Aims. The aims of this study were to compare the efficacy of two agents, aspirin and warfarin, for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (SBTKA), and to elucidate the risk of VTE conferred by this procedure compared with unilateral TKA (UTKA). Patients and Methods. A retrospective, multi-institutional study was conducted on 18 951 patients, 3685 who underwent SBTKA and 15 266 who underwent UTKA, using aspirin or warfarin as VTE prophylaxis. Each patient was assigned an individualised baseline VTE risk score based on a system using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Symptomatic VTE, including pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), were identified in the first 90 days post-operatively. Statistical analyses were performed with logistic regression accounting for baseline VTE risk. Results. The adjusted incidence of PE following SBTKA was 1.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 1.2) with aspirin and 2.2% (95% CI 2.0 to 2.4) with warfarin. Similarly, the adjusted incidence of VTE following SBTKA was 1.6% (95% CI 1.1 to 2.3) with aspirin and 2.5% (95% CI 1.9 to 3.3) with warfarin. The risk of PE and VTE were reduced by 66% (odds ratio (OR) 0.44, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.78) and 38% (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.0), respectively, using aspirin. In addition, the risk of PE was 204% higher for patients undergoing SBTKA relative to those undergoing UTKA. For each ten-point increase in baseline VTE risk, the risk of PE increased by 25.5% for patients undergoing SBTKA compared with 10.5% for those undergoing UTKA. Patients with a history of myocardial infarction or peripheral vascular disease had the greatest increase in risk from undergoing SBTKA instead of UTKA. Conclusion. Aspirin is more effective than warfarin for the prevention of VTE following SBTKA, and serves as the more appropriate agent for VTE prophylaxis for patients in all risk categories. Furthermore, patients undergoing SBTKA are at a substantially increased risk of VTE, even more so for those with significant underlying risk factors. Patients should be informed about the risks associated with undergoing SBTKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B(1 Supple A):68–75

Background. As the number of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) being performed continues to increase, the number of potential failures requiring revision surgery would also be expected to increase. This study analyzed the trends in revision TKA (rTKA) from 2009 to 2016. Methods. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was used to identify all rTKA by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. The diagnoses leading to revision, revision costs, patient and hospital characteristics, and major inpatient complications were compared between 2009 and 2016. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) for complications. Results. A total of 453,770 rTKA were performed between 2009 and 2016 (Table 1). The incidence of rTKA between 2009 and 2016 decreased by 4.3% among all age groups and decreased 5.9% in those over 65 years of age. The mean age at revision remained unchanged at 65 years, the mean Length of Stay (LOS) decreased 19.5% from 4.1 to 3.3 days (p<0.001), and the mean hospital costs increased 18.7% from $23,103 to $27,427 (p<0.001). Male to Female ratio remained unchanged with Females making up 58% of rTKA. The rTKA patients in 2016 versus 2009 had significantly lower odds of requiring a blood transfusion (OR 0.26, p<0.001). The rate of myocardial infarction remained unchanged in 2016 versus 2009 (4.1% vs. 4.0%, p=0.52), as did mortality (0.1% vs. 0.2%, p=0.089). Patients in 2016 were significantly less likely to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) (26.5% in 2016 vs. 31.6% in 2009, p<0.001). A significantly larger share of rTKA were performed in urban teaching hospitals in 2016 (66.6% in 2016 vs. 41.5% in 2009, p<0.001). Mechanical loosening remained the most common reason for rTKA and increased from 19.7% in 2009 to 28.4% in 2016. Infection remained the second most common reason for rTKA (14.7% in 2009 vs. 12.2% in 2016). Instability was the third most common reason for revision in 2016 (10.7%) but direct comparison with 2009 could not be made since ICD-9 did not include this diagnosis. When comparing 2009 to 2014, an increase in revision rates was noted. Upon inclusion of 2015 and 2016 data, a decrease is noted. The primary limitation of this study is the challenge faced when comparing results from before and after the October 2015 transition of ICD-9 to ICD-10 codes. Conclusions. The incidence of rTKA had decreased slightly between 2009 and 2016 even while the volume of primary TKA continued to rise. Implant loosening became increasingly prevalent as a reason for revision and infection continued to plague patients after TKA. Positive trends were noted, such as decreased rates of blood transfusion, LOS and rates of discharge to SNF. Still, the revision burden remains large, costing approximately $1.4 billion annually and we must continue to attempt to improve outcomes in this patient population. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Aims

Enhanced perioperative protocols have significantly improved patient recovery following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Little has been investigated the effectiveness of these protocols for revision TKA (RTKA). We report on a matched group of aseptic revision and primary TKA patients treated with an identical pain and rehabilitation programmes.

Aims

Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all TKAs. Although the complexity of these procedures is well recognized, few investigators have evaluated the cost and value-added with the implementation of a dedicated revision arthroplasty service. The aim of the present study is to compare and contrast surgeon productivity in several differing models of activity.

In this paper, we will consider the current role of simultaneous-bilateral TKA. Based on available evidence, it is our opinion that simultaneous bilateral TKA carries a higher risk of morbidity and mortality and should be reserved for select few.