There is an inherent risk of iatrogenic new neurological deficit (NND) arising at the spinal cord, cauda equina and nerve root during spinal surgery. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) can be employed to preserve spinal cord function during spinal surgery. IONM techniques include somatosensory and motor evoked potentials, amongst others. A Canadian survey of 95 spinal surgeons showed that 62.1% used IONM and a similar survey in France of 117 spinal surgeons showed that only 36% used IONM. Unavailability was a common reason for its disuse. Current literature by the British Society of Clinical Neurophysiology has outlined the importance of IONM in preventing NND and the need for the implementation of guidelines for IONM. The lack of an established guideline has resulted in a varied approach in the use of IONM in England. There has been no previous attempt to ascertain the current use of IONM in England. Our study is aimed at assessing the variability of the use of IONM in England as well as identifying the rationale amongst surgeons that dictate their use of IONM. We are in the process of investigating the indications of use of IONM for cervical and lumbar spine procedures in 252 spinal surgeons from 33 hospitals with spinal services. Our survey will illustrate the current use of IONM in spinal surgery in England. It will highlight some of the reasons for the variability of use of IONM and identify factors that can contribute to a more standardised use of IONM in spinal surgery

Introduction. Changes in central nervous system (CNS) pathways controlling trunk and leg muscles in patients with low back pain(LBP) and lumbar radiculopathy have been observed and this study investigated whether surgery impacts upon these changes in the long term. Methods. 80 participants were recruited into the following groups: 25 surgery(S), 20 chronic LBP(CH), 14 spinal injection(SI), and 21 controls(C). Parameters of corticospinal control were examined before, at 6, 26 and 52 weeks following lumbar decompression surgery and equivalent intervals. Electromyographic(EMG) activity was recorded from tibialis anterior(TA), soleus(SOL), rectus abdominis(RA), external oblique(EO) and erector spinae(ES) muscles at the T12&L4 levels in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) and cortical silent periods(cSP) recruitment curves(RC) were analysed. Results. Trunk muscles in all patients had reduced raw EMG (P<0.001), increased motor thresholds (MTh;P<0.001) and MEP RC slopes. MTh in ESL4 correlated with back pain in all patients (r=0.201, P=0.016) and soleus MTh laterality with disability in surgery patients (r=0.49, P=0.018). S&SI patients displayed bilaterally increased soleus cSP (p<0.001), MEP latencies on the painful side (P<0.001), and cSP asymmetry (cSPA;P<0.001). cSPA resulted from abnormal soleus late responses on the painful side, indicating compromised agonist-antagonist control in patients with radiculopathy. In contrast to SI, surgery significantly reduced soleus cSPA and MEP latencies at 6 weeks (P≤0.034). Discussion. These results show long term changes in CNS control of trunk and leg muscles in radiculopathy and LBP, which are only partly reversed by surgery, and may provide future therapeutic targets to address the altered inhibitory processes within the brain. No conflicts of Interest. Sources of funding: The DISCS foundation. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting

Summary Statement. The spinal cord showed marked sensibility to acute compression causing complete and irreversible injury. On the contrary, the spinal cord has more ability for adaptation to slow progressive compression mechanisms having the possibility of neural recovery after compression release. Introduction. The aim of this experimental study was to establish, by means of neurophysiologic monitoring, the degree of compression needed to cause neurologic injury to the spinal cord, and analyze whether these limits are different making fast or slow compression. Material and Methods. Spinal cord was exposed from T7 to T11 in 5 domestic pigs with a mean weight of 35 kg. The T8 and T9 spinal roots were also exposed. A pair of sticks, attached to a precise compression device, was set up to both sides of the spinal cord between T8 and T9 roots. Sequentially, the sticks were approximated 0.5 mm every 2 minutes causing progressive spinal cord compression. An acute compression of the spinal cord was also reproduced by a 2.5 mm displacement of the sticks. Cord to cord motor evoked potentials were obtained with two epidural catheters, stimulating proximal to T6 and recording below the compression level, distal to T10, for each sequential approach of the sticks. Results. The mean width of the dural sac was 7.1 mm. For progressive compression, increasing latency and decreasing amplitude of the evoked potentials were observed after a mean displacement of the sticks of 3.2 ± 0.9 mm, the evoked potential finally disappearing after a mean displacement of 4.6 ± 1.2 mm. The potential returned 16.8 ± 3.2 minutes after the compression was stopped in every case. The evoked potentials immediately disappeared after an acute compression 2.5 ± 0.3 mm, without any sign of recovering after 30 minutes. Conclusion. The proposed experimental model replicates the mechanism of a spinal cord injury caused by medially displaced screws into the spinal canal, causing therefore lateral compression to the spinal cord. The spinal cord showed marked sensibility to acute compression, which caused complete and irreversible injury. On the contrary, the spinal cord has more ability for adaptation to progressive and slow compression mechanisms. From a clinical point of view, it seems mandatory to avoid maneuvers of rapid mobilization or acute, even minimal, contusions of the thoracic cord