Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 6 | Pages 806 - 810
1 Jun 2018
Choudry QA Paton RW

Aims

The aim of this prospective cohort study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the neonatal hip instability screening programme.

Patients and Methods

The study involved a four-year observational assessment of a neonatal hip screening programme. All newborns were examined using the Barlow or Ortolani manoeuvre within 72 hours of birth; those with positive findings were referred to a ‘one-stop’ screening clinic for clinical and sonographic assessment of the hip. The results were compared with previous published studies from this unit.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 2 | Pages 265 - 269
1 Feb 2015
Mace J Paton RW

Over a 15-year prospective period, 201 infants with a clinically unstable hip at neonatal screening were subsequently reviewed in a ‘one stop’ clinic where they were assessed clinically and sonographically. Their mean age was 1.62 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35 to 1.89). Clinical neonatal hip screening revealed a sensitivity of 62% (mean, 62.6 95%CI 50.9 to 74.3), specificity of 99.8% (mean, 99.8, 95% CI 99.7 to 99.8) and positive predictive value (PPV) of 24% (mean, 26.2, 95% CI 19.3 to 33.0). Static and dynamic sonography for Graf type IV dysplastic hips had a 15-year sensitivity of 77% (mean, 75.8 95% CI 66.9 to 84.6), specificity of 99.8% (mean, 99.8, 95% CI 99.8 to 99.8) and a PPV of 49% (mean, 55.1, 95% CI 41.6 to 68.5). There were 36 infants with an irreducible dislocation of the hip (0.57 per 1000 live births), including six that failed to resolve with neonatal splintage.

Most clinically unstable hips referred to a specialist clinic are female and stabilise spontaneously. Most irreducible dislocations are not identified from this neonatal instability group. There may be a small subgroup of females with instability of the hip which may be at risk of progression to irreducibility despite early treatment in a Pavlik harness.

A controlled study is required to assess the value of neonatal clinical screening programmes.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:265-9.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 8 - 8
1 Jun 2017
Rymaruk S Rashed R Nie K Choudry Q Paton R
Full Access

Purpose

There is concern that the positive predictive value (PPV) of neonatal screening for instability may have deteriorated over recent years, this study aims to evaluate this.

Method

This is a prospective observational longitudinal study from 2012 – 2016. Patients that were referred from paediatric neonatal screening with hip instability (Ortolani / Barlow positive, clunks) were identified and underwent ultrasound and clinical examination in the one stop hip clinic by the senior author. Referrals were taken from a range of screeners from paediatric doctors to midwives and advanced neonatal practitioners. Syndromic or neurological dislocated hips were excluded. The outcome measures were the presence of a subluxated / dislocated hip on ultrasound as per Graf and Harcke classification and a positive provocative manoeuvre on examination. This allowed a PPV to be evaluated for both ultrasound and clinical examination.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 1 | Pages 132 - 134
1 Jan 2013
Barr LV Rehm A

Twins are often considered to be at an increased risk of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH); we therefore investigated whether multiple births have a higher incidence of DDH, and if selective ultrasound scanning should be considered for these infants.

We reviewed our records of all live births between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2008 and included 25 246 single and 990 multiple births.

Multiple births did not have a significantly higher incidence of DDH compared with single births (0.0030 vs 0.0023, p = 0.8939). Of the 990 multiple births, 267 had neonatal ultrasound scans and one case of DDH was diagnosed and treated successfully with a Pavlik harness. There were two late-presenting cases at eight and 14 months of age, neither of whom had risk factors for DDH and consequently had not had a neonatal scan. Whereas selective ultrasound scanning of multiple births would have led to earlier detection and treatment of the late-presenting cases, they did not have a significantly higher incidence of DDH compared with single births.

We conclude that being a twin or triplet in itself is not a risk factor for DDH and that selective ultrasound scanning is not indicated for this population.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:132–4.