Introduction. The increase in revision joint replacement surgery and fractures of bone around orthopaedic implants may be partly addressed by keeping bone healthy around orthopaedic implants by inserting implants with mechanical properties closer to the patient's bone properties. We do not currently have an accurate way of calculating a patient's bone mechanical properties. We therefore posed a simple question: can data derived from a micro-indenter be used to calculate bone stiffness?. Methods. We received ethical approval to retrieve femoral heads and necks from patients undergoing hip replacement surgery for research. Cortical bone from the medial calcar region of the femoral neck was cut into 3×3×6mm cuboid specimens using a diamond wafering blade. Micro-indentation testing was performed in the direction of loading of the bone using a MicroMaterials (MicroMaterials, UK) indenter, using the high load micro-indentation stage (see Figure 1). To simulate in vivo testing, the samples were kept hydrated and were not fixed or polished. From the unloading curve after indentation, the elastic modulus was calculated, using the Oliver-Pharr method using the indentation machine software. To assess which microindentation machine settings most precisely calculate the elastic modulus we varied the loading and unloading rates, load and indenter tip shape (diamond Berkovich tip, 1mm diameter Zirconia spherical tip and 1.5mm diameter ruby spherical tip). Following this, for 11 patients' bone, we performed compression testing of the same samples after they were indented with the 1.5mm diameter ruby spherical tip to assess if there was a correlation between indentation values of apparent elastic modulus and apparent modulus values calculated by compression testing (see Figure 2). Platens compression testing was performed using an Instron 5565 (Instron, USA) materials testing machine. Bluehill compliance correction software (Instron, USA) was used to correct for machine compliance. The strain rate was set at 0.03mm/s. The apparent elastic modulus was calculated from the slope of the elastic region of the stress-strain graph. The correlation between values of apparent modulus from compression testing and indentation were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 22. Results. The most precise results were obtained using a spherical indenter tip (1.5 mm diameter ruby ball), rather than a sharp Berkovich tip, high load (10N), a loading rate of 100 mN/s and unloading rate of 300 mN/s with a pause of 60 seconds at maximum load. We also used multiple load cycles with a peak load of 10N (see Figure 3). Using these optimal settings we calculated the mean elastic modulus over 10 cycles of testing with six indents on one sample to be 11.8 GPa (+/− 1.01). There was a moderate correlation between indentation and compression values of apparent modulus (r=0.62, n=11, p=0.04). Discussion. By using a spherical indenter tip and fast unloading it was possible to get precise apparent modulus values. The apparent modulus derived from micro-indentation, correlated moderately with that derived from direct compression testing. This early data suggests that microindentation may become a clinically relevant test of bone quality in real time

HXLPE acetabular liners were introduced to reduce wear-related complications in THA. However, post-irradiation thermal free radical stabilization can compromise mechanical properties, leave oxidation-prone residual free radicals, or both. Reports of mechanical failure of HXLPE acetabular liner rims raise concerns about thermal free radical stabilization and in vivo oxidization on implant properties. The purpose of this study is to explore the differences in the mechanical, physical and chemical properties of HXLPE acetabular liner rims after extended time in vivo between liners manufactured with different thermal free radical stabilization techniques. Remelted, single annealed and sequentially annealed retrieved HXLPE acetabular liners with in vivo times greater than 4.5 years were obtained from our implant retrieval laboratory. All retrieved liners underwent an identical sanitation and storage protocol. For mechanical testing, a total of 55 explants and 13 control liners were tested. Explant in vivo time ranged from 4.6 – 14 years and ex vivo time ranged from 0 – 11.6 years. Rim mechanical properties were tested by microindentation hardness testing using a Micromet II Vickers microhardness tester following ASTM standards. A subset of 16 explants with ex vivo time under one year along with five control liners were assessed for oxidation by FTIR, crystallinity by Raman spectroscopy, and evidence of microcracking by SEM. No significant difference in in vivo or ex vivo was found between thermal stabilization groups in either set of explants studied. In the mechanically tested explants, there was no significant correlation between in vivo time and Vickers hardness in any thermal stabilization group. A significant correlation was found between ex vivo time and hardness in remelted liners (r=.520, p = .011), but not in either annealed cohort. ANCOVA with ex vivo time as a covariate found a significant difference in hardness between the thermal free radical stabilization groups (p 0.1) was found in retrieved remelted (25%), single annealed (100%) and sequentially annealed (75%) liner rims. Crystallinity was increased in the subsurface region relative to control liners for both annealed, but not remelted, liner rims. Hardness was increased in oxidized rims for both annealed cohorts but not in the remelted cohort. Microcracking was only found along the surface of one unoxidized remelted liner rim. Mechanical properties were reduced at baseline and worsened after in vivo time for remelted HXLPE liner rims. Rim oxidation was detected in all groups. Oxidation was associated with increased crystallinity and hardness in annealed cohorts, but not remelted liners. Increased crystallinity and oxidation do not appear to be directly causing the worsened mechanical behavior of remelted HXLPE liner rims after extended in vivo time

Introduction. HXLPE acetabular liners were introduced to reduce wear-related complications in THA. However, post-irradiation thermal free radical stabilization can compromise mechanical properties, leave oxidation-prone residual free radicals, or both. Reports of mechanical failure of HXLPE acetabular liner rims raise concerns about thermal free radical stabilization and in vivo oxidization on implant properties. The purpose of this study is to explore the differences in the mechanical, physical and chemical properties of HXLPE acetabular liner rims after extended time in vivo between liners manufactured with different thermal free radical stabilization techniques. Material and Methods. Remelted, single annealed and sequentially annealed retrieved HXLPE acetabular liners with in vivo times greater than 4.5 years were obtained from our implant retrieval laboratory. All retrieved liners underwent an identical sanitation and storage protocol. For mechanical testing, a total of 55 explants and 13 control liners were tested. Explant in vivo time ranged from 4.6 – 14.0 years and ex vivo time ranged from 0 – 11.6 years. Rim mechanical properties were tested by microindentation hardness testing using a Micromet II Vickers microhardness tester following ASTM standards. A subset of 16 explants with ex vivo time under one year along with five control liners were assessed for oxidation by FTIR, crystallinity by Raman spectroscopy, and evidence of microcracking by SEM. Results. No significant difference in in vivo or ex vivo time was found between thermal stabilization groups in either set of explants studied. In the mechanically tested explants, there was no significant correlation between in vivo time and Vickers hardness in any thermal stabilization group. A significant correlation was found between ex vivo time and hardness in remelted liners (r=.520, p=.011), but not in either annealed cohort. ANCOVA with ex vivo time as a covariate found a significant difference in hardness between the thermal free radical stabilization groups (p<.0005, η. 2. = 0.322). Post hoc analysis revealed hardness was significantly lower in the retrieved remelted group compared to both the single annealed (p=.001) and sequentially annealed (p<.0005) cohorts. Hardness was significantly higher in the retrieved remelted liners compared to controls (p=.007), with no different in either annealed cohort. Detectable subsurface oxidation (OI > 0.1) was found in retrieved remelted (25%), single annealed (100%) and sequentially annealed (75%) liner rims. Crystallinity was increased in the subsurface region relative to control liners for both annealed, but not remelted, liner rims. Hardness was increased in oxidized rims for both annealed cohorts but not in the remelted cohort. Microcracking was only found along the surface of one unoxidized remelted liner rim. Conclusion. Mechanical properties were reduced at baseline and worsened after in vivo time for remelted HXLPE liner rims. Rim oxidation was detected in all groups. Oxidation was associated with increased crystallinity and hardness in annealed cohorts, but not remelted liners. Increased crystallinity and oxidation do not appear to be directly causing the worsened mechanical behavior of remelted HXLPE liner rims after extended in vivo time. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly