Aim. Fracture-related infection (FRI) is one of the most serious complications in orthopedic trauma surgery [1]. The role of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) remains controversial in the management pathway of FRI [2]. Currently, as scientific evidence is lacking, most recommendations for
Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is commonly used to manage severe open fracture wounds. The recently completed X randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the effect of
Aim. Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is often propagated as treatment option for fracture-related infection (FRI). After surgical debridement and repeated
Since its approval by the FDA two decades ago, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) has become a valuable asset in the management of open fractures with significant soft tissue damage as those seen in high velocity gunshot injuries. These lesions are often associated with grossly contaminated wounds and require a prompt and effective approach. Wound dehiscence and surgical site infection are two of the most common post-operative complications, with poor results when treated with standard gauze dresses. NPTW comes as a legitimate resource promoting secondary intention healing through increased granulation and improved tissue perfusion, as well as continuous local wound drainage preventing bacterial growth and further infection. Recent evidence-based guidelines are still limited for use of
Aim. Negative pressure wound treatment (NPWT) has been widely adopted in the management of septic wound complications or prophylactically after large surgeries. Recent publications have indicated the necessity of further investigations to support the use of
To evaluate the effectiveness of various tactics in treating septic complications following large joint replacement. Analysis of the outcomes of treatment 171 patients with SC following LJR from 2010 to 2014. Primary operations performed in 33 different hospitals; the time elapsed before complications from the date of primary intervention – from 3 days to 17 years. Depending on the type of complications, all patients were divided into 2 groups: those with superficial surgical site infections (SSSI) and deep surgical site infections (DSSI) associated with a prosthesis. In the treatment of these patients we followed different tactics using method of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), the antibiotic impregnated collagen sponge (AICS*) and antibacterial cement spacers (ACS). We obtained the results allowing to assess the impact of these methods on the effectiveness of treatment, recurrence rate and mortality in patients of different groups. By combining different methods were able to reduce the number of relapses from 20% to 0% in patients with SSSI and significantly improve treatment outcomes in patients with DSSI. This analysis helped us to determine the most appropriate tactics of treatment depending on the type of complications. The obtained results indicate the prospects of using
Necrotising fasciitis (NF) of the extremities is a rapidly progressive, potentially life threatening soft tissue infection. Recent advances in its management, like hidrobisturi-assisted debridement (Versajet®), negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), or Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) have not clearly influenced in mortality and morbidity rates, still high. We therefore sought to study the necrotising fasciitis of the extremities diagnosed in the last four year in our hospital. We investigate (1) the morbidity and mortality rates, (2) the microbiologic characteristics of the infection, and (4) the management focusing on the use of new treatment technologies. This is a 4-year retrospective chart review of all NF of the extremities who presented in our hospital, from 2010 through 2013. We collected data on demographics, comorbidities, diagnostic test, LRINEC score and microbiological information. We evaluated the therapeutic management of these patients, focusing in the intensive care necessities, the use of hidrobisturi and