Introduction. Ulnar nerve entrapment is the second most common nerve entrapment syndrome of the upper extremity. Despite this, only a few studies have assessed the outcome of ulnar nerve decompression. The objectives of the study were to review the pre-operative symptoms, nerve conduction studies, the co-morbidities, operative procedures undertaken and the post-operative outcomes; and investigate and ascertain prognostic factors particularly in cases of persistence of symptoms after the surgery. Methods. We reviewed the case notes of ulnar nerve decompressions surgery performed over a period of six year period. A structured proforma was created to document the demographics, patient complaints, method of decompression, per-operative findings and symptom status at the last follow up. Outcome grading was recorded as completely relieved, improved, unchanged or worse. Analysis of data was carried out using the SPSS software (Version 16.0; Illinois). The significance level was set at 5%. Results. 136 ulnar nerve decompressions formed the study group. Minimum follow-up was three months. Numbness and paresthesia in ulnar distribution were the two most common presenting symptoms (96%). The cause of compression was identified as idiopathic in 58.2%; flexor carpi ulnaris aponeurosis in 36.7% and Arcade of Stuthers in 5.1% extremities. The outcome was satisfactory in 85.2% of patients. No obvious association was demonstrated between the outcome of surgery and duration of symptoms, presence of co-morbidities or the type of surgery performed. Interestingly out of 12 patients who got worse or had no improvement, nine (75%) had either normal nerve conduction studies or none done pre-operatively. Conclusion. This is the largest review of outcomes after ulnar nerve decompressions at elbow. The study showed that good results (85.2%) of ulnar nerve decompression at elbow in majority of patients regardless of level of surgeon's experience or procedure undertaken

Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most frequent form of median nerve entrapment, accounting for 90% of all entrapment neuropathies. Routinely nerve conduction study (NCS) tests are ordered to confirm the diagnosis however; there are issues of long waiting periods and costs with it. We aimed to compare carpal tunnel questionnaire score (CTQS) by Kamath and Stothard (2003) to nerve conduction study result in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. This prospective study involved analysis of data from all the patients referred to NHS Tayside (Dundee) hand clinic with signs and symptoms of Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) from September 2016 to February 2017. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS and sensitivity and specificity was calculated. The questionnaires were filled in by a team of specialist physiotherapists. Nerve conduction study tests were done by a team of consultant neurophysiologists. Both the groups were blinded to each other's assessment. We analysed 88 patients who filled in CTQS and also underwent NCS. We noted that CTQS of less than 3 correlated 100% to negative nerve conduction result. When the carpal tunnel questionnaire score was more than or equal to 5, 54 patients had positive NCS result and 6 patients had negative NCS result, giving a 90% predictability of a positive NCS result. Mean waiting period of carpal tunnel patients for NCS was 141 days. We noted from this prospective study that CTQS was sensitive enough to exclude carpal tunnel syndrome when the questionnaire score was less than 3. In addition, the questionnaire revealed a 90% probability of having carpal tunnel syndrome when CTQS was more than or equal to 5. Based on the present study, we would recommend that patients in grey zone of 3 to 4 on questionnaire should undergo NCS, resulting in only 20% of patients (based on the figures from the current study) being referred for NCS. The questionnaire can be used in primary health care or specialist physiotherapy screening clinic as a tool for diagnosing CTS with implications of cost saving and avoiding long waiting periods

Injury to the sciatic nerve is one of the more serious complications of acetabular fracture and traumatic dislocation of the hip, both in the short and long term. We have reviewed prospectively patients, treated in our unit, for acetabular fractures who had concomitant injury to the sciatic nerve, with the aim of predicting the functional outcome after these injuries.

Of 136 patients who underwent stabilisation of acetabular fractures, there were 27 (19.9%) with neurological injury. At initial presentation, 13 patients had a complete foot-drop, ten had weakness of the foot and four had burning pain and altered sensation over the dorsum of the foot. Serial electromyography (EMG) studies were performed and the degree of functional recovery was monitored using the grading system of the Medical Research Council. In nine patients with a foot-drop, there was evidence of a proximal acetabular (sciatic) and a distal knee (neck of fibula) nerve lesion, the double-crush syndrome.

At the final follow-up, clinical examination and EMG studies showed full recovery in five of the ten patients with initial muscle weakness, and complete resolution in all four patients with sensory symptoms (burning pain and hyperaesthesia). There was improvement of functional capacity (motor and sensory) in two patients who presented initially with complete foot-drop. In the remaining 11 with foot-drop at presentation, including all nine with the double-crush lesion, there was no improvement in function at a mean follow-up of 4.3 years.