Fracture related infection remains a major challenge in musculoskeletal trauma surgery. Despite best practice, treatment strategies suffer from high failure rates due to antibiotic resistance and tolerance. Bacteriophages represent a promising alternative as they retain activity against such bacteria. However, optimal phage administration protocols remain unknown, although injectable hydrogels, loaded with phage and conventional antibiotics, may support conventional therapy. In this study we tested the activity of meropenem, and two newly isolated bacteriophages (ϕ9 and ϕ3) embedded within alginate-chitosan microbeads and a hydrogel. Antibiotic and phage stability and activity were monitored in vitro, over a period of 10 days. In vivo, the same material was tested in treatment of a 5-day old Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection of a tibial plate osteotomy in mice. Treatment involved debridement and 5 days of systemic antibiotic therapy plus: i- saline, ii-phages in saline, iii-phages and antibiotics loaded into a hydrogel (n=7 mice/group). To assess the efficacy of the treatments, the infection load was monitored during revision surgery with debridement of the infected tissue after 5,10 and 13 days (euthanasia) by CFU and PFU quantification. In vitro testing confirmed that the stability of meropenem and activity of ϕ9 and ϕ3, was not affected within the alginate beads or hydrogel over 10 days. The in vivo study showed that all mice receiving phages and antibiotics loaded into a hydrogel survived the infection with a reduction of the bacterial load in the soft tissue. Active phages could be recovered from the infected site at euthanasia (10. 4. PFU/g). The hydrogel loaded with bacteriophages and meropenem showed a positive result in locally reducing the infection load indicating a synergistic effect of the selected antimicrobials. Overall, our new strategy shows encouraging results for improving the treatment of antibiotic-resistant biofilm infections that are related to medical implants

Antibiotic-laden bone cement is an important strategy of treatment for an established bone infection. It was aimed to find the safe antibiotic dose intervals of the antibiotic cements soaked in Phosphate Buffered Saline solution and to determine whether there was a difference in terms of mechanical strength between the prepared samples. This study was done in our institute Microbiology and Metallurgy laboratories. All samples were prepared using manual mixing technique using 40 g radiopaque Biomet® Bone cement (Zimmer Biomet, Indiana, USA) under sterile conditions at 19 ± 2 ºC. In this study, vancomycin (4 groups − 0.5, 2, 4, 6 g), teicoplanin (4 groups − 0.8, 1.2, 2, 2.4 g), daptomycin (4 groups − 1, 2, 2.5, 3 g), piperacillin-tazobactam (4 groups − 0.125, 0.5, 1, 2 g) and meropenem (4 groups − 0.5, 2, 4, 6 g) were measured in a assay balance and added to the cement powder. Antibiotic levels ranged from the lowest 0.625% to the highest 15%. 80×10×4 mm rectangle prism-shaped sample for mechanical measurements in accordance to ISO 5833 standart and 12×6×1 mm disc-shaped samples for microbiological assesments were used. Four sample for each antibiotic dose and control group was made. Prepared samples were evaluated macroscopically and faulty samples were excluded from the study. Prepared samples were kept in Phosphate Buffered Saline solution renewed every 24 hours at 37 ºC. At the end of 6 weeks, all samples were tested with Instron ® 3369 (Norwood Massachusetts, USA) four point bending test. Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29213) strain was used for samples of antibiotics containing vancomycin, teicoplanin and daptomycin after the samples prepared for antibiotic release were maintained under sterile conditions and kept in Phosphate Buffered Saline solution as appropriate. For samples containing meropenem and piperacillin - tazobactam antibiotics, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) strain was used. The addition of more than 5% antibiotics to the cement powder was significantly reduced mechanical strength in all groups(p <0.05) however the power of significance was changed depending on the type of antibiotic. In general, adding antibiotics with 2.5% and less for cement amount was not cause significant changes in mechanical measurements. There was a negative correlation between the increase in the amount of antibiotics mixed with cement and the durability of the cement (p: <0.001, r: −0.883 to 0.914). In this study, especially the antibacterial effects of piperacillin-tazobactam, containing 0.25 gr and 0.5 gr antibiotic doses, were found to be low. There was no bacterial growth in all other groups for 21 days. Considering the mechanical properties of groups containing meropenem, vancomycin, daptomycin and teicoplanin, it was observed that all antibiotic cements remained above the limit value of 50 MPa in the bending test at concentrations containing 2.5% and less antibiotics. This was not achieved for the piperacillin-tazobactam group. The findings of the study showed that each antibiotic has different MPa values at different doses. Therefore, it could be concluded that not only the antibiotic dose but also the type oould change the mechanical properties. In the light of these findings, mixing more than 2.5% antibiotics in cement for the antibiotic types included in the study was ineffective in terms of antibacterial effect and mechanically reduces the durability of cement below the standard value of 50 MPa

Infection remains among the first reasons for failure of joint prosthesis. Currently, the golden standard for treating prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) is two-stage revision. However, two-stage procedures have been reported to be associated with higher costs and possible higher morbidity and mortality, compared to one-stage. Furthermore, recent studies showed the ability of a fast-resorbable, antibacterial-loaded hydrogel coating to reduce surgical site infections after joint replacement, by preventing bacterial colonization of implants. Aim of this study was then to compare the infection recurrence rate after a one-stage, cemenless exchange, performed with an antibacterial coated implant versus a standardized two-stage revision procedure. In this two-center prospective study, 22 patients, candidate to revision surgery for PJI, were enrolled to undergo a one-stage revision surgery with cementless implants, coated intra-operatively with a fast-resorbable, antibiotic-loaded hyaluronan and poly-D,L-lactide based hydrogel coating (“Defensive Antibacterial Coating”, DAC, Novagenit, Italy). DAC was reconstructed according to manufacturer indications and loaded with Vancomycin or Vancomycin + Meropenem, according to cultural examinations, and directly spread onto the implant before insertion. This prospective cohort was compared with a retrospective series of 22 consecutive patients, matched for age, sex, host type, site of surgery, that underwent a two stage procedure, using a preformed, antibiotic-loaded spacer (Tecres, Italy) and a cementless implant. The second surgery, for definitive implant placing, was performed only after CRP normalization and no clinical sign of infection. Clinical, laboratory and radiographic evaluation were performed at 3, 6 and 12 months, and every 6 months thereafter. Infection recurrence was defined by the presence of a sinus tract communicating with the joint, or at least two among the following criteria: clinical signs of infections; elevated CRP and ESR; elevated synovial fluid WBC count; elevated synovial fluid leukocyte esterase; a positive cultural examination from synovial fluid; radiographic signs of stem loosening. The two groups did not differ significantly for age, sex, host type and site of surgery (18 knees and 4 hips, respectively). The DAC hydrogel was loaded intra-operatively, according to cultural examination, with vancomycin (14 patients) or vancomycin and meropenem (8 cases). At a mean follow-up of 20.2 ± 6.3 months, 2 patients (9.1%) in the DAC group showed an infection recurrence, compared to 3 patients (13.6%) in the two-stage group. No adverse events associated with the use of DAC or radiographic loosening of the stem were observed at the latest follow-up months. This is the first report on one-stage cementless revision surgery for PJI, performed with a fast-resorbable antibacterial hydrogel coating. Our data, although in a limited series of patients and at a relatively short follow-up, show similar infection recurrence rate after one-stage exchange with cementless, coated implants, compared to two-stage revision. These findings warrant further studies in the possible applications of antibacterial coating technologies to treat implant-related infections

Summary Statement. An Implant Disposable Antibacterial Coating (i-DAC®) is described, consisting of a fully resorbable, biocompatible hydrogel, able to release antibacterial and antibiofilm agents. Direct application of the hydrogel on implants prevented infection occurrence in an in vitro model of peri-prosthetic infection. Introduction. Biofilm-related infections are among the main reasons for failure of joint prosthesis with high associated social and economical costs. Bacterial adhesion and subsequent biofilm formation have been shown to develop early after biomaterials implant into the human body, when a “race to the surface” takes place between the host's cells and the colonizing bacteria eventually present at the surgical site. Providing an antibacterial/antibiofilm coating of the implant may then play a strategic role in preventing biofilm related infections. Here we report the results of a series of in vitro and in vivo studies, partially performed under the European 7th Framework Programme (Implant Disposable Antibiotic Coating, IDAC, collaborative research project # 277988), concerning a fully resorbable, biocompatible antibacterial hydrogel coating (DAC®, Novagenit, Italy). The patented hydrogel, a co-polimer comprising of hyaluronic acid and a polylactic acid, has been designed to be mixed with various antibacterial agents and applied directly on the implant at the time of surgery, being fully resorbed within few days. Patients & Methods. The tested hydrogel (DAC®, Novagenit, Italy) is a derivative of a low molecular weight hyaluronan, grafted with poly-D, L-lactic acid and provided in powder form. At the point of care, the powder is hydrated with the antibiotic or antibiofilm solution, thus generating the final compound to be applied onto the implant surface. In vitro studies were conducted using DAC® coating on different biomaterials, including titanium, chrome-cobalt and polyethylene discs. The release of different antibacterial agents, including vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, meropenem, gentamycin, amikacin, tobramycin, clindamycin, doxycyclin, linezolid, NAsalycilate and N-acetylcisteine, adequately mixed with the hydrogel, has been tested by means of gas chromatography and microbiological methods. In vivo studies were then performed on 35 rabbits divided in 7 groups. Animals were implanted with an intramedullary titanium rod in their femur, with a known inoculum of methicillin-resistant Staph. aureus and vancomycin-loaded DAC® at different concentrations (2% and 5%) and compared with controls. Results. Regardless of the tested material, in vitro studies showed the ability of the hydrogel to be loaded and to sustain the release of the following antibacterial/antibiofilm compounds for up to 96 hours: vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, meropenem, gentamycin, amikacin, tobramycin, clindamycin, doxycyclin, linezolid, NAsalycilate, N-acetylcisteine. In vivo studies showed a bacterial load reduction ranging from 94% to 99.9% using vancomycin-loaded DAC®, compared to controls. Discussion/Conclusion. DAC®, a fast-resorbable antibacterial coating, showed the ability to be loaded with various antibacterial compounds and the ability to provide a highly significant reduction of bacterial colonization of implanted biomaterials in an animal model, opening a new pathway to local prevention and treatment of biofilm-/implant-related infections

Objectives

Thermal stability is a key property in determining the suitability of an antibiotic agent for local application in the treatment of orthopaedic infections. Despite the fact that long-term therapy is a stated goal of novel local delivery carriers, data describing thermal stability over a long period are scarce, and studies that avoid interference from specific carrier materials are absent from the orthopaedic literature.

The treatment of chronic osteomyelitis often includes surgical debridement and filling the resultant void with antibiotic-loaded polymethylmethacrylate cement, bone grafts or bone substitutes. Recently, the use of bioactive glass to treat bone defects in infections has been reported in a limited series of patients. However, no direct comparison between this biomaterial and antibiotic-loaded bone substitute has been performed.

In this retrospective study, we compared the safety and efficacy of surgical debridement and local application of the bioactive glass S53P4 in a series of 27 patients affected by chronic osteomyelitis of the long bones (Group A) with two other series, treated respectively with an antibiotic-loaded hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate compound (Group B; n = 27) or a mixture of tricalcium phosphate and an antibiotic-loaded demineralised bone matrix (Group C; n = 22). Systemic antibiotics were also used in all groups.

After comparable periods of follow-up, the control of infection was similar in the three groups. In particular, 25 out of 27 (92.6%) patients of Group A, 24 out of 27 (88.9%) in Group B and 19 out of 22 (86.3%) in Group C showed no infection recurrence at means of 21.8 (12 to 36), 22.1 (12 to 36) and 21.5 (12 to 36) months follow-up, respectively, while Group A showed a reduced wound complication rate.

Our results show that patients treated with a bioactive glass without local antibiotics achieved similar eradication of infection and less drainage than those treated with two different antibiotic-loaded calcium-based bone substitutes.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:845–50.