A previously fit and well 58 year old male suffered from a bilateral psoas haematoma (PH) following 52 days of veno-venous extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (VV-ECMO) for severe Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), refractory to all non-invasive and medical therapies. He developed multiple complications, including inability to walk or weight-bear, due to lumbar plexopathy triggered by bilateral PH compression, compounded by COVID-19-related mononeuritis multiplex. The patient was referred to our institution with a known diagnosis of bilateral PH and after spinal multidisciplinary team (MDT) input, was deemed not for surgical or interventional radiology treatments. The patient received extensive neurorehabilitation, coordinated by multiple MDTs. Although PH has been correlated to COVID-19, to the best of our knowledge this is the first reported case of such a complex presentation resulting in a dramatic bilateral PH. Health records from 3 large UK teaching hospitals were collected regarding treatment and follow up appointments, following patient's written informed consent. Patient's comorbidities, duration in hospital units, MDT inputs, health assessments, mobilisation progress and neurologic assessments, were all recorded. Data was collected retrospectively then prospectively due to lengthy in-patient stay. The literature review was conducted via PubMed and open access sources, selecting all the relevant studies and the ECMO guidelines. Patient received treatment from 3 different units in 3 hospitals over 212 days including 103 days in neurorehabilitation. Involvement of physiotherapy, dietitians, speech and language teams, neurologist, neurophysiotherapists, occupational therapists was required. The patient progressed from a bed-bound coma and inability to walk, to standing with lower limb backslab at discharge. Additionally, he was referred for elective exploratory surgery of the psoas region for scar debridement and potential nerve graft repair of the lumbosacral plexus. The surgery outcome is cautiously optimistic, with some improvement in
Segmental vessel ligation during anterior spinal surgery has been associated with paraplegia. However, the incidence and risk factors for this devastating complication are debated. We reviewed 346 consecutive paediatric and adolescent patients ranging in age from three to 18 years who underwent surgery for anterior spinal deformity through a thoracic or thoracoabdominal approach, during which 2651 segmental vessels were ligated. There were 173 patients with idiopathic scoliosis, 80 with congenital scoliosis or kyphosis, 43 with neuromuscular and 31 with syndromic scoliosis, 12 with a scoliosis associated with intraspinal abnormalities, and seven with a kyphosis. There was only one neurological complication, which occurred in a patient with a 127° congenital thoracic scoliosis due to a unilateral unsegmented bar with contralateral hemivertebrae at the same level associated with a thoracic diastematomyelia and tethered cord. This patient was operated upon early in the series, when intra-operative spinal cord monitoring was not available. Intra-operative spinal cord monitoring with the use of somatosensory evoked potentials alone or with motor evoked potentials was performed in 331 patients. This showed no evidence of signal change after ligation of the segmental vessels. In our experience, unilateral segmental vessel ligation carries no risk of neurological damage to the spinal cord unless performed in patients with complex congenital spinal deformities occurring primarily in the thoracic spine and associated with intraspinal anomalies at the same level, where the vascular supply to the cord may be abnormal.
