Background. Since it's establishment in 2007, the National Hip Fracture Database [NHFD] has been the key driving force in improving care for hip fracture patients across the UK. It has facilitated the setting of standards to which all musculoskeletal units are held, and guides service development to optimise outcomes in this group of patients. As with any audit, the ability to draw conclusions and make recommendations for changes in practise relies on the accuracy of data collection. This project aimed to scrutinise the data submitted to the NHFD from a Major Trauma Centre [MTC], focusing on procedure coding, and discuss the implications of any inaccuracies. Method. The authors performed a retrospective analysis of all procedure coding data entered into the NHFD from July 2009 to July 2014 at Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. We examined 1978 cases for discrepancies, comparing procedure codes entered into the NHFD with post-procedure imaging and operative notes. Results. The procedure coding data submitted to the NHFD was highly inaccurate, with incorrect procedure codes in 24% of the 1978 cases reviewed. In particular, coding of cemented total arthroplasty and cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty, with coding errors in registry data of 42% and 39% respectively. Of the 67 THRs performed only 52% were correctly coded for, and only 626 of the 915 hemiarthroplasties (68%). 16% of cannulated hip screws actually underwent primary arthroplasty. Conclusions. This study highlights the inaccuracy of coding data entered into the NHFD from a Major Trauma Centre, with data on arthroplasty being particularly inadequate. The unreliability of procedure data leaves us unable to evaluate surgical treatment strategies using the NHFD. This has worrying implications for standard setting, service development and, consequently, patient care. Level of evidence. 2c

The National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) is a clinically led web based audit used to inform national policy guidelines. The aim of this audit was to establish the accuracy of completion of NHFD v13.0 theatre collection sheets, identify common pitfalls and areas of good practice, whilst raising awareness of the importance of accuracy of this data and the manner in which it reflects performance of CAH Trauma & Orthopaedic unit in relation to national guidelines. Our aim was to improve completion up to >80% by the operating surgeon and improve overall accuracy. The methodology within both cycles of the audit were identical. It involved reviewing the NHFD V13.0 completed by the operating surgeon and cross-checking their accuracy against clinical notes, operation notes, imaging, anaesthetic charts and A&E admission assessment. Following completion of cycle 1 these results were presented, and education surrounding V13.0 was provided, at the monthly trust audit meeting. At this point we introduced a sticker onto the pre-operative checklist for Hip fractures. This included time of admission and reason for delay. We then completed a re-audit. Cycle-1 included 25 operations, 56% (n=14) had a completed V13.0 form. Of these 21% (n=3) were deemed to be 100% accurate. Cycle-2 included 31 operations (between April – June 21) 81% (n=25) had a completed intra-operative from and showed an increase in accuracy to 56% (n=14). Through raising awareness, education and our interventions we have seen a significant improvement in the completion and accuracy of v13.0. Although 100% accuracy was not achieved its clear that education and intervention will improve compliance over time. Through the interventions that we have implemented we have shown that it is possible to improve completion and accuracy of the NHFD V13.0 theatre collection sheet locally and feel this could be implemented nationally

The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) was developed in 2007 as a predictor of 30-day mortality after hip fracture surgery following a neck of femur fracture. The National Hip Fracture Database is the standard used which calculated their own score using national data. The NHF score for 30-day mortality was calculated for 50 patients presenting with a fractured neck femur injury between January 2020 to March 2020. A score <5 was classified as low risk and >/=5 as high risk. Aim was to assess the accuracy in calculating the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score against the National Hip Fracture Database. To explore whether it should it be routinely included during initial assessment to aid clinical management?. There was an increase in the number of mortalities observed in patients who belonged to the high-risk group (>=5) compared to the low risk group. COVID-19 positive patients had worse outcomes with average 30-day mortality of 6.78 compared to the average of 6.06. GEH NHF score per month showed significant accuracy against the NHFD scores. The identification of high-risk groups from their NHF score can allow for targeted optimisations and elucidation of risk factors easily gathered at the point of hospitalisation. The NHFS is a valuable tool and useful predictor to stratify the risk of 30-day mortality and 1-year mortality after hip fracture surgery. Inclusion of the score should be considered as mandatory Trust policy for neck of femur fracture patients to aid clinical management and improve patient safety overall

Abstract. Objectives. The need to accurately forecast the injury burden has never been higher. With an aging, ever expanding trauma population and less than half of the beds available compared to 1990, the National Health Service (NHS) is stretched to breaking point1,2. Resultantly, we aimed to determine whether it is possible to predict the proportionality of injuries treated operatively within orthopaedic departments based on their number of Neck of Femur fracture (NOF) patients reported both in our study and the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). Methods. We utilised the ORthopaedic trauma hospital outcomes - Patient operative delays (ORTHOPOD) dataset of 22,585 trauma patients across the four countries of the United Kingdom (UK) admitted to 83 hospitals between 22/08/22 – 16/10/22. This dataset had two arms: arm one was assessing the caseload and theatre capacity, arm two assessed the patient, injury and management demographics. Results. Our results complied with the data reported to the NHFD in over 80% of cases for both the 2022 and five-year average reported numbers. More operations were performed for elderly hip fractures alone than for the combined totals of the next four most common fractures: ankle, distal radius, tibial shaft and forearm (6387 vs 5922). Conversely, 10 out of the 13 fracture types were not encountered by at least one hospital and 93% of hospitals encountered less than 2 fractures of a certain type.60% of trauma is treated within Trauma Units (TUs) however, per unit, Major Trauma Centres (MTCs) treat approximately 43% more patients. Similarly, 11 out of the 14 fracture types examined presented more frequently to a MTC however 3 of the most common fractures had a preponderance for TUs (elderly hip, distal radius and forearm fractures). After excluding NOF, lower limb fractures accounted for approximately 57% of fractures in all countries and ankle and distal radius fracture combined comprised more than 50% in 74% of regions. There were few outliers across the study regarding number of fractures treated by a hospital with tibial shaft fractures demonstrating the highest number of outliers with 4. Conclusions. The number of hip fractures seen on average by an individual unit remains relatively consistent as does the regional variation of any given fracture; resultantly, it is possible to predict injury proportionality based off a unit's hip fracture numbers. This powerful tool could transform both resource allocation and recruitment. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Abstract. Objectives. Our study evaluates financial impact to the Best Practice Tariff (BPT) of hip fracture patients on Novel Oral Anti-Coagulant (NOAC) medication. Since their approval by NICE for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, the incidence of hip fracture patients admitted to hospitals on NOAC medication (e.g. rivaroxiban, apixaban) has been increasing. BPT for hip fractures has two components: a base tariff and a conditional top-up tariff of £1,335 per patient (applied to patients of 60 years of age). For the top-up tariff, six criteria must be met, of which time-to-surgery within 36 hours is one. Our department currently recommends withholding NOAC medication and delaying surgery for at least 48 hours as per our Trust's haematology guidelines to reduce intra-operative bleeding risk. Therefore, the conditional top-up tariff cannot be claimed for these patients. Method. A retrospective review of our Trust hip fracture patients over 60 years of age admitted during 2019 on NOAC medication using National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). Results. 545 hip fracture patients had operative treatment at our Trust during the one-year period of 2019. 31 of these patients were admitted on NOAC medication, and therefore had to stop the NOAC and wait for at least 48 hours before having surgery. This translates to a potential hip fracture BPT loss of £41,385 in 2019, as the conditional top-up tariff could not be claimed. Conclusion. This study illustrates the large financial impact to BPT that hip fracture patients admitted on NOAC medications has at our Trust. It raises the argument as to whether the BPT should allow for an increased length of time until surgery for such patients, to allow safe surgical treatment with reduced bleeding risk. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Hip fractures are a common injury in elderly patients. The UK has a National Hip Fracture Database to collect data on all patients presenting to hospital with a hip fracture. Literature evidence suggests that early surgery for hip fracture patients improves morbidity and mortality. UK national guidelines (BOA, NICE) recommend that surgery is performed within 36 hours of presentation and/or diagnosis for inpatients. Best Practice Tariffs ensure that hospitals are paid a set value if they meet this target of surgery within 36 hours. This study aims to look at reasons for delay to surgery for patients presenting to our busy level 2 trauma unit. This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data for patients referred to the orthopaedic team at our hospital with a diagnosis of a neck of femur fracture between 1st April and 31st December 2018. Patients under the age of 65 year of age were excluded from our study. Only patients who were operated on after 36 hours were included. The database for reasons of surgical delay was reviewed and electronic patient records were used to collect further data on length of stay and 30-day mortality. A total of 249 patients were diagnosed with a hip fracture during the study period. 2 patients were too unwell for an operation and died within 24 hours of diagnosis/admission. 46 patients were included in the study. The primary reasons for surgical delay were patients not being fit for surgery (14/46) and the use of anti-coagulation (14/46). Other reasons included a lack of surgical capacity (7/46) and delayed diagnosis due to further imaging (CT). Mean delay to surgery was 51.8 hours (range 34.5 – 157.2 hours; median 42.9 hours), mean length of stay 20.4 days (range 5.3 – 55.7 days, median 15.6 days). 30-day mortality was 4/46 (8.6%) for patients who were delayed. Many of the issues we found in this study are unusual however these problems are commonly faced in many level 2 trauma units that serve an ever growing ageing population. Changing practice to provide improved out-of-hours medical care to facilitate medical optimisation and using current literature evidence that shows that the use of DOACs/NOACs does not adversely affect outcomes when patients are operated on within 24 hours of the last dose may help improve times to surgery

Background. Hip fracture care has evolved, largely due to standardisation of practice, measurement of outcomes and the introduction of the Best Practice Tariff, leading to the sustained improvements documented by the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). The treatment of distal femoral fractures in this population has not had the same emphasis. This study defines the epidemiology, current practice and outcomes of distal femoral fractures in four English centres. Methods. 105 patients aged 50 years or greater with a distal femoral fracture, presenting to four UK major trauma centres between October 2010 and September 2011 were identified. Data was collected using an adapted NHFD data collection tool via retrospective case note and radiograph review. Local ethics approval was obtained. Results. Mean age was 77 years (range 50–99), with 86% female. 95% of injuries were sustained from a low energy mechanism, and 72% were classified as either 33-A1 or 33-C1. The mean Parker mobility score and Barthel Independence Index were 5.37 (0–9) and 75.5 (0–100) respectively. Operative management was performed in 84%, and 86% had their surgery within 36 h. Three quarters were fixed with a peri-articuar locking plate. There was no consensus on post operative rehabilitation, but no excess of complications in the centres where weight bearing as tolerated was the standard. 45% were seen by an orthogeriatrician during their admission. Mean length of stay was 29 days. Mortality at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year was 7%, 16% and 18% respectively. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that the distal femoral and hip fracture populations are similar, and highlights the current disparity in their management. The metrics and standards of care currently applied to hip fractures should be applied to the treatment of distal femoral fractures. Optimal operative treatment and rehabilitation remains unclear, and further research is in progress. Level of evidence. 2b. Ethics. Local approval was obtained