Objectives. The period of post-operative treatment before surgical wounds are completely closed remains a key window, during which one can apply new technologies that can minimise complications. One such technology is the use of negative pressure wound therapy to manage and accelerate healing of the closed incisional wound (incisional NPWT). . Methods. We undertook a literature review of this emerging indication to identify evidence within orthopaedic surgery and other surgical disciplines. Literature that supports our current understanding of the mechanisms of action was also reviewed in detail. . Results. A total of 33 publications were identified, including nine clinical study reports from orthopaedic surgery; four from cardiothoracic surgery and 12 from studies in abdominal, plastic and vascular disciplines. Most papers (26 of 33) had been published within the past three years. Thus far two randomised controlled trials – one in orthopaedic and one in cardiothoracic surgery – show evidence of reduced incidence of wound healing complications after between three and five days of post-operative NPWT of two- and four-fold, respectively. Investigations show that reduction in haematoma and seroma, accelerated wound healing and increased clearance of oedema are significant mechanisms of action. . Conclusions. There is a rapidly emerging literature on the effect of NPWT on the closed incision. Initiated and confirmed first with a randomised controlled trial in orthopaedic trauma surgery, studies in abdominal, plastic and vascular surgery with high rates of complications have been reported recently. The evidence from single-use NPWT devices is accumulating. There are no large randomised studies yet in reconstructive joint replacement. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2013;2:276–84

Abstract. Objective. In this systematic review we aim to compare wound complication rates from Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) to dry sterile surgical dressings in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. A search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library. Eligible studies included those investigating the use of NPWT in primary and revision TKA. Exclusion criteria included studies investigating NPWT not related to primary or revision TKA; studies in which data relating to NPWT was not accessible; missing data; without an available full text, or not well reported. We also excluded studies with poor scientific methodology. All publications were limited to the English language. Abstracts, case reports, conference presentations, and reviews were excluded. Welch independent sample t-test was used for the statistical analysis. Results. Our review identified 11 studies evaluating 1,414 patients. Of the 1,181 primary TKA patients analysed (NPWT = 416, surgical dressing = 765), the overall wound complication rates in patients receiving NPWT ranged from 0% – 63% (Median 7.30%, SD ± 21.44) This is in comparison to complication rates of 2.8% – 19% (Median 6.50%, SD ± 6.59) in the dry dressing group. The difference in complication rates between the two groups was not statistically significant (p =0.337). In the revision TKA cohort of 279 patients (NPWT group = 128, dry dressing group = 151), the overall wound complication rates in the NPWT group ranged between 6.7% – 12% (Median 9.80%, SD ± 2.32) vs 23.8% – 30% (Median 26.95%, SD ± 2.53) in the dry dressing group. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusion. NPWT dressing demonstrated statistically significant reduction in wound complication rates when used in revision TKA but not primary TKA when compared to dry sterile dressings. This is probably due to higher wound related risks encountered with revision TKA surgery compared to primary TKA surgery. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Abstract. Objective. In this systematic review we aim to analyse the economical impact of using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. Four medical electronic databases were searched. Eligible studies included those investigating the costs of NPWT in primary TKA. Exclusion criteria included studies investigating cost of NPWT not related to primary TKA. We also excluded studies with poor scientific methodology. We retrieved and analysed data on dressing costs and hospital length of stay (LOS). Results. Three studies (359 patients) reported on dressing and associated health care costs, and two further studies (330 patients) reported on hospital LOS in primary TKA. The cost of NPWT ranged between £125 and £196; with an average cost of £155, compared to £23 for the regular surgical dressing. The hospital LOS in NWPT patients ranged from 1.9 – 3.8 days, while LOS in patients managed with regular surgical dressing ranged between 2.3 – 4.7 days. The hospital LOS accounted for delayed discharge due to wound complications. Any extended LOS secondary to medical comorbidities or for other reasons were not included here. Conclusion. Our pooled analysis found a decrease in hospital LOS from wound related problems when using NWPT instead of regular dressings after accounting for other variables responsible for LOS. If the mean cost of overnight inpatient hospital stay for elective TKA is estimated as £275, the range of overnight admission cost for one TKA patient would be £522 - £1045 when NPWT dressing is used, and £632.5 - £1292 when using regular dressings. The cost savings from reduced LOS amounts to £110 - £247 per patient when NPWT is used. We hypothesize that in primary TKA patients with high risk of wound related problems that may delay discharge from hospital, there may be an overall cost saving when using NWPT dressings. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project