Background and study purpose. Low back pain with no identified underlying cause is categorised as primary musculoskeletal pain by the International Association for the Study of Pain. In April 2021, the National Institute for Care and Excellence (NICE) published updated guidance for the management of primary chronic pain conditions in England. As part of the De-STRESS pain study, we explored the perspectives of GPs on the updated guideline and impact upon clinical practice. Methods and results. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 GPs in England. Data were analysed using thematic analysis and constant comparison techniques. GPs agreed with the recommendations restricting pharmacological options for pain management and reflected that they now had an expert reference to back-up their decision-making and could use the guidance in potentially difficult conversations with patients. Frustration was expressed by GPs about the lack of alternative options to medication, as the non-pharmacological recommendations were difficult to implement, had lengthy waiting lists, or were unavailable in their locality. Conclusion. Although GPs discussed benefits of the updated NICE guideline in potentially reducing prescriptions of ineffective and potentially harmful medications, frustration about the lack of alternative strategies added to the difficulties encountered in managing people with persistent back pain in primary care. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: This study was funded by Versus Arthritis – grant number 22454; Carolyn A Chew-Graham is part-funded by NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands

Purpose of Study. To investigate current practice of thromboprophylaxis in major UK spinal centres for both trauma and elective surgery, and to asses compliance with NICE guidelines. Methods. A telephonic survey was carried out which comprised of questions relating to current practice of thromboprophylaxis in major spinal units across the UK. Questions probed practice with regard to trauma versus elective surgery, agents used, timing of prophylaxis, length of treatment and whether practice has changed since the introduction of NICE guidelines. Results. Thirty specialised centres were contacted. Twenty eight centres followed NICE recommendations, with 2 centres using their own protocol. Four centres made changes to their existing protocols after the emergence of NICE guidelines. GCS (Graduated compression stockings) were uniformly used by all, with most centres using flowtron boots and/or foot in addition. The practices are differing within centres for elective versus trauma surgery. Of note, in patients with an acute cord injury, 20 centres used combined pre operative prophylaxis whereas 10 centres used only mechanical prophylaxis. Three units (10 %) describe a noticeable rise in complications related to chemoprophylaxis, whilst only one unit has reported a PE death within the last year. Discussion. Our survey assesses compliance to the NICE guidelines by the UK's spinal units. Mechanical prophylaxis appears to be the most common mode of prophylaxis understandably due to predictable safety profile. Use of chemo-prophylaxis varies amongst different surgeons and centres. Rather than a result of evidence based practice, the decision appears to be related to the previous experiences of that unit. Although the NICE guidelines provide a reasonable platform to the practice of thromboprophylaxis, more studies are required to evaluate the risks of thrombosis and bleeding events in spinal surgery

Peninsula Spinal Unit, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Foundation NHS Trust, Exeter, UK. A retrospective audit in 2000 of cases presenting with metastatic cord compression (MSCC) was conducted. In June 2009 we introduced the role of MSCC coordinator. We present the preliminary results from a 6 month comparative audit and discuss whether implementation of the NICE Guidelines have improved the care pathway. Prospective cohort study with retrospective controlled group. Adults with suspected MSCC. Length of time to MR imaging. % referred for surgical opinion. Length of time on bed rest. % undergoing surgery. Retrospective audit 2000. 38 cases confirmed MSCC. 11 did not have MRI and were treated on the basis of clinical symptoms. Average time from admission to MRI 42 hours. 8 patients (21%) referred for surgical opinion. None had surgery. 38 had radiotherapy. Spinal stability documented on 1 patient. 5.5 days average bed rest. Prospective audit 2009. 54 patients referred to co-ordinator as suspected MSCC. 52 had MRI and 2 had CT. Average time from referral to MRI 41 hours. Average time for patients with neurological deficit 7.6 hours. 54 patients (100%) referred for surgical opinion. 12 patients had surgery (22%). 100% patients had spinal stability documented. Average length of time on bed rest 2 days. It is uncertain whether these results are attributed to the introduction of the NICE guidelines or improved awareness of condition. However we feel that NICE guidelines have improved the care pathway of patients with MSCC. Statement of ethics and interests: Study was approved and registered with audit department

Purpose of study. NICE recommends 8-9 sessions of non operative therapy for back pain that has lasted for 6 weeks but less than 12 months. NICE recommended exercises, manual therapy, acupuncture and suggested that Lumbar supports, TENS, Ultrasound and Traction should not be offered. Since multiple methods and disciplines were available a survey was conducted among the local General Practitioners to determine what non operative methods they preferred and how it matched with NICE's recommendation. Methods. An online survey was conducted on . www.surveymonkey.com. among the local GPs to determine their practice and preferences in investigating low back pain. The 5 questions in the survey were “rating scale questions” on a scale of 1 and 10, where 1 = DISAgree and 10 = Agree. A request to participate in the survey was sent to all the local General Practitioners by e-mail. Results. 25 General Practitioners participated in the survey. A sample of the scores obtained were as follows. Method of treatment. Mean Score. Mobilisation exercises. 8.20. Specific Core Stability Exercises. 8.13. Physiotherapy. 7.96. Pilates. 7.21. Attending a Gymnasium. 6.32. Medications. 6.20. Yoga. 6.18. TENS (Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation). 5.44. Acupuncture. 5.44. Chiropractory. 5.42. Osteopathy. 5.41. Massage. 4.73. Ultrasound. 3.43. Traction. 2.75. Lumbar support. 2.65. Conclusion. This limited study demonstrates that General Practitioners prefer patients to use active modalities of treatment like exercises which require participation of the patient rather than passive methods of treatment like lumbar support and massage. The choices of the GPs are nearly in tune with the recommendations of NICE with some exceptions. TENS (not recommended by NICE) obtained a better score than Acupuncture (recommended by NICE)

Aim. NICE guidance on lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) recommends ongoing audit should be an integral part of disc replacement surgery. We present our ongoing audit data and the extent of problem of patients lost to follow up. Method. 35 patients underwent lumbar TDR surgery over 4.5 years. They were followed prospectively. A database is maintained and ODI and VAS were collected prospectively, including patient satisfaction and any failures. Results. At latest follow up full data was available for 30 out of 35 patients. The mean follow-up was 34 months (range 3-52 months). There were 13 males with a mean age 37.7 years (range 27-62) and 17 females with a mean age of 49.8 years (range 27-62). Surgery was single level in 24 cases and double level in 6 cases. 21 patients rated their outcome as good or very good and 7 as unsatisfactory. There were 2 failures, one secondary to late extrusion of the polyethylene liner (12 months post-surgery) and one early anterior migration of the prosthesis. ODI scores improved by a mean of 28 points (range -4 to 68) whilst VAB scores improved by a mean of 4.9 (range -1 to 9). Five patients had been lost to follow up. One patient migrated out of the area. Two came from out of the area and did not return for follow up after the initial period and two further patients DNAed multiple clinic appointments. Conclusion. We conclude that lumbar disc replacement surgery can provide substantial improvement in pain relief and function. Continued audit of this cohort of patients is essential to comply with NICE guidance. 14% loss to follow up/audit is encountered despite our best effort

Aim. To assess whether oncologists are adhering to the NICE guidelines on MSCC. Methods and Results. All patients who received radiotherapy for metastatic spinal cord compression from 1. st. June 2009 – 1. st. June 2010 were identified. This information was then compared to the data collected via the MSCC Coordinator. The notes and radiological investigations were reviewed by the spinal consultant. 34 patients received radiotherapy for MSCC, 15 patients were not referred to the spinal team prior to radiotherapy. On reviewing each individual case 2 patients may have potentially benefited from surgical intervention. Conclusion. Many patients are still not referred for spinal opinion. The vast majority of these patients would not have been suitable for surgery, however, a small number may have potentially benefited

Introduction. Most common osteoporotic fracture. 20-30% of patients with OVFs are presented to hospital while 2.2 million remain undiagnosed, as diagnosis is usually opportunistic. 66,000 OVFs occur annually in the UK with increase by 18,000 cases a year until 2025. 20% chance of another OVF in next 12 months and 3 times risk of hip fracture. Acute painful OVFs poorly tolerated by infirm elderly patients, leading to significant morbidity and 8 times increase in age-adjusted mortality. Materials and Methods. Classify fracture severity and patents with ovfs in 12-month period. To assess follow-up status and if kyphoplasty was offered within 6 weeks as per NICE guidelines. To introduce Royal Osteoporosis Society and GIRFT guidelines on management of symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Results. Total no. of patients- 62. Initial pain assessment=40. Pain assessed at ≤6 weeks- 21. Duration from decision to operate to kyphoplasty 8.7 weeks. 11% had kyphoplasty of which 50% noted improvement in pain. 11 deaths. Nearly similar findings to NoSH study. Conclusion. To improve pain assessment on admission of patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures. To follow GIRFT guidelines for early assessment and intervention in patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures to improve pain, mobility and early discharge from hospital. Conflicts of interest. None. Sources of funding. None

Purpose/Background. More than 20 million UK citizens have MSK conditions, and post-pandemic the backlog awaiting access to MSK services has increased. The most prevalent MSK condition is low back pain (LBP), and getUBetter has been recommended by NICE as one of five digital health technologies for helping manage LBP. Purpose: Evaluate impact of getUBetter on a community MSK waiting list. Methods/Results. Mixed methods approach used. All patients on community MSK waiting list sent a postal invite for getUBetter. Number of downloads and frequency of use recorded, and users emailed questionnaire exploring outcomes and satisfaction. Rate users removed themselves from the waiting list compared with non-users. Of 14,500 invitations, 657(4.5%) patients downloaded getUBetter, 395(60.1%) used it once and 138(21%) ≥3 times. Seventeen (7%) of 239 patients canvassed responded to questionnaire, 17% reported improved pain, 21% reported improved confidence and had been helped back to work. Twenty-five percent better understood their condition and 43% needed no other treatment. Seventy-five percent were critical of limited content, with chronic osteoarthritis mentioned. 69.6% of users removed themselves from the waiting list. This was 29.6% above the rate for non-users. Conclusion. Sending postal invites for getUBetter to a MSK waiting list yielded limited uptake. However, despite some criticisms, patients using it reported improved pain, early return to usual activities, and improved confidence in self-management. Some patients recovered without the need for additional support and getUBetter shows some potential for reducing a MSK waiting list. Clearly further work is required to explore methods to increase patient uptake and maximise impact. Conflicts of interest. None. Sources of funding. None

Background. The advent of EOS imaging has offered clinicians the opportunity to image the whole skeleton in the anatomical standing position with a smaller radiation dose than standard spine roentgenograms. It is known as the fifth modality of imaging. Current NICE guidelines do not recommend EOS scans over x-rays citing: “The evidence indicated insufficient patient benefit in terms of radiation dose reduction and increased throughput to justify its cost”. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 103 adult and 103 paediatric EOS scans of standing whole spines including shoulders and pelvis for those undergoing investigation for spinal deformity in a tertiary spinal centre in the UK. We matched this against a retrospective control group of 103 adults and 103 children who underwent traditional roentgenograms whole spine imaging at the same centre during the same timeframe. We aimed to compare the average radiation dose of AP and lateral images between the two modalities. We utilised a validated lifetime risk of cancer calculator (. www.xrayrisk.com. ) to estimate the additional mean risk per study. Results. In the Adult EOS Group (AEG) the mean estimated effective dose of AP was 0.08 mSv (0.04–0.15) and Lateral 0.06 mSv (0.03–0.14). Conversely in the Adult Roentgenograms Group (ARG) the mean AP was 0.49 mSv (0.15–1.88) and Lateral was 0.29 mSv (0.07–1.20). In the Paediatric EOS Group (PEG): the mean dose of AP was 0.07 mSv (0.02–0.21) and Lateral 0.04 mSv (0.02–0.11). Conversely Paediatric Roentgenograms Group (PRG) had a mean dose in AP of 0.37 mSv (0.03–5.92) and in lateral of 0.17 mSv (0.03–0.44). The percentage differences were: ARG:AES AP 613%, ARG:AES Lat 483%, PPG:PEG AP 529%, PRG:PEG Lat 425%. Mean difference 513%. The additional lifetime cancer risk for AEG was 1 in 176056 for males and 1 in 138696 for females, compared to ARG 1 in 31596 for males and 1 in 24894 for females. In PEG that was 1 in 58207 for boys and 1 in 33367 for girls, compared to PRG 1 in 11860 for boys and 1 in 6797 in girls. Differences in additional lifetime risk of cancer per scan: ARG:AES Male 557%, Female 557%, PRG:PEG Male 491%, Females 491%. Conclusion. Standard plain film imaging of the whole spine requires approximately five-times higher doses of radiation compared to dual planar EOS scans. This carries a significant impact when considering the need for repeat imaging on additional lifetime malignancy risk in both children and adults. There is approximately 5-fold increase in risk of cancer for all groups with roentgenograms over EOS. We directly challenge the NICE guidance and recommend EOS dual planar imaging in favour of plane roentgenograms for investigation of spinal deformity

Aims. To investigate whether the duration of pain has an influence on the clinical outcomes of patients with low back pain (LBP) managed through the North East of England Regional Back Pain and Radicular Pain Pathway (NERBPP). Patients and Methods. The NERBPP is a clinical pathway based upon NICE guidelines (2009) for LBP. Patients with LBP referred onto the NERBPP by their General Practitioner (GP) between May 2015 and January 2017 were included in this evaluation. Data from 635 patients, who provided pre and post data for pain (Numerical rating scale [NRS]), function (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]) and quality-of-life (EuroQol [EQ5D]), were analysed using a series of covariate adjusted models in SPSS. Patients were categorised into four groups based upon pain duration: <3months, ≥3 to <6months, ≥6months to <12months, ≥12months. Results. Each group showed improved outcomes greater than MCID for each measure as defined in NICE guidelines (2016). Preliminary analysis raises the possibility of a trend towards better outcomes for those with shorter pain durations. Conclusion. Patients with all durations of back pain showed benefit on the NERBPP. Clinical relevance. Recent changes to NICE guidelines (2016), advocate the same management of all LBP patients regardless of pain duration. These findings explore the appropriateness of those changes. Conflicts of interest: None. The study was supported by funding from the Health Foundation and the North East Academic Health Science Network. For table, please contact authors directly by clicking on ‘Info & Metrics’ at the top of the abstract for their contact details

Purpose. To establish if the subjective features of both bilateral leg pain and sexual dysfunction are presenting features in cauda equina syndrome (CES). Background. There appears to be conflicting expert opinion ‘red flag’ symptoms in the context of CES with many experts basing clinical decisions on the objective clinical findings only. Bilateral radiculopathy has been suggested as a possible sign of suspected CES, although a consensus statement by BASS and SBNS makes no reference to either this or sexual dysfunction. However, bilateral leg pain is included in the NICE clinical knowledge summary and sexual dysfunction is highlighted within CES guidance by the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Methods. The clinical documentation of patients undergoing urgent magnetic resonance imaging (MR) due to clinical suspicion of cauda equina syndrome (CES) was reviewed over 12 months. Patients questioned regarding sexual function were included in this retrospective analysis (n=179), along with those with bilateral leg pain (n=294). Patients with confirmed cauda equina compression (CES +ve) were compared to those without (CES -ve). A logistic regression was applied to find the odds ratio. Results. In CES +ve 37.5% had sexual dysfunction, 48% had bilateral leg pain. CES –ve 14% had sexual dysfunction, 27% bilateral leg pain. Both significant to p=0.015 with an odds ratio of 3.6 and 2.5 respectively. Conclusions. Both sexual dysfunction and bilateral leg pain do appear to be ‘red flags’ for CES and should therefore be asked in the ED to aid clinical reasoning when suspecting this diagnosis. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Background. NICE guidance suggests that caudal epidural injections of steroid and local anaesthetic may be considered for acute and severe sciatica, however studies have demonstrated limited long-term benefit and impact on future surgery. This study aimed to investigate the use of caudal epidural injections in a district general hospital setting and the rate of subsequent operation. Methods. All patients undergoing caudal epidural injection between 1. st. January and 30. th. June 2015 were included. Records were reviewed to obtain diagnosis, pre- and post-epidural clinical findings, prior interventions, and subsequent operations. Results. A total of 141 patients underwent a caudal epidural, with a median age of 63 (18 – 90). 37 patients went on to surgical intervention within 3 years, resulting in a conversion rate of 26.1%. Amongst those not requiring surgery, 59 (56.19%) had disc herniation, 42 (40%) stenosis, 4 spondylolisthesis, and 1 a facet cyst. Pre-operatively 63.81% reported back pain and 93.33% sciatica. 39.05% of patients had sensorimotor changes. Post-operatively, 27.62% reported an improvement in their back pain, compared to 62.86% reporting improved leg pain. 36.59% of those with sensorimotor changes reported improvement. 32 later had a further caudal epidural or foraminal block, and 25 had facet and sacroiliac joint injections. Amongst those requiring surgery, 21 (56.76%) had disc herniation, 15 (40.54%) stenosis, and 1 spondylolisthesis (2.7%). Conclusion. In our series, approximately three quarters of patients undergoing caudal epidural injection did not subsequently require surgery. Lumbosacral radicular symptoms improved in two thirds, however the epidural was less effective at treating back pain. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Background and purpose of the study. Axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is commonly mistaken as chronic mechanical back pain. Delayed diagnosis averages 5- 8 years with impacts on effective and timely management, outcomes and quality of life. NICE Guidance (2017) highlights the importance of the recognition and referral of suspected axial spondyloarthritis. This study investigated the occurrence of physiotherapy care prior to diagnosis of axSpA within physiotherapy outpatient settings. Methods and results. A retrospective review was performed of all patients diagnosed with axSpA who had received physiotherapy care prior to their diagnosis from 1990–2016. Three or more episodes of care prior to diagnosis was taken as unrecognised axSpA. Information was obtained on diagnostic codes, number of episodes of care and contacts per episode from nine outpatient physiotherapy services. Analysis showed that 263 people (17–69 years) diagnosed with axSpAs had received physiotherapy care prior to diagnosis. Within this population, 103 (44%) had received ≥3 episodes of care. Number of contacts within each episode ranged from 3 (47 people) to 58 (1 person) [median=11 contacts-10 people]. Average time from initial physiotherapy episode to date of diagnosis was 6.4 years (range=0.3–12.8 years, median=8.8 years). The most common assigned diagnostic code was back pain (49.6%), followed by shoulder (11.1%), knee (8.5%), neck (7.7%), ankle/foot (4.3%), tendonitis (4.2%), joint pain (3.4%), osteoarthritis (3.4%) and sacroiliac joint (2%). Conclusion. Findings illustrate the extent of unrecognised axial spondyloarthritis referred to and missed in musculoskeletal physiotherapy practice. It is essential to improve screening and recognition of inflammatory back pain and possible axSpA in musculoskeletal assessments, supported by rheumatology referral guidance. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Background and aims. The EU-funded Back-UP project aims to develop a cloud computer platform to guide the treatment of low back and neck pain (LBNP) in first contact care and early rehabilitation. In order to identify evidence-based treatment options that can be recommended and are accessible to people with LBNP across Europe, we conducted a systematic review of recently published guidelines. Methods. Electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, HMIC, Epistemonikos, PEDro, TRIP, NICE, SIGN, WHO, Guidelines International Network (G-I-N) and DynaMed Plus were searched. We searched for guidelines published by European health professional or guideline development organisations since 2013, focusing on the primary care management of adult patients presenting with back or neck pain (including whiplash associated symptoms, radicular pain, and pregnancy-related LBP). The AGREE-II tool was used to assess the quality of guideline development and reporting. Results. Searches generated 3098 unique citations that were screened for eligibility. A total of 189 full-texts were retrieved, and 18 guidelines were included in the review (from the UK, Germany, France, Italy, Denmark, Poland, Belgium, and the Netherlands). Data extraction showed considerable variation in guideline development processes, especially regarding the methods used for identifying, appraising, and synthesising evidence, and for formulating, agreeing, and grading recommendations. Conclusions. Recommendations for the management of LBNP cover a wide range of treatment options, with self-management advice, analgesics, and exercise proposed as core treatments by most guidelines. A narrative synthesis, taking into account consistency, strength, and quality of guideline recommendations, will be presented. No conflicts of interest. Funding: This abstract presents independent research within the Back-UP project, which has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 777090. This document reflects only the views of the authors, and the European Commission is not liable for any use that may be made of its contents. The information in this document is provided “as is”, without warranty of any kind, and accept no liability for loss or damage suffered by any person using this information

Aims

People with severe, persistent low back pain (LBP) may be offered lumbar spine fusion surgery if they have had insufficient benefit from recommended non-surgical treatments. However, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2016 guidelines recommended not offering spinal fusion surgery for adults with LBP, except as part of a randomized clinical trial. This survey aims to describe UK clinicians’ views about the suitability of patients for such a future trial, along with their views regarding equipoise for randomizing patients in a future clinical trial comparing lumbar spine fusion surgery to best conservative care (BCC; the FORENSIC-UK trial).

To describe the development of a system of referral, initial data acquisition and subsequent database recording and outcome reporting for metastatic spinal cord compression. Deficiencies in the literature identified by the NICE GDG for MSCC for research were compared with our original database and modifications made to ensure prospective collection of currently recognised and some proposed relevant factors. In addition modifications were made to ensure that all NICE implementation audit data and “target “ data are recorded and can be seamlessly transferred to necessary destinations. This generates standardised reports of the presentation, management and longitudinal interval outcomes including analogue pain scales, analgesic requirement, neurological function, Karnofsky performance indices, Euroquols, and ODIs. It includes pretreatment prognostic indices (updated 2005 Tokuhashi scores) relevant to treatment selection and scale of surgical intervention. Outcomes can be subclassified by type of intervention relative to clinical status at intervention. In house live assessment has revealed some reducing minor operational flaws and initial external assessment is current. A comprehensive information system and treatment guide for this increasing group has been developed and is evolving. Common adoption would facilitate earlier recognition and optimise treatment to diminish the high human and financial cost of MSCC. Currently networks are setting up NSSGs and for this process to be enhanced and to avoid costly duplication adoption of this system modified following peer review is suggested

Aims

Scoliosis is a lateral curvature of the spine with associated rotation, often causing distress due to appearance. For some curves, there is good evidence to support the use of a spinal brace, worn for 20 to 24 hours a day to minimize the curve, making it as straight as possible during growth, preventing progression. Compliance can be poor due to appearance and comfort. A night-time brace, worn for eight to 12 hours, can achieve higher levels of curve correction while patients are supine, and could be preferable for patients, but evidence of efficacy is limited. This is the protocol for a randomized controlled trial of ‘full-time bracing’ versus ‘night-time bracing’ in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Background. The BACK To Health programme is part of the wider North of England back pain and radicular pain pathway. The purpose of this programme is to provide a CPPP approach based on the NICE guidelines CG88 for those with back pain that has not responded to early management and simpler therapies. The purpose of this study is to present preliminary results of this programme. Method. Referral onto the programme occurred through triage and treat practitioners or consultant clinics. A total of 44 patients were referred, with 31 attending the programme. The programme was delivered as a 3 week residential programme, with patients present 9am-5pm Monday to Thursday. A MDT provided an intense programme consisting of education, physical exercise, practical coping strategies and group discussion. The work has received ethical approval from the School of Health and Social Care Research Ethics and Governance committee at Teesside University. Results. Significant improvements (p<0.05) were seen in the, EQ-5D-5L, GAD-7, PHQ9, pain VAS scores (respective mean improvement 0.170, 5.2, 5.5 and 1.25). Significant improvement (p<0.05) was seen in ODI scores but with a mean improvement of 7% clinical significance was not achieved. Self-management confidence by the end averaged 6/10. Conclusion. The majority of patients showed good response to the BACK To Health Programme. After undergoing 3 weeks of education and exercise using cognitive behavioural principles early improvements were seen in GAD-7, PHQ9, Pain VAS and EQ/5D/5L. At 6 months and 1 year we will follow these patients up to continually assess progress. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

A statement of the purposes of the study and background:. Merely publishing clinical guidelines is insufficient to ensure their implementation in clinical practice. We aimed to clarify the decision-making processes that result in the delivery of particular treatments to patients with low back pain (LBP) in primary care and to examine clinicians' perspectives on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines for managing LBP in primary care. A summary of the methods used and the results:. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 53 purposively-sampled clinicians from south-west England. Participants were: 16 General Practitioners (GPs), 10 chiropractors, 8 acupuncturists, 8 physiotherapists, 7 osteopaths, and 4 nurses. Thematic analysis showed that official guidelines comprised just one of many inputs to clinical decision-making. Clinicians drew on personal experience and inter-professional networks and were constrained by organisational factors when deciding which treatment to prescribe, refer for, or deliver to an individual patient with LBP. Some found the guideline terminology - “non-specific LBP” - unfamiliar and of limited relevance to practice. They were frustrated by disparities between recommendations in the guidelines and the real-world situation of short consultation times, difficult-to-access specialist services and sparse commissioning of guideline-recommended treatments. A conclusion:. The NICE guidelines for managing LBP in primary care are one, relatively peripheral, influence on clinical decision-making among GPs, chiropractors, acupuncturists, physiotherapists, osteopaths, and nurses. When revised, these guidelines could be made more clinically relevant by: ensuring guideline terminology reflects clinical practice terminology; dispelling the image of guidelines as rigid and prohibiting patient-centred care; providing opportunities for clinicians to engage in experiential learning about guideline-recommended therapies; and commissioning guideline-recommended treatments for NHS patients

Introduction. Spinal conditions commonly cause pain and disability. Various non-operative treatments including acupuncture are practiced for these conditions. Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture in management of common spinal conditions. Methodology. Between Jan 2011 and Feb 2013, 151 patients who received manual acupuncture in a hospital environment were assessed for pain improvement on Numerical-rating- scale (NRS) of 0–10, overall improvement with Core Outcome Measure Index (COMI) and for satisfaction with the care. Results. 110 had low back pain with and or radicular symptoms, 33 had neck pain and or radicular symptoms, 05 had thoracic and 04 multilevel symptoms. Average number of session given were 3.98 (range 2 to 8). Minimum and maximum reported pain improved statistically from 4.17 to 2.94 (Df 1.2, p = 0.00) and 8.00 to 6.03 (Df 1.9, p = 0.00) respectively but were below Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of 2. COMI improved statistically from 6.39(SD1.6) to 5.37 (SD 1.9) (Df 1.02, p = 0.00) that was below group MCID of COMI of 2.6. Seventy-five required further treatment, 49 were discharged and 11 patient did not complete the treatment. Discussion. Acupuncture is an NICE recommended established adjuvant treatment for treating common spinal conditions. This study demonstrates it to a be a safe technique with high patient satisfaction with statistically significant improvement in outcome measures that are below MCID of improvement raising questions on its cost effectiveness in routine clinical practice