Summary Statement. Routine metal allergy screening prior to joint arthroplasty is not essential and the use of cobalt chromium or stainless steel implants is recommended regardless of the patient's metal allergy status. Introduction. This study was undertaken to obtain a consensus amongst joint arthroplasty experts with regards to metal allergy screening prior to joint arthroplasty and the choice of implant in patients with potential metal allergy. Patients & Methods. A web based Delphi consensus study was used including orthopaedic surgeons that had previously published on the topic of knee, hip or shoulder arthroplasty. Two rounds of questionnaires were sent via electronic mail. Consensus was considered if agreement was 60% or higher. Results. 18 surgeons responded to the first and 17 to the second round of questionnaires. There was consensus that patients having metal arthroplasty surgery should not be routinely questioned about metal allergy prior to surgery. There was consensus that patch testing is not necessary even if metal allergy is suspected. Most respondents agreed in proceeding with cobalt chromium or stainless steel implant in patients suspected of metal allergy regardless of the results of cutaneous patch testing. Discussion/Conclusion. This consensus study suggests that routine metal allergy screening prior to joint arthroplasty is not essential. The use of traditional cobalt chromium/stainless steel implants is recommended regardless of the patient's metal allergy status

Introduction. Today TKR is considered one of the most successful operative procedures in orthopedic surgery. Nevertheless, failure rates of 2 – 10% depending on the length of the study and the design are still reported. This provides evidence for further development in knee arthroplasty. Particularly the oxide ceramics used now in THA show major advantages due to their excellent tribological properties, their significantly reduced third-body wear as well as their high corrosion resistance. A further advantage of ceramic materials is their potential use in patients with metal allergy. Metallic wear induces immunological reactions resulting in hypersensitivity, pain, osteolysis and implant loosening. The purpose of our study was to examine the safety of the tibial component of a novel all-ceramic TKR. Materials and Methods. We tested the tibial components of the primary knee implant BPK-S Integration Ceramic. Both the tibial and the femoral component consist of BIOLOX®delta ceramic The standards ISO 14879-1 and ASTM F1800-07 describe the test set-up for the experimental fatigue strength testing of tibial components from knee implants. We conducted the testing with a significantly increased maximum load of 5,300 N (900 N are required). A final burst strength test was carried out after the fatigue load testing in the same embedding and with the same test set-up. Results. No specimen failed during fatigue load testing. The subsequent post-fatigue burst strength testing showed a maximum strength against fracture of at least 9.7 kN for size 3 and at least 12.1 kN for size 6. Discussion. The good results of the strength testing of the tibial component of the BPK-S Integration Ceramic tibial plateau supported the good initial clinical outcome without any implant specific complications of this knee design. Further clinical studies have to show if this design fulfills the high expectations over long periods of time