The medial approach for the treatment of children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in whom closed reduction has failed requires minimal access with negligible blood loss. In the United Kingdom, there is a preference for these children to be treated using an anterolateral approach after the appearance of the ossific nucleus. In this study we compared these two protocols, primarily for the risk of osteonecrosis. Data were gathered prospectively for protocols involving the medial approach (26 hips in 22 children) and the anterolateral approach (22 hips in 21 children) in children aged <  24 months at the time of surgery. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head was assessed with validated scores. The acetabular index (AI) and centre–edge angle (CEA) were also measured. . The mean age of the children at the time of surgery was 11 months (3 to 24) for the medial approach group and 18 months (12 to 24) for the anterolateral group, and the combined mean follow-up was 70 months (26 to 228). Osteonecrosis of the femoral head was evident or asphericity predicted in three of 26 hips (12%) in the medial approach group and four of 22 (18%) in the anterolateral group (p = 0.52). The mean improvement in AI was 8.8° (4° to 12°) and 7.9° (6° to 10°), respectively, at two years post-operatively (p = 0.18). There was no significant difference in CEA values of affected hips between the two groups. Children treated using an early medial approach did not have a higher risk of developing osteonecrosis at early to mid-term follow-up than those treated using a delayed anterolateral approach. The rates of acetabular remodelling were similar for both protocols. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:406–13

A technique for epiphysiodesis using a cannulated tubesaw has been developed to combine the precision of the original Phemister method with newer percutaneous methods. The approach is unilateral, and requires minimal access. Reinsertion of the removed core of bone reduces haemorrhage from the defect and augments arrest of the growth plate. In 35 patients treated by this method predicted discrepancies of 2 to 4.5 cm were reliably reduced to 0.7 ± 0.6 cm, with no serious complications. The timing of surgery is critical, and relies upon careful monitoring of the pattern of discrepancy over several years, using clinical and radiographic measurements. Undercorrection of the disparity in three patients was the direct result of late referral