Fracture of a ceramic component in total hip replacement is a rare but potentially catastrophic complication. The incidence is likely to increase as the use of ceramics becomes more widespread. We describe such a case, which illustrates how inadequate initial management will lead to further morbidity and require additional surgery. We present the case as a warning that fracture of a ceramic component should be revised to another ceramic-on-ceramic articulation in order to minimise the risk of further catastrophic wear.

Wear testing of THR has chaperoned generations of improved UHMWPE bearings into wide clinical use. However, previous in vitro testing failed to screen many metal-on-metal hips which failed. This talk tours hip wear testing and associated standards, giving an assortment of THR wear test results from the author's laboratory as examples. Two international hip wear-simulator standards are used: ISO-14242-1 (anatomic configuration) and ISO-14242-3 (orbital-bearing). Both prescribe 5 million (MC) force-motion cycles involving cross-shear synchronized with compression simulating walking gate of ideally aligned THRs. ISO-14242-1 imposes flexion (flex), abduction-adduction (ad-ab) and internal-external (IE) rotations independently and simultaneously. An orbital-bearing simulator more simply rotates either a tilted femoral head or acetabular component, switching from flexion-dominated to ad-ab-dominated phases in each cycle with some IE. In the latter, the acetabular component is typically placed below the femoral head to accentuate abrasive conditions, trapping third-body-wear debris. Wear is measured (ISO-14242-2) gravimetrically (or volumetrically in some hard-on-hard bearings). Wear-rate ranges from negligible to >80mg/MC beyond what causes osteolysis. This mode-1 adhesive wear can therefore “discriminate” to screen hip designs-materials in average conditions. Stair-climbing, sitting, squatting and other activities may cause THR edge-loading and even impingement with smaller head-to-neck ratios or coverage angle, naturally worse in metal-on metal hips. Deformation of thin acetabular components during surgical impaction may cause elevated friction or metal-metal contact, shedding more metal-ions and accelerating failure. Surgical misalignments in inclination angle, version and tilt can make this worse, even during modest activities in hard-on-hard bearings. Abrasive particulate debris from bone or bone-cement, hydroxyapatite, neck-impingement, normal wear, or corrosion can compound the above. Such debris can scratch the femoral head surface, or embed in the UHMWPE liner compromising the wear of even metal-on-plastic hips. Much of the belated standardization activity for higher demand hip testing is in response to the metal-metal failures. ASTM F3047M is a recent non-prescriptive guide for what more rigorous testing can generally be done. Third-body particulate can be intentionally introduced or random scratching of the femoral component surface in extra abrasion testing. Also, the compressive load can be increased, more frequent start-stops to disrupt lubrication, and steepening acetabular shell-liner angles to reduce contact area and cause edge-loading, made harsher when combined with version misalignment. Transient separation can occur between head and liner during the swing phase in a lax THR joint with low coverage angle and misalignments; the separated head impacts the liner rim when reseating. An edge-loading ISO test is currently being discussed where (so-called) “microseparation” to a known distance is directly imposed by a lateral spring force in a hip simulator. Friction testing of a THR in a pendulum-like setup undergoing flexion or abduction swings is being discussed in the ASTM, and so have multi-dimensional THR friction measurements during a long-term wear test simultaneously measuring and separating friction of three rotational (flex, ad-ab, and IE) axes. THR wear test methods continue to evolve to address more challenges such as novel duo-mobility THR designs, where UHMWPE bearings cannot be removed for gravimetric wear measurements

Summary. Five year migration results of 49 large-head metal-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasties show good implant stability and no association between implant migration and metal-ions levels, stem and cup position, or femoral bone mineral density. Introduction. The failure mechanism of metal-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty has been related to metal wear-debris and pseudotumor, but it is unknown whether implant fixation is affected by metal wear-debris. Patients and Methods. In July-August 2012 41 patients (10 women) at a mean age of 47 (23–63) years with a total of 49 MoM hip arthroplasties (ReCap Shell/M2a-Magnum head/Bi-Metric stem; Biomet Inc.) participated in a 5–7 year follow-up with blood tests (chrome and cobalt serum ions), questionnaires (Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Harris Hip Score (HHS), measurement of cup and stem position and periprosthetic BMD. Further the patients had been followed with stereo-radiographs post-operative and at 1, 2 and 5 years for analysis of implant migration (Model-Based RSA 3.32). Results. 4 patients (6 hips) had elevated metal-ion levels (>7ug/l). The mean cup inclination was 45°(sd 6), the mean cup anteversion was 17°(sd7), and the mean stem anteversion was 19°(sd7). The difference between genders was statistically insignificant (p>0.09). At 5 years follow-up total translation (TT) for the stems (n=39 hips) was a mean 0.79mm (sd 0.53) and total rotation (TR) was a mean 1.99° (sd 1.53). Between 1–2 years there was no significant difference in mean TT (p=0.49)for the stems and between 2–5 years TT was mean 0.13 mm (sd 0.35) which was significant (p=0.03) but clinically very small and within the precision limits of the method. We found no significant migration along the 3 separate axes. There was no significant association between stem migration and metal ion levels >7ug/l (p=0.55), female gender (p=0.86), stem anteversion > 25° (p=0.29), T-scores < −1 (p=0.23), total OHS < 40 (p=0.19) or total HHS < 90 (p=0.68). Between 1–5 years there was no significant change in neither subsidence (p=0.14) nor in version (p=0.91) of the stems. At 5 years TT for the cups (n=36) was mean 1.21 mm (sd 0.74) and TR was mean 2.63° (sd 1.71). Between 1–2 years cup migration along the z-axis was mean 0.29 (sd 0.73) (p=0.03), which was also within precision limits of the method. There was a positive association between total OHS below 40 (n=4) and cup migration (p=0.04), but no association between cup migration and metal ion levels >7ug/l (p=0.80), female gender (p=0.74), cup inclination > 50° (p=0.93), cup anteversion > 25° (p=0.88) or HHS < 90 (p=0.93). Proximal cup migration at 5 years was mean 0.46 mm (sd 0.47), which was similar to the cup migration at 1 year (p=0.91) and 2 years (p=0.80) follow-up. No patients were revised before the final 5–7 year follow-up. Patient satisfaction was high (94%). Conclusion. All cups and stems were well-fixed between 1–5 years. We found no statistical significant correlation between implant migration and other factors that have been associated with failure of MoM hip arthroplasty such as elevated metal ion levels, component position, and female gender. Cup migration was higher in patients with a total OHS below 40. In conclusion, metal wear-debris does not seem to influence fixation of hip components in large-head MoM articulations at mid-term follow-up