The use of routine sampling for histological analysis during revision hip replacement has been standard practice in our unit for many years. It is used to identify the presence of inflammatory processes that may represent peri-prosthetic infection. This study follows up on a smaller study in the same unit in 2019 where an initial 152 cases were scrutinised. In this follow up study we examined 1,361 consecutive patients over a 16-year period whom had undergone revision hip replacement in a tertiary orthopaedic centre for any reason excluding primary bone tumour or malignant metastasis. All patients had tissue sampling for histopathological analysis performed by consultant histopathologists with a specialist interest in musculoskeletal pathology. The presence of bacteria in greater than 50% of samples sent for microbiological analysis in each patient was used as the gold standard diagnostic comparator for infection. This was then compared with the histology report for each patient. After excluding 219 patients with incomplete data and 1 sample rejection, 1,141 cases were examined. Microbiology confirmed infection in 132 cases (prevalence of infection 11.04%) and histopathology analysis suggested infection in 171 cases. Only 64 cases with confirmed infection in more than 50% of microbiology samples had concurrent diagnosis of infection on histological analysis (5.60% of total; PPV 51.20%). Furthermore, microbiology analysis confirmed infection in 62 cases where histological analysis failed to identify infection (5.43% of total; False negative rate 49.21%). Overall, histopathology analysis was seen to have a good specificity of 93.99% but poor sensitivity of 50.79%. We believe that this is the largest series in the literature and is somewhat unique in that all histology analysis was performed by consultant histopathologists with specialist interest in musculoskeletal pathology. Based on the costs incurred by this additional investigation our experience does not support routine sampling for histological analysis in revision hip arthroplasty. This is a substantial paradigm shift from current practice among revision arthroplasty surgeons in the United Kingdom but would equate to a substantial cost saving

Aims. The purpose of this study was to validate the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register (DHR). Patients and Methods. We identified a cohort of patients from the DHR who had undergone primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) since 1 January 2005 and followed them until first-time revision, death, emigration or until 31 December 2012. Revision for PJI, as registered in the DHR, was validated against a benchmark which included information from microbiology databases, prescription registers, clinical biochemistry registers and clinical records. We estimated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for PJI in the DHR alone and in the DHR when combined with microbiology databases. Results. In total, 1382 of the 37 826 primary THAs in the DHR were registered as having been revised for any cause once 26 patients with errors in registration had been excluded: 232 of these were for PJI. For this group, the sensitivity was 67%, specificity 95%, PPV 77%, and NPV 92%. Combining the data from the DHR with those from microbiology databases increased the sensitivity to 90% and also improved specificity (100%), PPV (98%) and NPV (98%). Conclusion. Only two thirds of revisions for PJI were captured in the DHR and only 77% of the PJI reported to the DHR could be confirmed to be infected. . Take home message: combining the data from the DHR with those from microbiology databases substantially improved the validity of the diagnosis of PJI and should enable future register-based studies. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:320–5

The documentation of deep infection rates in joint replacement is fraught with multiple difficulties. Deep infections acquired in theatre may present late, but some later presenting deep infections are clearly haematogenous, and not related to surgical management. The effect of Ultra Clean Air on infection rates was published by Charnley in 1972 (CORR,87:167–187). The data is valuable because large numbers of THRs were performed in standard and Ultra Clean theatres, and detailed microbiology of the air was also recorded. No IV antibiotics were used, so only the effect of air quality was studied. We extracted the data on theatre type and numbers from Table 3, and numbers and intervals from surgery of deep infections from Table 7. Theatre types with 300 air changes per hour and 3.5 CFU/M. 3. were classified as Ultra Clean. A logistic regression model was used to examine the effect of theatre type and time elapsed after procedure on the probability of becoming infected. The model suggests that, controlling for time period, Ultra Clean Air is associated with a significantly lower probability of infection, with an OR of 0.30, p = 2.74 × 10. −6. The effect is larger earlier post-surgery, but it does persist. The results are best reviewed as a graphic, which shows that Ultra Clean Air clearly affects the deep infection rate for up to four years post-surgery. Ultra Clean Air reduces infection rates for up to four years post-surgery, so it is safe to assume that infections presenting after this are haematogenous. Ultra Clean Air does not eliminate early deep infection, so some early infections are not related to air quality. It is not practical to undertake widespread detailed retrospective analyses of cases. When monitoring infection rates there needs to be a balance between failing to record infections related to surgical technique and waiting many years to record low numbers of very late presenting problems. We suggest that registries should regard infections documented within three years of surgery as treatment complications. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

The benefits of cell salvage autotransfusion are well reported. There is a common non-evidenced belief amongst revision arthroplasty surgeons that auto-transfusion is potentially contraindicated in infected revisions. The aim is to study the immediate and delayed outcomes of using cell saver on patients undergoing PJI surgery. Prospective cohort service evaluation registered with the local audit department. 20 PJI cases in 18 patients where cell saver was used over a period of 4 years. Intraoperative fluid and tissue samples were taken for culture. Blood culture from salvaged blood pre and post leucodepletion filter were sent for microbiological analysis. Data on type of surgery, blood loss, further allogenic transfusion and SIRS response was collected. Success of infection clearance was assessed using 2019 MSIS ORT. Five patients receiving autologous blood in non-infection cases were used as controls. Mean age for the PJI group was 67.7 years, 67% female. 11 patients (67%) had 1st stage surgery and 5 (25%) underwent 2nd stage whereas 4 patients had single stage surgery. The mean calculated blood loss was 1398 mls (range 400–3000mls). 6 Patients required further allogenic transfusion. 16 patients received blood via a leuco-depletion filter. The same organism grown from tissues was identified in post-filter blood in 8/17 patients (47%). 2/20 have grown a different organism in post-filtered blood, _P.Acne._. 2 patients developed SIRS upon auto-transfusion, however one was thought to be secondary to cementing. The control group had 443 mls mean amount of blood loss and 1 patient developed a SIRS response. 14/20 (70%) patients had successful clearance of infection (tier 1) 2 patients died prior to undergoing 2nd stage. Using cell saver did not impact main outcome of infection clearance in PJI surgery. We would advocate its routine usage whilst avoiding direct collection of heavily contaminated blood

Introduction. Two-stage reimplantation for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip is the standard of care with a 5–10% recurrence at a minimum two-year follow-up. Compiling outcomes data for this standard of care is necessary in order to characterize long-term reinfection risk and the culpable microbiology. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term success of two-stage reimplantation and identify the factors that affected the success. Methods. We performed a systematic review of randomized control trials, cohort studies, and case series through May 2019, searching Embase, Medline via PubMed, and Cochrane Library for the concept of two-stage reimplantation for the treatment of hip and knee PJIs, yielding 464 unique citations for abstract review, of which 135 were reviewed in full. Our parameters of interest included: reinfection and mortality events following successful reimplantation, the timing of these events, and the microbiology of index and recurrent infections. Results. Meeting our criteria were 59 studies with 4,494 patients (1,842 hips) who had completed reimplantation. Among successfully reimplanted hips, 4.76% (95% CI, 2.00–8.41) were reinfected by 24 months, 6.84% (4.92–9.02) were reinfected by final follow-up, 1.6% (0.32–3.52) were reinfected with an identical organism(s) with identical resistance, and 2.55% (0.77–5.03) were reinfected with a novel organism(s) or novel resistance. In 24 studies with reinfected patients and sufficient data, 8 studies reported an average interval from reimplantation to reinfection greater than 24 months, and 14 reported at least 1 patient with a reinfection event greater than 48 months following reimplantation. Conclusion. The results from this review determined that the host of an index PJI faces ongoing risk of recurrent infection years into the post-operative period despite initial eradication and that novel microbiology is the cause of a significant proportion of failures. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

The duration of systemic antibiotics following first-stage surgery is contentious. Our Institution's philosophy is to perform an aggressive debridement, high concentration of targeted antibiotics through cement beads and systemic prophylactic antibiotics alone. In the presence of significant soft tissue infection or microbiological diagnostic uncertainty; systemic antibiotics may be prescribed for 5 days whilst awaiting tissue culture results. The aim of this study was to assess the success of our philosophy for two-stage hip revision. A retrospective review of our Institution's prospective database was performed to identify all intended two-stage hip revision procedures for PJI. All patients had a confirmed PJI as per MSIS 2013 criteria, minimum 5-years follow up and outcomes according to the MSIS working group outcome-reporting tool; then grouped into “successful” or “unsuccessful” (suppressive antibiotics, further revision for infection, death within 1 year). 383 intended two-stage hip revisions were identified; of which 299 met our inclusion criteria, in 289 patients (6 repeat ipsilateral two-stage, 4 bilateral two-stage). Median follow up was 10.7 years (IQR 6.3 – 15.0). 258 (86%) patients proceeded to 2. nd. stage surgery. 91% success rate was observed for those patients who underwent reimplantation, although dropping to 86% when including the patients who did not proceed to second stage. The median duration of post-operative systemic antibiotics was 5 days (IQR 5–9). No significant difference was observed in patients who received either; < / = 48 hours (86%; n=70) compared to > 48 hours antibiotics (86%; n=229; p=0.96) or </= 5 days of antibiotics (88%; n=202) compared to > 5 days antibiotics (82%; p=0.38). A significant majority had gram-positive (88%) infection with 30% being polymicrobial. Greater success rates were observed with two-stage exchange or gram-positive PJI (86%); than for gram-negative PJI (81%) and polymicrobial infection (74%) (p=0.36). Fungal PJI was observed to have a significantly reduced rate of success (n=3; 33%; p=0.03). Aggressive surgical debridement with high concentration, targeted local antibiotic delivery at time of first stage to manage PJI of the hip provides a high rate of success, responsible antibiotic stewardship and reduced hospital costs

Introduction. Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) generate significant clinical and socio-economic pressures on the health service. Recent advances in the diagnosis of PJIs, with biomarkers and sonification have aided delineation of PJIs from aseptic processes. However these investigations are not widely available and expensive. Interface membrane histology has been shown to be superior to pseudocapsule histology; we therefore sought to ascertain the diagnostic benefit of deep canal sample microbiology in conjunction with standard pseudocapsule sampling. Patients/Materials & Methods. We performed a prospective study over a 20-month period as part of new multi-disciplinary approach to the management of suspected PJIs. 22 patients underwent 26 procedures at our institution where intra-operative deep canal samples were obtained concurrent to conventional pseudocapsule samples. These samples were cultured and analysed following our standardised microbiological methodology. Results. In 5 of 26 (19%) of cases deep canal microbiology yielded divergent results to those obtained from the pseudocapsule. There were 2 (8%) cases with negative capsule samples but positive deep canal samples, additionally different organisms were identified in the deep canal samples compared to conventional samples in 2 (8%) cases. Discussion. Our study has shown the additional diagnostic value that deep canal sampling microbiology adds to the diagnosis of PJIs, with this benefit being multifaceted; (a) the confirmation of the absence/presence of PJI, (b) confirmation of causative organisms and most importantly (c) the identification of patients with PJIs where conventional biopsy techniques would have produced a false negative result. Conclusion. Conventional pseudocapsule microbiology has good negative predictive value, however devastating complications of missing a PJI combined with the ease and accessibility to deep canal sampling, indicate the addition of this technique to a surgeon's armoury

Cutibacterium species (formerly Propionibacterium species) are increasingly recognized as causative pathogens of low-grade periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). The clinical manifestation of infections caused by this low virulent microorganism is nonspecific and the interpretation remains challenging. In this prospective cohort study from 01/2012 to 07/2017 we analyzed the clinical and diagnostic characteristics of microbiologically proven hip PJI caused by Cutibacterium species. PJI was defined by growth of Cutibacteria in ≥2 periprosthetic tissue samples or in sonication fluid of the removed implant (>50 CFU/ml) at revision surgery. If Cutibacteria grew only in synovial fluid at least one other positive microbiological specimen or non-microbiological criterion was required. We included 26 patients suffering from Cutibacterium hip PJI, among them 19 were males (73%). The majority of PJI (24, 92%) presented delayed (3–24 months) or late (>24 months) after implantation. Sinus tract was present in 4 patients (16%) and radiological implant loosening in 16 patients (62%). Among non-microbiological diagnostic tests, increased synovial fluid leukocyte count showed the highest sensitivity (82%), followed by tissue histology (71%) and serum C-reactive protein (58%). After 7 days of incubation Cutibacterium grew in synovial fluid, periprosthetic tissue and sonication fluid culture in 20%, 42% and 32%, respectively, and in 43%, 76% and 83%, respectively, after 14 days of incubation. We conclude that Cutibacterium PJI was diagnosed late in the disease course and presented with subtle clinical signs. Prolonged culture incubation and implant sonication improved the poor performance of conventional microbiological tests. Due to lack of reliable diagnostic tests, Cutibacterium remains difficult to detect making the diagnosis challenging

Aims. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty (THA) can present with pain and osteolysis. The Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) has provided criteria for the diagnosis of PJI. The aim of our study was to analyze the utility of F18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) CT scan in the preoperative diagnosis of septic loosening in THA, based on the current MSIS definition of prosthetic joint infection. Patients and Methods. A total of 130 painful unilateral cemented THAs with a mean follow-up of 5.17 years (. sd. 1.12) were included in this prospective study. The mean patient age was 67.5 years (. sd. 4.85). Preoperative evaluation with inflammatory markers, aspiration, and an F18 FDG PET scan were performed. Diagnostic utility tests were also performed, based on the MSIS criteria for PJI and three samples positive on culture alone. Results. The mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and white cell count were 47.83 mm/hr, 25.21 mg/l, and 11.05 × 10. 9. /l, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, negative predictive value, and false-positive rate of FDG PET compared with MSIS criteria were 94.87%, 38.46 %, 56.38%, 94.59 %, and 60.21%, respectively. The false-positive rate of FDG PET compared with culture alone was 77.4%. Conclusion. FDG PET has a definitive role in the preoperative evaluation of suspected PJI. This the first study to evaluate its utility based on MSIS criteria and compare it with microbiology results alone. However, FDG PET has a high false-positive rate. Therefore, we suggest that F18 FDG PET is useful in confirming the absence of infection, but if positive, may not be confirmatory of PJI. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:910–914

Joint replacement is a life-enhancing, cost-effective surgical intervention widely used to treat disabling joint pain mainly caused by osteoarthritis. Hip and knee joint replacements are common, highly successful operations bringing many patients relief from pain, and improve mobility. Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are often difficult to diagnose; diagnosis often relying on a combination of clinical findings, microbiological data and histological evaluation of periprosthetic tissue. The majority of recent studies demonstrate a higher sensitivity for the culture of sonication fluid (62–94%) than periprosthetic tissue (55–88%). The Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust provided a specialist multidisciplinary team. We evaluated the use of sonication for identifying pathogens during revision hip and knee replacement in our unit with the intention of applying for further grants to study this technology in more detail; it was a diagnostic feasibility study. The target recruitment was 50 patients; 25 consecutive patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty for any reason, and 25 undergoing revision knee arthroplasty for any reason. The majority of patients were identified in outpatient clinics. Our results show that tissue culture remains more sensitive than sonication. The sensitivity for direct sonication was 75% compared with 80% for tissue culture; sensitivity of enriched sonication was 80 %, compared to the unit results for tissue culture of 83%. The combined sensitivity of tissue culture was better as a higher number of tissue specimens were obtained. The different methodology might explain reported differences between this and other studies; however, our study does not support the use of sonication as the only tool in the diagnosis of PJI

The use of routine sampling for histological analysis during revision hip replacement has been standard practice in our unit for many years. It is used to assess for the presence of inflammatory processes that may represent peri-prosthetic infection. Our study examines 152 consecutive patients who underwent revision hip replacement in our centre for all reasons, excluding malignant neoplasm or metastasis. We reviewed the cases from a prospectively collated database, comparing microbiology results with histology results. Both microscopic and macroscopic analysis by specialist musculoskeletal histopathologist was included in our study. We found 17 (11.2%) patients had cultured bacteria from intra-operative samples. Eight patients (5.3%) had histological findings interpreted as infection. Only one patient who had macroscopic and microscopic histology findings suggestive of infection also had culture results that identified a pathogen. Furthermore, the macroscopic analyses by the histopathologist suggested infection in nine patients. Only one patient with positive culture in greater than 2 samples had histological features of infection. Of the 4 patients who were found to have 3 or more samples where an organism was identified only one had histological features of infection. This represents 25% sensitivity when using histology to analyse samples for infection. Of the 8 patients who had both macroscopic and microscopic features of infection only 1 patients cultured bacteria in more than 3 samples (PPV 12.5%). Our experience does not support the routine sampling for histology in revision hip replacement. We suggest it is only beneficial in cases where infection is suspected or where a multi-procedure, staged revision is performed and the surgeon is planning return to theatre for the final stage. This is a substantial paradigm shift from the current practice among revision arthroplasty surgeons in the United Kingdom but will equate to a substantial cost saving

Literature debates whether fluid aspirates for suspected PJI should undergo prolonged incubation for cultures. We looked at sensitivity and specificity of 14-day cultures, compared to 7-days, for aspirates from prosthetic hips and knees. Design and methods. Conducted at a quaternary referral centre for PJIs from Jan 2017 to July 2019. Suspected PJIs who underwent aspiration, incubated 14 days and later surgical intervention with minimum three tissue samples were included. Results. 176 aspirates were included. This is an increased number compared to our historic figures (average 88 Vs 48 pts/yr). 47 patients had fluid and tissue positive (true positive), 20 fluid +ive but tissue -ive (false positive), 98 fluid and tissue -ive (true negative) and 15 fluid negative but tissue +ive (False negative). Thus, sensitivity 76%, specificity 83%, positive predictive value70% and negative predictive value 87%. Of 88 positive aspirates, only 75% were within 7-day cultures. Low virulence organisms as Propionibacterium acnes and coagulase negative staph were grown later. Of 48 with only one tissue sample positive, 38 were culture-negative on aspiration and 6 grew different organisms on aspirate and tissues. Also, as many were cultured later, it suggests contamination. Conclusion. Increased numbers reflect quaternary referral nature of institution and increasing PJI load. Modest drop in sensitivity and specificity of 14-day cultures compared to 7-day(84 and 85% respectively) is due to higher false negatives. Contamination contributes to false-ive as more tissue samples become positive (there were 1076 tissue samples due to multiple sampling Vs 176 aspirates). Higher tissue yield may also be because they are more representative. Effect of antibiotic use between samples cannot be determined. Organism profile suggest14-day culture produces more contaminant growth despite a well-equipped microbiology lab with laminar airflow for subcultures. Caution in interpreting 14-day results in diagnosis of PJI of Hip and Knee is advised

Reliability of microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection [PJI] strongly depends on the ability to dislodge microorganisms from biofilm and on the rate of contaminating samples during collection in the operating room and processing. The aim of a correct protocol is to avoid false negative and false positive results in order to adapt the correct therapy for each patient. The object of the present study was to evaluate the impact of a novel closed bag system designed for samples collection and processing based on dithiothreitol (DTT), which is a sulfydryl compound able to remove bacteria from biofilm (MicroDTTect, 4i, Italy), on isolation of contaminant microorganisms in hip prostheses. Specimens (prostheses, spacers, periprosthetic tissues) were aseptically collected according to a standard protocol into the device, which was transported to the laboratory for culture. Three different models of the system were prospectively evaluated, each being a development of the previous one. The first generation device consisted in an “open” system (DTT eluate was collected with a syringe and dispensed into sterile tubes), the second generation device in a “partially closed” system (DTT eluate collected directly in sterile vacuum tubes) and the third generation device in a “completely closed system” (DTT reservoir directly connected with sealed tubes inside the device). PJI was diagnosed following criteria established by MSIS. The overall contamination rate, sensitivity and specificity of the first generation “open” system MicroDTTect were respectively 2.6% (1/39), 82.3% and 95.4% in 39 hips. The second generation “partially closed” device was characterized by a contamination rate of 1.96% (1/51), a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 96.1% in 51 hips. Contamination rate further decreased in the third generation “closed” system (1.89%, 2/106), while sensitivity (91.3%) and specificity (96.7%) improved in 106 hips. Differences have been also observed in hips (106) when compared to knees (70 cases) prosthetic infections (sensitivity 91.3% vs 89.3% and specificity 96.7% vs 100%). Our data show as, thanks to its ease of use, low contamination rate and high sensitivity, MicroDTTect can represent a useful tool for improving the microbiological diagnosis of PJIs in hip revisions and has replaced sonication in our practice

Aims

The number of revision arthroplasties being performed in the elderly is expected to rise, including revision for infection. The primary aim of this study was to measure the treatment success rate for octogenarians undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) compared to a younger cohort. Secondary outcomes were complications and mortality.

Aims

Current diagnostic tools are not always able to effectively identify periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Recent studies suggest that circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) undergo changes under pathological conditions such as infection. The aim of this study was to analyze miRNA expression in hip arthroplasty PJI patients.

Aims

The duration of systemic antibiotic treatment following first-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is contentious. Our philosophy is to perform an aggressive debridement, and to use a high local concentration of targeted antibiotics in cement beads and systemic prophylactic antibiotics alone. The aim of this study was to assess the success of this philosophy in the management of PJI of the hip using our two-stage protocol.

Aims

The aims of this study were to determine the incidence and factors for developing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following hemiarthroplasty (HA) for hip fracture, and to evaluate treatment outcome and identify factors associated with treatment outcome.

Aims

Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with Vancouver type B3 fractures with Paprosky type IIIA, IIIB, and IV femoral defects are difficult to treat. One option for Paprovsky type IIIB and IV defects involves modular cementless, tapered, revision femoral components in conjunction with distal interlocking screws. The aim of this study was to analyze the rate of reoperations and complications and union of the fracture, subsidence of the stem, mortality, and the clinical outcomes in these patients.

Aims

A revision for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has a major effect on the patient’s quality of life, including walking capacity. The objective of this case control study was to investigate the histological and ultrastructural changes to the gluteus medius tendon (GMED) in patients revised due to a PJI, and to compare it with revision THAs without infection performed using the same lateral approach.

Aims

The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between reason for revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) and outcomes in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).