The term mid-flexion instability has entered the orthopaedic literature as a concept, but has not been confirmed as a distinct clinical entity. The term is used freely, sometimes as a synonym for flexion instability. However, the terms need to be clearly separated. A cadaver study published in 1990 associated joint line elevation with decreased stability at many angles of flexion, but that model was not typical of clinical scenarios. The literature is considered and it is proposed that the more common entity of an uncorrected flexion contracture after a measured resection arthroplasty technique is more likely to produce clinical findings that suggest instability mid-flexion. It is proposed that the clinical scenario encountered is generalised instability, with the appearance of stability in full extension from tight posterior structures. This paper seeks to clarify whether mid-flexion instability exists as an entity distinct from other commonly recognised forms of instability. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B(1 Suppl A):84–8

Aims. Surgeons commonly resect additional distal femur during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to correct a flexion contracture, which leads to femoral joint line elevation. There is a paucity of data describing the effect of joint line elevation on mid-flexion stability and knee kinematics. Thus, the goal of this study was to quantify the effect of joint line elevation on mid-flexion laxity. Methods. Six computational knee models with cadaver-specific capsular and collateral ligament properties were implanted with a posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA. A 10° flexion contracture was created in each model to simulate a capsular contracture. Distal femoral resections of + 2 mm and + 4 mm were then simulated for each knee. The knee models were then extended under a standard moment. Subsequently, varus and valgus moments of 10 Nm were applied as the knee was flexed from 0° to 90° at baseline and repeated after each of the two distal resections. Coronal laxity (the sum of varus and valgus angulation with respective maximum moments) was measured throughout flexion. Results. With + 2 mm resection at 30° and 45° of flexion, mean coronal laxity increased by a mean of 3.1° (SD 0.18°) (p < 0.001) and 2.7° (SD 0.30°) (p < 0.001), respectively. With + 4 mm resection at 30° and 45° of flexion, mean coronal laxity increased by 6.5° (SD 0.56°) (p < 0.001) and 5.5° (SD 0.72°) (p < 0.001), respectively. Maximum increased coronal laxity for a + 4 mm resection occurred at a mean 15.7° (11° to 33°) of flexion with a mean increase of 7.8° (SD 0.2°) from baseline. Conclusion. With joint line elevation in primary PS TKA, coronal laxity peaks early (about 16°) with a maximum laxity of 8°. Surgeons should restore the joint line if possible; however, if joint line elevation is necessary, we recommend assessment of coronal laxity at 15° to 30° of knee flexion to assess for mid-flexion instability. Further in vivo studies are warranted to understand if this mid-flexion coronal laxity has negative clinical implications. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):87–93

Abstract. Introduction. Mid-flexion instability may cause poor outcomes following TKA. Surgical technique, patient-specific factors, and implant design could all contribute to it, with modelling and fluoroscopy data suggesting the latter may be the root cause. However, current implants all pass the preclinical stability testing standards, making it difficult to understand the effects of implant design on instability. We hypothesized that a more physiological test, analysing functional stability across the range of knee flexion-extension, could delineate the effects of design, independent of surgical technique and patient-specific factors. Methods. Using a SIMvitro-controlled six-degree-of-freedom robot, a dynamic stability test was developed, including continuous flexion and reporting data in a trans-epicondylar axis system. 3 femoral geometries were tested: gradually reducing radius, multi-radius and single-radius, with their respective tibial inserts. 710N of compression force (body weight) was applied to the implants as they were flexed from 0–140° with three levels of anterior/posterior (AP) tibial force applied (−90N,0N,90N). Results. While in static tests, the implants performed similarly, functional stability testing revealed different paths of motion and AP laxities throughout the flexion cycle. Some designs exhibited mid-flexion instability, while others did not: the multi-radius design allowed increased AP laxity as it transitioned to each arc of reduced femoral component radius; the single-radius design had low tibial bearing conformity, allowing 16mm difference in the paths of mid-flexion versus extension motion. Conclusions. Preclinical lab testing reveals functional differences between different design philosophies. Implant design impacts kinematics and mid-flexion stability, even before factoring in surgical technique and patient-specific factors

Introduction. Clinical observations suggest mid-flexion instability may occur more commonly with rotating platform (RP) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), including increased revision rates and patient-reported instability and pain. We propose that increased gap laxity leads to liftoff of the lateral femoral condyle with decreased conformity between the femoral component and polyethylene (PE) insert surface leading to PE subluxation or dislocation. The objectives of this study were to define “at risk” loading conditions that predispose patients to PE insert subluxation or spinout, and to quantify the margin of error for flexion/extension gap laxity in preventing these adverse events under physiologic loading conditions. Methods. Biomechanical testing was performed on six fresh frozen cadaveric knees implanted with a posterior stabilized RP TKA using a gap balancing technique. Rotational displacement and torque were measured over time, while stiffness, yield torque, max torque and displacement were calculated using a post-processing, custom MatLab code. Revision with varying size femoral components (size 3–6) and PE insert thicknesses (10–15mm), by downsizing one step, were used to create a spectrum of flexion/extension gap mismatch. Each configuration was subjected to three loaded testing conditions (0°, 30° and 60° flexion) in balanced and eccentric varus loading, known to represent daily clinical function and “at risk” circumstances. Results. PE insert rotational instability was primarily determined by conformity and contact area between the femoral condyle and the upper surface of the PE insert. In this RP design, contact area is known to decrease with flexion greater than 35°, which predisposed to abnormal motion of the femur on PE insert (Figure 1). Under all flexion/extension gap testing conditions, PE insert rotational displacement significantly decreased with increasing knee flexion (differences ranged from 0.42 to 1.01cm, p<0.05), confirming that decreased conformity allows unintended motion to occur on the upper rather than the lower insert surface, as kinematically designed. This decrease in insert rotation was further exacerbated with eccentric medial-sided loading (differences ranged from 0.77 to 1.18cm, p<0.05). Yield torque (19.66±6.79N-m, p=0.033) and max torque (19.76±5.93N-m, p=0.014) significantly increased with increasing flexion from 0° to 60° under gap balanced conditions. Yield torque significantly decreased with greater flexion gap laxity at 60° of flexion (−24.82±5.96N-m, p=0.004). The depth of the lateral PE insert concavity (1.7–3.6mm) varied with insert size and thickness and determined femoral condylar capture. The lateral insert concavity defines a narrow margin of error in flexion/extension gap asymmetry leading to rotational insert instability, especially in smaller sized knees (size 3) where the jump height (1.7mm) is less than the insert sizing increment of 2.5mm. Conclusions. Contact area is known to decrease with flexion greater than 35° in this TKA-RP design. Flexion gap laxity further increased the risk of unintended top-side rotation of the femur on the insert, especially with increasing flexion and smaller components. In RP-TKA, in addition to medial-lateral gap symmetry and flexion-extension balance, a snug flexion gap with less than 2mm lateral laxity is critical to avoid insert instability and condylar escape with insert subluxation. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Aims

The mid-term results of kinematic alignment (KA) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using image derived instrumentation (IDI) have not been reported in detail, and questions remain regarding ligamentous stability and revisions. This paper aims to address the following: 1) what is the distribution of alignment of KA TKAs using IDI; 2) is a TKA alignment category associated with increased risk of failure or poor patient outcomes; 3) does extending limb alignment lead to changes in soft-tissue laxity; and 4) what is the five-year survivorship and outcomes of KA TKA using IDI?

Aims

This prospective study reports longitudinal, within-patient, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) over a 15-year period following cemented single radius total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Secondary aims included reporting PROMs trajectory, 15-year implant survival, and patient attrition from follow-up.

Aims

Mid-level constraint designs for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are intended to reduce coronal plane laxity. Our aims were to compare kinematics and ligament forces of the Zimmer Biomet Persona posterior-stabilized (PS) and mid-level designs in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes under loads simulating clinical exams of the knee in a cadaver model.

Limb alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) influences periarticular soft-tissue tension, biomechanics through knee flexion, and implant survival. Despite this, there is no uniform consensus on the optimal alignment technique for TKA. Neutral mechanical alignment facilitates knee flexion and symmetrical component wear but forces the limb into an unnatural position that alters native knee kinematics through the arc of knee flexion. Kinematic alignment aims to restore native limb alignment, but the safe ranges with this technique remain uncertain and the effects of this alignment technique on component survivorship remain unknown. Anatomical alignment aims to restore predisease limb alignment and knee geometry, but existing studies using this technique are based on cadaveric specimens or clinical trials with limited follow-up times. Functional alignment aims to restore the native plane and obliquity of the joint by manipulating implant positioning while limiting soft tissue releases, but the results of high-quality studies with long-term outcomes are still awaited. The drawbacks of existing studies on alignment include the use of surgical techniques with limited accuracy and reproducibility of achieving the planned alignment, poor correlation of intraoperative data to long-term functional outcomes and implant survivorship, and a paucity of studies on the safe ranges of limb alignment. Further studies on alignment in TKA should use surgical adjuncts (e.g. robotic technology) to help execute the planned alignment with improved accuracy, include intraoperative assessments of knee biomechanics and periarticular soft-tissue tension, and correlate alignment to long-term functional outcomes and survivorship.

Aims

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using functional alignment aims to implant the components with minimal compromise of the soft-tissue envelope by restoring the plane and obliquity of the non-arthritic joint. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of TKA with functional alignment on mediolateral soft-tissue balance as assessed using intraoperative sensor-guided technology.

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to compare the postoperative systemic inflammatory response in conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty (conventional TKA) versus robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty (robotic TKA). Secondary aims were to compare the macroscopic soft tissue injury, femoral and tibial bone trauma, localized thermal response, and the accuracy of component positioning between the two treatment groups.

Aims

The aim of this study was to establish the results of isolated exchange of the tibial polyethylene insert in revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) in patients with well-fixed femoral or tibial components. We report on a series of RTKAs where only the polyethylene was replaced, and the patients were followed for a mean of 13.2 years (10.0 to 19.1).

As part of the national initiative to reduce waiting times for joint replacement surgery in Wales, the Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust referred 224 patients to the NHS Treatment Centre in Weston-Super-Mare for total knee replacement (TKR). A total of 258 Kinemax TKRs were performed between November 2004 and August 2006. Of these, a total of 199 patients (232 TKRs, 90%) have been followed up for five years. This cohort was compared with 258 consecutive TKRs in 250 patients, performed at Cardiff and Vale Orthopaedic Centre (CAVOC) over a similar time period. The five year cumulative survival rate was 80.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 74.0 to 86.0) in the Weston-Super-Mare cohort and 95.0% (95% CI 90.2 to 98.2) in the CAVOC cohort with revision for any reason as the endpoint. The relative risk for revision at Weston-Super-Mare compared with CAVOC was 3.88 (p < 0.001). For implants surviving five years, the mean Oxford knee scores (OKS) and mean EuroQol (EQ-5D) scores were similar (OKS: Weston-Super-Mare 29 (2 to 47) vs CAVOC 29.8 (3 to 48), p = 0.61; EQ-5D: Weston-Super-Mare 0.53 (-0.38 to 1.00) vs CAVOC 0.55 (-0.32 to 1.00), p = 0.79). Patients with revised TKRs had significantly lower Oxford knee and EQ-5D scores (p < 0.001).

The results show a higher revision rate for patients operated at Weston-Super-Mare Treatment Centre, with a reduction in functional outcome and quality of life after revision. This further confirms that patients moved from one area to another for joint replacement surgery fare poorly.