Aims. Despite numerous studies on periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), there are no robust data on the risk factors and timing of metachronous infections. This study was performed to answer the following questions: 1) Is there any difference of manifestation time of metachronous PJIs between different localizations of multiple artificial joints? 2) Can we identify any specific risk factor for metachronous PJIs for different localizations of multiple artificial joints?. Methods. Between January 2010 and December 2018, 661 patients with more than one prosthetic joint at the time of PJI surgical treatment were recruited. Seventy-one developed metachronous PJI after a mean time interval of 101.4 months (range 37.5 to 161.5 months). The remaining patients were chosen as control group. The diagnosis of the PJI, including the metachronous PJI, was made according to the Muscoloskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. The metachronous infections were divided in group 1: metachronous infections in the same extremity (e.g. right hip and right knee); group 2: metachronous infections of the other extremity (e.g. right knee and left hip); group 3: metachronous infections of the lower extremity and upper extremity (e.g. right knee and left shoulder). Results. We identified 32 PJI cases in group 1, 38 in group 2 and 1 in group 3. Diabetes mellitus was found higher in the metachronous infections (p<0.05). Rate of same side infection was significantly higher compared to contralateral and upper and lower infection (p<0.05). Time interval of metachrononous infection development was faster in same-side infections. Same bacteria sample rate between primary PJI and metachronous PJI in same side infections (21/32) was significantly higher than in the contralateral PJI group (13/38, p<0.05). Conclusions. The current study underlined that the risk of metachronous infections are relatively high, particularly in the cases of prostheses on the same side

All patients referred to our unit with previously untreated metastatic renal cancer were included in this review. We investigated likely prognostic factors including age, sex, site, synchronous or metachronous metastasis, stage of the disease and the type of treatment received. From 1976 until 2004, a total of 198 patients were treated by our unit for renal metastases. 15 patients were excluded because they were referred after failure of previous treatment or only had advice. 96 patients were already known to have renal metastasis with their diagnosis having been made between 0.2 and 17 years from the diagnosis of primary cancer (mean 4 years). 33 patients presented to us with a pathological fracture and were found to have renal cancer. A total of 54 patients had multiple metastases and 129 had a solitary metastasis. The cumulative survival from the time of diagnosis of the bone metastasis is 70 percent at 1 year, 40% at 3 years and 18% at 5 years. In patients with a solitary metastasis, the overall survival was 74% at 1 year and 45% at 3 years, whereas in patients with multiple metastases it was 55% at 1 year and 22% at 3 years. (p=0.02) In patients with a solitary metastasis treated by excision of the metastasis, the survival at 1 year was 86% as compared to 38% for those that were treated with just a local procedure. Cox multivariate analysis shows that survival was better in those with solitary metachronus metastasis who underwent a radical procedure. Conclusion. We recommend a radical procedure for patients who present with a solitary renal metastasis, particularly those with a disease-free interval of more than one year