The use of intraoperative navigation and robotic surgery for minimally invasive lumbar fusion has been increasing over the past decade. The aim of this study is to evaluate postoperative clinical outcomes, intraoperative parameters, and accuracy of pedicle screw insertion guided by intraoperative navigation in patients undergoing lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis. Patients who underwent posterior lumbar fusion interbody using intraoperative 3D navigation since December 2021 were included. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3, and 6 months. Screw placement accuracy, measured by Gertzbein and Robbins classification, and facet joint infringement, measured by Yson classification, were assessed by intraoperative Cone Beam CT scans performed at the end of instrumentation. Finally, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and screw insertion time were evaluated. This study involved 50 patients with a mean age of 63.7 years. VAS decreased from 65.8±23 to 20±22 (p<.01). ODI decreased from 35.4%±15 to 11.8%±14 (p<.01). An increase of SF-36 from 51.5±14 to 76±13 (p<.01) was demonstrated. The accuracy of “perfect” and “clinically acceptable” pedicle screw fixation was 89.5% and 98.4%, respectively. Regarding facet violation, 96.8% of the screws were at grade 0. Finally, the average screw insertion time was 4.3±2 min, hospital stay was 4.2±0.8 days, operation time was 205±53 min, and blood loss was 169±107 ml. Finally, a statistically significant correlation of operation time with hospital stay, blood loss and placement time per screw was found. We demonstrated excellent results for accuracy of pedicle screw fixation and violation of facet joints. VAS, ODI and SF-36 showed statistically significant improvements from the control at one month after surgery. Navigation with intraoperative 3D images represents an effective system to improve operative performance in the surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis

Objectives. We evaluated the accuracy of augmented reality (AR)-based navigation assistance through simulation of bone tumours in a pig femur model. Methods. We developed an AR-based navigation system for bone tumour resection, which could be used on a tablet PC. To simulate a bone tumour in the pig femur, a cortical window was made in the diaphysis and bone cement was inserted. A total of 133 pig femurs were used and tumour resection was simulated with AR-assisted resection (164 resection in 82 femurs, half by an orthropaedic oncology expert and half by an orthopaedic resident) and resection with the conventional method (82 resection in 41 femurs). In the conventional group, resection was performed after measuring the distance from the edge of the condyle to the expected resection margin with a ruler as per routine clinical practice. Results. The mean error of 164 resections in 82 femurs in the AR group was 1.71 mm (0 to 6). The mean error of 82 resections in 41 femurs in the conventional resection group was 2.64 mm (0 to 11) (p < 0.05, one-way analysis of variance). The probabilities of a surgeon obtaining a 10 mm surgical margin with a 3 mm tolerance were 90.2% in AR-assisted resections, and 70.7% in conventional resections. Conclusion. We demonstrated that the accuracy of tumour resection was satisfactory with the help of the AR navigation system, with the tumour shown as a virtual template. In addition, this concept made the navigation system simple and available without additional cost or time. Cite this article: H. S. Cho, Y. K. Park, S. Gupta, C. Yoon, I. Han, H-S. Kim, H. Choi, J. Hong. Augmented reality in bone tumour resection: An experimental study. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:137–143

Introduction and Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether CT-based pre-operative planning, integrated with intra-operative navigation could improve glenoid baseplate fixation and positioning by increasing screw length, reducing number of screws required to obtain fixation and increasing the use of augmented baseplate to gain the desired positioning. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) successfully restores shoulder function in different conditions. Glenoid baseplate fixation and positioning seem to be the most important factors influencing RSA survival. When scapular anatomy is distorted (primitive or secondary), optimal baseplate positioning and secure screw purchase can be challenging. Materials and Methods. Twenty patients who underwent navigated RSA (oct 2018 and feb 2019) were compared retrospectively with twenty patients operated on with a conventional technique. All the procedures were performed by the same surgeon, using the same implant in cases of eccentric osteoarthritis or complete cuff tear. Exclusion criteria were: other diagnosis as proximal humeral fractures, post-traumatic OA previously treated operatively with hardware retention, revision shoulder arthroplasty. Results. The NAV procedure required mean 11 (range 7–16) minutes more to performed than the conventional procedure. Mean screw length was significantly longer in the navigation group (35.5+4.4 mm vs 29.9+3.6 mm; p . .001). Significant higher rate of optimal fixation using 2 screws only (17 vs 3 cases, p . .019) and higher rate of augmented baseplate usage (13 vs 4 cases, p . .009) was also present in the navigation group. Signficant difference there is all in function outcomes, DASH score is 15.7 vs 29.4 and constant scale 78.1 vs 69.8. Conclusions. The glenoid component positioning in RSA is crucial to prevent failure, loosening and biomechanical mismatch, coverage by the baseplate of the glenoid surface, version, inclination and offset are all essential for implant survival. This study showed how useful 3D CT-based planning helps in identifying the best position of the metaglena and the usefulness of receiving directly in the operation theater real-time feedback on the change in position. This study shows promising results, suggesting that improved baseplate and screw positioning and fixation is possible when computer-assisted implantation is used in RSA comparing to a conventional procedure

The purpose of this study is to evaluate accuracy of tibia cutting and tibia implantation in UKA which used navigation system for tibia cutting and tibia component implantation, and to evaluate clinical results. We performed 72 UKAs using navigation system from November, 2012. This study of 72 knees included 56 females and 16 males with an average operation age of 74.2 years and an average body mass index (BMI) of 24.8 kg/m2. The diagnosis was osteoarthritis (OA) in 67 knees and osteonecrosis (ON) in 5 knees. The UKA (Oxford partial knee microplasty, Biomet, Warsaw, IN) was used all cases. We evaluated patients clinically using the Japanese orthopaedic association (JOA) score, range of motion (ROM), operation time, the amount of bleeding and complications. Patients were evaluated clinically at preoperation and final follow up in JOA score and ROM. As an radiologic examination, we evaluated preoperative and postoperative lower limb alignment in FTA (femoro-tibial angle) by weightbearing long leg antero-posterior alignment view X-rays. Also we evaluated a tibial component implantation angle by postoperative CT, and tibia cutting angle by intraoperative navigation system. We defined the tibial angle which a tibia functional axis and the tibia component made in coronal plane, also tibial posterior slope angle which a tibia axis and tibia component made in sagittal plane by CT. We measured tibial angle and tibial posterior slope angle by 3D template system. We performed UKA in all cases mini-midvastus approach. At first we performed osteotomy of the proximal medial tibia using CT-Free navigation. At this procedure we performed osteotomy to do re-cut if check did cutting surface in navigation, and there was cutting error (>3°), and then to do check again in navigation. Next we did not use navigation and went the osteotomy of the distal femur with an IM rod and drill guide of microplasty system. And then we performed a trial and decided bearing gap and moved to cementing. At first we went cementing of the tibia component. At this procedure we went to drive implant again if check did implant surface in navigation, and there was implantation error(>3°), and to do check. We checked did tibia cutting, tibia implantation carefully in navigation. In addition, We sterilize a clips and use it came to be in this way possible for the check of the first osteotomy side exactly. ROM was an average of 122.7° of preoperation became an average of 128.2° at final follow up, and JOA score was an average of 50.5 points of preoperation improved an average of 86.6 points at final follow up after UKA. An average of the operation time was 94 minutes, an average of the amount of bleeding was 137.7ml, and complications were one proximal type deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and one pin splinter joining pain by navigation, .Asetic loosening(tibial component) was one case, and this conversed the TKA. In the radiologic evaluation, FTA was an average of 182.1° of preoperation corrected an average of 175.9°after UKA. In other words, an average of 6.2° were corrected by UKA. The tibia component implantation angle was an average of 90.18° in a measurement by the CT after UKA, intoraoperative tibia component implantation angle was an average of 90.32° in a measurement by the navigation system. These two differences did not accept the significant difference at an average of 1.33°.(P=0.5581). Similarly, the posterior slope angle were as follow; average of 5.65°by CT and average of 5.75°by navigation. These two differences did not accept the significant difference at an average of 1.33°. (P=0.6475). Discussion: We performed UKA using navigation and evaluated the implantation accuracy for tibia osteotomy, tibia implantation. They were good alignment with an average of 90.18°, and outliers more than 3° were two cases(2.8%). It will be necessary to examine long-term progress including clinical results complications in future. We are performed UKA now in femur side using PSI(patient specific instruments) and tbia side using Navigation

A cadaver study using six pairs of lower limbs was conducted to investigate the accuracy of computer navigation and standard instrumentation for the placement of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing femoral component. The aim was to place all the femoral components with a stem-shaft angle of 135°. The mean stem-shaft angle obtained in the standard instrumentation group was 127.7° (120° to 132°), compared with 133.3° (131° to 139°) in the computer navigation group (p = 0.03). The scatter obtained with computer-assisted navigation was approximately half that found using the conventional jig. Computer navigation was more accurate and more consistent in its placement of the femoral component than standard instrumentation. We suggest that image-free computer-assisted navigation may have an application in aligning the femoral component during hip resurfacing

Introduction. With the development of 3D printing technology, there are many different types of PSI in the world. The accuracy of patient specific instrumentation (PSI) in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is dependent on appropriate placement of the cutting blocks. However, previous reports on one type of PSI measured the difference between postoperative prosthetic alignment and postoperative mechanical axis and thus these reports did not evaluate intraoperative comparison of PSIs between two different designs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intraoperative accuracy of two different designed PSIs (My knee, Medacta International, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland) with two examiners using CT free navigation system (Stryker, Mahwar, NJ, USA) in regards to sagittal and coronal alignment. Methods. We enrolled 78knees (66 patients) with a primary cemented TKA using two different designed CT-based PSIs (My knee, Medacta International, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland). All operations were performed by two senior surgeons who have experience with greater than 500 TKAs and greater than 200 navigated TKAs. Two examiners were same two surgeons. The study period was between June 2015 and November 2016. The local ethics' committee approved the study prior to its initiation, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. After placement of the PSI on the femur and tibia, the position of the PSI was evaluated by s intraoperative navigation. Two examiners placed two different types (STD(standard) and MIS(minimum invasive surgery)) of PSI on same joint. As required by the PSI, only soft- tissue was removed and osteophytes were left in place. Femoral MIS PSI was required partial remove of lateral cartilage. For the femur, the coronal position in relation to the mechanical axis were documented. For the tibia, the coronal alignment and the tibial slope were documented. Of note, intraoperative modifications to the PSI were not made based upon the results of the navigation. Rather, the findings of the intraoperative navigation were simply documented. Results. The mean age of the cohort was 72.9±7.5years (range, 55–85years). The study included 11men and 55women, with a mean height of 151±8.2cm (range, 135–175cm), mean weight of 59.4±4.3kg (range, 42–82kg), and a mean of Body Mass Index of 25.9±3.6 (range, 17.2–36.4). HKA angle (supine position) measured by CT was 170.8 ±4.4 degree(range, 162.5–182degree). Diagnosis was osteoarthritis in all patient. There was no statistically significant difference in PSI position alignment for femoral flexion, tibial coronal angle, tibial slope between the two groups with two examiners. However, the intraoperative coronal position using the femoral STD PSI significantly deviated from using femoral MIS PSI from both examiners. (PSI vs. MIS, examiner1 p = 0.02, examiner2 p=0.04)

Our aim was to assess the intra- and inter-observer reliability in the establishment of the anterior pelvic plane used in imageless computer-assisted navigation. From this we determined the subsequent effects on version and inclination of the acetabular component. A cadaver model was developed with a specifically-designed rod which held the component tracker at a fixed orientation to the pelvis, leaving the anterior pelvic plane as the only variable. Eight surgeons determined the anterior pelvic plane by palpating and registering the bony landmarks as reference points. The exact anterior pelvic plane was then established by using anatomically-placed bone screws as reference points. The difference between the surgeons was found to be highly significant (p < 0.001). The variation was significantly larger for anteversion (. sd. 9.6°) than for inclination (. sd. 6.3°). The present method for registering pelvic landmarks shows significant inaccuracy, which highlights the need for improved methods of registration before this technique is considered to be safe

The surgical management of musculoskeletal tumours is a challenging problem, particularly in pelvic and diaphyseal tumour resection where accurate determination of bony transection points is extremely important to optimise oncologic, functional and reconstructive options. The use of computer assisted navigation in these cases could improve surgical precision and achieve pre-planned oncological margins with improved accuracy. We resected musculoskeletal tumours in ten patients using commercially available computer navigation software (Orthomap 3D, Stryker UK Ltd). Of the five pelvic tumours, two underwent biological reconstruction with extra corporeal irradiation, two endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) and one did not require bony reconstruction. Three tibial diaphyseal tumours had biological reconstruction. One patient with proximal femoral sarcoma underwent extra-articular resection and EPR. One soft tissue sarcoma of the adductor compartment involving the femur was resected with EPR. Histological examination of the resected specimens revealed tumour free margins in all cases. Post-operative radiographs and CT show resection and reconstruction as planned in all cases. Several learning points were identified related to juvenile bony anatomy and intra-operative registration. The use of computer navigation in musculoskeletal oncology allows integration of local anatomy and tumour extent to identify resection margins accurately. Furthermore, it can aid in reconstruction following tumour resection. Our experience thus far has been encouraging. Further clinical trials are required to evaluate its long-term impact on functional & oncological outcomes

Spinal surgery deals with the treatment of different pathological conditions of the spine such as tumors, deformities, degenerative disease, infections and traumas. Research in the field of vertebral surgery can be divided into two main areas: 1) research lines transversal to the different branches; 2) specific research lines for the different branches. The transversal lines of research are represented by strategies for the reduction of complications, by the development of minimally invasive surgical techniques, by the development of surgical navigation systems and by the development of increasingly reliable systems for the control of intra-operative monitoring. Instead, specific lines of research are developed within the different branches. In the field of oncological pathology, the current research concerns the development of in vitro models for the study of metastases and research for the study of targeted treatment methods such as electrochemotherapy and mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of aneurysmal bone cysts. Research in the field of spinal deformities is focused on the development of increasingly minimally invasive methods and systems which, combined with appropriate pharmacological treatments, help reduce trauma, stress and post-operative pain. Scaffolds based on blood clots are also being developed to promote vertebral fusion, a fundamental requirement for improving the outcome of vertebral arthrodesis performed for the treatment of degenerative disc disease. To improve the management and the medical and surgical treatment of vertebral infections, research has focused on the definition of multidisciplinary strategies aimed at identifying the best possible treatment path. Thus, flow-charts have been created which allow to manage the patient suffering from vertebral infection. In addition, dedicated silver-coated surgical instrumentation and bone substitutes have been developed that simultaneously guarantee mechanical stability and reduce the risk of further local infection. In the field of vertebral traumatology, the most recent research studies have focused on the development of methods for the biostimulation of the bone growth in order to obtain, when possible, healing without surgery. Methods have also been developed that allow the minimally invasive percutaneous treatment of fractures by means of vertebral augmentation with PMMA, or more recently with the use of silicone which from a biomechanical point of view has an elastic modulus more similar to that of bone. It is clear that scientific research has changed clinical practice both in terms of medical and surgical management of patients with spinal pathologies. The results obtained stimulate the basic research to achieve even more. For this reason, new lines of research have been undertaken which, in the oncology field, aim at developing increasingly specific therapies against target receptors. Research efforts are also being multiplied to achieve regeneration of the degenerated intervertebral disc and to develop implants with characteristics increasingly similar to those of bone in order to improve mechanical stability and durability over time. Photodynamic therapies are being developed for the treatment of infections in order to reduce the use of antibiotic therapies. Finally, innovative lines of research are being launched to treat and regenerate damaged nerve structures with the goal, still far from today, of making patients with spinal cord injuries to walk

Abstract. Introduction. Component mal-positioning in total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) can increase the risk of revision for various reasons. Compared to conventional surgery, relatively improved accuracy of implant positioning can be achieved using computer assisted technologies including navigation, patient-specific jigs, and robotic systems. However, it is not known whether application of these technologies has improved prosthesis survival in the real-world. This study aimed to compare risk of revision for all-causes following primary THR and TKR, and revision for dislocation following primary THR performed using computer assisted technologies compared to conventional technique. Methods. We performed an observational study using National Joint Registry data. All adult patients undergoing primary THR and TKR for osteoarthritis between 01/04/2003 to 31/12/2020 were eligible. Patients who received metal-on-metal bearing THR were excluded. We generated propensity score weights, using Sturmer weight trimming, based on: age, gender, ASA grade, side, operation funding, year of surgery, approach, and fixation. Specific additional variables included position and bearing for THR and patellar resurfacing for TKR. For THR, effective sample sizes and duration of follow up for conventional versus computer-guided and robotic-assisted analyses were 9,379 and 10,600 procedures, and approximately 18 and 4 years, respectively. For TKR, effective sample sizes and durations of follow up for conventional versus computer-guided, patient-specific jigs, and robotic-assisted groups were 92,579 procedures over 18 years, 11,665 procedures over 8 years, and 644 procedures over 3 years, respectively. Outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed using hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results. For THR, analysis comparing computer-guided versus conventional technique demonstrated HR of 0.771 (95%CI 0.573–1.036) p=0.085, and 0.594 (95%CI 0.297–1.190) p=0.142, for revision for all-causes and dislocation, respectively. When comparing robotic-assisted versus conventional technique, HR for revision for all-causes was 0.480 (95%CI 0.067 –3.452) p=0.466. For TKR, compared to conventional surgery, HR for all-cause revision for procedures performed using computer guidance and patient-specific jigs were 0.967 (95% CI 0.888–1.052) p=0.430, and 0.937 (95% CI 0.708–1.241) p=0.65, respectively. HR for analysis comparing robotic-assisted versus conventional technique was 2.0940 (0.2423, 18.0995) p = 0.50. Conclusions. This is the largest study investigating this topic utilising propensity score analysis methods. We did not find a statistically significant difference in revision for all-causes and dislocation although these analyses are underpowered to detect smaller differences in effect size between groups. Additional comparison for revision for dislocation between robotic-assisted versus conventionally performed THR was not performed as this is a subset of revision for all-causes and wide confidence intervals were already observed for that analysis. It is also important to mention this NJR analysis study is of an observational study design which has inherent limitations. Nonetheless, this is the most feasible study design to answer this research question requiring use of a large data set due to revision being a rare outcome. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

We compared the orientation of the acetabular component obtained by a conventional manual technique with that using five different navigation systems. Three surgeons carried out five implantations of an acetabular component with each navigation system, as well as manually, using an anatomical model. The orientation of the acetabular component, including inclination and anteversion, and its position was determined using a co-ordinate measuring machine. The variation of the orientation of the acetabular component was higher in the conventional group compared with the navigated group. One experienced surgeon took significantly less time for the procedure. However, his placement of the component was no better than that of the less experienced surgeons. Significantly better inclination and anteversion (p < 0.001 for both) were obtained using navigation. These parameters were not significantly different between the surgeons when using the conventional technique (p = 0.966). The use of computer navigation helps a surgeon to orientate the acetabular component with less variation regarding inclination and anteversion

Summary Statement. Navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is becoming increasingly popular in the United States. Compared to traditional unnavigated TKA, the use of navigation is associated with decreased blood transfusions and shorter hospital stays. Introduction. Navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a recent modification to standard TKA with many purported benefits in regards to component positioning. Controversy currently exists though regarding its clinical benefits. The purpose of this study was to assess recent national trends in navigated and unnavigated total knee arthroplasty and to evaluate perioperative outcomes for each group. Methods. International Classification of Disease - 9th Revision (ICD-9) procedure codes were used to search the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS) for all patients admitted to US hospitals after navigated and unnavigated TKA for each year between 2005 and 2010. Data regarding patient demographics, hospitalization length, discharge disposition, blood transfusions, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, mortality, and hospital location were gathered from the NHDS. Trends were evaluated by linear regression with Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) and statistical comparisons were made using Student's t-test, z-test for proportions, and chi-square analysis with a significance level of 0.05. Results. 22,443 patients admitted for TKA were identified. 578 (2.6%) of these patients had a TKA utilizing navigation. After adjusting for fluctuations in annual TKA performed, the use of navigation in TKA demonstrated a strong positive correlation with time (r=0.71), significantly increasing from an average utilization rate of 2.2% between 2005–2007 to 3.2% between 2008–2010 (p<0.01). The location of the hospital was found to significantly impact the utilization of navigation, with the lowest rate seen in the Midwest region (2.0%) of the US and the highest rate seen in the South region (3.0%). The mean age of navigated patients was 66.0 years. This group included 211 men and 367 women. The unnavigated group had a mean patient age that was insignificantly higher at 66.4 years (p=0.37) and included 7,815 men and 14,047 women. Gender was also not significantly different (p=0.71) between those with navigated TKA and those with unnavigated TKA. The number of medical co-morbidities was significantly higher in those with navigation (mean 5.4 diagnoses) than those without navigation (mean 5.1 diagnoses, p=0.01). Average hospitalization length also varied based on navigation status, with significantly shorter stays for those with navigation (3.3 days, range 1–11) compared to those without (3.6 days, range 1–73, p<0.01). The rate of blood transfusion was significantly lower in the navigated group (13.0%) versus the unnavigated group (17.4%, p<0.01). There was no difference in the rate of deep vein thrombosis (0.69% vs 0.53%, p=0.64) or pulmonary embolism (0.17% vs 0.47%, p=0.10). Mortality was also not significantly different for navigated TKA (0.17%) when compared to unnavigated TKA (0.08%, p=0.61). Discharge disposition did not significantly vary based on navigation status either, with 65.5% of navigated patients and 67.0% of unnavigated patients able to go directly home (p=0.55) after their inpatient stay. Discussion/Conclusion. This study demonstrates that the use of navigated TKA in the US is rising. Additionally, despite having more medical co-mobidities, the navigated population required less blood transfusions and shorter lengths of stay. Interestingly, navigation utilization demonstrated variability based on hospital region. The reasons for this are not immediately clear, but may be related to differences in regional training

We hypothesized that using the navigation system, intra-operative knee kinematics after implantation measured may predict that post-operative kinematic in activities of daily living. Our aim was to compare intra-operative knee kinematics by a computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system and post-operative by the 2- to 3-dimensional registration techniques (2D3D). This study were performed for 8 patients (10 knees, medial osteoarthritis) who underwent primary PS TKA using CT-based navigation system. The median follow-up period from operation date to fluoroscopic surveillance date was 13 months (range 5 – 37 months). Navigation and 2D3D had a common coordinate origin for components. Medial and lateral femoral condyle anterior-posterior translation (MFT and LFT) were respectively defined as the distance of the projection of the points (which was set on the top of the posterior femoral pegs) onto the axial plane of the tibial coordinate system. Intraoperative kinematics was measured using the navigation system after final implantation and closure of the retinaculum during passive full flexion and extension imposed by the surgeon. Under fluoroscopic surveillance in the sagittal plane, each patient was asked to perform sequential deep knee flexion under both weight bearing (WB) and non-weight bearing (NWB) conditions from full extension to maximum flexion. Repeated two-way ANOVA (tasks × flexion angles) were used, and then post-hoc test (paired t-tests with Boferroni correction) were performed. The level of statistical significant difference was set at 0.05 on two-way ANOVAs and 0.05 / 3 on post-hoc paired t-tests. Mean range of motion between femoral and tibial components were Intra-operative (Intra): 28.0 ± 9.7, NWB conditions: 120.6 ± 11.1, WB conditions: 125.1 ± 12.9°, respectively. Mean ER (+) / IR (−) from 0° to 120° were Intra-operative (Intra): 9.3 ± 10.2°, NWB conditions: 8.1 ± 8.9, WB conditions: 5.2 ± 7.0, respectively. Mean MFT /LFT from 0° to 90° were Intra; 4.4 ±14.8/ 4.2± 8.5mm, NWB; 6.2 ± 6.9 / 9.2 ± 3.1 mm, WB; 9.2 ± 3.5 / 7.4 ± 2.8 mm, respectively. Mean MFT /LFT from 90° to 120° were Intra; −4.4 ± 2.5 / −5.7 ± 2.9 mm, NWB; −5.5 ± 1.8 / −8.2 ± 0.6 mm, WB; −4.0 ± 1.9 / −5.4 ± 2.3mm, respectively. Mean ADD/ABD from 0° to 120° were Intra;-4.2 ± 3.0, NWB; −0.2 ± 2.1, WB; −0.1 ± 0.8, respectively. Repeated two-way ANOVA showed a significant all interaction on kinematic variables (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference at post-hoc test was found in ER/ IR of all tasks and MFT /LFT of Intra vs NWB and Intra vs WB from 0° to 120° (p>0.05 / 3). The Conditions of these tasks were different from each others. Our study demonstrated that intra-operative kinematics could predict post-operative kinematics

The Pivot-shift phenomenon (PS) is known to be one of the essential signs of functional insufficiency of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). To evaluate the dynamic knee laxity is very important to accurately diagnose ACL injury, to assess surgical reconstructive techniques, and to evaluate treatment approaches. However, the pivot-shift test remains a subjective clinical examination difficult to quantify. The aim of the present study is to validate the use of an innovative non-invasive device based on the use of an inertial sensor to quantify PS test. The validation was based on comparison with data acquired by a surgical navigation system. The surgeon intraoperatively performed the PS tests on 15 patients just before fixing the graft required for the ACL reconstruction. A single accelerometer and a navigation system simultaneously acquired the joint kinematics. An additional optical tracker set to the accelerometer has allowed to quantify the movement of the sensor. The tibial anteroposterior acceleration obtained with the navigation system was compared with the acceleration acquired by the accelerometer. It is therefore estimated the presence of any artifacts due to the soft tissue as the test-retest repositioning error in the positioning of the sensor. It was also examined, the repeatability of the acceleration parameters necessary for the diagnosis of a possible ACL lesion and the waveform of the output signal obtained during the test. Finally it has been evaluated the correlation between the two acceleration measurements obtained by the two sensors. The RMS (root mean square) of the error of test-retest positioning has reported a good value of 5.5 ± 2.9 mm. While the amounts related to the presence of soft tissue artifacts was equal to 4.9 ± 2.6 mm. It was also given a good intra-tester repeatability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86). The inter-patient similarity analysis showed a high correlation in the acceleration waveform of 0.88 ± 0.14. Finally the measurements obtained between the two systems showed a good correlation (rs = 0.72, p<0.05). This study showed good reliability of the proposed scheme and a good correlation with the results of the navigation system. The proposed device is therefore to be considered a valid method for evaluating dynamic joint laxity

Our aim was to investigate whether it is possible to predict post-operative kinematics (Post-Ope) from intra-operative kinematics (Intra-Ope) after total knee arthroplasty. Our study were performed for 11 patients (14 knees) who underwent primary PS TKA using CT-based navigation system between Sept.2012 and Sept.2014. The mean subject age was 71.5 ± 5.5 years at the time of surgery. Intra-Ope was measured using the navigation system after implantation during passive full extension and flexion imposed by the surgeon. Under fluoroscopic surveillance, each patient was asked to perform sequential deep knee flexion under both non-weight bearing (NWB) and weight bearing (WB) conditions from full extension to maximum flexion. To estimate the spatial position and orientation, we used a 2- to 3- dimensional (2D3D) registration technique. Intra-Ope and Post-Ope had a common coordinate axis for bones. Evaluations were range of motion (ROM), external rotation angles (ER). The level of statistical significant difference was set at 0.05. Mean ROM in Intra-Ope(130°± 7.9°) was statistically larger than both NWB(121.1°±10.5°) and WB(124.0°±14.7°). No Statistically significant difference was found in the mean ER from 10° to 120° among Intra-Ope (11.2°± 8.5°) and NWB(7.1°±6.0°) and WB(5.3°±3.2°). It is suggested that we could predict Post-Ope from Intra-Ope by considering the increase of the range of motion due to the muscle relaxation condition and the amount of change in the ER

Poor soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most primary causes of dissatisfaction and reduced joint longevity, which are associated with postoperative instability and early implant failure. 1. Therefore, surgical techniques, including mechanical instruments and 3-D guided navigation systems, in TKA aim to achieve optimum soft tissue balancing in the knee to improve postoperative outcome. 2. Patella-in-Place balancing (PIPB) is a novel technique which aims to restore native collateral ligament behaviour by preserving the original state without any release. Moreover, reduction of the joint laxity compensates for the loss of the visco-elastic properties of the cartilage and meniscus. Following its clinical success, we aimed to evaluate the impact of the PIPB technique on collateral ligament strain and laxity behaviour, with the hypothesis that PIPB would restore strains in the collateral ligaments. 3. . Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric legs were obtained (KU Leuven, Belgium, H019 2015-11-04) and CT images were acquired while rigid marker frames were affixed into the femur, and tibia for testing. After carefully removing the soft tissues around the knee joint, while preserving the joint capsule, ligaments, and tendons, digital extensometers (MTS, Minnesota, USA) were attached along the length of the superficial medial collateral ligament (MCL) and lateral collateral ligament (LCL). A handheld digital dynamometer (Mark-10, Copiague, USA) was used to apply an abduction or adduction moment of 10 Nm at fixed knee flexion angles of 0°, 30°, 60° and 90°. A motion capture system (Vicon Motion Systems, UK) was used to record the trajectories of the rigid marker frames while synchronized strain data was collected for MCL/LCL. All motion protocols were applied following TKA was performed using PIPB with a cruciate retaining implant (Stryker Triathlon, MI, USA). Furthermore, tibiofemoral kinematics were calculated. 4. and combined with the strain data. Postoperative tibial varus/valgus stresses and collateral ligament strains were compared to the native condition using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test (p<0.05). Postoperative tibial valgus laxity was lower than the native condition for all flexion angles. Moreover, tibial valgus of TKA was significantly different than the native condition, except for 0° (p=0.32). Although, tibial varus laxity of TKA was lower than the native at all angles, significant difference was only found at 0° (p=0.03) and 90° (p=0.02). No significant differences were observed in postoperative collateral ligament strains, as compared to the native condition, for all flexion angles, except for MCL strain at 30° (p=0.02) and 60° (p=0.01). Results from this experimental study supported our hypotheses, barring MCL strain in mid-flexion, which might be associated with the implant design. Restored collateral ligament strains with reduced joint laxity, demonstrated by the PIPB technique in TKA in vitro, could potentially restore natural joint kinematics, thereby improving patient outcomes. In conclusion, to further prove the success of PIPB, further biomechanical studies are required to evaluate the success rate of PIPB technique in different implant designs

We aim to compare post-operative length of stay and cardiopulmonary morbidity in patients randomised to either navigated or conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients undergoing primary TKA for osteoarthritis were prospectively assigned randomly to either navigation-guided or control groups and blinded to this. All patients received a PFC implant (DePuy, Warsaw, IN). In the control group the standard femoral intramedullary and tibial extramedullary alignment rod was used. In the navigation group, the BrainLab (Munich, Germany) navigation system was used. All operations were carried out by one of two consultant orthopaedic knee surgeons. Length of post operative hospital stay and the development of cardiopulmonary complication were recorded and groups compared. 100 patients were recruited (55 control vs 45 navigated). Patient demographics were similar in both groups. Mean length of stay was 7 days in the control group (range 3-101), 5 days in the navigation group (range 3-10). The mode was 4 days in both groups. 7 patients (13%) stayed for >7 days in the control group, 3 patients (7%) stayed >7 days in the navigation group(p=0.339). 4 patients(7%) required >10 days inpatient stay in the control group, 0 patients required to stay in hospital for longer than 10 days in the navigation group(p=0.069). The causes for the length of stay exceeding 10 days were pulmonary embolus in 3 patients, and chest infection in 1 patient. Patients undergoing navigation-guided TKA required shorter post-operative inpatient stays than those undergoing arthroplasty using conventional techniques. Fewer patients in the navigation group required stays longer than 7 or 10 days. The difference in post-operative stay was associated with fewer respiratory complications in the navigated group

UKA with mobile bearing is a one of the treatment of medial osteoarthritis. However, some reports refer to the risk of dislocation of the mobile bearing. Past reports pointed out that medial gap might be enlarged in deep flexion position (over 120 degrees), and says that it will lead to instability of the mobile bearing. The purpose of this study is to research the risk factors of enlargement of medial gap in deep flexion position. We performed 81 UKAs with mobile bearing system from November 2013 to December 2015, and could evaluate 41 knees. This study of 41 knees included 9 males and 32 females, with average operation age of 75.4years(63–89years). The diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 39 knees and osteonecrosis in 2 knees. The UKA(Oxford partial knee microplasty, Biomet, Warsaw, IN) was used in all cases. We performed distal femur and proximal tibia osteotomy using CT-Free navigation system(Stryker Navigation System II/precision Knee Navigation ver4.0). And we inserted femoral and tibial trial component, then we placed an UKA tensioner on the medial component of the knee. Using tensioner under 30 lbs, we measured joint medial gap at 0,20,45,90,130(deep flexion) degrees. When we compared medial gap at 90 degrees position with at 130 degrees, we defined it as ‘instability group’ if there was gap enlargement more than 1mm, and defined it as ‘stability group’ if there wasn't. We compared this two groups with regard to age, BMI, femoro-tibial angle (FTA), the diameter of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), tibial angle and tibial posterior slope angle of the implant. We evaluated preoperative and postoperative FTA by weightbearing long leg antero-posterior alignment view X-rays. We measured ACL diameter at its condyle level in coronal view of MRI. Also we evaluated tibial component implantation angle by postoperative CT using 3D template system. These measurement were analyzed statistically using t test. The stability group contained 26 knees, and the instability group contained 15 knees. Compared with the stability group, the instability group indicated higher FTA (p=0.001). Between 20 and 90 degrees flexion position, there was no change of medial gap. Dislocation of the mobile bearing is one of the complications of UKA and it will need re-operation. It is said to be caused by impingement of the bearing and osteophyte of femur. However, some reports said that dislocation was happened when the knee was flexed deeply or twisted, and there was no impingement. We think it may means that dislocation could be caused by medial gap enlargement. This study indicates that higher FTA could be risk factor of dislocation of mobile bearing. It is important to evaluate preoperatively FTA by X-ray

Objectives. Acetabular component orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) influences results. Intra-operatively, the natural arthritic acetabulum is often used as a reference to position the acetabular component. Detailed information regarding its orientation is therefore essential. The aim of this study was to identify the acetabular inclination and anteversion in arthritic hips. Methods. Acetabular inclination and anteversion in 65 symptomatic arthritic hips requiring THA were measured using a computer navigation system. All patients were Caucasian with primary osteoarthritis (29 men, 36 women). The mean age was 68 years (SD 8). Mean inclination was 50.5° (SD 7.8) in men and 52.1° (SD 6.7) in women. Mean anteversion was 8.3° (SD 8.7) in men and 14.4° (SD 11.6) in women. . Results. The difference between men and women in terms of anteversion was significant (p = 0.022). In 75% of hips, the natural orientation was outside the safe zone described by Lewinnek et al (anteversion 15° ± 10°; inclination 40° ± 10°). Conclusion. When using the natural acetabular orientation to guide component placement, it is important to be aware of the differences between men and women, and that in up to 75% of hips natural orientation may be out of what many consider to be a safe zone. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2015;4:6–10

Non-invasive assessment of lower limb mechanical alignment and assessment of knee laxity using navigation technology is now possible during knee flexion owing to recent software developments. We report a comparison of this new technology with a validated commercially available invasive navigation system. We tested cadaveric lower limbs (n=12) with a commercial invasive navigation system against the non-invasive system. Mechanical femorotibial angle (MFTA) was measured with no stress, then with 15 Nm of varus and valgus moment. MFTA was recorded at 10° intervals from full knee extension to 90° flexion. The investigator was blinded to all MFTA measurements. Repeatability coefficient was calculated to reflect each system's level of precision, and agreement between the systems; 3° was chosen as the upper limit of precision and agreement when measuring MFTA in the clinical setting based on current literature. Precision of the invasive system was superior and acceptable in all conditions of stress throughout flexion (repeatability coefficient <2°). Precision of the non-invasive system was acceptable from extension until 60° flexion (repeatability coefficient <3°), beyond which precision was unacceptable. Agreement between invasive and non-invasive systems was within 1.7° from extension to 50° flexion when measuring MFTA with no varus / valgus applied. When applying varus / valgus stress agreement between the systems was acceptable from full extension to 30° knee flexion (repeatability coefficient <3°). Beyond this the systems did not demonstrate sufficient agreement. These results indicate that the non-invasive system can provide reliable quantitative data on MFTA and laxity in the range relevant to knee examination