ranging from 24 to 60 months. The average patient age was 47.8 years, ranging from 16 to 76 years. There were 29 (6.0%) related complications that emerged, including 3 cases (0.6%) of fragment omission, and the symptoms gradually eased following 3–6 weeks of conservative treatment; 2 cases (0.4%) of nerve root injury, and the patients recovered well following 1–3 months of taking neurotrophic drugs and functional exercise; 15 cases (3.1%) of paresthesia, and this condition gradually improved following 3–6 weeks of rehabilitation exercises and treatment with mecobalamin and pregabalin; and recurrence occurred in 9 cases (1.9%), and the condition was controlled in 4 of these cases by using a conservative method, while 5 of the cases underwent reoperation, including 3 traditional open surgeries and 2 PEID. Furthermore, the complication rate for the first 100 cases was 16%. This rate decreased to 3.4% (for cases 101–479), and the incidence of L4–5 (8.2%) was significantly higher than L5-S1 (4.5%). Limitations. This is a retrospective study, and some bias exists due to the single-center study design. Conclusion. PEID is a surgical approach, which has a low complication rate. Fragment omission, nerve root injury, paresthesia and recurrence are relatively common. Some effective measures can prevent and reduce the incidence of the complications, such as strict indications for surgery, a thorough action plan and skilled operation skills


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXVIII | Pages 45 - 45
1 Jun 2012
Russell D Behbahani M Alakandy L
Full Access

Pedicle screw fixation is an effective and reliable method for achieving stabilization in lumbar degenerative disease. The procedure carries a risk of violating the spinal and neural canal which can lead to nerve injury. This audit examines the accuracy of screw placement using intra-operative image guidance. Retrospective audit of patients undergoing lumbar pedicle screw fixation using image guidance systems over an 18-month period. Case records were reviewed to identify complications related to screw placement and post-operative CT scans reviewed to study the accuracy of screw position. Of the 98 pedicle screws placed in 25 patients, pedicle violation occurred in 4 screw placements (4.1%). Medial or inferior breach of the pedicle cortex was seen in 2 screws (2%). Nerve root injury as a consequence of this violation was seen in one patient resulting in irreversible partial nerve root dysfunction. Mean set up time for the guidance system was 42 minutes. The mean operative time was 192 minutes. Violation of either the medial or inferior pedicle cortex during placement of fixation screws is a rare, but potentially serious complication bearing lasting consequences. Image-guided placement can be helpful and possibly improve accuracy; particularly in patients with distorted spinal anatomy


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_31 | Pages 66 - 66
1 Aug 2013
Bell S Brown M Hems T
Full Access

Current knowledge regarding upper limb myotomes is based on historic papers. Recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical exploration with intraoperative nerve stimulation now allow accurate identification of nerve root injuries in the brachial plexus. The aim of this study is to identify the myotome values of the upper limb associated with defined supraclvicular brachial plexus injuries. 57 patients with partial supraclavicular brachial plexus injuries were identified from the Scottish brachial plexus database. The average age was 28 years and most injuries secondary to motor cycle accidents or stabbings. The operative and MRI findings for each patient were checked to establish the root injuries and the muscle powers of the upper limb documented. The main patterns of injuries identified involved (C5,6), (C5,6,7), (C5,6,7,8) and (C8, T1). C5, 6 injuries were associated with loss of shoulder abduction, external rotation and elbow flexion. In 30% of the 16 cases showed some biceps action from the C7 root. C5,6,7 injuries showed a similar pattern of weakness with the additional loss of flexor carpi radialis and weakness but not total paralysis of triceps in 85% of cases. C5,6,7,8 injuries were characterised by loss of pectoralis major, lattisimus dorsi, triceps, wrist extension, finger extension and as well as weakness of the ulnar intrinsic muscles. We identified weakness of the flexor digitorum profundus to the ulnar sided digits in 83% of cases. T1 has a major input to innervation of flexors of the radial digits and thumb, as well as intrinsics. This is the largest study of myotome values in patients with surgically or radiologically confirmed injuries in the literature and presents information for general orthopaedic surgeons dealing with trauma patients for the differentiation of different patterns of brachial plexus injuries. In addition we have identified new anatomical relationships not previously described in upper limb myotomes


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXVI | Pages 33 - 33
1 Jun 2012
Saxena A Alakandy L
Full Access

Purpose. Posterior lumbar fusion using minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques are reported to minimise postoperative pain, soft tissue damage and length of hospital stay when compared to the traditional open procedure. Methods. This is a review of patients who underwent MIS for posterolateral lumbar fusion in a single practice over a 2-year period. Results. Twenty-eight patients underwent this procedure. The median age was 57 (range 34-80). Male:female ratio was 1:1. The most common symptom was radicular pain (n=26). Two patients had back pain without radicular symptoms. Primary degenerative spondylolisthesis was seen in 22 patients and post-laminectomy spondylolisthesis in 3 patients. Transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) with pedicle screw fixation was the commonest procedure (20) while the rest had pedicle screw fixation and inter-transverse fusion. Along with fusion, nerve root decompression alone was performed in 19, while 5 had decompression of the central spinal canal. Intra-operative navigation was used to assist screw placement in 5 patients. The typical hospital stay was 3 days. All but two patients were mobilised the same or the following day. Twenty-one patients with radiculopathy (80%) reported improvement in VAS at 6-months. One patient suffered irreversible nerve root injury (L5). Significant pedicle breach without nerve injury by a screw was seen in one patient. Conclusion. Minimally invasive TLIF and pedicle screw fixation lumbar degenerative condition is a safe procedure with complications comparable to traditional open techniques. Minimal muscle dissection and soft tissue damage allows for earlier ambulation and reduced hospital stay. The procedure however required longer operative time and increased exposure to intra-operative x-rays


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 370 - 371
1 Mar 2004
Hadjipavlou A Gaitanis I Crow W Lander P Katonis P Kontakis G
Full Access

Purpose: To describe the percutaneous transpedicular biopsy technique as a novel way of approaching lesion of the thoracic and lumbar spine, to determine the amount of bone retrievable through the pedicle and its diagnostic yield. Material and Methods: Seventy-nine patients underwent 84 biopsies. Seventy-seven procedures were performed with ßuoroscopic guidance arid seven with CT guidance. Seventy-one biopsies underwent under local anesthesia and ten under general anesthesia. Age range of patient was from 3 to 81 years. Results: Adequate specimens for correct diagnosis were obtained in 80 of the 84 patients with the following diagnoses. Pyogenic spondylodiscitis 31, tuberculosis 4, coccidiomycosis 2, echinococcus cyst 1, blastomycosis 1, brucella 4, primary neoplasm 7, metastatic neoplasms 16, osteoporotic fractures 8, osseous repair for insufþciency fractures 5, Pagetñs disease 1. The 4 negative biopsies subsequently proven to be Ç false negative È and were related to faulty biopsy techniques. Conclusion: Pitfalls can be avoided when adhering to the details of our technique. These pitfalls can occur while retrieving the instrumentation without simultaneous withdrawal of the guiding pin; crushing pathological soft tissue against sclerotic or normal bone; or when encountering a sclerotic lesion distal to normal bone without using a sequential type of biopsy specimen-retrieval technique. Any type of bleeding is controllable. The approach is a safe, efþcacious and cost effective and avoids so the problems such low diagnostic yield nerve root injury, pneumothorax and hematoma encountered with conventional needle technique


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 91 - 91
1 Jan 2004
Sherwood MJ Robertson PA Hadlow AT
Full Access

Purpose: Lumbosacral dislocation injuries are rare. Severe trauma disrupts the mechanically stable lumbosacral junction, rendering the injuries particularly unstable. Aggressive surgical management has been recommended. We present a review of our experience with these uncommon injuries defining injury patterns, surgical strategies and outcomes. Methodology: Six patients were treated at Auckland Hospital in the last decade. Thorough review and literature search were performed to revise recommendations for management. Results: All injuries were associated with high-energy trauma. In two cases there was evidence of previous spondylolysis, with dramatic progression after injury. All cases were surgically treated with decompression, reduction as indicated, and fusion with instrumentation. The only instrumentation failure occurred when reduction reconstituted disc height without attention to reconstruction of the severely mechanically compromised intervertebral disc. Satisfactory recovery of nerve root injury occurred in all but one case. Major cauda equina damage did not occur. Correlations with previously described classification systems for this injury were poor, and often showed injuries to span grades. Conclusions: These highly unstable injuries require a high index of suspicion, and aggressive surgical management of these highly unstable injuries is warranted, yielding satisfactory outcomes. Existing classification systems are of little value prognostically, or in planning treatment, and it is better to classify and treat these injuries specifically relating to the anatomical injury patterns. The severe disruption to the intervertebral disc warrants special consideration with attention to a stable reduction position or three-column reconstruction. Spondylolysis may represent a predisposing factor


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 208 - 209
1 Mar 2003
Sherwood M Robertson P Hadlow A
Full Access

Lumbosacral dislocation injuries are rare. Severe trauma disrupts the mechanically stable lumbosacral junction, rendering the injuries particularly unstable. Aggressive surgical management has been recommended. We present a review of our experience with these uncommon injuries defining injury patterns, surgical strategies and outcomes. Six patients were treated at Auckland Hospital in the last decade. Thorough review and literature search were performed to revise recommendations for management. All injuries were associated with high-energy trauma. In two cases there was evidence of previous spondylolysis, with dramatic progression after injury. All cases were surgically treated with decompression, reduction as indicated, and fusion with instrumentation. The only instrumentation failure occurred when reduction reconstituted disc height without attention to reconstruction of the severely mechanically compromised intervertebral disc. Satisfactory recovery of nerve root injury occurred in all but one case. Major cauda equina damage did not occur. Correlations with previously described classification systems for this injury were poor, and often showed injuries to span grades. These highly unstable injuries require a high index of suspicion, and aggressive surgical management of these highly unstable injuries is warranted, yielding satisfactory outcomes. Existing classification systems are of little value prognostically, or in planning treatment, and it is better to classify and treat these injuries specifically relating to the anatomical injury patterns. The severe disruption to the intervertebral disc warrants special consideration with attention to a stable reduction position or three-column reconstruction. Spondylolysis may represent a predisposing factor


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 287 - 287
1 Mar 2003
Sherwood M Robertson P Hadlow A
Full Access

PURPOSE: Lumbosacral dislocation injuries are rare. Severe trauma disrupts the mechanically stable lumbosacral junction, rendering the injuries particularly unstable. Aggressive surgical management has been recommended. We present a review of our experience with these uncommon injuries defining injury patterns, surgical strategies and outcomes. METHODOLOGY: Six patients were treated at Auckland Hospital in the last decade. Thorough review and literature search were performed to revise recommendations for management. RESULTS: All injuries were associated with high-energy trauma. In two cases there was evidence of previous spondylolysis, with dramatic progression after injury. All cases were surgically treated with decompression, reduction as indicated, and fusion with instrumentation. The only instrumentation failure occurred when reduction reconstituted disc height without attention to reconstruction of the severely mechanically compromised intervertebral disc. Satisfactory recovery of nerve root injury occurred in all but one case. Major cauda equina damage did not occur. Correlations with previously described classification systems for this injury were poor, and often showed injuries to span grades. CONCLUSIONS: These highly unstable injuries require a high index of suspicion, and aggressive surgical management of these highly unstable injuries is warranted, yielding satisfactory outcomes. Existing classification systems are of little value prognostically, or in planning treatment, and it is better to classify and treat these injuries specifically relating to the anatomical injury patterns. The severe disruption to the intervertebral disc warrants special consideration with attention to a stable reduction position or three-column reconstruction. Spondylolysis may represent a predisposing factor


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 170 - 170
1 Feb 2003
Russell R Corbett S March G
Full Access

A prospective series of patients undergoing intradiscal electrothermal therapy for treatment of lower back pain refractory to physiotherapy. 33 patients with a mean follow up of 16 months were assessed pre- and postoperatively at Mayday University Hospital between 1999–2001 using visual analogue scores and SF-36. These patients failed to show an improvement with physiotherapy and had no evidence of a significant disc prolapse according to MRI with their back pain being reproduced at one or more disc levels on provocative discography. All procedures were performed as day cases with a temperature of 90 degrees being reached in all patients. Baseline and follow-up outcome measures indicated the SF-36 mean improvement of pcs to be 7.05 (P< 0.001) and the mean improvement of mcs 10.05 (P< 0.001) following IDET with a mean change of 1.5 in the visual analogue score. Overall 25 patients reported a noticeable improvement in their back pain symptoms with 3 patients recording worsening symptoms and the other 5 patients remaining unchanged. Surgical complications included 1 breakage of the catheter within the patient and a disc prolapse at the level of surgery that required subsequent discectomy. 30% of patients were noted to have a temporary foot drop postoperatively which was due to inadvertently performing a lumbar plexus block on infusion of local anaesthetic before catheter insertion. There was no reported discitis, deep infection or nerve root injury. Patients with proven discogenic lower back pain that have not responded to physiotherapy have generally improved following IDET in this series. However, this improvement is not as dramatic as first indicated in preliminary studies and includes a small number of patients which noted a deterioration in their symptoms, one of which requiring a discectomy as a direct result of the procedure


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 529 - 530
1 Aug 2008
Lakkireddi MP Trehan MR Heilpern MG Jones MHW Marsh MG
Full Access

Purpose of Study: To prospectively study the clinical and radiological outcomes following lumbar interbody fusion with an intersegmental device(SpineLink™, Biomet) in smokers versus non smokers. Materials and Methods: 64 patients who underwent spine fusion with intrasegmental fixation were prospectively studied at Mayday University Hospital. 54 patients with suffient follow up were included. Patients were assessed pre and postoperatively clinically using validated scoring systems (VAS pain score, SF-36 v1, Oswestry Disability Index). Radiologically classified into fused, indeterminate or pseudoarthrosis. Results: There were 54 patients in the analysis (34 patients in the smoker group and 20 patients in the non smoking group) with an average age of 52 years and an average follow-up of 28 months. 32 patients had multilevel procedures (25 two level, 5 three level, 2 four level). The treatment groups were comparable with respect to demographic, diagnostic (53% spondylolisthesis, 35% degenerative disc disease, 12% other) and surgical variables. No other significant medical problems affected patients in either group. Radiographically there were no pseudarthroses observed in either group. The SF-36 physical health score increased from 22.4 to 40.1 (+18.0) following surgery in smokers compared to an increase from 25.0 to 36.0 (+11.0) in non-smokers. The SF-36 mental health score increased from 36.4 to 45.0 (+8.6) in smokers compared to an increase of 30.8 to 42.7 (+2.9) in non-smokers. Complications included 2 nerve root injuries requiring hardware removal, and 3 deep infections which resolved with appropriate treatment. Conclusions: There were no differences between smokers and non-smokers in radiographic fusion success or postoperative complications. As expected, smokers had lower SF-36 physical health and mental health scores pre-op, but unexpectedly, smokers had a greater degree of improvement in these scores postoperatively than non-smokers. Thus, from our experience, there is an incremental benefit to the use of intrasegmental fixation in smokers and warrants further investigation


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 494 - 494
1 Sep 2009
O’Dowd J Courtier N
Full Access

Introduction: This is a report on results from the first three years of the British Spinal Registry. Background: The British Scoliosis Society supported a web based scoliosis registry in 2003. At the Britspine meeting in 2004 all four British spine societies (BSS, BASS, BCSS, SBPR) agreed to expand this to include all spinal surgical procedures in the United Kingdom. An extensive marketing and promotional campaign was targeted at all members of the four societies, and online and telephone support was provided. Aims: To report on the clinical results from the first three years registry activity. Methods: The British Spinal Registry is a web based out-come tool, collecting basic demographic and outcome data on spinal surgical procedures in the UK. Over three years from November 2004, 1410 patient data sets were entered. The activity analysis is party carried out using the online diagnostics that are part of the web based software tool, and partly with downloaded data. Results: 73 surgeons from 55 centres entered patient data on 1410 surgical episodes between November 2004 and December 2007. The number of patients entered per year has declined marginally, with 540 patients in the first year, 454 in the second and 416 in the third. The majority of cases entered have a low back diagnosis (842) of whom 106 were part of a BASS audit on discectomy. Of the low back cases 40% had disc herniation and 7.4% had previous surgery. The complications included dural tear (3.7%), nerve root injury (0.4%) and infection (1.1%). The BASS study showed that 70% of UK surgeons were not using intraoperative radiographic localisation of surgical level. There were 448 deformity cases, and of these 223 were idiopathic scoliosis, 49 neuromuscular and 20 congenital. 57% had posterior surgery, 20% anterior and 23% combined. There were no intraoperative deaths, no complete spinal cord injuries, 4 partial spinal cord injuries (0.9%), 6 deep infections (1.3%) and 14 implant revisions (3.1%). Conclusion: The initial clinical results from the British Spinal Registry support the hypothesis that such registries can produce useful audit data. There is no other record nationally of number and type of procedures in spinal surgery in the UK. The complication rates are similar to those reported elsewhere and provide an opportunity for benchmarking and for comparative personal and centre audit. The uptake and usage rates however are low and would not allow scientifically valid clinical results to be reported


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 243 - 243
1 Sep 2005
Adams C Freeman B Clark AJ Pickering S
Full Access

Study Design: A consecutive retrospective cohort including all patients treated by a single consultant spinal surgeon (BJCF) with targeted foraminal epidural steroid injection (FESI) for radicular pain. Objective: To assess the efficacy of targeted foraminal epidural steroid injection (FESI) for radicular pain in preventing surgical intervention. Summary of Background Data: 90% of sciatica resolves within 90 days. Beyond this period, decompresssive surgery for pain relief maybe considered. Open surgery however carries attendant risk including nerve root injury, dural laceration, cauda equina syndrome, deep infection, recurrent disc prolapse, epidural fibrosis and post-discectomy lumbar instability. Peri-radicular infiltration of local anaesthetic and steroid has been shown to reduce pain, at least in the short term. We were interested in whether FESI could obviate the need for surgery in refractory cases of nerve root pain. Methods: 83 consecutive patients (45 female, 38 male) with a mean age of 51 years (range 24 to 87) presenting between November 2000 and February 2003 with radicular pain were treated with targeted FESI. 55 patients had a principal diagnosis of disc prolapse, 20 had lateral canal stenosis and 8 had degenerative spondylolisthesis. Fourteen had previous surgery and 38 had previous caudal or lumbar epidural injections. Outcome Measures: Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Score and disability by the Oswestry Disability Index. The product-limit method of Kaplan Meier was used to assess the time to further procedure or the date of last review. Results: 21 of 83 patients (25.3%) underwent an open procedure (discectomy/decompression) within the designated time period (median 20 months). Median time to open procedure was 6.5 months (mean 8.2 months). Repeat FESI was required in 16 patients (19.2%). The remaining 46 (55.4%) patients avoided any further procedure at a median of 20 months (range 13 to 36). No complications resulted from these procedures. Conclusions: Targeted foraminal epidural steroid injection can resolve radicular pain caused by varying pathologies. Surgical procedures (decompression/discectomy) can be avoided in 74.7% of cases up to a median of 20 months thereby avoiding unnecessary surgical risk


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 39 - 39
1 Mar 2005
Heilpern G Jones HW Marsh G
Full Access

Purpose of Study: It has been widely reported that smokers undergoing lumbar spinal surgery are more likely to develop postoperative complications such as pseudarthrosis, superficial and deep wound infection, as well as diminished clinical improvement. New spine instrumentation was developed (SpineLinkTM, Biomet) which enables surgeons to fuse multiple levels by linking single level fusions in series. This is accomplished through titanium links and polyaxialscrews which preserve lordosis without the bending of rods or plates. During an ongoing 5 year prospective investigation on fusion with intrasegmental fixation the authors analysed and compared outcomes in smokers versus non-smokers to determine the impact of this new system on outcomes in smokers. Materials and Methods: 64 patients who underwent spine fusion with intrasegmental fixation were prospectively studied at Mayday University Hospital beginning in 1997, 54 have sufficient follow-up to be included in the analysis. Patients were assessed pre and postoperatively, both radiographically and clinically, using validated outcome instruments including the SF-36. Results: There were 54 patients in the analysis (34 patients in the smoker group and 20 patients in the non-smoking group) with an average age of 52 years and an average follow-up of 28 months. 32 patients had multilevel procedures (25 two level, 5 three level, 2 four level). The treatment groups were comparable with respect to demographic, diagnostic (53% spondylolisthesis, 35% degenerative disc disease, 12% other) and surgical variables. No other significant medical problems affected patients in either group. Radiographically there were no pseudarthroses observed in either group. The SF-36 physical health score increased from 22.4 to 40.1 (+18.0) following surgery in smokers compared to an increase from 25.0 to 36.0 (+11.0) in non-smokers. The SF-36 mental health score increased from 36.4 to 45.0 (+8.6) in smokers compared to an increase of 30.8 to 42.7 (+2.9) in non-smokers. Complications included 2 nerve root injuries requiring hardware removal, and 3 deep infections which resolved with appropriate treatment. Conclusions: There were no differences between smokers and non-smokers in radiographic fusion success or postoperative complications. As expected, smokers had lower SF-36 physical health and mental health scores pre-op, but unexpectedly, smokers had a greater degree of improvement in these scores postoperatively than non-smokers. Thus, from our experience, there is an incremental benefit to the use of intrasegmental fixation in smokers and warrants further investigation


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 199 - 199
1 Mar 2003
Lykomitros V Wllliamson J Spilsbury J Ross R
Full Access

Introduction: Treatment of thoracolumbar fractures remains controversial. The treatment options are conservative management or operative treatment, either through a posterior or anterior approach. Surgery through an anterior approach provides excellent decompression through vertebrectomy and the ability to correct the deformity. Stabilisation with Moss cage and Kaneda device remains unproven. Methods and Results: This is a retrospective study of 55 consecutive patients with thoracolumbar fractures operated on between 1993–99. Indications for surgery were: neurological deficit, two or three column injury causing instability or significant kyphotic deformity . There were 34 male and 21 female patients, mean age 33 years old. Trauma was caused by a fall from a height, either due to accident (30 patients) or suicide attempt (5), RTAs (14), sporting injury (6). Other injuries included multiple level spinal fractures (9 patients), pelvic (5), calcaneal (3), talar (1) and malleolar (1) fractures. Surgery was performed on the next available list unless there was an indication for emergency intervention, (mean 5 days post injury, range 1–19). Post-operative hospital stay averaged 17 days (7–59). Forty-seven patients underwent an anterior procedure alone, whilst eight patients had combined anterior and posterior instrumentation and fusion. Mean operative time was 207 minutes (150–360) and blood loss 2670 ml (985– 7000). Nineteen patients (35% of all) had neurological deficit. Neurological status improved post-op in 85% of these patients, remained the same in nine per cent and there was a nerve root injury in one patient (revision case) which has almost recovered. Other complications included five chest infections, three UTIs, one incisional hernia, four implant problems and eight patients with thigh pain. Results were analysed according to return to work and the Oswestry Disability Score with a mean follow-up of three years. Thirty-eight patients (69%) returned to the same occupation held before the injury, 11 patients (20% ) had a lighter job and six patients ( 11% ) are not working with litigation going on. Oswestry Disability Score post-op was 24% (4%–72%). Conclusion: Compared to the natural history of conservatively treated thoracolumbar fractures, surgical treatment with anterior decompression and stabilisation with Moss cage and Kaneda device offers considerable advantages. It enables a thorough decompression and has the advantage of providing greater deformity correction than the traditional posterior approach while instrumenting fewer vertebrae, thus preserving spinal motion segments. Early mobilization of the patients is a major advantage


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 460 - 460
1 Oct 2006
Vaccaro A
Full Access

The most appropriate classification of traumatic thoracolumbar (TL) spine injuries remains controversial and current systems can be cumbersome and difficult to apply. No classification aids decision making in clinical management. Clinical spine trauma specialists from institutions around the world were canvassed with respect to information deemed pivotal in the communication of TL spine trauma and the clinical decision making process. Traditional injury patterns were reviewed and reconsidered in light of these essential characteristics. The reliability and validity of an earlier version of this system has been demonstrated. The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) was devised based upon the three most important injury characteristics: 1) morphology of injury determined by radiographic appearance, 2) integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and 3) neurological status of the patient. These characteristics are largely independent of each other. A composite injury severity score can be calculated from these characteristics stratifying patients into surgical and non-surgical treatment groups. The three principal injury patterns are compression (including burst – 1 point each), translation/rotation (3 points) and distraction (4 points). Neurological status can be classified as a nerve root injury (1 point), a complete (ASIA A-2 points) or incomplete injury (3 points) to the spinal cord or conus, or injury of the cauda equina (3 points). Disruption of the posterior ligamentous complex and facet joint capsules results in instability. Disrupted posterior ligaments can be seen as subluxation or dislocation of a facet, interspinous widening, or MRI evidence of ligament discontinuity. Failure of the posterior ligamentous complex can be classified as indeterminate (2 points) or definitely disrupted (3points). Coexisting clinical factors (qualifiers) may alter decision making by virtue of their effect on stability, general management or effect on healing. Metabolic disorders such as ankylosing spondylitis, DISH, osteoporosis and age may influence treatment. Injury characteristics such as excessive kyphosis, severe vertebral body collapse and sternal fracture may influence outcome and modify treatment. Treatment options might be influenced in patients with head injuries or polytrauma. The impact of these clinical qualifiers on patient care must be evaluated. Once all the major variables have been assigned points, a total TLICS Score can be determined. Patients with 3 or less points are non-operative candidates while patients scoring 5 or more points should be considered for surgery. Clinical qualifiers may modify treatment. The morphology of the injury, neurological status, and integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex can help guide the management of TL injuries. Incomplete neurological injuries warrant anterior decompression if posterior realignment is ineffective in relieving neurological compromise. Distraction and translational injuries, and disruptions of the posterior ligamentous complex are managed optimally with an initial posterior approach for realignment and stabilization. Although there will always be limitations to any cataloging system, the TLICSS reflects accepted features cited in the literature important in predicting spinal stability, future deformity, and progressive neurological compromise. This classification system is intended to be easy to apply and to facilitate clinical decision making


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 431 - 432
1 Sep 2009
Tan L Ng W Slattery M
Full Access

Introduction: Spinal fusions have been shown to be useful in correcting spinal deformities resulting from degenerative disc disease. We sought to produce a prospective analysis of functional outcomes following lumbar spinal fusion surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis or degenerative scoliosis secondary to degenerative disc disease. We present the interim results from our case cohort of 74 patients. Methods: Over a period of 3 years (2005–2007), all patients who presented to this private practice with symptoms of canal stenosis or radicular pain secondary to degenerative spondylolisthesis or degenerative scoliosis were offered decompressive laminectomy and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery with interbody cages, pedicle screw instrumentation, bone morphogenic protein (BMP) and bicalcium phosphate (BCP). Patients who presented only with low back pain and did not have radicular pain or neurogenic claudication were excluded from this study. All patients who were offered spinal fusion surgery were consecutively offered the opportunity to enrol in this functional cohort analysis. Those patients who consented were prospectively entered into this functional analysis and were asked to complete Oswestry and SF-36 function questionnaires preoperatively and post-operatively. Post-operative data has been collected in some cases up to 16 months postoperatively. Patients were also assessed post-operatively by the surgeon and given an Odom clinical assessment score. Complications were also collated. Results: 102 patients were offered surgery with 18 patients not consenting to participate in this study. Of the 84 patients who consented to participate in this study, 10 patients failed to submit both pre-operative and postoperative questionnaires, leaving 74 patients who were followed for a median 7 months (range of 1.5–16 months). There were 30 males and 44 females in the study with a median age of 73 (range 46–89). Of these 74 patients, 63 had degenerative spondylolisthesis and 11 had degenerative scoliosis. 52 patients had sufficient follow-up to assess bony fusion, of which 1 patient failed to fuse. 32 of the patients who fused reported to have improved, but 16 did not and the remainder did not submit both pre-operative and post-operative questionnaires. For the SF-36 questionnaire, the median pre-operative SF-36 score was 30 (96.6% CI 26–35) and the median post-operative SF-36 score was 48 (95.3% CI 42–56). The mean difference between the preoperative and post-operative SF-36 scores was 14 (95% CI 11–18) (p< 0.0001. The median preoperative Oswestry score was 46 (96.6% CI 42–50) and the median post-operative Oswestry score was 30 (96.6% CI 24–40) and the median post-operative Oswestry score was 30 (96.6% CI 24–40). The mean difference between the preoperative and post-operative Oswestry scores was 14 (95% CI 10–19) (p= 0.0001). 45 patients (61%) reported improvements of greater than 20 between their pre-operative and post-operative scores in either their SF-36 or Oswestry questionnaires. Of these 45 patients, 40 (89%) were also given moderate or good Odom (clinical) scores. 29 patients (39%) reported that they had not experienced improvement in their symptoms based on either their SF-36 or Oswestry questionnaires, with 12 (41%) of those 29 patients scoring poorly on their Odom scores. In all, there were 18 complications ranging from wound collections (4) and breakdowns (2) to repositioning of screws (6) and nerve root injury (2), to DVT (1) and transfusion (3). Discussion: Interim results suggest that most patients undergoing PLIF and pedicle screw surgery with decompressive laminectomy for treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis and degenerative scoliosis report significant improvements in function which correlate fairly well with clinical assessments performed by the surgeon at pre-operative and post-operative reviews. IInterestingly, patients generally reported either significant improvements (rather than borderline improvements) or that they had not improved at all, and that those who did report significant improvements also generally scored well on their Odom assessments. These reported improvements currently seem to be independent of whether bony fusion is achieved or not, as 16 of the 29 patients who did not report improvement actually achieved fusion. This is not unexpected as the initial PLIF procedure provides initial pre-fusion in situ rigid internal fixation


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 104-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1110 - 1117
12 Oct 2022
Wessling M Gebert C Hakenes T Dudda M Hardes J Frieler S Jeys LM Hanusrichter Y

Aims

The aim of this study was to examine the implant accuracy of custom-made partial pelvis replacements (PPRs) in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Custom-made implants offer an option to achieve a reconstruction in cases with severe acetabular bone loss. By analyzing implant deviation in CT and radiograph imaging and correlating early clinical complications, we aimed to optimize the usage of custom-made implants.

Methods

A consecutive series of 45 (2014 to 2019) PPRs for Paprosky III defects at rTHA were analyzed comparing the preoperative planning CT scans used to manufacture the implants with postoperative CT scans and radiographs. The anteversion (AV), inclination (IC), deviation from the preoperatively planned implant position, and deviation of the centre of rotation (COR) were explored. Early postoperative complications were recorded, and factors for malpositioning were sought. The mean follow-up was 30 months (SD 19; 6 to 74), with four patients lost to follow-up.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 4 | Pages 355 - 360
1 Apr 2019
Todd NV Birch NC

Informed consent is a very important part of surgical treatment. In this paper, we report a number of legal judgements in spinal surgery where there was no criticism of the surgical procedure itself. The fault that was identified was a failure to inform the patient of alternatives to, and material risks of, surgery, or overemphasizing the benefits of surgery. In one case, there was a promise that a specific surgeon was to perform the operation, which did not ensue. All of the faults in these cases were faults purely of the consenting process. In many cases, the surgeon claimed to have explained certain risks to the patient but was unable to provide proof of doing so. We propose a checklist that, if followed, would ensure that the surgeon would take their patients through the relevant matters but also, crucially, would act as strong evidence in any future court proceedings that the appropriate discussions had taken place. Although this article focuses on spinal surgery, the principles and messages are applicable to the whole of orthopaedic surgery.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:355–360.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 4 | Pages 519 - 523
1 Apr 2020
Kwan KYH Koh HY Blanke KM Cheung KMC

Aims

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and analyze the trends of surgeon-reported complications following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) over a 13-year period from the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Morbidity and Mortality database.

Methods

All patients with AIS between ten and 18 years of age, entered into the SRS Morbidity and Mortality database between 2004 and 2016, were analyzed. All perioperative complications were evaluated for correlations with associated factors. Complication trends were analyzed by comparing the cohorts between 2004 to 2007 and 2013 to 2016.