Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 574 - 574
1 Sep 2012
Selvaratnam V Shetty V Manickavasagar T Sahni V
Full Access

Introduction. Nerve conduction studies are considered to be the investigation of choice for the diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. However they are expensive and can be painful. We scored patients based on a ten point scoring system; four symptoms (Katz Hand Diagram – Classic and Probable pattern for tingling and numbness, nocturnal paresthesia, bilateral symptoms), four signs (weak thumb abduction test, Tinel sign, Phalen sign, Hypoalgesia in median nerve territory) and two risk factors (age more than 40 years and female sex). This was done in an effort to predict the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome and to correlate it with nerve conduction studies. Method. A prospective study of 59 patients was performed between May 2009 and March 2010. For every patient in the study we completed a scoring system based on ten points and correlated it with the severity (normal, mild, moderate and severe) result from the nerve conduction studies. Results. There were 61 completed data sets (59 patients, two patients had bilateral carpal tunnel release). The mean age of patients was 60 years (range: 37–91 years). The mean duration of symptoms was 17 months. The female to male ratio was 2.3:1. All scores greater than seven matched with nerve conduction study of moderate to severe intensity apart from three scores which were greater than seven that matched with a normal result. Conclusion. Based on this study, we believe that patients who score less than eight may require nerve conduction studies to confirm the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. However patients who score more than seven have a 93% chance of having moderate to severe carpal tunnel syndrome on nerve conduction studies


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 535 - 535
1 Sep 2012
Karuppaiah K Nanda R Stothard J Balasubramaniam S
Full Access

Introduction. The role of in-situ decompression in patients with severe ulnar nerve compression is still controversial. The authors present a prospective study on the results of in-situ decompression in this selected group of patients treated through a mini open incision (4cms) and complete decompression by appropriate patient positioning. Material/Methods. Thirty patients (20 Male/10 Female) with severe degree of nerve compression, confirmed clinically by Dellon's classification and by abnormal Nerve Conduction Study, underwent simple in-situ decompression under general anaesthesia as a day-case procedure. Through a 4cms incision and by moving the elbow the nerve is fully visualised and decompressed. Outcome was measured prospectively at three months and one year using Modified Bishop's score, grip strengths and two point discrimination (2PD). Results/Statistics. The average age of patients were 58.3 (26–87) and dominant hand was involved in 13 patients. Patients showed improvement greater at 1year than at 3 months. There was statistically significant improvement in power (p-0.01) and pinch grip strength (p-0.001) at one year after surgery. According to Modified Bishop's scoring, 24 patients (80%) had good to excellent results at one year follow-up. Of the eight patients with fair results at three months four improved and two detiorated, leading to a total of four poor results (13.3%) at one year follow-up. The 2PD identified the patients with poor or good results according to the Modified Bishop score at three months follow-up. Conclusions. Our results show that the minimally invasive in-situ decompression is technically simple, safe and gives good results in patients with severe nerve compression. The Modified Bishop score and 2PD were more reliable in assessing these patients at follow-up


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 91-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1487 - 1492
1 Nov 2009
Blakey CM Biant LC Birch R

A series of 26 children was referred to our specialist unit with a ‘pink pulseless hand’ following a supracondylar fracture of the distal humerus after a mean period of three months (4 days to 12 months) except for one referred after almost three years. They were followed up for a mean of 15.5 years (4 to 26). The neurovascular injuries and resulting impairment in function and salvage procedures were recorded. The mean age at presentation was 8.6 years (2 to 12). There were eight girls and 18 boys.

Only four of the 26 patients had undergone immediate surgical exploration before referral and three of these four had a satisfactory outcome. In one child the brachial artery had been explored unsuccessfully at 48 hours. As a result 23 of the 26 children presented with established ischaemic contracture of the forearm and hand. Two responded to conservative stretching. In the remaining 21 the antecubital fossa was explored. The aim of surgery was to try to improve the function of the hand and forearm, to assess nerve, vessel and muscle damage, to relieve entrapment and to minimise future disturbance of growth.

Based on our results we recommend urgent exploration of the vessels and nerves in a child with a ‘pink pulseless hand’, not relieved by reduction of a supracondylar fracture of the distal humerus and presenting with persistent and increasing pain suggestive of a deepening nerve lesion and critical ischaemia.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 94-B, Issue 4 | Pages 523 - 528
1 Apr 2012
Birch R Misra P Stewart MPM Eardley WGP Ramasamy A Brown K Shenoy R Anand P Clasper J Dunn R Etherington J

We describe 261 peripheral nerve injuries sustained in war by 100 consecutive service men and women injured in Iraq and Afghanistan. Their mean age was 26.5 years (18.1 to 42.6), the median interval between injury and first review was 4.2 months (mean 8.4 months (0.36 to 48.49)) and median follow-up was 28.4 months (mean 20.5 months (1.3 to 64.2)). The nerve lesions were predominantly focal prolonged conduction block/neurapraxia in 116 (45%), axonotmesis in 92 (35%) and neurotmesis in 53 (20%) and were evenly distributed between the upper and the lower limbs. Explosions accounted for 164 (63%): 213 (82%) nerve injuries were associated with open wounds. Two or more main nerves were injured in 70 patients. The ulnar, common peroneal and tibial nerves were most commonly injured. In 69 patients there was a vascular injury, fracture, or both at the level of the nerve lesion. Major tissue loss was present in 50 patients: amputation of at least one limb was needed in 18. A total of 36 patients continued in severe neuropathic pain.

This paper outlines the methods used in the assessment of these injuries and provides information about the depth and distribution of the nerve lesions, their associated injuries and neuropathic pain syndromes.