Summary. The M2a-38. tm.
The poor outcome of large head
This study reports the mid-term results of a large bearing hybrid
There is increasing worldwide interest in the assessment of wear in explanted hip components. This is due is part to high profile failures of orthopaedic components in the US, whilst in the UK hip resurfacings have been experiencing a higher than expected failure rate. The reasons for these failures are not well understood, with data from the NJR suggesting the 43% of MoM resurfacing failures are unexplained. Wear analysis is a vital tool in determining failure mechanisms and ultimately improving the longevity of joint replacements through improved design and manufacturing control. There are currently no relevant measurement standards for the evaluation of retrieved orthopaedic components. This paper will assess two of the most commonly used techniques namely roundness measurement and co-ordinate measurement. The advantages and disadvantages of both techniques are considered in this paper. The Talyrond 365 is a stylus based roundness machine. The component is located on a rotating table and the stylus measures the deviation from a perfect circle as the component is slowly rotated. The Talyrond measures a single profile to an accuracy of 30 nm and up to 72,000 data points per revolution. The air spindle has a radial accuracy of <0.02 μm and the Talymin gauge a minimum resolution of 12 nm. Individual roundness profiles can be stitched together to build up 3D cylinder maps, allowing 3D pictures of sections of explanted hip components to be generated.INTRODUCTION
ROUNDNESS MACHINE
In vitro the introduction of microseparation and edge loading to hip simulator gait cycle has replicated clinically relevant wear rates and wear mechanisms in ceramic-on-ceramic bearings[1], and elevated the wear rates of MoM surface replacements (SR) to levels similar to those observed in retrievals[2]. The aim was to assess the wear of two different sized MoM total hip replacement bearings under steep cup inclination angles and adverse microseparation and edge loading conditions. Two tests were performed on the Leeds II hip joint simulator using two different size bearings (28mm and 36mm). Cups were mounted to provide inclination angles of 45 degrees (n=3) and 65 degrees (n=3). The first three million cycles were under standard gait conditions. Microseparation and edge loading conditions as described by Nevelos et al[1] were introduced to the gait cycle for the subsequent three million cycles. The lubricant was 25% new born calf serum. The mean wear rates and 95% confidence limits were determined and statistical analysis was performed using One Way ANOVA. Under standard gait conditions, when the cup inclination angle increased from 45 degrees to 65 degrees, the wear of size 28mm bearing significantly (p=0.004) increased by 2.7-fold, however, the larger bearings did not show any increase in wear (p=0.9). The introduction of microseparation conditions resulted in a significant (p=0.0001) increase in wear rates for both bearing sizes under both cup inclination angle conditions. Under microseparation conditions, the increase in cup inclination angle had no influence on the wear rate for both bearing sizes (Figure 1). With larger bearings, head-rim contact occurs at a steeper cup inclination angle providing an advantage over smaller bearings. The introduction of edge loading and microseparation conditions resulted in a significant increase in wear rates for both bearing sizes. The wear rates obtained in this study under combined increased cup inclination angle and microseparation were half of those obtained when SR MoM bearings were tested under similar adverse conditions[2]. This study shows the importance of prosthesis design and accurate surgical positioning of the head and acetabular cup in MoM THRs.
The implantation of endoprosthesis is a routine procedure in orthopaedics. Endoprosthesis are mainly manufactured from ceramics, polymers,
An increase in
The biological reaction in metallosis and pseudotumor generation after
Summary. Management of metal on metal hip replacements can be accomplished with a simple algorithm including easily available
Metal on metal hip replacements have been one of worst failures in recent years in terms of orthopaedic implants. Some of these devices have had catastrophic failure rates, with reports of 48% failure at 6 years. The failure of these devices has led to considerable suffering, pain and reduction in quality of life; consequently, they have given rise to high costs and multi-million-dollar legal cases. This talk will describe the history of the current
Adverse reaction to
Summary. 162 patient cohort with serial
Background. Hip resurfacing has resurged in the last decade due to a renewed interest in
Summary. Despite high revision rates, the mean two year migration of the ASR. TM. cup is within an acceptable threshold. Slightly higher migration rates found for the M2a- Magnum™ Porous Coated Acetabular Component but longer follow up is needed to establish if this implant is at risk. Introduction. RSA can detect the migration of an implant, and continuous migration is a predictor for failure (1). The ASR. TM. resurfacing implant was withdrawn from the marked due to excessive failure rate but showed initial femoral component stability. The aim of this study was to investigate the initial implant stability for the ASR cup as a possible explanation for the high revision rate, and to compare it to another
SUMMARY. We report a prospective study of clinical data collected pre, intra and post operation to remove both cup and head components of 118 failed, current generation
The renewed interest in the clinically proven low wear of the metal-on-metal bearing combined with the capacity of inserting a thin walled cementless acetabular component has fostered the reintroduction of hip resurfacing. As in other forms of conservative hip surgery, i.e. pelvic osteotomies and impingement surgery, patient selection will help minimize complications and the need for early reoperation. Patient Selection and Hip Resurfacing. Although hip resurfacing was initially plagued with high failure rates, the introduction of
Metal-on-metal (MOM) hip arthroplasty, including resurfacing, has become the subject of recent research and debate. There is the perceived benefit of improved wear rates of bearing surfaces leading to superior durability and performance of these types of implant. An associated feature of MOM bearing surfaces is the generation of
Objectives. We sought to determine if a durable bilayer implant composed of trabecular